Making sense of how proponents conspire to thwart environmental impact assessment processes: insights from the Miramar Resort controversy in Taiwan

References

• Baxter, J., and J. Eyles. 1997. “Evaluating Qualitative Research in Social Geography: Establishing ‘Rigour’ in Interview Analysis.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 22 (4): 505–525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1997.00505.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, D.J.H., and K. Barney. 2018. “Structural Injustice, Slow Violence? The Political Ecology of a ‘Best Practice’ Hydropower Dam in Lao PDR.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 48 (5): 808–834. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1482560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blowers, A. 1999. “Nuclear Waste and Landscapes of Risk.” Landscape Research 24 (3): 241–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01426399908706562.
   Google Scholar
• Boeckmann, M. 2016. “Exploring the Health Context: A Qualitative Study of Local Heat and Climate Change Adaptation in Japan.” Geoforum 73, 1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, J., K. Branch, J. Heerwagen, and E. Liebow. 1994. “Community Viewpoints of the Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program.” Summary Report and Eight Community Reports Prepared for the US Army and Science Applications International Corporation, Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods: 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, R., and T. Hinch. 2006. Tourism and Indigenous People: Issues and Implications Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cambrosio, A., and C. Limoges. 1991. “Controversies as Governing Processes in Technology Assessment.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 3 (4): 377–396. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329108524067.
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore, M. 2004. “The Role of Science in Environmental Impact Assessment: Process and Procedure versus Purpose in the Development of Theory.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24 (4): 403–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2003.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore, M., and T. Richardson. 2013. “Power and Environmental Assessment: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 39: 1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cass, N., and G. Walker. 2009. “Emotion and Rationality: The Characterisation and Evaluation of Opposition to Renewable Energy Projects.” Emotion, Space and Society 2 (1): 62–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.05.006.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S.K. 2013. “Discussion on Avoidance of BOT Project's EIA Procedure: Start from the Miramar Resort Case.” Taiwan Environmental and Land Law Journal 1 (5): 83–98. in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. L. 2014. “Institutional Roles of Political Processes, Expert Governance, and Judicial Review in Environmental Impact Assessment: A Theoretical Framework and a Case Study of Taiwan.” Natural Resources Journal 54: 41–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs, J. 2019. “Greening the Blue? Corporate Strategies for Legitimising Deep Sea Mining.” Political Geography 74: 102060. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., and E.-H. Lee. 2014. “Reducing Confusion about Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences.” The Qualitative Report 19 (32): 1–20. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss32/2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chou, K.-T., K. Hasegawa, D. Ku, and S.-F. Kao. 2020. Climate Change Governance in Asia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics. 2010. 2010 Population and Housing Census. Accessed April 7 2021. https://census.dgbas.gov.tw/PHC2010/english/rehome.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, L. E., N. Xemŧoltw–Claxton, C. Owens, A. Johnston, N. C. Ban, F. Moola, and C. T. Darimont. 2020. “Indigenous Knowledge and Federal Environmental Assessments in Canada: Applying Past Lessons to the 2019 Impact Assessment Act.” Facets 5 (1): 67–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2019-0039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EIA Act Article Five from Environmental Protection Administration. (2018). Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan) official website. Accessed October 16 2019. https://oaout.epa.gov.tw/law/LawContent.aspx?id=FL016247 (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Enríquez-de-Salamanca, Á. 2018. “Stakeholders’ Manipulation of Environmental Impact Assessment.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 68: 10–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Administration. 2019. ‘Environmental Impact Assessment (環境影響評估)’ https://www.epa.gov.tw/eng/392EF735A15E6538
   Google Scholar
• Fan, M..F. 2006. “Nuclear Waste Facilities on Tribal Land: The Yami's Struggles for Environmental Justice.” Local Environment 11 (4): 433–444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830600785589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, M.-F., C.-M. Chiu, and L. Mabon. 2020. “Environmental Justice and the Politics of Pollution: The Case of the Formosa Ha Tinh Steel Pollution Incident in Vietnam.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620973164.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, M. F. 2016. “Environmental Justice and the Politics of Risk: Water Resource Controversies in Taiwan.” Human Ecology 44 (4): 425–434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9844-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grano, S.A. 2014. “Change and Continuities: Taiwan’s Post-2008 Environmental Policies.” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 43 (3): 129–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261404300306.
   Google Scholar
• Grano, S.A. 2015. Environmental Governance in Taiwan: A New Generation of Activists and Stakeholders. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, M.S. 2004. “Contested Governance between Politics and Professionalism in Taiwan.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 34 (2): 238–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330480000071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, M. S. 2010. “Co-Opting Social Ties: How the Taiwanese Petrochemical Industry Neutralized Environmental Opposition’ Mobilization.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 15 (4): 447–463. doi:https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.15.4.n077415430371445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, H.-H.M. 1990. “The Rise of Environmental Consciousness in Taiwan.” Impact Assessment 8 (1-2): 217–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1990.9726039.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, H.-H.M. 1999. “Environmental Movements in Taiwan.” in Asia’s Environmental Movements: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Y-S. F. Lee and A. Y So, 31–54. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., and S.E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis’ Qualitative.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S.J., and S.F. Hsu. 2001. “The Research of Environmental Impact Assessment from the Viewpoint of Citizen Participation.” Journal of Taiwan Land Research 2: 101–130. (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Huang, I.-M.P. 2014. “Rediscovering Local Environmentalism in Taiwan.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 16 (4): 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2563.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.-C., and L. Mabon. 2021. “Coastal Landscapes, Sustainable Consumption and Peripheral Communities: Evaluating the Miramar Resort Controversy in Shanyuan Bay, Taiwan.” Marine Policy 123: 104283. ; doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, J.T. 2017. “Changing South Korean Water Policy after Political and Economic Liberalisation.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 47 (2): 225–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1266014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indigenous Sight. 2019. “When Indigenous Communities Meet Tourism: Those BOT Projects in Our Traditional Territories: Indigenous Sight.” Accessed April 7 2021 https://insight.ipcf.org.tw/en-US/article/124
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. 2014. “Good Governance for Environmental Protection in China: Instrumentation, Strategic Interactions and Unintended Consequences.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 44 (2): 241–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.870828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karrasch, L., and T. Klenke. 2016. “Aligning Local Adaptive Land Use Management in Coastal Regions with European Policies on Climate Adaptation and Rural Development.” in European Rural Peripheries Revalued: Governance, Actors, Impacts, edited by U. Grabski-Kieron, I. Mose, A. Reichert-Schick, and A. Steinführer, 296–312. Munster: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, M. 2015. “Peripheralization: Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio-Spatial Inequalities.” European Planning Studies 23 (2): 367–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.862518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.Y. 2013. “Hua-Tung Pure Land, Beautiful Back Garden ‘Plant a Hope for the Land’.” ISBNet 179: 31–34. (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki, J., and L. Peltonen. 2016. “Mining through Controversies: Public Perceptions and the Legitimacy of a Planned Gold Mine near a Tourist Destination.” Land Use Policy 54: 479–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak, A.H.N. 2017. “Online Destination Image: Comparing National Tourism Organisations’ and Tourists' Perspectives.” Tourism Management 60: 280–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2019. “Qualitative Content Analysis: Demarcation, Varieties, Developments.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 20 (3): 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3343.
   Google Scholar
• Mehnen, N., I. Mose, and D. Strijker. 2013. “The Delphi Method as a Useful Tool to Study Governance and Protected Areas?” Landscape Research 38 (5): 607–624. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2012.690862.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Interior Statistics 2021. Monthly Bulletin of Interior Statistics. Accessed April 7 2021 https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/400/relfile/0/4413/fb872a90-4ab8-4752-bf7b-7bcd890da5f3/month/month_en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Miramar Resort. 2008. Miramar Resort Project Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Miramar Resort Limited Company: Taipei.
   Google Scholar
• Miramar Resort. n.d. Illustration Meeting Documents of the Miramar Resort Project 2006 and 2007. Miramar Resort Limited Company: Taipei.
   Google Scholar
• Miramar Resort. 2019. ‘Miramar Facts: Official Website’ [online] Accessed October 16 2019 http://www.miramarfacts.com.tw/ (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Moser, S. 2020. “New Cities: Engineering Social Exclusions.” One Earth 2 (2): 125–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.01.012.
   Google Scholar
• Nordberg, K., and P. Salmi. 2019. “Addressing the Gap between Participatory Ideals and the Reality of Environmental Management: The Case of the Cormorant Population in Finland.” Environmental Policy and Governance 29 (4): 251–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1850
   Google Scholar
• PeoPo Citizen Journalism. 2012. Accessed October 16, 2019 http://www.peopo.org/news/98877 (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Puig, J., and A. Villarroya. 2013. “Ecological Quality Loss and Damage Compensation in Estuaries: Clues from a Lawsuit in the Basque Country, Spain.” Ocean & Coastal Management 71: 46–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandham, L. A., J. J. Chabalala, and H. H. Spaling. 2019. “Participatory Rural Appraisal Approaches for Public Participation in EIA: Lessons from South Africa.” Land 8 (10): 150. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/land8100150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, D. E., T. A. Stojanovic, and C. R. Warren. 2014. “Is EIA Part of the Wind Power Planning Problem?” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 49: 13–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2015. “Indigenous Activists Win Legal Battle against Luxury Resort Developer in Taiwan” Cultural Survival Accessed October 16 2019 https://www.culturalsurvival.org/news/indigenous-activists-win-legal-battle-against-luxury-resort-developer-taiwan
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, S. J. 2017. “EIAs, Power and Political Ecology: Situating Resource Struggles and the Techno-Politics of Small-Scale Mining.” Geoforum 87: 95–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, H. S., W. S. Kong, and C. W. Kou. 2012. “Environment Impact Assessment under Developmentalism and Neoliberalism: Rethinking the Case of Miramar Resort.” Paper presented at the 4^th Annual Conference on Development Studies in Taiwan: Trans-X Risk and Justice, Taiwan. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Tai, H. S., W. S. Kong, and C. W. Kou. 2013. “The Miramar Resort Case: Controversy over the Design and Enforcement of Taiwan’s Environmental Impact Assessment.” Journal of National Development Studies 12 (2): 133–178. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Taitung County Government. 2018. “Introduction: Taitung Travel” Available at: Accessed October 16 2019 https://tour.taitung.gov.tw/en/discover/intro
   Google Scholar
• Taitung County Public Work Bureau 2012. Accessed October 16 2019 http://www.taitung.gov.tw/Publicwork/News_Content.aspx?n=E4FA0485B2A5071E&sms=E13057BB37942D3F&s=3F66F5AE0561EF79 (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Tu, W. L. 2010. “Environmental Impact Assessment: Environmental Disputes over the 3rd Stage of Central Taiwan Science Park Development.” Journal of Public Administration 35: 29–60. (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Tu, W. L. 2012. “Expert Meetings in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process: The Framed Expert’s Rationality’ Taiwan.” Journal of Democracy 9 (3): 119–155. in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• UDN News. 2018. Accessed July 28, 2019 https://udn.com/news/story/7328/3279250 (In Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Wei, B. R. 2018. “Against Opposition to Anti-Meiliwan.” in Resistance: Ten Environmental Movements from Streets to the Court, edited by Y. Y. Chang and C. Lee, 34–43. Taipei: Sharing. (In Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., and C.-Y. D. Chang. 2008. Taiwan’s Environmental Struggle: Toward a Green Silicon Island. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W. M. N. 2017. “The Road to Environmental Participatory Governance in Taiwan: Collaboration and Challenges in Incineration and Municipal Waste Management.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60 (10): 1726–1740. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1251400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1984. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar