939
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research article

Institutional factors affecting urban green space provision – from a local government revenue perspective

&
Pages 2313-2329 | Received 12 Jun 2018, Accepted 18 Oct 2018, Published online: 01 Feb 2019

References

  • Alm, J., R. D. Buschman, and D. L. Sjoquist. 2011. “Rethinking Local Government Reliance on the Property Tax.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 41 (4): 320–331. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.03.006
  • Alsayyad, N., and K. Bristol. 1992. “Levels of Congruence: On Urban Form and Institutional Structure in Different Societies.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 9 (3): 193–206.
  • Bengston, D. N., J. O. Fletcher, and K. C. Nelson. 2004. “Public Policies for Managing Urban Growth and Protecting Open Space: Policy Instruments and Lessons Learned in the United States.” Landscape and Urban Planning 69 (2–3): 271–286. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.007
  • Buitelaar, E., and A. Segeren. 2011. “Urban Structures and Land. The Morphological Effects of Dealing with Property Rights.” Housing Studies 26 (5): 661–679. doi:10.1080/02673037.2011.581909
  • Buitelaar, E., M. Galle, and N. Sorel. 2011. “Plan-Led Planning Systems in Development-Led Practices: An Empirical Analysis into the (Lack of) Institutionalisation of Planning Law.” Environment and Planning A 43 (4): 928–941. doi:10.1068/a43400
  • Byrne, J., N. Sipe, and G. Searle. 2010. “Green Around the Gills? the Challenge of Density for Urban Greenspace Planning in SEQ.” Australian Planner 47 (3): 162–177. doi:10.1080/07293682.2010.508204
  • Chen, W. Y., and F. Z. Y. Hu. 2015. “Producing Nature for Public: Land-Based Urbanization and Provision of Public Green Spaces in China.” Applied Geography 58: 32–40. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.01.007
  • Chigbu, U. E., A. Schopf, W. T. de Vries, F. Masum, S. Mabikke, D. Antonio, and J. Espinoza. 2017. “Combining Land-Use Planning and Tenure Security: A Tenure Responsive Land-Use Planning Approach for Developing Countries.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60 (9): 1622–1639. doi:10.1080/09640568.2016.1245655
  • Choumert, J. 2010. “An Empirical Investigation of Public Choices for Green Spaces.” Land Use Policy 27 (4): 1123–1131. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.03.001
  • Cuevas, S. C., A. Peterson, C. Robinson, and T. H. Morrison. 2016. “Institutional Capacity for Long-Term Climate Change Adaptation: Evidence from Land Use Planning in Albay, Philippines.” Regional Environmental Change 16 (7): 2045–2058. doi:10.1007/s10113-015-0909-8
  • De Sousa, C. A. 2003. “Turning Brownfields into Green Space in the City of Toronto.” Landscape and Urban Planning 62 (4): 181–198. doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00149-4
  • Duke, J. M., and L. Lynch. 2006. “Farmland Retention Techniques: Property Rights Implications and Comparative Evaluation.” Land Economics 82 (2): 189–213.
  • Feder, G., and D. Feeny. 1991. “Land-Tenure and Property-Rights: Theory and Implications for Development Policy.” The World Bank Economic Review 5 (1): 135–153. doi:10.1093/wber/5.1.135
  • Gerber, J. D., and A. R. Rissman. 2012. “Land-Conservation Strategies: The Dynamic Relationship Between Acquisition and Land-Use Planning.” Environment and Planning A 44 (8): 1836–1855. doi:10.1068/a44395
  • Gerber, J. D., S. Nahrath, and T. Hartmann. 2017. “The Strategic Use of Time-Limited Property Rights in Land-Use Planning: Evidence from Switzerland.” Environment and Planning A 49 (7): 1684–1703. doi:10.1177/0308518x17701916
  • Geyer, H. S. 2009. International Handbook of Urban Policy. Vol. 2, Issues in the Developed World. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Gielen, D. M., I. M. Salas, and J. B. Cuadrado. 2017. “International Comparison of the Changing Dynamics of Governance Approaches to Land Development and Their Results for Public Value Capture.” Cities 71: 123–134. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.05.012
  • Haaland, C., and C. K. van den Bosch. 2015. “Challenges and Strategies for Urban Green-Space Planning in Cities Undergoing Densification: A Review.” Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 14 (4): 760–771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009
  • Havel, M. B. 2014. “Delineation of Property Rights as Institutional Foundations for Urban Land Markets in Transition.” Land Use Policy 38: 615–626. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.004
  • Hotte, N., C. Mahony, and H. Nelson. 2016. “The Principal-Agent Problem and Climate Change Adaptation on Public Lands.” Global Environmental Change 36: 163–174. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.01.001
  • Jim, C. Y. 2013. “Sustainable Urban Greening Strategies for Compact Cities in Developing and Developed Economies.” Urban Ecosystems 16 (4): 741–761. doi:10.1007/s11252-012-0268-x
  • Jim, C. Y., and M. W. H. Chan. 2016. “Urban Greenspace Delivery in Hong Kong: Spatial-Institutional Limitations and Solutions.” Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 18: 65–85. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.015
  • King, M. 2005. “Epistemic Communities and the Diffusion of Ideas: Central Bank Reform in the United Kingdom.” West European Politics 28 (1): 94–123. doi:10.1080/0140238042000297107
  • Lai, Y., J. Wang, and W. Lok. 2017. “Redefining Property Rights over Collective Land in the Urban Redevelopment of Shenzhen, China.” Land Use Policy 69: 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.046
  • Lichtenberg, E., C. Tra, and I. Hardie. 2007. “Land Use Regulation and the Provision of Open Space in Suburban Residential Subdivisions.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54 (2): 199–213. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.02.001
  • Loh, C. G. 2015. “Adventures in Implementation: Mandating Open Space Preservation in a Weak Mandate State.” Journal of Urban Affairs 37 (5): 584–599. doi:10.1111/juaf.12182
  • Mann, S. 2009. “Institutional Causes of Urban and Rural Sprawl in Switzerland.” Land Use Policy 26 (4): 919–924. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.11.004
  • Mathur, S. 2013. “Self-Financing Urbanization: Insights from the Use of Town Planning Schemes in Ahmadabad, India.” Cities 31: 308–316. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.09.004
  • Mattsson, L. G. 2016. “Bridging Gaps Between Policies for Sustainable Markets and Market Practices.” IMP Journal 10 (2): 339–356. doi:10.1108/imp-01-2016-0002
  • Musole, M. 2009. “Property Rights, Transaction Costs and Institutional Change: Conceptual Framework and Literature Review.” Progress in Planning 71 (2): 43–85. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2008.09.002
  • Neuman, M. 2012. “The Image of the Institution.” Journal of the American Planning Association 78 (2): 139–156. doi:10.1080/01944363.2011.619464
  • Ostrom, E. 2003. “How Types of Goods and Property Rights Jointly Affect Collective Action.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (3): 239–270. doi:10.1177/0951692803015003002
  • Peterson, G. E. 2009. Unlocking Land Values to Finance Urban Infrastructure. Washington, DC: World Bank, Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility.
  • Quinn, C. H., E. D. G. Fraser, K. Hubacek, and M. S. Reed. 2010. “Property Rights in UK Uplands and the Implications for Policy and Management.” Ecological Economics 69 (6): 1355–1363. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.006
  • Roe, M., and I. Mell. 2013. “Negotiating Value and Priorities: Evaluating the Demands of Green Infrastructure Development.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56 (5): 650–673. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.693454
  • Romero, F. S. 2003. “Open Space Preservation Policies: An Institutional Case Study.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 20 (2): 164–176.
  • Tang, B. S., S. W. Wong, and S. C. Liu. 2011. “Institutions, Property Taxation and Local Government Finance in China.” Urban Studies 48 (5): 847–875. doi:10.1177/0042098010363497
  • Walsh, E. 2017. “Public Versus Private Land Use Controls in England and the USA.” International Journal of Law in the Built Environment 9 (1): 18–31. doi:10.1108/ijlbe-09-2016-0013
  • Wang, A. Q., E. H. W. Chan, S. C. W. Yeung, and J. B. Han. 2017. “Urban Fringe Land Use Transitions in Hong Kong: From New Towns to New Development Areas.” Procedia Engineering 198: 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.122
  • Warren, P. S., R. L. Ryan, S. B. Lerman, and K. A. Tooke. 2011. “Social and Institutional Factors Associated with Land Use and Forest Conservation along Two Urban Gradients in Massachusetts.” Landscape and Urban Planning 102 (2): 82–92. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.012
  • Wiebe, K. D., and R. Meinzen-Dick. 1998. “Property Rights as Policy Tools for Sustainable Development.” Land Use Policy 15 (3): 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(98)00014-3
  • Wyatt, P. 2011. “Land Administration in a Micro-State: The Role of Land Use Planning.” Survey Review 43 (323): 505–522. doi:10.1179/003962611x13117748891994
  • Young, O. R. 2002. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Zammit, C. 2013. “Landowners and Conservation Markets: Social Benefits from Two Australian Government Programs.” Land Use Policy 31: 11–16. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.011
  • Zhang, J., J. Fan, and J. Mo. 2016. “Government Intervention, Land Market, and Urban Development: Evidence from Chinese Cities.” Economic Inquiry 55 (1): 115–136. doi:10.1111/ecin.12353
  • Zhou, X. L., and Y. C. Wang. 2011. “Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of Urban Green Space in Response to Rapid Urbanization and Greening Policies.” Landscape and Urban Planning 100 (3): 268–277. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.013
  • Zhu, P., and Y. Zhang. 2008. “Demand for Urban Forests in United States Cities.” Landscape and Urban Planning 84 (3–4): 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.005
  • Ziblatt, D. 2008. “Why Some Cities Provide More Public Goods than Others: A Subnational Comparison of the Provision of Public Goods in German Cities in 1912.” Studies in Comparative International Development 43 (3–4): 273–289. doi:10.1007/s12116-008-9031-y

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.