From non-place to place in post-suburbia: city-edge office parks as loci for nature-based micro-interventions

References

• Augé, M. 2008. Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Better Buildings Partnership. 2019. “LaSalle’s Bourne Business Park Boosts Biodiversity and Wellbeing.” Accessed June 3, 2020. https://www.betterbuildingspartnership.co.uk/lasalle%E2%80%99s-bourne-business-park-boosts-biodiversity-and-wellbeing
   Google Scholar
• Blomberg, J., and H. Karasti. 2012. “Ethnography: Positioning Ethnography Within Participatory Design Projects.”. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 86–116. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bontje, M. 2004. “Sustainable New Economic Centres in European Metropolitan Regions: A Stakeholders’ Perspective.” European Planning Studies 12 (5): 703–722. doi:10.1080/0965431042000220039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontje, M., and J. Burdack. 2005. “Edge Cities, European-Style: Examples from Paris and the Randstad.” Cities 22 (4): 317–330. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2005.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting, M. 2004. Willing Slaves: How the Overwork Culture is Ruling Our Lives. London: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Burdack, J. 2001. “Die Städtische Peripherie Zwischen ‘Suburbanen’ Und ‘Postsuburbanen’ Entwicklungen.” Berichte Zur Deutschen Landeskunde 75: 188–196.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan Architects. (2019). “ Sustainable Retrofit.” Accessed June 3, 2020. https://cowan-architects.co.uk/commercial-developers/sustainable-retrofit/
   Google Scholar
• Dale, K., and G. Burrell. 2002. “An-Aesthetics and Architecture.” TAMARA: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science 2 (1): 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Daskalaki, M., and O. Mould. 2013. “Beyond Urban Subcultures: Urban Subversions as Rhizomatic Social Formations.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01198.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daskalaki, M., A. Stara, and M. Imas. 2008. “The ‘Parkour Organisation’: Inhabitation of Corporate Spaces.” Culture and Organization 14 (1): 49–64. doi:10.1080/14759550701659029.
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., and K. Polakit. 2009. “Urban Slippage: Smooth and Striated Streetscapes in Bangkok.” In Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban Life, edited by K. A. Franck and Q. Stevens, 167–184. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunham-Jones, E., and J. Williamson. 2009. Retrofitting Suburbia: Urban Design Solutions for Redesigning Suburbs. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Eames, M., T. Dixon, S. C. Lannon., M. Hunt, C. De Laurentis, S. Marvin, M. Hodson, P. Guthrie, and M. C. Georgiadou. 2014. Retrofit 2050: Critical Challenges for Urban Transitions. Report. Cardiff, UK: Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Farrar, M. E. 2011. “Amnesia, Nostalgia, and the Politics of Place Memory.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 723–735. doi:10.1177/1065912910373553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatignon-Turnau, A. L., and K. Mignonac. 2015. “Mis)Using Employee Volunteering for Public Relations: Implications for Corporate Volunteers’ Organizational Commitment.” Journal of Business Research 68 (1): 7–18. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaver, B., T. Dunne, and E. Pacenti. 1999. “Design: Cultural Probes.” interactions 6 (1): 21–29. doi:10.1145/291224.291235.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, J., and L. Boffi. 2016. “Design Interventions as a Form of Inquiry.” In Design Anthropological Futures, edited by R. Smith, K. Vangkilde, and M. Kjaersgaard, 89–103. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2018. A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment. Report. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. 1997. The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D. 2005. “Introduction.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, edited by D. Howes, 1–19. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Jones Lang LaSalle. 2014. The New Geography of Office Demand 2: Business Parks: Rising to the Challenge. Report. London: JLL.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. 1993. “The Role of Nature in the Context of the Workplace.” Landscape and Urban Planning 26 (1–4): 193–201. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(93)90016-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. 2007. “Employees’ Reactions to Nearby Nature at Their Workplace: The Wild and the Tame.” Landscape and Urban Planning 82 (1–2): 17–24. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten, M., and H. Usbeck. 2001. “Gewerbesuburbanisierung: die tertiarisierung der suburbanen standorte.” In Suburbanisierung in Deutschland, edited by K. Brake, J. S. Dangschat, and G. Herfert, 71–80. Opladen: Leske Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Lenskjold, T. U., S. Olander, and J. Halse. 2015. “Minor Design Activism: Prompting Change from Within.” Design Issues 31 (4): 67–78. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loder, A. 2014. “There’s a Meadow Outside my Workplace’: A Phenomenological Exploration of Aesthetics and Green Roofs in Chicago and Toronto.” Landscape and Urban Planning 126: 94–106. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lottrup, Lene, Ulrika K. Stigsdotter, Henrik Meilby, and Anne Grete Claudi. 2015. “The Workplace Window View: A Determinant of Office Workers’ Work Ability and Job Satisfaction.” Landscape Research 40 (1): 57–19. doi:10.1080/01426397.2013.829806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozingo, L. A. 2011. Pastoral Capitalism: A History of Suburban Corporate Landscapes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, E. H., and K. Simonsen. 2003. “Scaling from ‘Below’: Practices, Strategies and Urban Spaces.” European Planning Studies 11 (8): 911–927. doi:10.1080/0965431032000146123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongreening. 2015. “Sustainable Building Retrofit Awarded LEED Platinum in Italy.” Accessed June 3, 2020. https://ongreening.com/en/News/sustainable-building-retrofit-awarded-leed-platinum-italy-1219
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, D. D. 1997. “Community Building and the Necessity for Radical Revision.” Landscape and Urban Planning 39 (2–3): 83–98. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00043-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, D. D., and K. Connery. 1997. “Reconfiguring the Edge City: The Use of Ecological Design Parameters in Defining the Form of Community.” Landscape and Urban Planning 36 (4): 327–346. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00363-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., and C. Silva. 2018. “Mind the Gaps! A Research Agenda for Urban Interstices.” Urban Studies 55 (6): 1203–1222. doi:10.1177/0042098017732714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., and A. M. Wood. 2011. “The New Post-Suburban Politics?” Urban Studies 48 (12): 2591–2610. doi:10.1177/0042098011411944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., A. M. Wood, and D. C. Valler. 2010. “A Postsuburban World? An Outline of a Research Agenda.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42 (2): 366–382. doi:10.1068/a427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2009. Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., and J. Morgan. 2013. “Short‐Term Ethnography: Intense Routes to Knowing.” Symbolic Interaction 36 (3): 351–361. doi:10.1002/symb.66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 2003. “Citizenship and the Right to the Global City: Reimagining the Capitalist World Order.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (3): 564–590. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relph, E. 1976. Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Schrijver, L. 2011. “Utopia and/or Spectacle? Rethinking Urban Interventions Through the Legacy of Modernism and the Situationist City.” Architectural Theory Review 16 (3): 245–258. doi:10.1080/13264826.2011.621545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieverts, T. 2003. Cities without Cities: An Interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skärbäck, E. 2007. “COMMENTARY: Landscape Planning to Promote Well Being: Studies and Examples from Sweden.” Environmental Practice 9 (3): 206–217. doi:10.1017/S1466046607070299.
   Google Scholar
• Snep, R., E. Van Ierland, and P. Opdam. 2009. “Enhancing Biodiversity at Business Sites: What Are the Options, and Which of These Do Stakeholders Prefer?” Landscape and Urban Planning 91 (1): 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudjic, D. 1993. The 100 Mile City. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Tardiveau, A., and D. Mallo. 2014. “Unpacking and Challenging Habitus: An Approach to Temporary Urbanism as a Socially Engaged Practice.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (4): 456–472. doi:10.1080/13574809.2014.923743.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenfeld, A. E., S. Shefkind, and N. Hock. 2019. “Measuring Emotional Response to a Planting Activity for Staff at an Urban Office Setting: A Pilot Study.” Open Journal of Occupational Therapy 7 (2). doi:10.15453/2168-6408.1532.
   Google Scholar