Constructing forest owner identities and governing decisions and relationships: the owner as distant consumer in Swedish forestry

References

• Agrawal, A. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, E., E. C. H. Keskitalo, and A. Lawrence. 2017. “Adaptation to Climate Change in Forestry: A Perspective on Forest Ownership and Adaptation Responses.” Forests 8 (12): 493–511. doi:10.3390/f8120493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, E., and E.C.H. Keskitalo. 2018. “Adaptation to Climate Change? Why Business-as-Usual Remains the Logical Choice in Swedish Forestry.” Global Environmental Change 48 (1): 76–85. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.004.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, E., and E.C.H. Keskitalo. 2019. “Service Logics and Strategies of Swedish Forestry in the Structural Shifts of Forest Ownership: Challenging the ‘Old’ and Shaping the ‘New’.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 34 (6): 508–520. doi:10.1080/02827581.2019.1604990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, E., and G. Lidestav. 2016. “Creating Alternative Spaces and Articulating Needs: Challenging Gendered Notions of Forestry and Forest Ownership through Women’s Networks.” Forest Policy and Economics 67 (1): 38–44. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.014.
   Google Scholar
• Appelstrand, M. 2007. Miljömålet i Skogsbruket: Styrning Och Frivillighet [The Environmental Goal of Swedish Forest Policy: Regulation and Voluntariness]. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Appelstrand, M. 2012. “Developments in Swedish Forest Policy and Administration: From a ‘Policy of Restriction’ toward a ‘Policy of Cooperation’.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 27 (2): 186–199. doi:10.1080/02827581.2011.635069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson, A.-L., and L. Östlund. 2001. “Retrospective Gap Analysis in a Swedish Boreal Forest Landscape Using Historical Data.” Forest Ecology and Management 147 (2–3): 109–122. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00470-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, A. 2003. “The Nature of the Boreal Forest: Governmentality and Forest-Nature.” Space and Culture 6 (4): 415–428. doi:10.1177/1206331203253189.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, C., G. Lidestav, and S. Holm. 2006. “Values Placed on Forest Property Benefits by Swedish NIPF Owners: Differences between Members in Forest Owner Associations and Non-Members.” Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy 5 (1): 83–96. doi:10.1007/s11842-006-0005-5.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., and P. Pattberg. 2008. “Global Environmental Governance: Taking Stock, Moving Forward.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33 (1): 277–294. doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.33.050707.085733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjärstig, T., and A. Sténs. 2018. “Social Values of Forests and Production of New Goods and Services: The Views of Swedish Family Forest Owners.” Small-Scale Forestry 17 (1): 125–146. doi:10.1007/s11842-017-9379-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkesjø, T.F., and S. Baardsen. 2002. “Roundwood Supply in Norway: Micro-Level Analysis of Self-Employed Forest Owners.” Forest Policy and Economics 4 (1): 55–64. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00081-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashore, B., G. Auld, and D. Newsom. 2004. Governing through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2008. “Neoliberalising Nature: The Logics of Deregulation and Reregulation.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (1): 131–152. doi:10.1068/a3999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2010. “Neoliberalism and the Biophysical Environment 1: What ‘Neoliberalism’ is, and What Difference Nature Makes to It.” Geography Compass 4 (12): 1725–1733. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00405.x.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M.C., G. S. Amacher, J. Sullivan, and D. Wear. 2003. “Decisions Nonindustrial Forest Landowners Make: An Empirical Examination.” Journal of Forest Economics 9 (3): 181–203. doi:10.1078/1104-6899-00034.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, K., and A. Demo. 2001. “Imagining Nature and Erasing Class and Race: Carleton Watkins, John Muir, and the Construction of Wilderness.” Environmental History 6 (4): 541–560. doi:10.2307/3985254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, J. 1998. “Marketing and Moral Indifference.” In: Ethics and Organizations, edited by M. Parker, 173–196. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez, G., and M. Shannon. 2011. “A Wish, a Fear and a Complaint: Understanding the (Dis)Engagement of Forest Owners in Forest Management.” European Journal of Forest Research 130 (3): 435–450. doi:10.1007/s10342-009-0332-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Gay, P. 1995. Consumption and Identity at Work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Favada, I. M., H. Karppinen, J. Kuuluvainen, J. Mikkola, and C. Stavness. 2009. “Effects of Timber Prices, Ownership Objectives, and Owner Characteristics on Timber Supply.” Forest Science 55 (6): 512–523. doi:10.1093/forestscience/55.6.512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficko, A., G. Lidestav, Á. Ní Dhubháin, H. Karppinen, I. Zivojinovic, and K. Westin. 2019. “European Private Forest Owner Typologies: A Review of Methods and Use.” Forest Policy and Economics 99 (2): 21–31. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. 2017. “Environmentality Unbound: Multiple Governmentalities in Environmental Politics.” Geoforum 85: 311–315. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follo, G., M. Forbord, R. Almås, A. Blekesaune, J. F. Rye. 2006. Den Nye Skogeieren. Hvordan Øke Hogsten i Trøndelag. Rapport 1/06. Trondheim: Norsk senter for bygdeforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Follo, G., G. Lidestav, A. Ludvig, L. Vilkriste, T. Hujala, H. Karppinen, F. Didolot, et al. 2017. “Gender in European Forest Ownership and Management: Reflections on Women as “New Forest Owners.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 32 (2): 174–184. doi:10.1080/02827581.2016.1195866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forest-Europe. 2015. State of Europe's Forests. Madrid: FAO & EFI.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry 8 (4): 777–795. doi:10.1086/448181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L. H. 2010. Transnational Environmental Governance: The Emergence and Effects of the Certification of Forests and Fisheries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, E., J. Seppala, and H. Juslin. 2002. “Marketing Strategies of Softwood Sawmills in Western.” North America. Forest Products Journal 52 (10): 19–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugen, K., S. Karlsson, and K. Westin. 2016. “New Forest Owners: Change and Continuity in the Characteristics of Swedish Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners (NIPF Owners) 1990–2010.” Small-Scale Forestry 15 (4): 533–550. doi:10.1007/s11842-016-9338-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hokajärvi, R., T. Hujala, L. Leskinen, and J. Tikkanen. 2009. “Effectiveness of Sermon Policy Instruments: Forest Management Planning Practices Applying the Activity Theory Approach.” Silva Fennica 43 (5): 889–906. doi:10.14214/sf.178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren, S. 2015. Governing Forests in a Changing Climate: Exploring Patterns of Thought at the Climate Change-Forest Policy Intersection. Uppsala: Department of Forest Products, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2001. “Types of Multi-Level Governance.” European Integration Online Paper 5 (11): 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hudgson, D. 2001. Empowering Customers through Education’ or Governing without Government? Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hujala, T., M. Kurttila, and H. Karppinen. 2013. “Customer Segments among Family Forest Owners: Combining Ownership Objectives and Decision-Making Styles.” Small-Scale Forestry 12 (3): 335–351. doi:10.1007/s11842-012-9215-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hujala, T., and J. Tikkanen. 2008. “Boosters of and Barriers to Smooth Communication in Family Forest Owners’ Decision Making.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 23 (5): 466–477. doi:10.1080/02827580802334209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häyrinen, L., O. Mattila, S. Berghäll, and A. Toppinen. 2015. “Forest Owners’ Socio-Demographic Characteristics as Predictors of Customer Value: Evidence from Finland.” Small-Scale Forestry 14 (1): 19–37. doi:10.1007/s11842-014-9271-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, J. 2013. Constructing and Contesting the Legitimacy of Private Forest Governance: The Case of Forest Certification in Sweden. Umeå: Department of Political Science, Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, E. C. H. 2017. Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use: Natural Resource Management in Transition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, E. C. H., and M. Pettersson. 2012. “Implementing Multi-Level Governance? The Legal Basis and Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive for Forestry in Sweden.” Environmental Policy and Governance 22 (2): 90–103. doi:10.1002/eet.1574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinschmit, D., B. H. Lindstad, B. J. Thorsen, A. Toppinen, A. Roos, and S. Baardsen. 2014. “Shades of Green: A Social Scientific View on Bioeconomy in the Forest Sector.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29 (4): 402–410. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.921722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knights, D., and A. Sturdy. 1997. “Marketing the Soul: From the Ideology of Consumption to Consumer Subjectivity.” In Financial Institutions and Social Transformations: International Studies of a Sector, edited by D. Knights, and T. Tinker,158–188. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Knights, D., A. Sturdy, and G. Morgan. 1994. “The Consumer Rules?” European Journal of Marketing 28 (3): 42–54. doi:10.1108/03090569410057281.
   Google Scholar
• Krott, M. 2005. Forest Policy Analysis. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen, J., and J. Salo. 1991. “Timber Supply and Life Cycle Harvest of Nonindustrial Private Forest Owners: An Empirical Analysis of the Finnish Case.” Forest Science 37 (4): 1011–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A., UNECE/FAO. 2020. “Overview.” In: Who Owns Our Forests? Forest Ownership in the ECE Region, 1–17. Geneva: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A., P. Deuffic, T. Hujala, L. Nichiforel, D. Feliciano, K. Jodlowski, T. Lind, et al. 2020. “Extension, Advice and Knowledge Systems for Private Forestry: Understanding Diversity and Change across Europe.” Land Use Policy 94: 104522. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidestav, G., and A.-M. Arvidsson. 2012. “Member, Owner, Customer, Supplier? The Question of Perspective on Membership and Ownership in a Private Forest Owner Cooperative.” In Global Perspectives on Sustainable Forest Management, edited by Dr. C. A. Okia, 75–94. Rijeka, Croatia: INTECH Open Access Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Lidestav, G., and S. Berg Lejon. 2013. “Harvesting and Silvicultural Activities in Swedish Family Forestry: Behavior Changes from a Gender Perspective.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 28 (2): 136–142. doi:10.1080/02827581.2012.701324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidestav, G., and T. Nordfjell. 2005. “A Conceptual Model for Understanding Social Practices in Family Forestry.” Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy 4 (4): 391–408. doi:10.1007/s11842-005-0024-7.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and D. Sjödin. 2014. “Why Do Forest Owners Fail to Heed Warnings? Conflicting Risk Evaluations Made by the Swedish Forest Agency and Forest Owners.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29 (3): 1–282. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.910268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and D. Sjödin. 2016. “Risk Governance through Professional Expertise: Forestry Consultants’ Handling of Uncertainties after a Storm Disaster.” Journal of Risk Research 19 (10): 1275–1286. doi:10.1080/13669877.2015.1043570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind-Riehl, J., S. Jeltema, M. Morrison, G. Shirkey, A. L. Mayer, M. Rouleau, R. Winkler, et al. 2015. “Family Legacies and Community Networks Shape Private Forest Management in the Western Upper Peninsula of Michigan (USA).” Land Use Policy 45: 95–102. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindkvist, A., E. Mineur, A. Nordlund, C. Nordlund, O. Olsson, C. Sandström, K. Westin., et al. 2012. “Attitudes on Intensive Forestry. An Investigation into Perceptions of Increased Production Requirements in Swedish Forestry.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 27 (5): 438–448. doi:10.1080/02827581.2011.645867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockie, S. 2013. “Market Instruments, Ecosystem Services, and Property Rights: Assumptions and Conditions for Sustained Social and Ecological Benefits.” Land Use Policy 31: 90–98. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodin, I., V. Brukas, and I. Wallin. 2017. “Spruce or Not? Contextual and Attitudinal Drivers Behind the Choice of Tree Species in Southern Sweden.” Forest Policy and Economics 83 (10): 191–198. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.11.010.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, M., and A. Matilainen. 2014. “Born to Be a Forest Owner? An Empirical Study of the Aspects of Psychological Ownership in the Context of Inherited Forests in Finland.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29 (2): 101–110. doi:10.1080/02827581.2013.869348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfmarck, E., Y. Uggla, and R. Lidskog. 2017. “Freedom with What? Interpretations of ‘Responsibility’ in Swedish Forestry Practice.” Forest Policy and Economics 75: 34–40. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, T. 1999. “Rural Futures: The Consumption Countryside and Its Regulation.” Sociologia Ruralis 39 (4): 501–526. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mårald, E., and E. Westholm. 2016. “Changing Approaches to the Future in Swedish Forestry, 1850–2010.” Nature and Culture 11 (1): 1–21. doi:10.3167/nc.2016.110101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, O., and A. Roos. 2014. “Service Logics of Providers in the Forestry Services Sector: Evidence from Finland and Sweden.” Forest Policy and Economics 43 (6): 10–17. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, C. L., B. Cashore, and P. Kanowski. 2010. Global Environmental Forest Policies: An International Comparison. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, J., J. Herbohn, and N. Emtage. 2013. “Supporting Cooperative Forest Management among Small-Acreage Lifestyle Landowners in Southeast Queensland.” Society & Natural Resources 26 (7): 745–761. doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.719586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. 1992. “Accounting and Objectivity: The Invention of Calculating Selves and Calculable Spaces.” Annals of Scholarship 9 (1/2): 61–86.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G., and A. Sturdy. 2000. Beyond Organizational Change: Structure, Discourse, and Power in UK Financial Services. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mori, A. S., K. P. Lertzman, and L. Gustafsson. 2017. “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Forest Ecosystems: A Research Agenda for Applied Forest Ecology.” Journal of Applied Ecology 54 (1): 12–27. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, I. A., S. A. Barlow, D. L. Evans, and D. Cleaves. 2002. “Urbanization’s Impact on Timber Harvesting in the South Central United States.” Journal of Environmental Management 64 (1): 65–76. doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichiforel, L., K. Keary, P. Deuffic, G. Weiss, B. J. Thorsen, G. Winkel, M. Avdibegović, et al. 2018. “How Private Are Europe’s Private Forests? A Comparative Property Rights Analysis.” Land Use Policy 76: 535–552. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlund, A., and K. Westin. 2010. “Forest Values and Forest Management Attitudes among Private Forest Owners in Sweden.” Forests 2 (1): 30–50. doi:10.3390/f2010030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattberg, P. 2005. “What Role for Private Rule-Making in Global Environmental Governance? Analysing the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC).” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 5 (2): 175–189. doi:10.1007/s10784-005-0951-y.
   Google Scholar
• Pattberg, P., and J. Stripple. 2008. “Beyond the Public and Private Divide: Remapping Transnational Climate Governance in the 21st Century.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 8 (4): 367–388. doi:10.1007/s10784-008-9085-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rametsteiner, E., and M. Simula. 2003. “Forest Certification: An Instrument to Promote Sustainable Forest Management?”Journal of Environmental Management 67 (1): 87–98. doi:10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00191-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. 2001. Explorations in the Sociology of Consumption: Fast Food, Credit Cards and Casinos. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., and P. Miller. 1992. “Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government.” The British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 173–205. doi:10.2307/591464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, O., M. Brunson, and M. Kuhns. 2006. “Benefit-Based Audience Segmentation: A Tool for Identifying Nonindustrial Private Forest (NIPF) Owner Education Needs.” Journal of Forestry 104 (8): 419–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmithüsen, F., and F. Hirsch. 2010. Private Forest Ownership in Europe. Geneva Timber and Forest Study Papers 26. United Nations: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2014. “Skogsstatistisk Årsbok.” Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• SFIF. 2017. Swedish Forest Industries Federation: Ekonomi [Economy]. Accessed August 1, 2017. http://www.skogsindustrierna.org/branschen_1/fakta/ekonomi.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, K. G., T. K. Marsden, and P. Milbourne. 2005. “Governance, Rurality, and Nature: Exploring Emerging Discourses of State Forestry in Britain.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23 (5): 679–695. doi:10.1068/c43m.
   Google Scholar
• Stoettner, E. M., and Á. Ní Dhubháin. 2019. “The Social Networks of Irish Private Forest Owners: An Exploratory Study.” Forest Policy and Economics 99: 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Størdal, S., G. Lien, and S. Baardsen. 2008. “Analyzing Determinants of Forest Owners’ Decision-Making Using a Sample Selection Framework.” Journal of Forest Economics 14 (3): 159–176. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2007.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivonen, R., E. Järvinen, K. Lindroos, A.-K. Rämö, and P. Ripatti. 2005. “The Challenge of Information Service Development for Private Forest Owners: The Estonia and Finland Cases.” Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy 4 (4): 451–469. doi:10.1007/s11842-005-0028-3.
   Google Scholar
• Törnqvist, T. 1995. Skogsrikets Arvingar: En Sociologisk Studie av Skogsägarskapet Inom Privat, Enskilt Skogsbruk [Inheritors of the Woodlands: A Sociological Study of Private, Non-Industrial Forest Ownership]. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• UNECE/FAO. 2020. Who Owns Our Forests? Forest Ownership in the ECE Region. Geneva: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vainio, A., and R. Paloniemi. 2012. “Forest Owners and Power: A Foucauldian Study on Finnish Forest Policy.” Forest Policy and Economics 21: 118–125. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, G., A. Lawrence, T. Hujala, G. Lidestav, L. Nichiforel, E. Nybakk, S. Quiroga, et al. 2019. “Forest Ownership Changes in Europe: State of Knowledge and Conceptual Foundations.” Forest Policy and Economics 99 (2): 9–20. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, G., L. Nichiforel, and UNECE/FAO. 2020. “Concepts and Definitions of Forest Ownership.” In: Who Owns Our Forests? Forest Ownership in the ECE Region, 19–29. Geneva: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Westin, K., L. Eriksson, G. Lidestav, H. Karppinen, K. Haugen, and A. Nordlund. 2017. “Individual Forest Owners in Context.”. In: Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use: Natural Resource Management in Transition, edited by E. C. H. Keskitalo, 57–95 London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Winkel, G. 2012. “Foucault in the Forests: A Review of the Use of ‘Foucauldian’ Concepts in Forest Policy Analysis.” Forest Policy and Economics 16: 81–92. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel, G., M. Blondet, L. Borrass, T. Frei, M. Geitzenauer, A. Gruppe, A. Jump, et al. 2015. “The Implementation of Natura 2000 in Forests: A Trans- and Interdisciplinary Assessment of Challenges and Choices.” Environmental Science & Policy 52: 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel, G., T. Kaphengst, S. Herbert, Z. Robaey, L. Rosenkranz, and M. Sotirov. 2009. EU Policy Options for the Protection of European Forests against Harmful Impacts. Freiburg: IFP.
   Google Scholar