Fit for purpose? Establishing the robustness of EIA screening systems for land-use planning using a case study from South Australia

References

• ANZECC. 1991. A National Approach to Environmental Impact Assessment in Australia. Canberra: Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council.
   Google Scholar
• ANZECC. 1996. Guidelines and Criteria for Determining the Need for and Level of Environmental Impact Assessment in Australia. Canberra: Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, S., and M.D. Hudson. 2013. “Determination of Significance in Ecological Impact Assessment: Past Change, Current Practice and Future Improvements.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 38: 16–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter, L., and G. Canty. 1993. “Impact Significance Determination – Basic Considerations and a Sequenced Approach.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 13 (5): 275–297.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., and N. Harvey. 2006. The Changing Role of Environmental Impact Assessment Under the South Australian Development Act 1994 to 2005. Adelaide: The Royal Geographical Society of Australasia (SA Branch). (Inc. South Australian Geographical Papers No. 7).
   Google Scholar
• DMITRE. 2011. South Australian Major Developments Directory 2011/12. Adelaide: Department for Manufacturing, Innovation, Trade, Resources and Energy, South Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• DMITRE. 2012. South Australian Major Developments Directory 2012/13. Adelaide: Department for Manufacturing, Innovation, Trade, Resources and Energy, South Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• DMITRE. 2013. South Australian Major Developments 2013/14 in Focus. Adelaide: Department for Manufacturing, Innovation, Trade, Resources and Energy, South Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• DPLG. 2008. Major Development Proposals. Adelaide: Department of Planning and Local Government (SA). http://www.planning.sa.gov.au
   Google Scholar
• DTED. 2009. South Australian Major Developments Directory 2009/10. Adelaide: Department Trade and Economic Development, South Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• DTED. 2010. South Australian Major Developments Directory 2010/11. Adelaide: Department Trade and Economic Development, South Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Duinker, P., and G. Beanlands. 1986. “The Significance of Environmental Impacts: An Exploration of the Concept.” Environmental Management 10 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1007/BF01866412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Commission Staff Working Document Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment Accompanying the Document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 2011/92/EU on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014a. Directive 2011/92/EU* of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment (Codification) (OJ L 26, 28.1.2012, p. 1) as Amended by: Directive 2014/52/EU** of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014b. Environmental Impact Assessment – EIA. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Communities. 2001. Guidance on EIA: Screening. Luxembourg: Environmental Resources Management.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. 2011. “Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment (Codification).” Official Journal of the European Communities 55 (L26): 26/21–/21.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, R. 2013. “Major and Crown Development – The Use of EIA.” Paper presented at the Environmental Defenders Office (SA) Seminar: Towards a Sustainable Planning System. Adelaide, September 26.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson, J., R. Therivel, and A. Chadwick. 2005. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson, J., R. Therivel, and A. Chadwick. 2012. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. 4th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Government of South Australia. 1993. Development Act (version 18.9.2014). Adelaide: Government of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A., and N. Harvey. 2006. “Environmental Assessment Procedures for Wind Power Projects in Australia.” Energy and Environment 17 (5): 715–733.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, N., and B. Clarke. 2012. Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IAIA. 1999. Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice. Fargo, ND: International Association of Impact Assessment in conjunction with Institute of Environmental Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• IEMA. 2011. Special Report – The State of Environmental Impact Assessment Practice in the UK. Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment. http://www.iema.net/system/files/iema20special20report20web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kjellerup, U. 1999. “Significance Determination: A Rational Reconstruction of Decisions.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 19 (1): 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, D.P. 2007. “Impact Significance Determination – Back to Basics.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27 (8): 755–769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, B.M., and S. Richie. 2013. “Variation and Challenges in the Global Practice of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).” International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies 4 (4): 628–635.
   Google Scholar
• Middle, G., B. Clarke, D. Franks, L. Brown, J. Kellett, S. Lockie, A. Morrison-Saunders, et al. 2013. “Reducing Green Tape or Rolling Back IA in Australia, Impact Assessment, The Next Generation.” Paper presented at IAIA13, Impact Assessment, the Next Generation: the 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment. Calgary, Canada, May 13–16. http://www.iaia.org/conferences/iaia13/proceedings/Final%20papers%20review%20process%2013/Reducing%20Green%20Tape%20or%20Rolling%20back%20IA%20in%20Australia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders, A. 2010. Utility of Environmental Impact Assessment Processes in Western Australia. Perth: Environment and Natural Resources Committee of the Parliament of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders, A. 2011. “Principles for Effective Impact Assessment: Examples from Western Australia.” Paper presented at Impact Assessment and Responsible Development for Infrastructure, Business and Industry 31st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Puebla, May 28–June 4.
   Google Scholar
• NSW DoP. 2008. New South Wales Major Development Monitor 2007–08. Sydney: NSW Department of Planning.
   Google Scholar
• NSW DoP. 2010. New South Wales Major Development Monitor 2008–09. Sydney: NSW Department of Planning.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Government. 2011. State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011 Under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Sydney: Department of Planning and Infrastructure.
   Google Scholar
• NSW DoP. 2012. What is State Significant Development and How are Applications Assessed and Determined? Fact Sheet. Sydney: New South Wales Department of Planning and Infrastructure.
   Google Scholar
• Parnell, M. 2006. Development (Development Plans) Amendment Bill: Speech. Adelaide: Legislative Council. Accessed December 11. http://www.markparnell.org.au/speech.php?speech=53
   Google Scholar
• Pinho, P., S. McCallum, and S.S. Cruz. 2010. “A Critical Appraisal of EIA Screening Practice in EU Member States.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 28 (2): 91–107. doi:10.3152/146155110×498799
   Google Scholar
• Planning SA. 1994. Guide to the Assessment of Major Develoments or Projects. Adelaide: Planning SA.
   Google Scholar
• Rajaram, T., and A. Das. 2011. “Screening for EIA in India: Enhancing Effectiveness Through Ecological Carrying Capacity Approach.” Journal of Environmental Management 92 (1): 140–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, W.A., A. Morrison-Saunders, and R. Marshall. 2006. “Common Sense in Environmental Impact Assessment: It is Not as Common as it Should be.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 24 (1): 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom. 2011. The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Weston, J. 2000. “EIA, Decision-Making Theory and Screening and Scoping in UK Practice.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43 (2): 185–203.
   Google Scholar
• Weston, J. 2011. “Screening for Environmental Impact Assessment Projects in England: What Screening?” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 29 (2): 90–98. doi:10.3152/146155111×12913679730593
   Google Scholar
• Wood, C. 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G. 2008. “Thresholds and Criteria for Evaluating and Communicating Impact Significance in Environmental Statements: ‘See no Evil, Hear no Evil, Speak no Evil’?” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28 (1): 22–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, G., and J. Becker. 2005. “Discretionary Judgement in Local Planning Authority Decision Making: Screening Development Proposals for Environmental Impact Assessment.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 48 (3): 349–371. doi:10.1080/09640560500067467
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G., J. Glasson, and J. Becker. 2006. “EIA Scoping in Engalnd and Wales: Practitioner Approaches, Perspectives and Constraints.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26: 221–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar