Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management Volume 63, 2020 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
891
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research article

An ecosystem services-based approach for decision-making in urban planning

Fatih TerziFaculty of Architecture, Urban and Regional Planning Department, Taskisla, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey; Correspondence[email protected] [email protected]
,
Azime TezerFaculty of Architecture, Urban and Regional Planning Department, Taskisla, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey;
,
Zeynep TurkayFaculty of Architecture, Urban and Regional Planning Department, Taskisla, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey;
,
Osman UzunFaculty of Forestry Landscape Architecture Department, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey;
,
Pınar KöylüFaculty of Forestry Landscape Architecture Department, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey;
,
Elif KaracorFaculty of Forestry Landscape Architecture Department, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey;
,
Nilgun OkayFaculty of Mines Geological Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
&
Melek KayaFaculty of Forestry Landscape Architecture Department, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey;
show all
Pages 433-452 | Received 24 Jun 2018, Accepted 04 Mar 2019, Published online: 30 Apr 2019

References

  • Anna, K., K. Jaan-Henrik, K. Jakub, and H. Dagmar. 2016. “Ecosystem Services in Urban Land Use Planning: Integration Challenges in Complex Urban Settings: Case of Stockholm.” Ecosystem Services 22: 204–212. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.006.
  • Baro, F., I. Palomo, G. Zulian, P. Vizcaino, D. Haase, and E. Gomez-Baggethun. 2016. “Mapping Ecosystem Service Capacity, Flow and Demand for Landscape and Urban Planning: A Case Study in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region.” Land Use Policy 57: 405–417. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.0060264-8377.
  • Bennett, E. B., W. Cramer, A. Begossi, G. Cundill, S. Diaz, B. N. Egoh, I. R. Geijzendorffer, et al. 2015. “Linking Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, and Human Well-Being: Three Challenges for Designing Research for Sustainability.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 76–85. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007.
  • Brown, C., A. Burn, and A. Arnell. 2018. “A Conceptual Framework for Integrated Ecosystem Assessment.” One Ecosystem 3: e25482. doi:10.3897/oneeco.3.e25482.
  • Burkhard, B., M. Kandziora, Y. Hou, and F. Müller. 2014. “Ecosystem Service Potentials, Flows and Demands: Concepts for Spatial Localisation, Indication and Quantification.” Landscape Online 34: 1–32. doi:10.3097/LO.201434.
  • Buuren, M. V. 1994. “The Hydrological Landscape Structure as a Basis for Network Formulation: A Case Study for the Regge Catchment (NL).” In Landscape Planning and Ecological Networks, edited by E. A. Cook and H. N. van Lier, 117–136. Wageningen: Elsevier Science Publication.
  • Campagne, C. S., and P. K. Roche. 2018. “May the Matrix Be with You! Guidelines for the Application of Expert-Based Matrix Approach for Ecosystem Services Assessment and Mapping.” One Ecosystem 3: e24134. doi:10.3897/oneeco.3.e24134.
  • Chen, Y., J. Yu, and S. Khan. 2010. “Spatial Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Criteria Weights in GIS-Based Land Suitability Evaluation.” Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1582–1591. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.06.001.
  • Collins, M. G., F. R. Steiner, and M. J. Rushman. 2001. “Land-Use Suitability Analysis in the United States: Historical Development and Promising Technological Achievements.” Environmental Management 28 (5): 611–621. doi:10.1007/s002670010247.
  • Cork, S., G. Stoneham, and K. Lowe. 2007. Ecosystem Services and Australian Natural Resource Management (NRM) Futures: Paper to the Natural Resource Policies and Programs Committee (NRPPC) and the Natural Resource Management Standing Committee (NRMSC). Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/11543d24-9f2c-44ee-a52c-83dfa6adb7d9/files/ecosystem-services.pdf
  • Costanza, R., R. d'Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, et al. 1997. “The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital.” Nature 387 (6630): 253–260. doi:10.1038/387253a0.
  • Daily, G. C. 1997. “Introduction: What Are Ecosystem Services?” In Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, edited by G. C. Daily, 1–10. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • de Groot, R. S. 2006. “Function-Analysis and Valuation as a Tool to Assess Land Use Conflicts in Planning for Sustainable, Multi-Functional Landscapes.” Landscape and Urban Planning 75 (3–4): 175–186. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016.
  • de Groot, R. S., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen. 2010. “Challenges in Integrating the Concept of Ecosystem Services and Values in Landscape Planning, Management and Decision Making.” Ecological Complexity 7 (3): 260–272. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
  • Dilek, E. F., S. Sahin, and I. Yılmazer. 2008. “Afforestation Areas Defined by GIS in Gölbasi Specially Protected Area Ankara/Turkey.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 66: 239–247. doi:10.1007/s10661-007-9985-7.
  • Epanchin-Niell, R. S., J. W. Boyd, M. K. Macauley, C. D. Scarlett, Lynn, Shapiro, and B. K. Williams. 2018. Integrating Adaptive Management and Ecosystem Services Concepts to Improve Natural Resource Management: Challenges and Opportunities. US Geological Survey Circular 1439. Reston, VA: USGS. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/cir1439
  • European Commission. 2011. Our Life Insurance, Our Natural Capital: An EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 (Com(2011) 244), Brussels: European Commission.
  • Fisher, J. A., and K. Brown. 2014. “Ecosystem Services Concept and Approaches in Conservation: Just a Rhetorical Tool?” Ecological Economics 108: 257–265. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.004.
  • Forkink, A. 2017. “Benefits and Challenges of Using an Assessment of Ecosystem Services Approach in Land-Use Planning.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60 (11): 2071–2084. doi:10.1080/09640568.2016.1273098.
  • Förster, J., J. Barkmann, R. Fricke, S. Hotes, M. Kleyer, S. Kobbe, D. Kübler, et al. 2015. “Assessing Ecosystem Services for Informing Land-Use Decisions: A Problem Oriented Approach.” Ecology and Society 20 (3): 31. doi:10.5751/ES-07804-200331.
  • Geneletti, D. 2013. “Assessing the Impact of Alternative Land-Use Zoning Policies on Future Ecosystem Services.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 40: 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.003.
  • General Directorate of Disaster Affairs. 2006. Integration of Earth Scientific Data to Spatial Planning: Manual. https://www.afad.gov.tr/upload/Node/3489/xfiles/integration_of_earth_scientific_data_to_spatial_planning_eng2.pdf
  • Governorship of Duzce. 2011. Duzce il cevre durum raporu (Duzce environmental inspection report). http://www.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/editordosya/duzce_icdr2011.pdf
  • Grêt-Regamey, A., J. Altwegg, E. A. Siren, M. J. van Strien, and B. Weibel. 2017. “Integrating Ecosystem Services into Spatial Planning: A Spatial Decision Support Tool.” Landscape and Urban Planning 165: 206–219. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.003.
  • Haase, D., N. Larondelle, E. Andersson, S. B. Artmann, J. Breuste, E. Gomez-Baggethun, A. Gren, et al. 2014. “A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation.” Ambio 43 (4): 413–433. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0.
  • Ikiel, C., B. Ustaoglu, A. A. Dutucu, and D. E. Kilic. 2013. “Remote Sensing and GIS-Based Integrated Analysis of Land Cover Change in Duzce Plain and its Surroundings (North Western Turkey).” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185 (2): 1699–1709. doi:10.1007/s10661-012-2661-6.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2013. “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution Of Working Group I To The Fifth Assessment Report Of The Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change” In IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P. M. Midgley, 3–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_all_final.pdf
  • Jacobs, S., B. Burkhard, T. V. Daele, J. Staes, and A. Schneiders. 2015. “The Matrix Reloaded”: A Review of Expert Knowledge Use for Mapping Ecosystem Services.” Ecological Modelling 295: 21–30. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024.
  • Japan Satoyama Satoumi Assessment. 2010. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Socio-Ecological Production Landscapes of Japan: Summary for Decision Makers. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University.
  • Joerin, F., M. Thériault, and A. Musy. 2001. “Using GIS and Outranking Multicriteria Analysis for Land-Use Suitability Assessment.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15 (2): 153–174. doi:10.1080/13658810051030487.
  • Jorgensen, P. W., D. C. Trotter, and T. R. Hill. 2016. “Ecosystem Services Assessments in Local Municipal Decision Making in South Africa: Justification for the Use of a Business-Based Approach.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 59 (2): 263–279. doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1009626.
  • Kara, F. 2010. “Determination of Land-Use/Land-Cover Change and Urban Growth by Using Remote Sensing: A Case Study of Duzce Province in Turkey.” Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 19 (7): 1312–1319.
  • Kasperson, R., K. Dow, E. Archer van Garderen, E. Caceras, T. E. Downing, T. Elmqvist, S. Eriksen, et al. 2005. Vulnerable Peoples and Places in Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends, Chapter 6. Washington, DC: Island Press. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.275.aspx.pdf
  • Koschke, L., C. Fürst, S. Frank, and F. Makeschin. 2012. “A Multi-Criteria Approach for an Integrated Land-Cover-Based Assessment of Ecosystem Services Provision to Support Landscape Planning.” Ecological Indicators 21: 54–66. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010.
  • Liu, J., S. Li, Z. Ouyang, C. Tam, and X. Chen. 2008. “Ecological and Socioeconomic Effects of China’s Policies for Ecosystem Services.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (28): 9477–9482. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706436105.
  • Malczewski, J. 2004. “GIS-Based Land-Use Suitability Analysis: A Critical Overview.” Progress in Planning 62 (1): 3–65. doi:10.1016/S0305-9006(03)00079-5.
  • Mapa/Icona. 1983. “Paisajes Erosivos en el Sureste Español: Ensayo de Metodología Para el Estudio de su Cualificación y Cuantificación (Erosive Landscapes in the Southeast Spain: Methodology Essay for the Study of Its Qualification and Quantification).” Proyecto LUCDEME, 66. Madrid: EGRAF, SA.
  • Mapa/Icona. 1991. “Metodologia Para el Diseño de Actuaciones Agrohidrologias En Las Cuencas Del Ambito Mediterraneo (Methodology for the Design of Agro-Hydrological Actions in the Basins of the Mediterranean Area).” Proyecto LUCDEME, 1–31. Madrid: EGRAF, SA.
  • MEA. 2005. Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Mercer, D. E., D. Cooley, and K. Hamilton. 2011. Taking Stock: Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services in the United States. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service. https://www.forest-trends.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/ForestPES_Final.pdf
  • Portman, M. E. 2013. “Ecosystem Services in Practice: Challenges to Real World Implementation of Ecosystem Services across Multiple Landscapes: A Critical Review.” Applied Geography 45: 185–192. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.011.
  • Potschin, M. B., and R. H. Haines-Young. 2011. “Ecosystem Services: Exploring.” A Geographical Perspective. Progress in Physical Geography 35 (5): 575–594. doi:10.1177/0309133311423172.
  • Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, A. Persson, F. S. Chapin III, E. Lambin, T. M. Lenton, et al. 2009. “Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Ecology and Society 14 (2): 32. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/
  • Ronchi, S. 2018. Ecosystem Services for Spatial Planning: Innovative Approaches and Challenges for Practical Approaches. Basel, Switzerland: Green Energy and Technology, Springer.
  • Sahin, S. 1996. “Dikmen Vadisi peyzaj potansiyelinin saptanmasi ve degerlendirmesi üzerine bir arastirma [A Research on Determining and Evaluating the Landscape Potential of Dikmen Valley].” PhD diss., Ankara University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Sahin, S., and E. Kurum. 2002. “Erosion Risk Analysis by GIS in Environmental Impact Assessments: A Case Study - Seyhan Köprü Dam Construction.” Journal of Environmental Management 66 (3): 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2002.0574.
  • Sahin, S., H. Percin, E. Kurum, O. Uzun, and B. C. Bilgili. 2014. National Technical Guideline for Landscape Character Analysis and Assessment at the Regional and Sub-Regional (Provincial) Levels. Ankara: Rebuplic of Turkey. http://acikarsiv.ankara.edu.tr/browse/27272/Landscape_Character_Analysis_and_Assessment_at_the_Regional_and_Sub-Regional_Levels.pdf
  • Schröter, M., C. Albert, A. Marques, W. Tobon, S. Lavorel, J. Maes, C. Brown, S. Klotz, and A. Bonn. 2016. “National Ecosystem Assessment in Europe: A Review.” BioScience 66 (10): 813–828. doi:10.1093/biosci/biw101.
  • Speziale, L., and D. Geneletti. 2014. “Applying an Ecosystem Services Approach to Support Land-Use Planning: A Case Study in Koboko District, Uganda.” Ecological Processes 3 (10): 1–13.
  • StatSoft Inc. 2013. Electronic Statistics Textbook. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft. http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/
  • Sugden, A. M. 2016. “China’s National Ecosystem Assessment.” Science 352 (6292): 1421–1423. doi:10.1126/science.352.6292.1421-l.
  • TEEB. 2011. TEEB: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. TEEB Manual for Cities: Ecosystem Services in Urban Management. http://www.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Additional%20Reports/Manual%20for%20Cities/TEEB%20Manual%20for%20Cities_English.pdf
  • Tezer, A., Z. Turkay, O. Uzun, F. Terzi, P. Koylu, E. Karacor, N. Okay, and M. Kaya. 2018. “Ecosystem Services-Based Multi-Criteria Assessment for Ecologically Sensitive Watershed Management.” Environment, Development and Sustainability. doi:10.1007/s10668-018-00300-5.
  • UK National Ecosystem Assessment. 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
  • Uzun, O., and P. Gultekin. 2011. “Process Analysis in Landscape Planning: The Example of Sakarya/Kocaeli, Turkey.” Scientific Research and Essays 6 (2): 313–331. doi:10.5897/SRE10.716.
  • Uzun, O., F. Dilek, G. Cetinkaya, R. Erduran, and S. Aciksöz. 2012. Peyzaj Planlama Konya Ili Bozkir-Seydisehir-Ahirli-Yalihüyük Ilceleri ve Sugla Golü Mevkii Peyzaj Yönetimi Koruma ve Planlama Projesi (Landscape Management, Protection and Planning Project for Konya Province, Bozkir-Seydisehir-Ahirli-Yalihüyük Districts and Sugla Lake). Ankara, Turkey: Nature Conservation Office of the General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks, Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
  • Uzun, O., H. Müderrisoglu, Z. Demir, L. G. Kara, P. Gültekin, and S. Gündüz. 2015. Yesilirmak Basin Landscape atlas on Behalf of Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs, Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks. Ankara, Turkey: AKS Planning and Engineering Limited Company.
  • Wong, C. P., B. Jiang, A. P. Kinzig, K. L. Lee, and Z. Ouyang. 2015. “Linking Ecosystem Characteristics to Final Ecosystem Services for Public Policy.” Ecology Letters 18 (1): 108–118. doi:10.1111/ele.12389.
  • Wu, J. 2013. “Landscape Sustainability Science: Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being in Changing Landscapes.” Landscape Ecology 28 (6): 999–1023. doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9.
  • Xu, E., and H. Zhang. 2013. “Spatially-Explicit Sensitivity Analysis for Land Suitability Evaluation.” Applied Geography 45: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.08.005.

Data Sources

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.