Sectorial variation in the quality of environmental impact statements and factors influencing the quality

References

• Badr, E., M. Cashmore, and D. Cobb. 2004. “The Consideration of Impacts Upon the Aquatic Environment in Environmental Impact Statements in England and Wales.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 6 (1): 19–49.
   Google Scholar
• Badr, E. A., A. A. Zahran, and M. Cashmore. 2011. “Benchmarking Performance: Environmental Impact Statements in Egypt.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 31 (3): 279–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, A., and C. Wood. 1999. “An Evaluation of EIA System Performance in Eight EU Countries.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 19 (4): 387–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canelas, L., P. Almansa, M. Merchan, and P. Cifuentes. 2005. “Quality of Environmental Impact Statements in Portugal and Spain.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25 (3): 217–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore, M., E. Christophilopoulos, and D. Cobb. 2002. “An Evaluation of the Quality of Environmental Impact Statements in Thessaloniki, Greece.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 4 (4): 371–395.
   Google Scholar
• DOE. 1997. The Environmental Conservation Rules. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2007. Designing Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, J. 1999. “Quality and Quality Control in Environmental Impact Assessment.” In Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, Volume 2, edited by J. Petts, 55–84. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson, J., R. Therivel, and A. Chadwick. 2005. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson, J., R. Therivel, J. Weston, E. Wilson, and R. Frost. 1997. “EIA – Learning from Experience: Changes in the Quality of Environmental Impact Assessments for UK Planning Projects.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 40 (4): 451–464.
   Google Scholar
• GOB. 2004. Standard Request for Proposal for Selection of Consulting Firm. Central Procurement Technical Unit, Ministry of Planning, Dhaka.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, I., and G. Edward-Jones. 2003. “A Review of Environmental Statements in the British Forest Sector.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21 (4): 303–312.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., and C. Wood. 1996. “Formal and Informal Environmental Assessment Reports. Their Role in UK Planning Decisions.” Land Use Policy 13 (2): 101–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir, S. M. Z., and S. Momtaz. 2011. “The Strengths and Weaknesses of Institutional Arrangements of EIA in Bangladesh.” International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability 7 (2):149–166.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, S. M. Z., and S. Momtaz. 2012. “Quality of Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Assessment Practice in Bangladesh.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 30 (2): 94–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N., and R. Colley. 1991. “Reviewing the Quality of Environmental Statements: Review Methods and Findings.” The Town Planning Review 62 (2): 239–248.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N., and R. Colley. 1992. “Reviewing the Quality of Environmental Assessments.” Occasional paper no 24. Environmental Impact Assessment Centre, University of Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N., Colley, R., Bonde, J., and Simpson, J. 1999. “Reviewing the Quality of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Appraisals.” Occasional paper no. 55. Environmental Impact Assessment Centre, University of Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. 2000. “Reviewing the Quality of Environmental Assessments.” In Environmental Assessment in Developing and Transitional Countries: Principles, Methods and Practice, edited by N. Lee and C. George, 137–147. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Modak, P., and A. K. Biswas. 1999. Conducting Environmental Impact Assessment in Developing Countries. New York: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Momtaz, S. 2005. “Institutionalizing Social Impact Assessment in Bangladesh Resource Management: Limitations and Opportunities.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25 (1): 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders, A., D. Annandale, and J. Cappulluti. 2001. “Practitioner Perspectives on what Influences EIA Quality.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 19 (4): 321–325.
   Google Scholar
• Pinho, P., M. Rodrigo, and A. Monterrosso. 2007. “The Quality of Portuguese Environmental Impact Studies: The Case of Small Hydropower Projects.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27 (3): 189–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, C. K., and D. M. Gregory. 2003, “Evaluation of Qualitative Research Studies.” Evidence Based Nursing 6: 36–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Samarakoon, M., and J. S. Rowan. 2008. “A Critical Review of Environmental Impact Statements in Sri Lanka with Particular Reference to Ecological Impact Assessment.” Environmental Management 41 (3): 441–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandham, L. A., and H. M. Pretorius. 2008. “A Review of EIA Report Quality in the North West Province of South Africa.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28 (4–5): 229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, J. 2000. “Reviewing Environmental Statements: New Demands for the UK's EIA Procedure.” Planning, Practice and Research 15 (1–2): 135–142.
   Google Scholar