Land conflict management measures in peri-urban areas: a meta-synthesis review

References

• Aalbers, C. B. E. M., and K. Eckerberg. 2011. “Governance Patterns and Performance of Regional Strategies in Peri-Urban Areas: Comparative Analysis of Seven Case Studies in Europe and China (No. D3. 3.8). Wageningen: Plurel. https://edepot.wur.nl/161013
   Google Scholar
• Abramson, D. B. 2006. “Urban Planning in China: Continuity and Change: What the Future Holds May Surprise You.” Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (2): 197–215. doi:10.1080/01944360608976739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, A. G. 2015. “Land Readjustment as an Alternative Land Development Tool for Peri-Urban Areas of Ethiopia.” Property Management 33 (1): 36–58. doi:10.1108/PM-05-2013-0034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adell, G. 1999. Theories and Models of the Peri-Urban Interface: A Changing Conceptual Landscape. London: UCL.
   Google Scholar
• Akrofi, E. O., and J. Whittal. 2011. “Traditional Governance and Customary Peri-Urban Land Delivery: A Case Study of Asokore-Mampong in Ghana.” A Paper to Be Presented at Africa in Cape Town May 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A., N. da Silva, and E. Corubolo. 1999. Environmental Problems and Opportunities of the Peri-urban Interface and Their Impact Upon the Poor. London: UCL.
   Google Scholar
• Armar-Klemesu, M., and D. Maxwell. 1999. Urban Agriculture: A Case Study of Accra. Legon: University of Ghana.
   Google Scholar
• AUC-ECA-AfDB Consortium. 2010. Framework and Guidelines on Land Policy in Africa. Land Policy in Africa: A Framework to Strengthen Land Rights, Enhance Productivity and Secure Livelihoods. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: African Union Commission (AUC), Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) and African Development Bank (AfDB) Consortium. https://www.uneca.org/sites/default/files/PublicationFiles/fg_on_land_policy_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Balta, M. O., and F. Eke. 2011. “Spatial Reflection of Urban Planning in Metropolitan Areas and Urban Rent.” European Planning Studies 19 (10): 1817–1838. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.614396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, H. S., and N. Lavery. 2010. “Can the Land Tax Help Curb Urban Sprawl? Evidence from Growth Patterns in Pennsylvania.” Journal of Urban Economics 67 (2): 169–179. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2009.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatley, T. 2000. “Land Use and Urban Form: Planning Compact Cities.” In Green Urbanism, Learning from European Cities, edted by Timothy Beatley, 491. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benfield, F. K., J. Terris, and N. Vorsanger. 2003. Solving Sprawl: Models of Smart Growth in Communities across America. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N., and Y. C. Youn. 2006. “Urban Containment Policies and the Protection of Natural Areas: The Case of Seoul's Greenbelt.” Ecology and Society 11(1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bertaud, A. 2012. “Government Intervention and Urban Land Markets: The Case of China.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 29 (4): 335–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyhan, B. 2014. “The Tools of Metropolitan Unity in Turkey: A Holistic and Historical Elaboration.” Turkish Public Administration Annual 39: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Beyhan, B.,. H. Taubenböck, S. Suffa, T. Ullmann, J. Rauh, and S. Dech. 2012. “Urban Growth and Sprawl of Mersin City, Turkey: Change Analysis Based on Earth Observation and Socio-Economic Data.” Megaron 7 (1): 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2003. “Metropolitan Institutional Reform and the Rescaling of State Space in Contemporary Western Europe.” European Urban and Regional Studies 10 (4): 297–324. doi:10.1177/09697764030104002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S. 2013. “The Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences of Sprawling Development Patterns in the United States.” Nature Education Knowledge 4 (5): 2.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H. J., R. S. Phillips, and N. A. Roberts. 1981. “Land Markets at the Urban Fringe New Insights for Policymakers.” Journal of the American Planning Association 47 (2): 131–144. doi:10.1080/01944368108977098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brueckner, J. K. 2000. “Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and Remedies.” International Regional Science Review 23 (2): 160–171. doi:10.1177/016001700761012710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, R. W., and S. Mukherji. 2003. “Conventional Development versus Managed Growth: The Costs of Sprawl.” American Journal of Public Health 93 (9): 1534–1540. doi:10.2105/ajph.93.9.1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, T., and K. Dalrymple. 2008. “A Conceptual Framework for Governance in Land Administration.” Paper presented at the FIG Working Week in Stockholm, Sweden. June 14–19. https://www.fig.net/resources/monthly_articles/2008/august_2008/burns_dalrymple_august_2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, M., G. Tieman, S. Bekessy, T. Budge, D. Mercer, M. Coote, and J. Morcombe. 2006. Change and Continuity in Peri-Urban Australia, State of the Peri-Urban Regions: A Review of the Literature Monograph 1. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University.
   Google Scholar
• Byun, P., and A. X. Esparza. 2005. “A Revisionist Model of Suburbanization and Sprawl: The Role of Political Fragmentation, Growth Control, and Spillovers.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (3): 252–264. doi:10.1177/0739456X04272252.
   Google Scholar
• Çamur, K. C., and S. B. Yenigul. 2009. “The Rural-Urban Transformation Through Urban Sprawl: Assessment of Ankara Metropolitan Area.” Paper presented at The 4th International Conference of the International Forum on Urbanism (IFoU), Delft, Netherlands, November 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, J. I. 2003. “Growth at the Fringe: The Influence of Political Fragmentation in United States Metropolitan Areas.” Papers in Regional Science 82 (4): 475–499. doi:10.1007/s10110-003-0148-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Ontario Smart Growth Panel. 2003. Shape the Future (Final Report). Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, T. 2007. “Local Governments as Policy Entrepreneurs: Evaluating Florida’s ‘Concurrency Experiment’.” Urban Affairs Review 42 (4): 505–532. doi:10.1177/1078087406295275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S. H., D. M. Lambert, R. K. Roberts, and S. G. Kim. 2010. “Demand for Open Space and Urban Sprawl: The Case of Knox County, Tennessee.”. In Progress in Spatial Analysis edited by A. Páez, J. Gallo, R. N. Buliung, and S. Dall’erba, 171–193. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, G. C. 2007. China’s Economic Transformation, 2nd ed. London: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cobbinah, P. B., and C. Amoako. 2012. “Urban Sprawl and the Loss of Peri-Urban Land in Kumasi, Ghana.” International Journal of Social and Human Sciences 6 (388): E 397.
   Google Scholar
• Dadashpoor, H., and N. Malekzadeh. 2020. “Driving Factors of Formation, Development, and Change of Spatial Structure in Metropolitan Areas: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Urban Management 9 (3): 286–297. doi:10.1016/j.jum.2020.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadashpoor, H., and S. Ahani. 2019a. “Land Tenure-Related Conflicts in Peri-Urban Areas: A Review.” Land Use Policy 85: 218–229. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadashpoor, H., and S. Ahani. 2019b. “A Conceptual Typology of the Spatial Territories of the Peripheral Areas of Metropolises.” Habitat International 90: 102015. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadashpoor, H., and F. Salarian. 2020. “Urban Sprawl on Natural Lands: Analyzing and Predicting the Trend of Land Use Changes and Sprawl in Mazandaran City Region.” Environment, Development and Sustainability 22 (2): 593–614. doi:10.1007/s10668-018-0211-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadashpoor, H., P. Azizi, and M. Moghadasi. 2019a. “Land Use Change, Urbanization, and Change in Landscape Pattern in a Metropolitan Area.” The Science of the Total Environment 655: 707–719. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadashpoor, H., P. Azizi, and M. Moghadasi. 2019b. “Analyzing Spatial Patterns, Driving Forces and Predicting Future Growth Scenarios for Supporting Sustainable Urban Growth: Evidence from Tabriz Metropolitan Area, Iran.” Sustainable Cities and Society 47: 101502. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darin-Drabkin, H. 1977. Land Policy and Urban Growth. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. W. E. 1989. Planning Control in Western Europe (Includes England, Denmark, France, Germany and The Netherlands). London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Dávila, J., J. Budds, and A. Minaya. 1999. A Review of Policies and Strategies Affecting the Peri-Urban Interface. London: Department Planning Unit, University College.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, C. J., and A. C. Nelson. 2002. “Urban Containment Policies and Housing Prices: An International Comparison with Implications for Future Research.” Land Use Policy 19 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00038-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearborn, K. W., and A. M. Gygi. 1992. “Planner's Panacea or Pandora's Box: A Realistic Assessment of the Role of Urban Growth Areas in Achieving Growth Management Goals.” University Puget Sound Law Review 16: 975.
   Google Scholar
• Deininger, K., H. Selod, and A. Burns. 2012. The Land Governance Assessment Framework: Identifying and Monitoring Good Practice in the Land Sector. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, F. F., and Y. Huang. 2004. “Uneven Land Reform and Urban Sprawl in China: The Case of Beijing.” Progress in Planning 61 (3): 211–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieleman, F. M., M. J. Dijst, and T. Spit. 1999. “Planning the Compact City: The Randstad Holland Experience.” European Planning Studies 7 (5): 605–621. doi:10.1080/09654319908720541.
   Google Scholar
• Dierwechter, Y. 2008. Urban Growth Management and Its Discontents: Promises, Practices, and Geopolitics in US City-Regions. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dierwechter, Y., and T. Carlson. 2007. “Effects of Urban Growth Boundaries on Residential Development in Pierce County.” The Professional Geographer 59 (2): 209–220. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00608.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, W. 2007. “Problems and Solutions in the Land Reserve System of Medium and Small Cities.” Guang Dong Tu Di Ke Xue 6: 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Doygun, H. 2009. “Effects of Urban Sprawl on Agricultural Land: A Case Study of Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 158 (1-4): 471–478. doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0597-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, M., D. Simon, and D. Thompson. 2006. Peri-Urban Interface: Approaches to Sustainable Natural and Human Resource Use. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Dunkerley, H. B., and C. M. Whitehead. 1983. Urban Land Policy: Issues and Opportunities (No. 283). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, V. 2012. “Land Use Dynamics and Peri-Urban Growth Characteristics: Reflections on the Master Plan and Urban Suitability from a Sprawling North Indian City.” Environment and Urbanization Asia 3 (2): 277–301. doi:10.1177/0975425312473226.
   Google Scholar
• English, M.R., and R.J. Hoffman. 2001. “Planning For Rural Areas in Tennessee Under Public Chapter 1101, White Paper Presented for the TACIR-The Tennessee Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.”
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. W. 2004. Economics, Real Estate and the Supply of Land. Oxford, UK; Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. W. 2008. Economics, Real Estate and the Supply of Land. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Farvacque, C., and P. McAuslan. 1992. Reforming Urban Land Policies and Institutions in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Festus, I. A., I. F. Omoboye, and O. B. Andrew. 2020. “Urban Sprawl: Environmental Consequence of Rapid Urban Expansion.” Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH) 5 (6): 110–118. doi:10.47405/mjssh.v5i6.411.
   Google Scholar
• Firman, T. 1997. “Land Conversion and Urban Development in the Northern Region of West Java.” Urban Studies 34 (7): 1027–1046. doi:10.1080/0042098975718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firman, T. 2004. “Major Issues in Indonesia's Urban Land Development.” Land Use Policy 21 (4): 347–355. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. 1991. “Growth Management Reconsidered: Good for the Town, Bad for the Nation? A Comment.” Journal of the American Planning Association 57 (3): 341–344. doi:10.1080/01944369108975504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, R. P., and R. D. Gross. 1971. “Public Land Banking: A New Praxis for Urban Growth.” Case W. Res. L. Rev 23: 897.
   Google Scholar
• Flechner, H. L. 1974. Land Banking in the Control of Urban Development. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2012. Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, F., and E. Jason. 2002. “Transfer of Development Right Programs: Using the Market for Compensation and Preservation.” Cornell University. http://www.mildredwarner.org/gov-restructuring/privatization/tdr
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B., and E. Coiacetto. 2005. “Public Land Agencies in Australia: The Key to Positive Planning?” Urban Research Program Research Paper 5: 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• González, M. S. 2015. “Peri-urban Development in Cholula, Mexico: Towards a Socio-spatial Management Model.” PhD diss., Technische Universität München.
   Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H., J. D. Kline, G. Chrostek, and J. Duncan. 2011. “Is Oregon's Land Use Planning Program Conserving Forest and Farmland? A Review of the Evidence.” Land Use Policy 28 (1): 185–192. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. 2001. Planning and the Intelligence of Institutions: Interactive Approaches to Territorial Policy-Making between Institutional Design and Institution-Building. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Haaland, C., and C. K. van Den Bosch. 2015. “Challenges and Strategies for Urban Green-Space Planning in Cities Undergoing Densification: A Review.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14 (4): 760–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hague, C. 2007. “Urban Containment: European Experience of Planning for the Compact City.” Ch. 1 in Incentives, Regulations and Plans: The Role of States and Nation-States in Smart Growth Planning, edited by Gerrit-Jan Knaap, Huibert A. Haccoû, Kelly J. Clifton and John W. Frece. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Han, A. T. 2019. “Effects of Relaxing the Urban Growth Management Policy: Greenbelt Policy of Seoul Metropolitan Area.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 39 (3): 300–314. doi:10.1177/0739456X17739110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebbert, M. 1986. “Urban Sprawl and Urban Planning in Japan.” Town Planning Review 57 (2): 141. doi:10.3828/tpr.57.2.m025v26776t87704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Z. Xie, Z. Hu, M. Tang, and C. Chen. 2002. “Research on Operation and Reform of Land Banking in Nanjing.” Social Science in Nanjing 9: 87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Hudalah, D. 2010. “Peri-Urban Planning in Indonesia. Contexts, Approaches, and Institutional Capacity.”
   Google Scholar
• Hudalah, D., H. Winarso, and J. Woltjer. 2007. “Peri-Urbanisation in East Asia: A New Challenge for Planning.” International Development Planning Review 29 (4): 503–519. doi:10.3828/idpr.29.4.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, R. (Ed.). 2010. Encyclopedia of Urban Studies. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• ILC. 2015. “Secure and Equitable Land Rights in the Post-2015 Agenda: A Key Issue in the Future We Want.” International Land Coalition (ILC), Technical Briefing. https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/secure-and-equitable-land-rights-post-2015-agenda-key-issue-future-we-want
   Google Scholar
• Jehling, M., R. Hecht, and H. Herold. 2018. “Assessing Urban Containment Policies within a Suburban Context: An Approach to Enable a Regional Perspective.” Land Use Policy 77: 846–858. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, P. 2000. “Urban Management, Urban Poverty and Urban Governance: Planning and Land Management in Maputo.” Environment and Urbanization 12 (1): 137–152. doi:10.1177/095624780001200110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, M., and R. Burgess. 2000. Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, P., Q. Cheng, Y. Gong, L. Wang, Y. Zhang, L. Cheng, and D. Chen. 2016. “Using Urban Development Boundaries to Constrain Uncontrolled Urban Sprawl in China.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106 (6): 1321–1343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jud, G. D., and D. T. Winkler. 2002. “The Dynamics of Metropolitan Housing Prices.” Journal of Real Estate Research 23: 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, M. J. 2006. “The Effects of Portland's Urban Growth Boundary on Housing Prices.” Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (2): 239–243. doi:10.1080/01944360608976742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karkkainen, B. C. 1994. “Zoning: A Reply to the Critics.” Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law 10: 45.
   Google Scholar
• Keivani, R., and M. Mattingly. 2007. “The Interface of Globalization and Peripheral Land in the Cities of the South: Implications for Urban Governance and Local Economic Development.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31 (2): 459–474. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00718.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaap, G., and A. C. Nelson. 1992. The Regulated Landscape: Lessons on State Land Use Planning from Oregon. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Kombe, W. J. 2005. “Land Use Dynamics in Peri-Urban Areas and Their Implications on Urban Growth and Form: The Case of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.” Habitat International 29 (1): 113–135. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00076-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laruelle, N., and C. Legenne. 2008. “The Paris-Ile-de-France Ceinture Verte.” In Urban Green Belts in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Marco Amati, 227–241. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. 2018. “The Impacts of Greenbelt Policies on Anti-Sprawl.” Journal of Korea Planning Association 53 (2): 45–65. doi:10.17208/jkpa.2018.04.53.2.45.
   Google Scholar
• Legates, R., and D. Hudalah. 2014. “Peri-Urban Planning for Developing East Asia: Learning from Chengdu, China and Yogyakarta/Kartamantul.” Journal of Urban Affairs 36 (sup1): 334–353. doi:10.1111/juaf.12106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, N. 1999. “The Effects of Local Growth Controls on Regional Housing Production and Population Redistribution in California.” Urban Studies 36 (12): 2047–2068. doi:10.1080/0042098992539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low Choy, D., C. Sutherland, B. Gleeson, N. Sipe, and J. Dodson. 2008. Change and Continuity in Peri-Urban Australia: Peri-Urban Futures and Sustainable Development. Brisbane: Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Lydecker, M., and P. Drechsel. 2010. “Urban Agriculture and Sanitation Services in Accra, Ghana: The Overlooked Contribution.” International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 8 (1-2): 94–103. doi:10.3763/ijas.2009.0453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, B., V. P. Singh, and B. Thoradeniya. 2016. Balanced Urban Development: Options and Strategies for Liveable Cities, 601. London, UK: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P., and P. O'Neill. 2002. “Planning a Prosperous Sydney: The Challenges of Planning Urban Development in the New Urban Context.” Australian Geographer 33 (3): 301–316. doi:10.1080/0004918022000028707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micelli, E. 2002. “Development Rights Markets to Manage Urban Plans in Italy.” Urban Studies 39 (1): 141–154. doi:10.1080/00420980220099122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millward, H. 2006. “Urban Containment Strategies: A Case-Study Appraisal of Plans and Policies in Japanese, British and Canadian Cities.” Land Use Policy 23 (4): 473–485. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojica Bonilla, A. I. 2007. “Assessing Urban Containment Policies for Managing the Urban Growth of Santa Tecla City.” El Salvador, PhD diss., Ohio University.
   Google Scholar
• Mortoja, M. G., T. Yigitcanlar, and S. Mayere. 2020. “What is the Most Suitable Methodological Approach to Demarcate Peri-Urban Areas? a Systematic Review of the Literature.” Land Use Policy 95: 104601. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munton, R. 1983. London's Greenbelt: Containment in Practice. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Munton, R. 2009. “Rural Land Ownership in the United Kingdom: Changing Patterns and Future Possibilities for Land Use.” Land Use Policy 26: S54–S61. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1999. Governance and Opportunity in Metropolitan America. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C. 1994. “Oregon’s Urban Growth Boundary Policy as a Landmark Planning Tool.” In Planning the Oregon Way: A Twenty-Year Evaluation, edited by Carl Abbott, Deborah A. Howe and Sy Adler, 25–47. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C. 2015. “Growth Management and Urban Planning in the United States.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, edited by James Wright, 447–452. Tucson, AZ: Elsevier Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C., and J. B. Duncan. 1995. Growth Management Principles and Practices. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C., and D. R. Peterman. 2000. “Does Growth Management Matter? The Effect of Growth Management on Economic Performance.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 (3): 277–285. doi:10.1177/0739456X0001900307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C., C. J. Dawkins, and T. W. Sanchez. 2004. “Urban Containment and Residential Segregation: A Preliminary Investigation.” Urban Studies 41 (2): 423–439. doi:10.1080/0042098032000165325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northwest, E. C. O., and D. J. Newton. 1991. “Urban Growth Management Study: Case Studies Report (1991-01).”
   Google Scholar
• Nunn, S., and M. S. Rosentraub. 1997. “Dimensions of Interjurisdictional Cooperation.” Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (2): 205–219. doi:10.1080/01944369708975915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliarin, S. 2018. “Linking Processes and Patterns: Spatial Planning, Governance and Urban Sprawl in the Barcelona and Milan Metropolitan Regions.” Urban Studies 55 (16): 3650–3668. doi:10.1177/0042098017743668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallagst, K. 2007. Growth Management in the United States: Between Theory and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D., S. Fricska, and B. Wehrmann. (September, 2009). Towards Improved Land Governance, In Collaboration with Clarissa Augustinus, Paul MunroFaure, Mika-Petteri Törhönen, Anni Arial, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, “United Nations Human Settlements Programme.” 2009. Land Tenure Working Paper (11), 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. 1999. “Do Land-Use Controls Cause Sprawl.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26 (4): 555–571. doi:10.1068/b260555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R., J. Martin, and W. B. Fulton. 2002. “Holding the Line: Urban Containment in the United States. Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.” Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J., and E. Goodstein. 2000. “Growth Management and Housing Prices: The Case of Portland.” Contemporary Economic Policy 18 (3): 334–344. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7287.2000.tb00030.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizor, P. J. 1986. “Making TDR Work: A Study of Program Implementation.” Journal of the American Planning Association 52 (2): 203–211. doi:10.1080/01944368608976620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyakov, M., and D. Zhang. 2008. “Property Tax Policy and Land-Use Change.” Land Economics 84 (3): 396–408. doi:10.3368/le.84.3.396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. T., A. S. Aldosary, and M. Mortoja. 2017. “Modelling Future Land Cover Changes and Their Effects on the Land Surface Temperatures in the Saudi Arabian Eastern Coastal City of Dammam.” Land 6 (2): 36. doi:10.3390/land6020036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raslanas, S., E. K. Zavadskas, and A. Kaklauskas. 2010. “Land Value Tax in the Context of Sustainable Urban Development and Assessment. Part i‐Policy Analysis and Conceptual Model for the Taxation System on Real Property.” International Journal of Strategic Property Management 14 (1): 73–86. doi:10.3846/ijspm.2010.06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reydon, B. P., V. B. Fernandes, and T. S. Telles. 2015. “Land Tenure in Brazil: The Question of Regulation and Governance.” Land Use Policy 42: 509–516. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. W., and P. Gordon. 1993. “Market Planning Oxymoron or Common Sense?” Journal of the American Planning Association 59 (3): 347–352. doi:10.1080/01944369308975885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, D. A., F. Targa, and S. A. Aytur. 2006. “Transport Implications of Urban Containment Policies: A Study of the Largest Twenty-Five US Metropolitan Areas.” Urban Studies 43 (10): 1879–1897. doi:10.1080/00420980600838127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. 2003. Conflict, Consensus, and Rationality in Environmental Planning: An Institutional Discourse Approach. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., and J. Barroso. 2007. Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, B., and V. Mukhija. 2001. “Institutional Pluralism and Housing Delivery: A Case of Unforeseen Conflicts in Mumbai.” World Development 29 (12): 2043–2057. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00082-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serratosa, A. 1998. “El Pla Territorial Metropolità de Barcelona i el Dinamisme Econòmic.” Revista Econòmica de Catalunya (34): 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J. 2005. “Space, Scale and the State: Reorganizing Urban Space in China.” In Restructuring the Chinese City: Changing Society, Economy and Space, edited by L. J. C. Ma and Fulong Wu, 39–58. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, I. W. (2002, April). “Preserving Rural Land in Australia.” Paper presented to the Joint NZPI/RAPI National Congress, Wellington, NZ, April 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. 2016. “Peri-Urbanization as the Institutionalization of Place: The Case of Japan.” Cities 53: 134–140. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. J. 1996. “Cities in the Desert: The Egyptian New-Town Program.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 86 (3): 459–480. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1996.tb01762.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumardjono, M., and S.W. 2001. Land Policy between Regulation and Implementation, Jakarta: Kompas Book.
   Google Scholar
• Suo, L. 2017. “Institutional Collective Action and Interlocal Collaborative Network” Paper presented at the Urban Agglomeration of China, 3rd International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP3), Singapore, June 28-30, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, P. C., S. J. Anderson, R. Costanza, and I. Kubiszewski. 2016. “The Ecological Economics of Land Degradation: Impacts on Ecosystem Service Values.” Ecological Economics 129: 182–192. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, B. S., S. W. Wong, and A. K. W. Lee. 2007. “Green Belt in a Compact City: A Zone for Conservation or Transition.” Landscape and Urban Planning 79 (3-4): 358–373. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Z. 2000. “A Comparative Study on China Urban Land Development Models.” Center of Real Estate Studies: 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Tekeli, I. 2009. “Cities in Modern Turkey.” Istanbul. City of Intersections 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. 1997. “The Interlaced Metropolis: Cities in Layered Networks and Confederations in the Detroit Urbanized Area.” College of Urban, Labor, and Metropolitan Affairs. Wayne State University.
   Google Scholar
• Tosics, I., and A. Gertheis. 2010. Review of Further Instruments with an Indirect Effect on the Regulation of Peri-urban Land Uses. PLUREL report D, 2. Ispra: Plurel.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2003. Handbook on Best Practices, Security of Tenure and Access to Land, United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2012. Handling Land: Innovative Tools for Land Governance and Secure Tenure. HS Number: HS/023/12E, United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
   Google Scholar
• ÜZer, F. 2016. “Hybrid Mapping for Large Urban Environments.” PhD diss, Sung Kyun Kwan university (Séoul).
   Google Scholar
• Van der Schans, J. W., and J. S. Wiskerke. 2012. “Urban Agriculture in Developed Economies.” In Sustainable Food Planning: Evolving Theory and Practice, edited by André Viljoen and Johannes S.C. Wiskerke, 245–258. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vejre, H. 2008. “Land Use Planning and Management in Urban and Peri-Urban Areas.” Land Use, Land Cover and Soil Science 4: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Vickrey, W. 1996. “Fifteen Fatal Fallacies of Financial Fundamentalism.” In Commitment to Full Employment: The Economics and Social Policy of William S. Vickrey, edited by Aaron W. Warner, Mathew Forstater, Sumner M. Rosen, and Robert Heilbroner, 193–219. Armonk: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. E. 1987. An Invaded Countryside: Structures of Life on the Toronto Fringe (No. 17). North York, ON: Department of Geography, Atkinson College, York University.
   Google Scholar
• Wandl, A., and M. Magoni. 2017. “Sustainable Planning of Peri-Urban Areas: Introduction to the Special.” Planning Practice & Research 32 (1): 1–3. issue. doi:10.1080/02697459.2017.1264191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., L. Tian, and Z. Yao. 2018. “Institutional Uncertainty, Fragmented Urbanization and Spatial Lock-in of the Peri-Urban Area of China: A Case of Industrial Land Redevelopment in Panyu.” Land Use Policy 72: 241–249. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrmann, B. 2008. Land Conflicts: A Practical Guide to Dealing with Land Disputes. Eschborn: GTZ.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Y. D. 2001. “Decentralization, Marketization, and Globalization: The Triple Processes Underlying Regional Development in China.” Asian Geographer 20 (1-2): 7–23. doi:10.1080/10225706.2001.9684073.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, C. M. 1999. “Urban Housing Markets: Theory and Policy.” Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 3: 1559–1594.
   Google Scholar
• Winarso, H., D. Hudalah, and T. Firman. 2015. “Peri-Urban Transformation in the Jakarta Metropolitan Area.” Habitat International 49: 221–229. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, M. 2007. “Impacts of Urban Containment Policies on Urban Growth and Structure.” PhD diss., The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, M., and J. M. Guldmann. 2011. “Impacts of Urban Containment Policies on the Spatial Structure of US Metropolitan Areas.” Urban Studies 48 (16): 3511–3536. doi:10.1177/0042098011399594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F. 2019. “Land Financialisation and the Financing of Urban Development in China.” Land Use Policy. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., and A. G. O. Yeh. 1999. “Urban Spatial Structure in a Transitional Economy: The Case of Guangzhou.” China. Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (4): 377–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, T., M. Kamruzzaman, and S. Teriman. 2015. “Neighbourhood Sustainability Assessment: Evaluating Residential Development Sustainability in a Developing Country Context.” Sustainability 7 (3): 2570–2602. doi:10.3390/su7032570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yumin, Y., and R. LeGates. 2013. Coordinating Urban and Rural Development in China: Learning from Chengdu. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zacharoula, V. 2013. “Urban Containment Policies in European Regions: The Case Studies of Randstad and Greater London.” Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Radboud University.
   Google Scholar
• Zagema, B. 2011. “Land and Power: The Growing Scandal Surrounding the New Wave of Investments in Land.” Oxfam Policy and Practice: Agriculture, Food and Land 11 (6): 114–164.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., W. Zhang, M. Li, Q. Huang, and F. Li. 2012. “Land Banking: A Mechanism for Urban Sustainable Development in China.” Ambio 41 (8): 904–906. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0297-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T. 2000. “Land Market Forces and Government's Role in Sprawl: The Case of China.” Cities 17 (2): 123–135. doi:10.1016/S0264-2751(00)00007-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, P. 2013. “Too Complex to Be Managed? New Trends in Peri-Urbanization and Its Planning in Beijing.” Cities 30: 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2011.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., B. Lü, and J. Woltjer. 2009. “Growth Management and Decentralization: An Assessment of Urban Containment Policies in Beijing in the 1990s.” International Development Planning Review 31 (1): 55–79. doi:10.3828/idpr.31.1.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar