Why citizen scientists volunteer: the influence of motivations, barriers, and perceived project relevancy on volunteer participation and retention from a novel experiment

References

• Alender, B. 2016. “Understanding Volunteer Motivations to Participate in Citizen Science Projects: A Deeper Look at Water Quality Monitoring.” Journal of Science Communication 15 (03): A04. doi:10.22323/2.15030204.
   Google Scholar
• Asingizwe, D., P. M. Poortvliet, C. J. Koenraadt, A. J. van Vliet, C. M. Ingabire, L. Mutesa, and C. Leeuwis. 2020. “Why (Not) Participate in Citizen Science? Motivational Factors and Barriers to Participate in a Citizen Science Program for Malaria Control in Rwanda.” PloS One 15 (8): e0237396. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie Smith, M., N. Laurie, and M. Griffiths. 2018. “South–South Volunteering and Development.” The Geographical Journal 184 (2): 158–168. doi:10.1111/geoj.12243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, A., A. May, and D. Yu. 2016. “The Motivations, Enablers and Barriers for Voluntary Participation in an Online Crowdsourcing Platform.” Computers in Human Behavior 64: 923–931. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, K. S. 2003. Assessing the Benefits for Conservation of Volunteer Involvement in Conservation Activities. Science for Conservation 223. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, H. N., and D. A. Boone. 2012. “Analyzing Likert Data.” Journal of Extension 50 (2): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Bramston, P., G. Pretty, and C. Zammit. 2011. “Assessing Environmental Stewardship Motivation.” Environment and Behavior 43 (6): 776–788. doi:10.1177/0013916510382875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brossard, D., B. Lewenstein, and R. Bonney. 2005. “Scientific Knowledge and Attitude Change: The Impact of a Citizen Science Project.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (9): 1099–1121. doi:10.1080/09500690500069483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyere, B., and S. Rappe. 2007. “Identifying the Motivations of Environmental Volunteers.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (4): 503–516. doi:10.1080/09640560701402034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carifio, J., and R. J. Perla. 2007. “Ten Common Misunderstandings, Misconceptions, Persistent Myths and Urban Legends about Likert Scales and Likert Response Formats and Their Antidotes.” Journal of Social Sciences 3 (3): 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, C. C., and K. G. Hilchey. 2011. “A Review of Citizen Science and Community-Based Environmental Monitoring: Issues and Opportunities.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 176 (1-4): 273–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. 2016. Citizen Science: How Ordinary People Are Changing the Face of Discovery. New York: The Overlook Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crall, A. W., R. Jordan, K. Holfelder, G. J. Newman, J. Graham, and D. M. Waller. 2013. “The Impacts of an Invasive Species Citizen Science Training Program on Participant Attitudes, Behavior, and Science literacy.” Public Understanding of Science 22 (6): 745–764. doi:10.1177/0963662511434894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, D. W., and G. Godbey. 1987. “Reconceptualizing Barriers to Family Leisure.” Leisure Sciences 9 (2): 119–127. doi:10.1080/01490408709512151.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, E., and C. Duchêne-Lacroix. 2014. “Multi-Local Living in the Global South and Global North: Differences, Convergences and Universality of an Underestimated Phenomenon.” Trialog 116 (117): 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, Janis L., Jennifer Shirk, David Bonter, Rick Bonney, Rhiannon L. Crain, Jason Martin, Tina Phillips, and Karen Purcell. 2012. “The Current State of Citizen Science as a Tool for Ecological Research and Public Engagement.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10 (6): 291–297. doi:10.1890/110236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diner, D.,. S. Nakayama, O. Nov, and M. Porfiri. 2018. “Social Signals as Design Interventions for Enhancing Citizen Science Contributions.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (4): 594–611. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1299779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domroese, M. C., and E. A. Johnson. 2017. “Why Watch Bees? Motivations of Citizen Science Volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project.” Biological Conservation 208: 40–47. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, B. J. 1997. “Fostering Volunteerism in an Environmental Stewardship Group: A Report on the Task Force to Bring Back the Don, Toronto, Canada.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 40 (4): 483–505. doi:10.1080/09640569712056.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, G., and M. Laing. 2017. “Policy-Makers Perspectives on Credibility, Relevance and Legitimacy (CRELE).” Environmental Science & Policy 76: 146–152. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, C. 2011. “Civic Engagement Highest in Developed Countries.” Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/145589/Civic-Engagement-Highest-Developed-Countries.aspx#1
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C., E. Abrams, R. Reitsma, K. Roux, L. Salmonsen, and P. P. Marra. 2005. “The Neighborhood Nestwatch Program: Participant Outcomes of a Citizen-Science Ecological Research Project.” Conservation Biology 19 (3): 589–594. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00s01.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, G., and H. Geoghegan. 2016. “Initiating and Continuing Participation in Citizen Science for Natural History.” BMC Ecology 16 (1): 13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finkelstein, M. A. 2008. “Volunteer Satisfaction and Volunteer Action: A Functional Approach.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 36 (1): 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, M. A., and M. T. Brannick. 2007. “Applying Theories of Institutional Helping to Informal Volunteering: Motives, Role Identity, and Prosocial Personality.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 35 (1): 101–114. doi:10.2224/sbp.2007.35.1.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follett, R., and V. Strezov. 2015. “An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns.” PLoS One 10 (11): e0143687.
   Google Scholar
• García-Coll, I., A. Martínez-Otero, A. Ramírez-Soto, A. NiñoCruz, A. J. Rivas, and L. Domínguez-Barrada. 2004. “Relación aguabosque: delimitación de zonas prioritarias para pago de servicios ambientales hidrológicos en la cuenca del río Gavilanes, Coatepec, Veracruz.” In Manejo integral de cuencas en México: estudios y reflexiones para orientar la política ambiental INE/SEMARNAT, edited by H. Cotler, 99–115. Mexico City.
   Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, H., A. Dyke, R. Pateman, S. West, and G. Everett. 2016. Understanding Motivations for Citizen Science. Final Report on behalf of UKEOF, University of Reading, Stockholm Environment Institute (University of York) and University of the West of England.
   Google Scholar
• Grube, J. A., and J. Allyn Piliavin. 2000. “Role Identity, Organizational Experiences, and Volunteer Performance.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (9): 1108–1119. doi:10.1177/01461672002611007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Pearson College Division.
   Google Scholar
• Haywood, B. K., J. K. Parrish, and J. Dolliver. 2016. “Place-Based and Data-Rich Citizen Science as a Precursor for Conservation Action.” Conservation Biology 30 (3): 476–486.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, O., and C. M. Shackleton. 2015. “The Benefits from and Barriers to Participation in Civic Environmental Organisations in South Africa.” Biodiversity and Conservation 24 (8): 2031–2046. doi:10.1007/s10531-015-0924-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, P.R., C. Brownlow, I. Murray, and B. Cozens. 2004. SPSS Explained. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, S. J., and P. C. White. 2012. “Motivations and Barriers in Relation to Community Participation in Biodiversity Recording.” Journal for Nature Conservation 20 (6): 364–373. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2012.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estatistícas y Geographía (INEGI). 2015a. Demografía – Xalapa. Mexico City, Mexico: INEGI.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estatistícas y Geographía (INEGI). 2015b. Demografía – Coatepec. Mexico City, Mexico: INEGI.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, S. K., J. S. Carlton, and M. C. Monroe. 2012. “Motivation and Satisfaction of Volunteers at a Florida Natural Resource Agency.” Journal of Park and Recreation Administration Spring 30: 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Jennett, Charlene, Laure Kloetzer, Daniel Schneider, Ioanna Iacovides, Anna Cox, Margaret Gold, Brian Fuchs., et al. 2016. “Motivations, Learning and Creativity in Online Citizen Science.” Journal of Science Communication 15 (03): A05. doi:10.22323/2.15030205.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J. H., C. Schneider, and J. Valacich. 2010. “Enhancing the Motivational Affordance of Information Systems: The Effects of Real-Time Performance Feedback and Goal Setting in Group Collaboration Environments.” Management Science 56 (4): 724–742. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullenberg, C., and D. Kasperowski. 2016. “What is Citizen Science?: A Scientometric Meta-Analysis.” PLoS One 11 (1): e0147152. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahsen, M. 2009. “A Science–Policy Interface in the Global South: The Politics of Carbon Sinks and Science in Brazil.” Climatic Change 97 (3–4): 339–372. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9610-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land-Zandstra, A. M., J. L. Devilee, F. Snik, F. Buurmeijer, and J. M. van den Broek. 2016. “Citizen Science on a Smartphone: Participants’ Motivations and Learning.” Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 25 (1): 45–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, Lincoln R., Caren B. Cooper, Sara Futch, Devyani Singh, Nathan J. Shipley, Kathy Dale, Geoffrey S. LeBaron, and John Y. Takekawa. 2020. “The Diverse Motivations of Citizen Scientists: Does Conservation Emphasis Grow as Volunteer Participation Progresses?” Biological Conservation 242: 108428. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laut, J., F. Cappa, O. Nov, and M. Porfiri. 2017. “Increasing Citizen Science Contribution Using a Virtual Peer.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68 (3): 583–593. doi:10.1002/asi.23685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. K., K. Crowston, M. Harandi, C. Østerlund, and G. Miller. 2018. “Appealing to Different Motivations in a Message to Recruit Citizen Scientists: Results of a Field Experiment.” Journal of Science Communication 17 (01): A02. doi:10.22323/2.17010202.
   Google Scholar
• López-Rodríguez, R., and F. Acevedo-Rosas. 2005. Flood Risk Zones within the State of Veracruz. Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico: Mexican National Water Commission, Veracruz Delegation.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, V. Y., and E. I. Greig. 2019. “Young Adults' Motivations to Feed Wild Birds and Influences on Their Potential Participation in Citizen Science: An Exploratory Study.” Biological Conservation 235: 295–307. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, M. G. 2015. “Solver Engagement in Knowledge Sharing in Crowdsourcing Communities: Exploring the Link to Creativity.” Research Policy 44 (8): 1419–1430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maund, P. R., K. N. Irvine, B. Lawson, J. Steadman, K. Risely, A. A. Cunningham, and Z. G. Davies. 2020. “What Motivates the Masses: Understanding Why People Contribute to Conservation Citizen Science Projects.” Biological Conservation 246: 108587. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measham, Thomas G., and Guy B. Barnett. 2008. “Environmental Volunteering: Motivations, Modes and Outcomes.” Australian Geographer 39 (4): 537–552. doi:10.1080/00049180802419237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokondoko, P., R. H. Manson, and O. Pérez-Maqueo. 2016. “Assessing the Service of Water Quality Regulation by Quantifying the Effects of Land Use on Water Quality and Public Health in Central Veracruz, Mexico.” Ecosystem Services 22: 161–173. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nava-López, Mariana, Theresa L. Selfa, Diana Cordoba, Erin C. Pischke, David Torrez, Sophie Ávila-Foucat, Kathleen E. Halvorsen, and Carmen Maganda. 2018. “Decentralizing Payments for Hydrological Services Programs in Veracruz, Mexico: Challenges and Implications for Long-Term Sustainability.” Society & Natural Resources 31 (12): 1389–1399. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1463420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, G., A. Wiggins, A. Crall, E. Graham, S. Newman, and K. Crowston. 2012. “The Future of Citizen Science: Emerging Technologies and Shifting Paradigms.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10 (6): 298–304. doi:10.1890/110294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, G., M. Chandler, M. Clyde, B. McGreavy, M. Haklay, H. Ballard, S. Gray, et al. 2017. “Leveraging the Power of Place in Citizen Science for Effective Conservation Decision Making.” Biological Conservation 208: 55–64. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nyaupane, G. P., and K. L. Andereck. 2008. “Understanding Travel Constraints: Application and Extension of a Leisure Constraints Model.” Journal of Travel Research 46 (4): 433–439. doi:10.1177/0047287507308325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, L., M. Townsend, and M. Ebden. 2008. Environmental Volunteering: Motivations, Barriers and Benefits. Report to the Scottish Forestry Trust and Forestry Commission. https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/research/environmental-volunteering-motivations-and-barriers/
   Google Scholar
• Paré, L., and P. Gerez. 2012. Al filo del agua: cogestión de la subcuenca del río Pixquiac, Veracruz. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Ecología.
   Google Scholar
• Penner, L. A. 2002. “Dispositional and Organizational Influences on Sustained Volunteerism: An Interactionist Perspective.” Journal of Social Issues 58 (3): 447–467. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piliavin, J. A., J. A. Grube, and P. L. Callero. 2002. “Role as Resource for Action in Public Service.” Journal of Social Issues 58 (3): 469–485. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.t01-1-00027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, J. 2005. “Volunteering in Victoria over 2004.” Australian Journal on Volunteering 10 (2): 29.
   Google Scholar
• Raddick, M. J., G. Bracey, P. L. Gay, C. J. Lintott, C. Cardamone, P. Murray, K. Shawinski, A. S. Szalay and J. Vandenberg. 2013. “Galaxy Zoo: Motivations of Citizen Scientists.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.6886.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S. J., J. A. Galbraith, J. A. Smith, and D. N. Jones. 2017. “Garden Bird Feeding: Insights and Prospects from a North-South Comparison of This Global Urban Phenomenon.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 5: 24. doi:10.3389/fevo.2017.00024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roggenbuck, J. W., S. C. Haas, T. E. Hall, and R. B. Hull. 2001. Motivation, Retention, and Program Recommendations of save Our Streams Volunteers. Blacksburg: Virginia Water Resources Research Center at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
   Google Scholar
• Roitter, M. 2016. “Beyond Images and Perceptions: Conceptualizing and Measuring Volunteerism in Buenos Aires.” In Perspectives on Volunteering: Voices from the South, edited by Jaqueline Butcher and Christopher J. Einolf, 171–193. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rotman, D., J. Hammock, J. Preece, D. Hansen, C. Boston, A. Bowser, and Y. He. 2014. “Motivations Affecting Initial and Long-Term Participation in Citizen Science Projects in Three Countries.” In iConference 2014 Proceedings, 110–124. doi:10.9776/14054.
   Google Scholar
• Ruxton, G. D., and G. Beauchamp. 2008. “Time for Some a Priori Thinking about Post Hoc Testing.” Behavioral Ecology 19 (3): 690–693. doi:10.1093/beheco/arn020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. L., R. Kaplan, and R. E. Grese. 2001. “Predicting Volunteer Commitment in Environmental Stewardship Programmes.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44 (5): 629–648. doi:10.1080/09640560120079948.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., M. A. Haddock, and S. W. Sokolowski. 2017. “Closing the Gap? New Perspectives on Volunteering North and South.” In Perspectives on Volunteering: Voices from the South, edited by Jaqueline Butcher and Christopher J. Einolf, 29–51. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., S. W. Sokolowski, and M. A. Haddock. 2011. “Measuring the Economic Value of Volunteer Work Globally: Concepts, Estimates, and a Roadmap to the Future.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 82 (3): 217–252. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2011.00437.x.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkki, S., J. Niemelä, R. Tinch, S. Van Den Hove, A. Watt, and J. Young. 2014. “Balancing Credibility, Relevance and Legitimacy: A Critical Assessment of Trade-Offs in Science–Policy Interfaces.” Science and Public Policy 41 (2): 194–206. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkki, Simo, Rob Tinch, Jari Niemelä, Ulrich Heink, Kerry Waylen, Johannes Timaeus, Juliette Young, Allan Watt, Carsten Neßhöver, and Sybille van den Hove. 2015. “Adding ‘Iterativity’ to the Credibility, Relevance, Legitimacy: A Novel Scheme to Highlight Dynamic Aspects of Science–Policy Interfaces.” Environmental Science & Policy 54: 505–512. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirk, J. L., H. L. Ballard, C. C. Wilderman, T. Phillips, A. Wiggins, R. Jordan, E. McCallie, et al. 2012. “Public Participation in Scientific Research: A Framework for Deliberate Design.” Ecology and Society 17(2): 29. doi:10.5751/ES-04705-170229.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, P. F., M. E. Kraft, and S. Kamieniecki. 2001. Environmental Leadership in Developing Countries: Transnational Relations and Biodiversity Policy in Costa Rica and Bolivia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., and T. Dietz. 1994. “The Value Basis of Environmental Concern.” Journal of Social Issues 50 (3): 65–84. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2018. “The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education.” Research in Science Education 48 (6): 1273–1296. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theobald, E. J., A. K. Ettinger, H. K. Burgess, L. B. DeBey, N. R. Schmidt, H. E. Froehlich, C. Wagner et al. 2015. “Global Change and Local Solutions: Tapping the Unrealized Potential of Citizen Science for Biodiversity Research.” Biological Conservation 181: 236–244.
   Google Scholar
• Tulloch, A. I., K. Mustin, H. P. Possingham, J. K. Szabo, and K. A. Wilson. 2013. “To Boldly Go Where No Volunteer Has Gone Before: Predicting Volunteer Activity to Prioritize Surveys at the Landscape Scale.” Diversity and Distributions 19 (4): 465–480.
   Google Scholar
• Verduzco, G. 2016. “Solidarity and Volunteering: A View from Mexico.” In Perspectives on Volunteering: Voices from the South, edited by Jaqueline Butcher and Christopher J. Einolf, 195–211. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D. R., L. G. Underhill, M. Keene, and A. T. Knight. 2015. “Understanding the Motivations and Satisfactions of Volunteers to Improve the Effectiveness of Citizen Science Programs.” Society & Natural Resources 28 (9): 1013–1029. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1054976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yáñez-Arancibia, A., and J.W. Day. 2004. “Environmental Subregions in the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Zone: The Ecosystem Approach as an Integrated Management Tool.” Ocean & Coastal Management 47 (11–12): 727–757. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2004.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., J. Tang, Y. C. Zhao, and T. Wang. 2020. “Effects of Feedback Design and Dispositional Goal Orientations on Volunteer Performance in Citizen Science Projects.” Computers in Human Behavior 107: 106266. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar