Recentralisation through regionalisation in the implementation of Rural Development Policy in Scotland

References

• Andersson, K.P., and E. Ostrom. 2008. “Analyzing Decentralized Resource Regimes from a Polycentric Perspective.” Policy Science 41 (1): 71–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battershill, M.R.J., and A.W. Gilg. 1997. “Socio-Economic Constraints and Environmentally Friendly Farming in the Southwest of England.” Journal of Rural Studies 13 (2): 213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., B. Morse, and R.A. Shah. 2012. “Understanding Stakeholder Participation in Research as Part of Sustainable Development.” Journal of Environmental Management 101: 13–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, G. 2003. “Reflections of Governance: Power Relations and Policy Making in Regional Sustainable Development.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 5 (3): 219–234.
   Google Scholar
• Bickers, K., and J.T. Williams. 2001. Public Policy Analysis: A Political Economy Approach. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, H. 2000. “Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries.” World Development 28 (1): 21–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2005. “Public Governance: Balancing Stakeholder Power in a Network Society.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 71 (2): 217–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Löffler. 2003. “Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, models, and Methodologies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 69 (2): 313–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, L., and R. Parker. 2006. “Do Australian Public Sector Employees have the Type of Culture they want in the Era of New Public Management?” Australian Journal of Public Administration 65 (1): 89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugha, R., and Z. Varvasovszky. 2000. “Stakeholder Analysis: A Review.” Health Policy and Planning 15 (3): 239–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, R.L. 2009. “Born to Be Wild? Non-governmental Organisations, Politics and the Environment.” Geography Compass 3 (4): 1540–1558.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., M.Q. Patton, and R.A. Bowman. 2011. “Working with Evaluation Stakeholders: A Rationale, Step-Wise Approach and Toolkit.” Evaluation and Program Planning 34 (1): 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., and A. Jordan. 2012. “Transnational Environmental Governance: New Findings and Emerging Research Agendas.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30 (4): 556–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COM (Commission of the European Communities). 2001. European Governance; A White Paper. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Communities, Commission of the European Communities (COM).
   Google Scholar
• COM. 2006. Rural Development 2007–2013; Handbook on Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework, Guidance Document. Brussels: Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Commission of the European Communities (COM).
   Google Scholar
• COM. 2008. Fact Sheet: EU Rural Development Policy 2007–2013. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities (COM). http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/fact/rurdev2007/2007_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• COM. 2009a. The Committee of the Regions’ White Paper on Multilevel Governance. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities (COM).
   Google Scholar
• COM. 2009b. Programming Guide for Strategy Papers, Programming Fiche; Decentralisation. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities (COM).
   Google Scholar
• COM. 2011. A Short Guide to the European Commission's proposals for EU Rural Development after 2013. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities (COM).
   Google Scholar
• COM. 2012. Proposal for the Regulation of The European Parliament and of the Council on the support of the Rural Development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities (COM).
   Google Scholar
• Cook, P. 2009. Scotland Rural Development Programme; First Stage Review. P & L Cook and Partners.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13 (1): 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Crofting Commission. 2013. “Crofting Commission: About Crofting.” http://www.crofting.scotland.gov.uk/What-is-Crofting.asp
   Google Scholar
• Damianos, D., and N. Giannakopoulos. 2002. “Farmers’ Participation in Agri-Environmental Schemes in Greece.” British Food Journal 104 (3/4/5): 261–273.
   Google Scholar
• Dupraz, P., I. Vanslembrouck, F. Bonnieux, and G. van Huylenbroeck. 2002. “Farmers’ Participation in European Agri-Environmental Policies.” Paper presented at the Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE) on Exploring Diversity in the European Agri-Food System, Zaragoza, Spain, 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Eden, C., and F. Ackermann. 1998. Making Strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eldon J. 1988. “Agricultural Change, Conservation and the Role of Advisors.” ECOS: A Review of Conservation 9 (4): 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, L.S. 1995. “What is Global Governance?” Global Governance 1 (1): 368–372.
   Google Scholar
• Forestry Commission Scotland. 2012. “Forestry Commission Scotland: Our Management Structure.” http://www.forestry.gov.uk/website/forestry.nsf/byunique/infd-7upd3g
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R.B. 2006. “Beyond the Pillars: Sustainability Assessment as a Framework for Effective Integration of Social, Economic and Ecological Considerations in Significant Decision-Making.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 8 (3): 259–280.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., B. Amos, and T. Plumptree. 2003. “Governance Principles for Protected Areas in the 21st Century.” Paper presented at The Fifth World Parks Congress Durban, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 1995. “Policy Advice and the Public Sector.” In Governance in a Changing Environment, edited by B.G. Peters and D.T. Savoie, 138–172. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Jover, M., J. Gilmour, N. Schembri, T. Sysak, P.K. Holyoake, R. Beilin, and J.-A.L.M.L. Toribio. 2012. “Use of Stakeholder Analysis to Inform Risk Communication and Extension Strategies for Improved Biosecurity amongst Small-Scale Pig Producers.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 104 (3–4): 258–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., and D. Lehmkuhl. 2008. “The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance.” Journal of Public Policy 28 (1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S.N., and P. Leavy. 2011. The Practice of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggett, P. 1991. “A New Management in the Public Sector.” Policy and Politics 19 (4): 243–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howick, S., and J. Whalley. 2008. “Understanding the Drivers of Broadband Adoption: The Case of Rural and Remote Scotland.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 59: 1299–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, J., and S. Lowe. 2005. Understanding the Policy Process; Analysing Welfare Policy and Practice. Bristol: The Policy Press and the Social Policy Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., and M. Hill. 2007. “Street-Level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability.” Public Administration 85 (2): 279–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilbery, B.W., and I.R. Bowler. 1993. “The Farm Diversification Grant Scheme: Adoption and Non-Adoption in England and Wales.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 11 (2): 161–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keast, R., and K. Brown. 2002. “The Government Service Delivery Project: A Case Study of the Push and Pull of Central Government Coordination.” Public Management Review 4 (4): 439–459.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, A. 2002. “Natural Resources and Decentralization in Nicaragua: are Local Governments up to the Job?” World Development 30 (1): 17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, G. 2005. “Promoting Sustainable Development: The Question of Governance.” Research in Rural Sociology and Development 11: 145–174.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. 2010. “Good Governance for Terrestrial Protected Areas: A Framework, Principles and Performance Outcomes.” Journal of Environmental Management 91 (3): 754–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., J. Davidson, A. Curtis, E. Stratford, and R. Griffith. 2009. “Multi-level Environmental Governance: Lessons from Australian Natural Resource Management.” Australian Geographer 40 (2): 169–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S., and M.P. Gennaio. 2010. “The Central Role of Centralisation in Environmental Policy Initialisation.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53 (3): 283–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, M.M., and R.L. Shotland. 1987. Multiple Methods in Program Evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, D., J. Möllers, and G. Buchenrieder. 2012. “Social Networks and Rural Development: LEADER in Romania.” Sociologia Ruralis 52 (4): 398–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzorra, A.P. 2001. “Agri-Environmental Policy in Spain. The Agenda of Socio-Political Developments at the National, Regional and Local Levels.” Journal of Rural Studies 17 (1): pp. 81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKight, P.E., and J. Najab. 2010. “Kruskal-Wallis Test.” Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, 1. John Wiley & Sons. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0491
   Google Scholar
• McTavish, D. 2014. “Debate: Scotland, the United Kingdom and Complex Government.” Public Money & Management 34 (1): 4–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, R., and C. Snow. 1986. “Network Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms.” California Management Review 28, 62–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R.K., B.R. Agle, and D.J. Wood. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.” The Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 853–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P. 1999. Climate for Change: Non-State Actors and the Global Politics of the Greenhouse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NFUS (2014) About NFUS (National Farmers Union Scotland) http://www.nfus.org.uk/about-nfus
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom. 2010. Communications Market Report: Scotland, 5th Annual Review. Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. 2002. “Participative and Stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and Modelling Processes.” Integrated Assessment 3 (1): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B.G. 2002. “Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-ordination.” Public Administration 76 (2): 295–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M.S., A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C.H. Quinn, and L.C. Stringer. 2009. “Who's In and Why? A Typology of Stakeholder Analysis Methods for Natural Resource Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 90, 1933–1949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R.A.W. 2006. “Policy Network Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, edited by R.E. Goodin, 423–445. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M.L., and R. Boyle. 2012. “Progress and Pitfalls in Public Service Reform and Performance Management in Ireland.” Administration 60 (1): 31–59.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J.C., A. Agrawal, and A.M. Larson. 2006. “Recentralizing While Decentralizing: How National Governments Re-appropriate Forest Resources.” World Development 34 (11): 1864–1886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. 1997. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier. Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. 2013. Statistics for Evidence-Based Practice and Evaluation. 3rd ed. Belmont: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. 1997. Games Real Actors Can Play: Actor-Centred Institutionalism in Policy-Research, Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, M. 1994. On Understanding Organisational Cultures; Diagnosis and Understanding. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Scotland National Rural Network. 2010. “Scotland: National Rural Network Connecting Rural Scotland – Promoting Rural Growth.” http://www.ruralgateway.org.uk/en
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2007. “EU Funding.” http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Government/Finance/spfm/eufunding
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2008. “Scottish Rural Development Programme 2007–2013, Rural Development Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.” Edinburgh: Scottish Government. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/05/05134234/0
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2010. “Mid Term Evaluation of Scotland Rural Development Programme.” P & L Cook and Partners. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/346698/0115341.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2011. “The 2010/11 Audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts.” http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/10/04094356/1
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2012. “SRDP: Rural Priorities – How it Works.” http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/farmingrural/SRDP/RuralPriorities/HowItWorks
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Natural Heritage. 2012. “Scottish Natural Heritage Corporate Plan 2012–15, Scottish Natural Heritage.” http://www.snh.org.uk/pdfs/publications/corporate/Corporate%20Plan%202012-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shortall, S., and M. Shucksmith. 2001. “Rural Development in Practice: Issues Arising In Scotland and Northern Ireland.” Community Development Journal 36 (2): 122–113.
   Google Scholar
• Sidaway, R. 2005. Resolving Environmental Disputes: From Conflict to Consensus. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, R., M. Toogood, and A. Knierim. 2006. “Factors Affecting European Farmers’ Participation in Biodiversity Policies.” Sociologia Ruralis 46 (4): 318–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sproule-Jones, M. 1993. Governments at Work: Canadian Parliamentary Federalism and its Public Policy Effects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walford, N. 2002. “Agricultural Adjustment: Adoption of and Adaptation to Policy Reform Measures by Large-Scale Commercial Farmers.” Land Use Policy 19 (3): 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, G., B. Crabtree, and J. Potts. 2001. “Modelling Farmer Entry into the Environmentally Sensitive Area Schemes in Scotland.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 52 (1): 65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, A.L., M.D.A. Rounsevell, R.M. Wilson, and C. Haggett. 2014. “Spatial Analysis of Agri-Environmental Policy Uptake and Expenditure in Scotland.” Journal of Environmental Management 133 (15): 104–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar