Accelerating innovation for the Dutch bioeconomy transition: the case of biobased asphalt

References

• Bosman, R., and J. Rotmans. 2014. Benchmarking Finnish and Dutch Bioeconomy Transition Governance. Rotterdam: Drift. Accessed 31 March 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rick_Bosman/publication/280065267_Benchmarking_Finnish_and_Dutch_bioeconomy_transition_governance/links/55a63a1608aed6b0255b38a9/Benchmarking-Finnish-and-Dutch-bioeconomy-transition-governance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bosman, R., and J. Rotmans. 2016. “Transition Governance towards a Bioeconomy: A Comparison of Finland and The Netherlands.” Sustainability 8 (10): 1017. Accessed 31 March 2020. doi:10.3390/su8101017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2015. Social Research Methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, Elias G., Evangelos Grigoroudis, David F. J. Campbell, Dirk Meissner, and Dimitra Stamati. 2018. “The Ecosystem as Helix: An Exploratory Theory-Building Study of Regional Co-Opetitive Entrepreneurial Ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models.” R&D Management 48 (1): 148–162. doi:10.1111/radm.12300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBBD. 2014. Biobased Delta Verder op Weg Naar Een Topregio:Openbare Samenvatting Businessplan Biobased Delta Voorjaar 2014 [Biobased Delta Further on the Way to a Top Region: Public Summary Business Plan Biobased Delta Spring 2014]. Bergen op zoom: Circular Biobased Delta.
   Google Scholar
• CBBD. 2020. Factsheet - CHAPLIN Program: Collaboration in Asphalt Applications with Lignin. 200615. Bergen op zoom: CBBD.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, J. M. 2020a. “The Function of Transition Brokers in the Regional Governance of Implementing Circular Economy: A Comparative Case Study of Six Dutch Regions.” Sustainability 12 (12): 5015. Accessed 10 August 2020. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5015. doi:10.3390/su12125015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, J. M. 2020b. “Practice-Based Model for Implementing Circular Economy: The Case of the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area.” Journal of Cleaner Production 255: 120255. Accessed 10 August 2020. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620303024. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaf, B., A. R. Kan, and H. Molenaar. 2017. The Dutch National Research Agenda in Perspective. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Accessed 30 June 2020. doi:10.1515/9789048532827.
   Google Scholar
• de Haan, J. H., and J. Rotmans. 2011. “Patterns in Transitions: Understanding Complex Chains of Change.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (1): 90–102. Accessed 29 April 2020. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsamny, Maged. 2020. Role of Niche Innovation in the Dutch Bioeconomy Transition. Unpublished manuscript, Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Accessed 6 January 2020. http://publications.europa.eu/publication/manifestation_identifier/PUB_KI0418806ENN.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, L., and J. Newig. 2016. “Importance of Actors and Agency in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Exploration of the Literature.” Sustainability 8 (5): 476. Accessed 10 August 2020. doi:10.3390/su8050476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2005. “The Dynamics of Transitions in Socio-Technical Systems: A Multi-Level Analysis of the Transition Pathway from Horse-Drawn Carriages to Automobiles (1860–1930).” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17 (4): 445–476. Accessed 29 April 2020. doi:10.1080/09537320500357319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2017. Case Study Research: Principles and Practice. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gliedt, T., C. E. Hoicka, and N. Jackson. 2018. “Innovation Intermediaries Accelerating Environmental Sustainability Transitions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 174: 1247–1261. Accessed 17 August 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, J., J. Rotmans, and J. W. Schot. 2010. Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanemaaijer, A. H., A. Manders, O. Raspe, M. van den Berge, L. Brandes, S. van Esch, J. Notenboom, et al. 2014., Green Gains: In Search of Opportunities for the Dutch Economy. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Accessed 1 April 2020. http://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/green-gains-in-search-of-opportunities-for-the-dutch-economy.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, F. 2018. “The Potential Contribution of Transition Theory to the Analysis of Bioclusters and Their Role in the Transition to a Bioeconomy.” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 12 (2): 265–276. Accessed 1 April 2020. doi:10.1002/bbb.1861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K., J. M. Wittmayer, and D. Loorbach. 2018. “Transition versus Transformation: What’s the Difference?” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 27: 1–3. Accessed 26 April 2020. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R., R. Kemp, J. Schot, and B. Truffer. 2002. Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. 1st. London: Routledge. Accessed 29 April 2020. https://www.oapen.org/download?type=document&docid=1005879.
   Google Scholar
• IIZ. 2015. “World’s First for Zeeland with construction of bio asphalt trial sections.” Invest In Zeeland [blog], 7 September. Accessed 5 July 2020. https://www.investinzeeland.com/en/news/worlds-first-zeeland-construction-bio-asphalt-trial-sections
   Google Scholar
• IPW and EZK. 2013. Kamerbrief Groene Groei: Voor Een Sterke, Duurzame Economie [Parliamentary Letter on Green Growth: For a Strong Sustainable Economy]. The Hague: Ministry of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment. Accessed 1 April 2020. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/kamerstukken/2013/03/28/kamerbrief-groene-groei-voor-een-sterke-duurzame-economie/kamerbrief-groene-groei-voor-een-sterke-duurzame-economie.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IPW. 2016. A Circular Economy in The Netherlands by 2050: Government-Wide Programme for a Circular Economy. The Hague: Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment. Accessed 31 March 2020. http://edepot.wur.nl/409842.
   Google Scholar
• Jongsma, C., I. Nieuwenhuijse, B. Kampman, M. Broeren, and D. Jaspers. 2020., CO2-Reductie Met de Circular Biobased Delta: Aanzet Voor Een Routekaart Voor de Periode Tot 2030 (20.190303.147), Delft: CE Delft. Accessed 1 June 2020. https://biobaseddelta.nl/circulair-biobased-delta-routekaart.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R. and Loorbach, D., eds. 2003. “Governance for Sustainability through Transition Management, Anonymous” In EAEPE 2003 Conference. Maastricht, 7 November, Maastricht. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Derk_Loorbach/publication/2883708_Governance_for_Sustainability_Through_Transition_Management/links/02e7e51a74226aa52c000000/Governance-for-Sustainability-Through-Transition-Management.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. “Regime Shifts to Sustainability through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10 (2): 175–198. Accessed 20 April 2020. doi:10.1080/09537329808524310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, Jonathan, Frank W. Geels, Florian Kern, Jochen Markard, Elsie Onsongo, Anna Wieczorek, Floortje Alkemade., et al. 2019. “An Agenda for Sustainability Transitions Research: State of the Art and Future Directions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31: 1–32. Accessed 8 March 2020. https://www-sciencedirect-com.eur.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S2210422418303332. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwant, K., A. Hamer, W. Siemers, and D. Both. 2018. Monitoring Biobased Economy in Nederland 2017. Den Haag: Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland. Accessed 3 June 2020. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/titel/2161125.
   Google Scholar
• Langeveld, J. W. A., K. P. H. Meesters, and M. S. Breure. 2016. The Biobased Economy and the Bioeconomy in The Netherlands. 1601), Wageningen: Biomass Research. Accessed 1 April 2020. https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2016/03/Netherlands%20position%20biobased%20economy_FBR%20Biomass%20Research%202016_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• LNV. 2007. Government Vision on the Biobased Economy for Energy Transition: Closing the Chain. The Hague: Ministry of Agriculture, Nature, and Food Quality. Accessed 1 April 2020. https://edepot.wur.nl/177042.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. 2007. Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development. Doctorate. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/35149475_Transition_Management_New_Mode_of_Governance_for_Sustainable_Development/citations.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. 2010. “Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework.” Governance 23 (1): 161–183. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., and J. Rotmans. 2010. “The Practice of Transition Management: Examples and Lessons from Four Distinct Cases.” Futures 42 (3): 237–246. Accessed 26 April 2020. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328709001839. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., and R. van Raak. 2006. Strategic Niche Management and Transition Management: Different but Complementary Approaches. Rotterdam: DRIFT, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/37247/Metis_118209.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., J. M. Wittmayer, H. Shiroyama, J. Fujino, and S. Mizuguchi. 2016. Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions European and Asian Experiences. Tokyo: Springer Japan. Accessed 7 January 2020. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., N. Frantzeskaki, and F. Avelino. 2017. “Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42 (1): 599–626. Accessed 20 May 2020. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovrić, N., M. Lovrić, and R. Mavsar. 2020. “Factors behind Development of Innovations in European Forest-Based Bioeconomy.” Forest Policy and Economics 111: 102079. Accessed 3 April 2020. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934118305239. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., and B. Truffer. 2008. “Technological Innovation Systems and the Multi-Level Perspective: Towards an Integrated Framework.” Research Policy 37 (4): 596–615. Accessed 29 April 2020. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbeek, M. M. M., d., H. C. M. Bakker, V. Beekman, S. Davies., Z. Kiresiewa, S. Delbrück, B. Ribeiro, et al. 2016. D2.3: “Review of Bioeconomy Strategies at Regional and National Levels: Promoting Stakeholder Engagement and Public Awareness for a Participative Governance of the European Bioeconomy.” The European Union. Accessed 31 March 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5a5a82ec7&appId=PPGMS
   Google Scholar
• Rauschmayer, F., T. Bauler, and N. Schäpke. 2015. “Towards a Thick Understanding of Sustainability Transitions: Linking Transition Management, Capabilities and Social Practices.” Ecological Economics 109: 211–221. Accessed 30 April 2020. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800914003656. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijksoverheid. 2019. Climate Agreement. Den Haag: Government of the Netherlands. Accessed 10 August. https://www.klimaatakkoord.nl/binaries/klimaatakkoord/documenten/publicaties/2019/06/28/klimaatakkoord/klimaatakkoord.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and F. W. Geels. 2008. “Strategic Niche Management and Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Theory, Findings, Research Agenda, and Policy.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (5): 537–554. . Accessed 10 April 2020. doi:10.1080/09537320802292651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., J. Voß, and J. Grin. 2010. “Innovation Studies and Sustainability Transitions: The Allure of the Multi-Level Perspective and Its Challenges.” Research Policy 39 (4): 435–448. Available at: . Accessed 5 May 2020. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733310000375. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Taakgroep Innovatie. 2019. Innoveren Met Een Missie: Integrale Kennis- en Innovatieagenda Voor Klimaat en Energie [Innovation with a Mission: Intergrated Knowledge and Innovation Agenda for the Climate and Energy]. Den Haag: Secretariaat Klimaatakkoord. Accessed 10 August 2020. https://www.klimaatakkoord.nl/binaries/klimaatakkoord/documenten/publicaties/2019/03/12/innoveren-met-een-missie/rapport_innovatie-uitgave_compleet_DEF_HR_bladwijzers.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• TKI. 2015. Onderzoeksagenda Biobased Economy 2015–2027. B4B: Biobased Voor Bedrijven, Burgers, en Beleid. [Biobased Economy Research Agenda 2015–2027. B4B: Biobased for Companies, Citizens, and Policy.]. Den Haag: TKI-BBE.
   Google Scholar
• Wihlborg, M., J. Sörensen, and J. A. Olsson. 2019. “Assessment of Barriers and Drivers for Implementation of Blue-Green Solutions in Swedish Municipalities.” Journal of Environmental Management 233: 706–718. Accessed 20 April 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. M., F. Avelino, F. van Steenbergen, and D. Loorbach. 2017. “Actor Roles in Transition: Insights from Sociological Perspectives.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 24: 45–56. Accessed 19 August 2020. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422416301009. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar