Land-use planning and designated national interests in Sweden: arctic perspectives on landscape multifunctionality

References

• Bay-Larsen, I. 2010. “The Conservationists’ Concerns: On National Administration Response to Integrated Use and Protection Planning.” Local Environment 15 (4): 357–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A. 2010. “Levelling the Playing Field? the Influence of National Wind Power Planning Instruments on Conflicts of Interests in a Swedish County.” Energy Policy 38 (5): 2357–2369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjärstig, T., C. Thellbro, O. Stjernström, J. Svensson, C. Sandström, P. Sandström, and A. Zachrisson. 2018. “Between Protocol and Reality: Swedish Municipal Comprehensive Planning.” European Planning Studies 26 (1): 35–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhme, K. 2002. Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning: Discursive Integration in Practice. Stockholm: Nordregio. http://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/19205.
   Google Scholar
• Borges, L., and M. Adolphson. 2016. “The Role of Official Heritage in Regional Spaces.” Urban Research and Practice 9 (3): 290–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boverket 2017. “The Implementation of the Policy of National Interests” [in Swedish]. National Board of Housing, Building and Planning Report 2017:5. Accessed July 7, 2017. http://www.boverket.se/globalassets/publikationer/dokument/2017/slutredovisning-av-uppdrag-angaende-tillampningen-av-miljobalkens-bestammelser-om-riksintressen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, J., and H. Vejre. 2004. Multifunctional Landscapes. Volume 1, Theory, Values and History. Southampton: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broekhoven, S. van, F. Boons, A. van Buuren, and G. Teisman. 2015. “Boundaries in Action: A Framework to Analyse Boundary Actions in Multifunctional Land-Use Developments.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33 (5): 1005–1023.
   Google Scholar
• Buizer, M., B. Arts, and J. Westerink. 2016. “Landscape Governance as Policy Integration ‘From Below’: A Case of Displaced and Contained Political Conflict in the Netherlands.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34 (3): 448–462.
   Google Scholar
• Cloke, P., I. Cook, P. Crang, M. Goodwin, J. Painter, and C. Philo. 2004. Practising Human Geography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, K. I., and M. Hibbard. 2016. “Production, Consumption, and Protection: Perspectives from North America on the Multifunctional Transition in Rural Planning.” International Planning Studies 21 (3): 245–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görg, C. 2007. “Landscape Governance. The ‘Politics of Scale’ and the ‘Natural’ Conditions of Places”. Geoforum 38 (5): 954–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Bill 1972: 111. “Regional Development and Sustainable Management of Land and Water” [in Swedish]. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/proposition/kungl-majts-proposition-angaende-regional_FV03111.
   Google Scholar
• Haaland, C., G. Fry, and A. Peterson. 2011. “Designing Farmland for Multifunctionality.” Landscape Research 36 (1): 41–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higham, J., J. V. Haukeland, D. Hopkins, O. I. Vistad, K. Lindberg, and K. Daugstad. 2016. “National Parks Policy and Planning: A Comparative Analysis of Friluftsliv (Norway) and the Dual Mandate (New Zealand).” Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events 8 (2): 146–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horstkotte, T., C. Sandström, and J. Moen. 2014. “Exploring the Multiple Use of Boreal Landscapes in Northern Sweden.” Human Ecology 42 (5): 671–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, T., and J. Curry. 2002. “Regional Development and Land Use Planning in Rural British Columbia: Peace in the Woods?” Regional Studies 36 (4): 439–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., and J. C. Hansen. 2009. “The Nordic Countries: A Geographical Overview.” In Nordic Landscapes. Regions and Belonging on the Northern Edge of Europe, edited by M. Jones and K.R. Olwig, 543–567. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, R., and J. Alder. 2005. Coastal Planning and Management. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, P. 2016. “Summarizing the National Interest of Communications” [in Swedish]. In: “The Implementation of the Policy of National Interests” [in Swedish]. National Board of Housing, Building and Planning Report 2017:5, Appendix 4, http://www.boverket.se/globalassets/publikationer/dokument/2017/slutredovisning-av-uppdrag-angaende-tillampningen-av-miljobalkens-bestammelser-om-riksintressen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, C., J. Handley, and J. Rodwell. 2007. “Restructuring the Post-Industrial Landscape: A Multifunctional Approach.” Landscape Research 32 (3): 285–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst, R. 2009. “Interviews: In-Depth, Semi-Structured.” In International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography, edited by R. Kitchin and N. Thrift, 580–584. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lundmark, L., and D. K. Müller. 2010. “The Supply of Nature-Based Tourism Activities in Sweden.” Tourism Review 58 (4): 379–393.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, Ü., H. Wiggering, and K. Helming. 2007. “Multifunctional Land Use: Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services.” In Multifunctional Land Use, edited by Ü. Mander, H. Wiggering, and K. Helming, 1–13. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. 2005. “Rural Geography: Multifunctional Rural Geographies: Reactionary or Radical?” Progress in Human Geography 29 (6): 773–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B., and M. Degorski. 2007. “Integration of Multifunctional Goals into Land Use: The Planning Perspective”. In Multifunctional Land Use, edited by Ü. Mander, H. Wiggering, and K. Helming, 153–166. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Michanek, G., and C. Zetterberg. 2017. Den svenska miljörätten [Swedish Environmental Law]. 4th ed. Uppsala: Iustus Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. H., M. B. Lane, and M. Hibbard. 2015. “Planning, Governance and Rural Futures in Australia and the USA: Revisiting the Case for Rural Regional Planning.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (9): 1601–1616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otte, A., D. Simmering, and V. Wolters. 2007. “Biodiversity at the Landscape Level: Recent Concepts and Perspectives for Multifunctional Land Use.” Landscape Ecology 22 (5): 639–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, C. 2013. “Deliberation or Doctrine? Land Use and Spatial Planning for Sustainable Development in Sweden.” Land Use Policy 34: 301–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, M., K. Ek, K. Söderholm, and P. Söderholm. 2010. “Wind Power Planning and Permitting: Comparative Perspectives from the Nordic Countries.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 (9): 3116–3123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson-Forsberg, L. 2014. “Swedish Spatial Planning: A Blunt Instrument for the Protection of Outdoor Recreation.” Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 5–6: 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, M., O. Stjernström, and E. C. H. Keskitalo. 2017. “The Role of Participation in the Planning Process: Examples from Sweden.” Local Environment 22 (8): 986–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkänen, K., R. Puhakka, and M. Sawatzky. 2011. “The Role of Nature in the Place Meanings and Practices of Cottage Owners in Northern Environments.” Norwegian Journal of Geography 65 (3): 175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qviström, M. 2010. “Shadows of Planning: On Landscape/Planning History and Inherited Landscape Ambiguities at the Urban Fringe.” Geografiska Annaler B 92 (3): 219–235.
   Google Scholar
• Selman, P. 2002. “Multi-Function Landscape Plans: A Missing Link in Sustainability Planning?” Local Environment 7 (3): 283–294.
   Google Scholar
• Selman, P. 2004. “Community Participation in the Planning and Management of Cultural Landscapes.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47 (3): 365–392.
   Google Scholar
• Slätmo, E. 2017. “Preservation of Agricultural Land as an Issue of Societal Importance.” Rural Landscapes: Society, Environment, History 4 (1): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, B. 2007. “Landscape Goods and Services Related to Forestry Land Use.” In Multifunctional Land Use, edited by Ü. Mander, H. Wiggering, and K. Helming, 65–82. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2017. The Economy of the North 2015. Statistical Analyses 151. Oslo-Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Stenseke, M., and A. Hansen. 2014. “From Rhetoric to Knowledge Based Actions: Challenges for Outdoor Recreation Management in Sweden.” Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 7–8: 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Code of Statutes 1998:896. On the Management of Land and Water Areas. http://rkrattsbaser.gov.se/sfst?bet=1998:896.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. 2015. Planning and Decision-Making for Sustainable Development under the Riksintressen Regime [in Swedish]. Swedish Government Official Report SOU 2015:99. Accessed February 6, 2017. http://www.regeringen.se/rattsdokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2015/12/sou-201599/.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Land Survey. 2017. GSD General Map. Geodata by the Swedish National Land Survey. Accessed August, 21, 2017. https://ext-geodatakatalog.lansstyrelsen.se/GeodataKatalogen/.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Planning and Building Act 2010. 900.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., D. Carson, P. C. Ensign, L. Huskey, O. R. Rasmussen, and G. Saxinger. 2016. Settlements at the Edge: Remote Human Settlements in Developed Nations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Thune Hedström, R., and M. J. Lundström. 2013. “Swedish Land-Use Planning Legislation.” In Planning and Sustainable Urban Development in Sweden, edited by M. J. Lundström, C. Fredriksson, and J. Witzell, 69–82. Stockholm: Swedish Society for Town and Country Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. 2016. Environmental Governance: Institutions, Policies and Actions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vejre, H., Abildtrup, J. E. Andersen, P. S. Andersen, J. Brandt, A. Busck, T. Dalgaard, B., et al. 2007. “Multifunctional Agriculture and Multifunctional Landscapes: Land Use as an Interface”. In Multifunctional Land Use, edited by Ü. Mander, H. Wiggering, and K. Helming, 93–104. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., and S. D. Noam Cook. 2003. “Understanding Policy Practices: Action, Dialectic and Deliberation in Policy Analysis”. In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, edited by M. A. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, 139–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M. 2011. Rural. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. J., K. Isaksson, and H. Antonson. 2017. “The Struggle to Achieve Holistic Landscape Planning: Lessons from Planning the E6 Road Route Through Tanum World Heritage Site, Sweden.” Land Use Policy 67: 167–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2003. Applications of Case Study Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar