Residents’ perceptions of green infrastructure in the contemporary residential context: a study of Kingswood, Kingston-upon-Hull, England

References

• Abass, Zainab, and Richard Tucker. 2018. “White Picket Fences and Other Features of the Suburban Physical Environment: Correlates of Neighbourhood Attachment in 3 Australian Low Density Suburbs.” Landscape and Urban Planning 170: 231–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, R., and C. Jamieson. 2014. “'Identifying Trends in Masterplanning: A Typological Classification System.” Urban Design International 19 (4): 274–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, D., C. Leishman, and C. Moore. 2009. “Why Not Build Faster? Exploring the Speed at Which British House-Builders Develop New Homes for Owner Occupation.” Town Planning Review 80 (3): 291–314.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrey, C. 2016. “Urban Greenspace, Physical Activity and Wellbeing: The Moderating Role of Perceptions of Neighbourhood Affability and Incivility.” Land Use Policy 57: 638–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amdur, L., and M. Epstein-Pliouchtch. 2009. “Architects’ Places, Users’ Places: Place Meanings at the New Central Bus Station, Tel Aviv.” Journal of Urban Design 14 (2): 147–161.
   Google Scholar
• Arnberger, A., and R. Eder. 2012. “The Influence of Green Space on Community Attachment of Urban and Suburban Residents.” Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 11 (1): 41–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, G. 2014. Green Infrastructure for Landscape Planning: Integrating Human and Natural Systems. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baptiste, A. 2014. “Experience is a Great Teacher: Citizen's Reception of a Proposal for the Implementation of Green Infrastructure as Stormwater Management Technology.” Community Development 45 (4): 337–352.
   Google Scholar
• Baptiste, A., C. Foly, and R. Smardon. 2015. “Understanding Urban Neighbourhood Differences in Willingness to Implement Green Infrastructure Measures: A Case Study of Syracuse, NY.” Landscape and Urban Planning 36: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, Christine, and Katrin Rehdanz. 2015. “The Role of Urban Greenspace for Wellbeing.” Ecological Economics 120: 139–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M. 2007. Introduction to Residential Layout. Amsterdam and London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Botzat, A., L. Fischer, and I. Kowarik. 2016. “Unexploited Opportunities in Understanding Liveable and Biodiverse Cities: A Review on Urban Biodiversity Perception and Value.” Global Environmental Change 39: 220–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchel, S., and Frantzeskaki, N. 2015. “Citizens’ Voice: A Case Study about Perceived Ecosystems Services by Urban Park Users in Rotterdam, The Netherlands.” Ecosystem Services 12: 169–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. K., E. S. Svendsen, N. F. Sonti, and M. L. Johnson. 2016. “A Social Assessement of Urban Parkland: Analyzing Park Use and Meaning to Inform Management and Resilience Planning.” Environmental Science and Policy 62: 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2001. Housing Design Quality: Through Policy, Guidance and Review. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and V. Braun. 2017. “Thematic Analysis.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 12 (3): 297–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolen, H., and J. Meesters. 2012. “Private and Public Green Spaces: Meaningful But Different Settings.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 27 (1): 49–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, M. P. 2010. “Gods Golden Acre for Children’: Pastoralism and Sense of Place in New Suburban Communities.” Urban Studies 47 (12): 2537–2554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutts, C., and M. Hahn. 2015. “Green Infrastructure, Ecosystems Services and Human Health.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12 (8): 9768–9798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuzere, M., K. Orru, O. Heidrich, E. Olazabal, D. Geneletti, H. Orru, A. G. Bhave, N. Mittal, E. Feliu, and M. Faehnle. 2014. “Mitigating and Adapting to Climate Change: Multi-Functional and Multi-Scale Assessment of Green Urban Infrastructure.” Journal of Environmental Management 146: 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derkzen, M., A. van Teeffelen, and P. Verburg. 2017. “Green Infrastructure for Urban Climate Adaptation: How Do Residents’ Views on Climate Impacts and Green Infrastructure Shape Adaptation Preferences?” Landscape and Urban Planning 157: 106–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. M. 1981. The Design of Suburbia: A Critical Study in Environmental History. London: Pembridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Green Infrastructure (GI) Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital.” Accessed April 4, 2018. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri¼COM:2013:0249:FIN:EN:PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Faehnle, M., P. Bäcklund, L. Tyrväinen, J. Niemelä, and V. Yli-Pelkonen. 2014. “How Can Resident’s Experiences Inform Planning or Urban Green Infrastructure? Case Finland.” Landscape and Urban Planning 130: 171–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feilzer, M. Y. 2015. “Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmatically: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4 (1): 6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2014. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Edition 5. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvberg, B. 2004. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” In Qualitative Research Practice, edited by C. Seale, 219–245. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, R., N. Frantzeskaki, T. McPhearson, E. Rall, N. Kabisch, A. Kaczorowska, J-H. Kain, M. Artmann, and S. Pauleit. 2015. “The Uptake of the Ecosystems Services Concept in Planning Discourses of European and American Cities.” Ecosystems Services 12: 228–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, R., A. Olafsson, A. P. N. van Der Jagt, E. Rall, and S. Pauleit. 2019. “Planning Multifunctional Green Infrastructure for Compact Cities: What is the State of Practice?” Ecological Indicators 96: 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, R., and S. Pauleit. 2014. “From Multi-Functionality to Multiple Ecosystem Services? A Conceptual Framework for Multi-Functionality in Green Infrastructure Planning for Urban Areas.” AMBIO 43 (4): 516–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2010. Making Better Places: The Planning Project in the Twenty-First Century. Basinstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hebbert, M. 2008. “Re-Enclosure of the Urban Picturesque: Green-Space Transformations in Postmodern Urbanism.” Town Planning Review 79 (1): 31–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M., J. Westermann, I. Kowarik, and E. van der Meer. 2012. “Perception of Urban Parks and Derelict Land by Planners and Residents.” Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 11 (3): 303–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull City Council. 2016. Kingswood Area Action Plan. Hull: Hull City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Ives, C., C. Oke, A. Hehir, A. Gordon, Y. Wang, and S. Bekessy. 2017. “Capturing Residents’ Values for Urban Greenspace: Mapping, Analysis and Guidance for Practice.” Landscape and Urban Planning 161: 32–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H., and A. Bonnett. 2013. “Progressive Nostalgia in Novel Living Arrangements: A Counterpoint to Neo-Traditional New Urbanism?” Urban Studies 50 (11): 2349–2370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C., C. Leishman, and C. MacDonald. 2009. “Sustainable Urban Form and Residential Development Viability.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (7): 1667–1690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasemets, K., A. Rammo, and H. Palang. 2019. “Turning Landscape into a Suburban Community and the Realization of a Sense of Place.” Cities 88: 37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., and M. Scott. 2014. “Delivering Ecosystems Services via Spatial Planning: Reviewing the Possibilities and Implications of a Green Infrastructure Approach.” Town Planning Review 85 (5): 563–587.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., O. Douglas, and M. Scott. 2017. “Urban Green Space for Health and Well-Being: Developing an ‘Affordances’ Framework for Planning and Design.” Journal of Urban Design 22 (6): 778–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholst, A. C., O. H. Caspersen, and C. C. K. van Den Bosch. 2015. “Methods for Mapping Recreational and Social Values in Urban Green Spaces in the Nordic Countries and Their Merits for Urban Planning.” Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 12: 71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Llausàs, A., and M. Roe. 2012. “Green Infrastructure Planning: Cross-National Analysis Between the North East of England (UK) and Catalonia (Spain).” European Planning Studies 20 (4): 641–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewelyn-Davies. 2000. Urban Design Compendium 1. London: English Partnerships and Housing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, T., A. Lo, and J. Byrne. 2015. “Reconceptualising Green Infrastructure for Climate Change Adaptation: Barriers to Adoption and Drivers for Uptake by Spatial Planners.” Landscape and Urban Planning 138: 155–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, S., and L. Karsten. 2012. “Living in Commodified History: Constructing Class Identities in Neo-Traditional Neighbourhoods.” Social and Cultural Geography 13 (5): 517–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell, I. 2013. “Can You Tell a Green Field from a Cold Steel Rail? Examining the ‘Green’ of Green Infrastructure Development.” Local Environment 18 (2): 152–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell, I., S. Allin, M. Reimer, and J. Wilker. 2017. “Strategic Green Infrastructure Planning in Germany and the UK: A Transnational Evaluation of the Evolution of Urban Greening Policy and Practice.” International Planning Studies 22 (4): 333–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington, DC. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Framework.html
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. 2019. National Design Guidance. London: UK Government.
   Google Scholar
• National Planning Policy Framework [NPPF]. 2019. Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2.
   Google Scholar
• Natural England. 2008. Green Infrastructure Guidance. http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/35033.
   Google Scholar
• Nohl, W. 2001. “Sustainable Landscape Use and Aesthetic Perception: Preliminary Reflections on Future Landscape Aesthetics.” Landscape and Urban Planning 54 (1–4): 223–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutsford, D., A. Pearson, and S. Kingham. 2013. “An Ecological Study Investigating the Association Between Access to Urban Green Space and Mental Health.” Public Health 127 (11): 1005–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldrup, H. 2015. “Differential Belongings: Socio-Cultural Distinctions in Suburban Residential Areas.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 30 (3): 383–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozguner, H., and A. Kendle. 2006. “Public Attitudes Towards Naturalistic versus Designed Landscapes in the City of Sheffield (UK).” Landscape and Urban Planning 74 (2): 139–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, S. 2013. “Pioneers, Pragmatists Ad Sceptics: Speculative Housebuilders and Brownfield Development in the Early Twenty-First Century.” Town Planning Review 84 (1): 37–62.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health England. 2017. Spatial Planning for Health: An Evidence Resource for Planning and Designing Healthier Places. London: Public Health England, p. 64. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/625568/Spatial_planning_for_health_an_evidence_resource.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rapport, E., and A. Hult. 2017. “The Travelling Business of Sustainable Urbanism: International Consultants as Norm Setter.” Environment and Planning A 49 (8): 1779–1796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. 2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rishbeth, C. 2014. “Articulating Transnational Attachments Through On-Site Narratives.” In Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications, edited by L. C. Manzo and P. Devine-Wright, 100–111. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S., and V. Colic Peisker. 2015. “Policy Narratives versus Everyday Geographies: Perceptions of Changing Local Space in Melbourne’s Diverse North.” City and Community 14 (1): 68–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, M., and I. Mell. 2013. “Negotiating Value and Priorities: Evaluating the Demands of Green Infrastructure Development.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56 (5): 650–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southon, G., A. Jorgensen, N. Dunnett, H. Hoyle, and K. Evans. 2017. “Biodiverse Perennial Meadows Have Aesthetic Value and Increase Residents Perspectives of Quality in Urban Greenspace.” Landscape and Urban Planning 158: 105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suppakittpaisarn, P., J. Xiangrong, and W. Sullivan. 2017. “Green Infrastructure, Green Storm Water Infrastructure and Human Health: A Review.” Current Landscape Ecology Reports 2 (4): 96–110.
   Google Scholar
• TCPA (Town and Country Planning Association). 2004. Biodiversity by Design: A Guide for Sustainable Communities. London: Town and Country Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2018. World of Urbanisation Prospects: The 2018 Revision Highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Accessed August 14, 2018. https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and E. Banzhaf. 2018. “Towards a Better Understanding of Green Infrastructure: A Critical Review.” Ecological Indicators 85: 758–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M., L. Elliott, B. B. Wheeler, and L. Fleming. 2018. “Neighbourhood Greenspace is Related to Physical Activity in England But Only for Dog Owners.” Landscape and Urban Planning 174: 18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. 2011. “Understanding Green Infrastructure: The Development of a Contested Concept in England.” Local Environment 16 (10): 1003–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., and S. Lin. 2011. “Affective Appraisal of Residents and Visual Elements in the Neighbourhood: A Case Study in an Established Suburban Community.” Landscape and Urban Planning 101 (1): 11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlender, V., and W. Thompson. 2017. “Accessibility and Use of Peri-Urban Greenspace for Inner-City Dwellers: A Comparative Study.” Landscape and Urban Planning 165: 193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar