The evolution of regional cross-border water regimes, the case of Deltarhine

References

• Bernauer, T. 2002. “Explaining Success and Failure in International River Management.” Aquatic Sciences 64: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., and A. Kalbhenn. 2009. “The Politics of International Freshwater Resources.” In Potential Global Strategic Catastrophes: Balancing Transnational Responsibilities and Burden-sharing with Sovereignty and Human Dignity, edited by Nayef R. F. Al-Rodhan. Berlin: LIT.
   Google Scholar
• Bloesch, J., C. Sandu, and J. Janning. 2011. “Integrative Water Protection and River Basin Management Policy: The Danube Case.” River Systems 20 (1–2): 129–143.
   Google Scholar
• Bressers, H., and S. Kuks. 2013. “Water Governance Regimes: Dimensions and Dynamics.” International Journal of Water Governance 1 (2013): 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• BWC. 2014. Minutes of Meetings of the Border Waters Commission and its Subcommissions D, E and F from 1989 to 2014. Bonn: German Federal Ministry.
   Google Scholar
• Dieperink, C. 1997. Between Salt and Salmon: Lessons from Regime Development in Rhine Pollution. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. 2000. “European Water Framework Directive.” Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 327) 22/12/2000: 0001–0073.
   Google Scholar
• Dombrowsky, I. 2008. “Institutional Design and Regime Effectiveness in Transboundary River Management: The Elbe Water Quality Regime.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 12: 223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dombrowsky, I. 2009. “Revisiting the Potential for Benefit-Sharing the Management of Transboundary Rivers.” Water Policy 11 (2): 125–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durth, R. 1996. Transboundary Environmental Problems and Upstream-Downstream Constellations in International Rivers. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbens-Leenes, W., A. Y. Hoekstra, and T. H. Van der Meer. 2009. “The Water Footprint of Bioenergy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 10219–10223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, S., and B. A. Simmons. 1987. “Theories of International Regimes.” International Organization 41 (3): 491–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenclever, A., P. Mayer, and V. Rittberger. 2000. “Integrating Theories of International Regimes.” Review of International Studies 26 (1): 3–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, C., and D. Sprinz. 2000. “Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (5): 630–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IRBM. 2009. International River Basin Management Plan Deltarhine 2009–2015. Bonn: German Federal Ministry.
   Google Scholar
• Keetman, W. 2006. Grensoverschrijdende samenwerking in de regio. The Netherlands: Unie van Waterschappen.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Marquand, D. 1977. International Rivers: The Politics of Cooperation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Westwater Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, M. A., O. R. Young, and M. Zürn. 1995. “The Study of International Regimes.” European Journal of International Relations 1995 (1–3): 267–330.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann, S. 2008. Understanding Water Regime Formation: A Research Framework with Lessons from Europe. Global Environmental Politics 8 (4): 117–140.
   Google Scholar
• Lugo, C. 2010. “Analyzing the Effectiveness of Transboundary Water Regimes: The Case of Lake Victoria Basin. East Africa.” PhD diss., University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Marty, F. 2001. Managing International Rivers: Problems, Politics and Institutions. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Meijerink, S., and D. Huitema. 2010. “Policy Entrepreneurs and Change Strategies: Lessons from Sixteen Case Studies of Water Transitions Around the Globe.” Ecology and Society 15 (2): 21. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art21/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingst, K. A. 1981. “The Functionalist and Regime Perspectives: The Case of Rhine River Cooperation.” Journal of Common Market Studies 20: 161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., and S. Vergari. 1996. “Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change.” Policy Studies Journal 24: 420–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostert, E. 2003. “Conflict and Cooperation in the Management of International Freshwater Resources: A Global Review.” International Journal of River Basin Management 1 (3): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mostert, E. 2005. “How can International Donors Promote Transboundary Water Management?” Discussion Paper 8/2005. Bonn: German Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pekelder, J. 2014. New Neighborly Relationships: Germany and the Netherlands. Münster: Agenda Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Raadgever, G. T., E. Mostert, N. Kranz, E. Interwies, and J. G. Timmerman. 2008. “Assessing Management Regimes in Transboundary River Basins: Do they Support Adaptive Management?” Ecology and Society 13 (1): 14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art14/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner, T., and S. Meijerink. 2017. “Entrepreneurs in International River Basins: Getting Climate Adaptation on the Cross-Border Water Policy Agenda.” Regional Environmental Change. doi:10.1007/S10113-017-1178-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoff, C. W., and D. Grey. 2002. “Beyond the River: The Benefits of Cooperation on International Rivers.” Water Policy 4 (5): 389–403.
   Google Scholar
• Savenije, H. G., and P. van der Zaag. 2000. “Conceptual Framework for the Management of Shared River Basins: With Special Reference to the SADC and EU.” Water Policy 2: 9–45.
   Google Scholar
• Schmeier, S. 2010. Governing International Watercourses: Perspectives from Different Disciplines. A Comprehensive Literature Review. Berlin: Hertie School of Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. A., S. A. Pierce, M. J. Pasqualetti, A. L. Jones, B. E. Montz, and J. H. Hoover. 2011. “Policy and Institutional Dimensions of the Water-Energy Nexus.” Energy Policy 39: 6622–6630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SGDR. 2014. Minutes of Meetings of the Deltarhine Steering Group and its Working Group Between 2005 and 2014. The Hague: Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Skjaerseth, J. B. 2000. North Sea Cooperation: Linking International and Domestic Pollution Control. New York: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staatsvertrag. 1963. Vertrag zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und dem Königreich der Niederlande zur Regelung von Grenzfragen und anderen zwischen beiden Ländern bestehenden Problemen (Ausgleichsvertrag) [ International Treaty Between Germany and the Netherlands Regarding Border Issues and Other Problems Regarding Both Countries ]. Bonn: German Federal Ministry.
   Google Scholar
• TPRW. 2014. Minutes of Meetings, Notes and Reports of the Transboundary Platform for Regional Water Management (Steering Group, Strategic Working Group, Expert Groups. Gronau: Transboundary Platform for Regional Water Management.
   Google Scholar
• Turton, A., and R. Henwood, eds. 2002. Hydropolitics in the Developing World, a Southern Africa Perspective. Pretoria: South African Water Issues Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Underdal, A. 1992. “The Concept of Regime Effectiveness.” Cooperation and Conflict 27 (3): 227–240.
   Google Scholar
• UNECE. 2011. Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ast, J. 2000. “Interactive Water Management in Transboundary River Systems.” PhD diss., Eburon, Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Molen, J.. 2011. “Crossing Borders: A Framework for the Development of Cross-Border Cooperation.” PhD diss., University of Twente, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Van Herten, M. 2011. “Bridging the Dutch–German Border: Towards Effective Water Management in Transboundary Multi-Level and Multi-Actor River Basins.” BSc diss., Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leussen, W., E. van Slobbe, and G. Meinders. 2007. “Transboundary Governance and the Problem of Scale for the Implementation of the European WFD at the Dutch–German Border.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Adaptive and Integrated Water Management, Basel, Switzerland, November 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Zaag, P. 2007. “Asymmetry and Equity in Water Resources Management. Critical Institutional Issues for Southern Africa.” Water Resources Management 21: 1993–2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwijmeren, J., and M. Wiering. 2007. Many Rivers to Cross. Delft: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• WFD Working Group. 2011. “Discussion Paper on Possibilities of Transboundary Cooperation 2011–2015.” Internal Working Paper. Gronau: Transboundary Platform for Regional Water Management.
   Google Scholar
• Wiering, M., J. Verwijmeren, K. Lulofs, and C. Feld. 2010. “Experiences in Regional Cross Border Co-Operation in River Management: Comparing Three Cases at the Dutch-German Border.” Water Resources Management 24 (11): 2647–2672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. T. 1998. “Conflict and Cooperation Along International Waterways.” Water Policy 1: 251–265.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. T., S. B. Yoffe, and M. Giordano. 2003. “International Waters: Identifying Basins at Risk.” Water Policy 5: 29–60.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. 1982. “Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes.” International Organization 36 (2): 277–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. 1991. “Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society.” International Organization 45: 281–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. 1998. Creating Regimes. Arctic Accords and International Governance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. 1999. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R., and G. Osherenko. 1993. “The Formation of International Regimes: Hypotheses and Cases.” In Polar Politics: Creating International Environmental Regimes, edited by O. R. Young and G. Osherenko, 1–21. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., and J. Warner. 2006. “Hydro-Hegemony: A Framework for Analysis of Transboundary Water Conflicts.” Water Policy 8: 435–460.
   Google Scholar