The political economy of industrial pollution control: environmental regulation in Swedish industry for five decades

References

• Ambec, S., M. A. Cohen, S. Elgie, and P. Lanoie. 2013. “The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Competitiveness?” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 7 (1): 2–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annandale, D., and R. Taplin. 2003. “Is Environmental Impact Assessment Regulation a ‘Burden’ to Private Firms?” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23 (3): 383–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00002-7.
   Google Scholar
• Bastida, A. E. 2018. Latin America’s Policy Priorities on Mining and Sustainable Development, and Opportunities for EU Cooperation. Strategic Dialogue on Sustainable Raw Materials for Europe (STRADE), No. 05/2018, European Policy Brief, Brussels
   Google Scholar
• Behre Dolbear. 2014. 2014 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment. Greenwood Village, CO: Behre Dolbear.
   Google Scholar
• Bergquist, A. K. 2007. Guld och gröna skogar? Miljöanpassningen av Rönnskärsverken, 1960-2000. Umeå Studies in Economic History No. 36. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Bergquist, A. K., and K. Söderholm. 2011. “Green Innovation Systems in Swedish Industry, 1960-1989.” Business History Review 85 (4): 677–698. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680511001152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist, A. K., K. Söderholm, H. Kinneryd, M. Lindmark, and P. Söderholm. 2013. “Command-and-Control Revisited: Environmental Compliance and Technological Change in Swedish Industry, 1970–1990.” Ecological Economics 85: 6–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännlund, R., and T. Lundgren. 2009. “Environmental Policy without Costs? A Review of the Porter Hypothesis.” International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 3 (2): 75–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000020.
   Google Scholar
• Burtraw, D. 2013. “The Institutional Blindspot in Environmental Economics.” Daedalus 142 (1): 110–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervantes, M., F. McMahon, and A. Wilson. 2013. Fraser Institute Annual Survey of Mining Companies 2012/2013. Vancouver, Canada: Fraser Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Calzolari, G. 2001. “The Theory and Practice of Regulation with Multinational Enterprises.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 20 (2): 191–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011107413701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clagett, N. 2013. “A Rare Opportunity: Streamlining Permitting for Rare Earth Metals within the United States.” Journal of Energy and Environmental Law Summer 4: 123–138.
   Google Scholar
• Dechezleprêtre, A., and M. Sato. 2017. “The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 11 (2): 183–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudka, S., and D. C. Adriano. 1997. “Environmental Impacts of Metal Ore Mining and Processing: A Review.” Journal of Environmental Quality 26 (3): 590–602. doi:https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600030003x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, A. 2007. “Path Dependency and Institutional Change: The Case of Industrial Emission Control in Sweden.” Public Administration 85 (4): 1097–1118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00687.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggert, R. G. 1994. Mining and the Environment: International Perspective on Public Policy. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glachant, M. 1999. The Efficiency of Policy Instruments for Regulating Industrial Pollution: A Coasean Approach, Working Paper, CERNA. Paris: Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H., and I. W. H. Parry. 2008. “Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2 (2): 152–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 1997/98:45. Miljöbalk. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 2001/02:65. Ändrad ordning för utdömande av vite enligt miljöbalken. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 2004/05:129. En effektivare miljöprövning. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, D. 2013. “Environmental Permitting.” Presentation at Boliden’s Capital Market Days, 21 November, Kankberg and Rönnskär, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, W. B., R. J. Shadbegian, C. Wang, and M. Meral. 2014. “Do EPA Regulations Affect Labor Demand? Evidence from the Pulp and Paper Industry.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 68 (1): 188–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., and L. Coenen. 2017. “Unpacking Resource Mobilisation by Incumbents for Biorefineries: The Role of Micro-Level Factors for Technological Innovation System Weaknesses.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 29 (5): 500–513. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1249838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, D. 2000. “A Business Perspective on Community Relations in Mining.” Resources Policy 26 (3): 127–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4207(00)00024-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, D. 2015. The Remaking of the Mining Industry. Hampshire: Plagrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., S. R. Peterson, P. R. Portney, and R. N. Stavins. 1995. “Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?” Journal of Economic Literature 33 (1): 132–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M. 1992. “Conditions for Environmental Policy Success: An International Comparison.” The Environmentalist 12 (1): 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, B. 2006. “Climate Policy Instruments and Industry: Effects and Potential Responses in the Swedish Context.” Energy Policy 34 (15): 2344–2360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. J., and N. L. Schwartz. 1982. Market Structure and Innovation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R. 1997. Environmental Policy and Technical Change: A Comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and S. Pontoglio. 2011. “The Innovation Effects of Environmental Policy Instruments: A Typical Case of the Blind Men and the Elephant.” Ecological Economics 72: 28–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstad, C. D. 2000. Environmental Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen, J., S. Pätäri, A. Toppinen, and A. Tuppura. 2015. “The Role of Environmental Regulation in the Future Competitiveness of the Pulp and Paper Industry: The Case of the Sulfur Emissions Directive in Northern Europe.” Journal of Cleaner Production 108: 864–872. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriström, B., and S. Wibe. 1992. “En effektiv miljöpolitik.” Appendix 6 to Long-term Survey of the Swedish Economy 1992. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A., J. Khan, and R. Hildingsson. 2019. “Actor Relations in Climate Policymaking: Governing Decarbonisation in a Corporatist State.” Environmental Policy and Governance 29 (6): 399–408. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krysiak, F. C. 2011. “Environmental Regulation, Technological Diversity, and the Dynamics of Technological Change.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35 (4): 528–544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2010.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindmark, M., and A. K. Bergquist. 2008. “Expansion for Pollution Reduction? Environmental Adaptation of a Swedish and a Canadian Smelter, 1960-2005.” Business History 50 (4): 530–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00076790802106877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R E., D. Vogel, O. Renn, D. Slater, and M D. Rogers. 2001. “The Changing Character of Regulation: A Comparison of Europe and the United States.” Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 21 (3): 399–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.213121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, L. J. 1980. The Hare and the Tortoise: Clean Air Policies in the United States and Sweden. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, N. 2009. “The Environmental Regulation of Mining: An International Comparison.” Ph.D. diss., School of Law of the University of Southern Queensland, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Mickwitz, P., H. Hyvättinen, and P. Kivimaa. 2008. “The Role of Policy Instruments in the Innovation and Diffusion of Environmentally Friendlier Technologies: Popular Claims versus Case Study Experiences.” Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (1): S162–S170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliman, S. R., and R. Prince. 1989. “Firm Incentives to Promote Technical Change in Pollution Control.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17 (3): 247–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(89)90019-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment. 2007. Regulatory Framework for Air Emissions. Vancouver: Government of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment and Energy. 2018. Anpassad Miljöprövning För en Grön Omställning. Ds 2018:38. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, R. D. 2006. “Environmental Performance Standards and the Adoption of New Technology.” Ecological Economics 58 (2): 238–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau, V., P. C. Dos Reis, and F. Vuille. 2019. “Enough Metals?” Resources 8 (1): 29. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8010029.
   Google Scholar
• Nentjes, A., F. P. de Vries, and D. Wiersma. 2007. “Technology-Forcing through Environmental Regulation.” European Journal of Political Economy 23 (4): 903–916. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2007.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Pätäri, S., A. Tuppura, A. Toppinen, and J. Korhonen. 2016. “Global Sustainability Megaforces in Shaping the Future of the European Pulp and Paper Industry towards a Bioeconomy.” Forest Policy and Economics 66: 38–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, M. J., Landsberg, H. H., Tilton, J. E. (Eds.). 1992. Competitiveness in Metals: The Impact of Public Policy. London: Mining Journal Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, Maria, Anniina Oksanen, Tatiana Mingaleva, Victor Petrov, and Vladimir Masloboev. 2015. “License to Mine: A Comparison of the Scope of the Environmental Sssessment in Sweden, Finland and Russia.” Natural Resources 06 (04): 237–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2015.64022.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, M., and P. Söderholm. 2014. “Industrial Pollution Control and Efficient Licensing Processes: The Case of Swedish Regulatory Design.” Sustainability 6 (8): 5401–5422. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su6085401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, M., and P. Söderholm. 2019. Miljölagstiftningens betydelse för kunskapsintensiva investeringar. Report 2019:15. Östersund, Sweden: The Swedish Agency for Growth Policy Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, M., K. Ek, K. Söderholm, and P. Söderholm. 2010. “Wind Power Planning and Permitting: Comparative Perspectives from the Nordic Countries.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 (9): 3116–3123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., and C. van der Linde. 1995. “Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4): 97–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prno, J. 2013. “An Analysis of Factors Leading to the Establishment of a Social License to Operate in the Mining Industry.” Resources Policy 38 (4): 577–590. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranängen, H., and Å. Lindman. 2018. “Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility Practice versus Stakeholder Interests in Nordic Mining.” Journal of Cleaner Production 197: 668–677. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstaller, A. 2008. “The Technological Transition to Chlorine Free Pulp Bleaching Technologies: Lessons for Transition Policies.” Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (1): S133–S147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rémy, F. 2003. Mining Reform and the World Bank: Providing a Policy Framework for Development. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Requate, T. 2005. “Dynamic Incentives by Environmental Policy Instruments: A Survey.” Ecological Economics 54 (2–3): 175–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogge, Karoline S., Joachim Schleich, Philipp Haussmann, Annette Roser, and Felix Reitze. 2011. “The Role of the Regulatory Framework for Innovation Activities: The EU ETS and the German Paper Industry.” International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 11 (3/4): 250–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2011.042086.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. 1992. Den korporativa staten: Intresseorganisationer och statsförvaltning i svensk politik. Stockholm: Nordstedts juridik.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., and J. Bergström. 1999. Korporatismens Fall Och Den Svenska Modellens Kris. Stockholm: Center for Business and Policy Studies (SNS).
   Google Scholar
• Sandén, B., and C. Azar. 2005. “Near-Term Technology Policy for Long-Term Climate Targets. Economy-Wide versus Technology Specific Approaches.” Energy Policy 33 (12): 1557–1576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Similä, J. 2002. “Pollution Regulation and Its Effects on Technological Innovations.” Journal of Environmental Law 14 (2): 143–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SNL Metals & Mining. 2015. Permitting, Economic Value and Mining in the United States. Report prepared for the National Mining Association, USA. Washington, DC: National Mining Association.
   Google Scholar
• Söderholm, K. 2009. “Environmental Awakening in the Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry: Pollution Resistance and Firm Responses in the Early 20th Century.” Business Strategy and the Environment 18 (1): 32–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm, K., A. K. Bergquist, and P. Söderholm. 2017. “The Transition to Chlorine Free Pulp Revisited: Nordic Heterogeneity in Environmental Regulation and R&D Collaboration.” Journal of Cleaner Production 165: 1328–1339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm, K., P. Söderholm, H. Helenius, M. Pettersson, R. Viklund, V. Masloboev, T. Mingaleva, and V. Petrov. 2015. “Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness in the Mining Industry: Permitting Processes with a Special Focus on Finland, Sweden and Russia.” Resources Policy 43: 130–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm, K., P. Söderholm, S. Gustafsson, and T. Sundin. 2019. “Miljöprövningens Roll För Industrins Utsläppsreduktion: Erfarenheter Från Svenska Pappers- Och Massabruk, 1981–2013.” In Miljörätten Och Den Förhandlingsovilliga Naturen, edited by J. Darpö, M. Forsberg, M. Pettersson, and C. Zetterberg, 355–374. Uppsala, Sweden: Iustus förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Söderholm, K., and R. Viklund. 2019. “Policy and Business Efforts for the Reduced Impact of Mining on Nature. When Historical Studies Have Something to Offer Policy Makers.” Technology and Culture 60 (1): 192–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2019.0006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm, P. 2013. “The Political Economy of a Global Ban on Mercury-Added Products: Positive versus Negative List Approaches.” Journal of Cleaner Production 53: 287–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm, P., A. K. Bergquist, and K. Söderholm. 2019. “Environmental Regulation in the Pulp and Paper Industry: Impacts and Challenges.” Current Forestry Reports 5 (4): 185–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-019-00097-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm, P., and N. Svahn. 2015. “Mining, Regional Development and Benefit-Sharing in Developed Countries.” Resources Policy 45: 78–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderqvist, T., G. Jirvell, M. Malmaeus, E. Roseman, A. Tegeback, J. Gotting, L. Hasselström, Å. Soutukorva, and L. Lundmark. 2015. Hur tillämpas miljöbalkens rimlighetsavvägning? Report 2015:1. Stockholm: Enveco.
   Google Scholar
• Solbu, E. 1986. “Reningskrav på Rönnskär Utvecklade ny Miljöteknik.” Bergsmannen 6: 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrell, S. 2002. “The Meaning of BATNEEC: Interpreting Excessive Costs in UK Industrial Regulation.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 4 (1): 23–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jepp.102.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. 2008. Myndighet För Miljön: en Granskning av Naturvårdsverket, 62. Stockholm: Official Reports of the Swedish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Agency. 2019. Hinder för klimatomställning i processindustrin. Report ER 2019:20. Eskilstuna, Sweden: Swedish Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. 2019. The Boliden Rönnskär smelter: Emissions. Accessed 12 August, 2019. http://utslappisiffror.naturvardsverket.se/Sok/Anlaggningssida/?pid=4505.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Geological Survey. 2013. Vägledning För Prövning av Gruvverksamhet, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• SweMin. 2012. Gruvbranschen: en tillväxtmotor för Sverige. Stockholm: Swedish Association of Mines, Mineral and Metal Producers.
   Google Scholar
• SweMin. 2019. Färdplan För en Konkurrenskraftig Och Fossilfri Gruv-Och Mineralnäring. Stockholm: Swedish Association of Mines, Mineral and Metal Producers.
   Google Scholar
• Tole, L., and G. Koop. 2011. “Do Environmental Regulations Affect the Location Decisions of Multinational Gold Mining Firms.” Journal of Economic Geography 11 (1): 151–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulibarri, N., B. E. Cain, and N. K. Ajami. 2017. “A Framework for Building Efficient Environmental Permitting Processes.” Sustainability 9 (2): 180. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi, W. K., J. M. Vernon, and J. E. Harrington. 2005. Economics of Regulation and Antitrust. 4th ed. Cambrdige, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, D. 1995. Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation: Strategies in Europe, the US and Japan. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, J. F., A. Stephan, and T. Anisimova. 2019. “Well-Designed Environmental Regulation and Firm Performance. Swedish Evidence on the Porter Hypothesis and the Effect of Regulatory Time Strategies.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 62 (2): 342–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1419940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, J. F., and T. Anisimova. 2019. “The Innovation and Performance Effects of Well-Designed Environmental Regulation: Evidence from Sweden.” Industry and Innovation 26 (5): 534–567. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1468240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, J. 2010. “Competition and Regulation in the Gold Industry: An American Perspective.” University of Botswana Law Journal 12: 117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P. 2012. “Global Trends and Tribulations in Mining Regulation.” Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 30 (4): 391–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2012.11435304.
   Google Scholar
• Yarime, M. 2007. “Promoting Green Innovation or Prolonging the Existing Technology: Regulation and Technological Change in the Chlor-Alkali Industry in Japan and Europe.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 11 (4): 117–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2007.1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar