1,393
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Perceptions and practice in Natural Flood Management: unpacking differences in community and practitioner perspectives

Pages 2528-2552 | Received 13 Jun 2022, Accepted 15 Mar 2023, Published online: 17 May 2023

References

  • Ambiental. 2021. “UK Flood Report – Storm Christoph.” Accessed 22 October 2022. https://www.ambientalrisk.com/uk-flood-report-storm-christoph-2021/
  • Anderson, Carl, and Fabrice Renaud. 2021. “A Review of Public Acceptance of Nature-Based Solutions: The ‘Why’, ‘When’, and ‘How’ of Success for Disaster Risk Reduction Measures.” Ambio: A Journal of Environment and Society 50 (8): 1552–1573. doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01502-4.
  • Anderson, Carl, Fabrice Renaud, Stuart Hanscomb, and Alejando Gonzalez-Ollauri. 2022. “Green, Hybrid, or Grey Disaster Risk Reduction Measures: What Shapes Public Preferences for Nature-Based Solutions?” Journal of Environmental Management 310: 114727. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114727.
  • Auster, Roger, Alan Puttock, and Richard Brazier. 2020. “Unravelling Perceptions of Eurasian Beaver Reintroduction in Great Britain.” Area 52 (2): 364–375. doi:10.1111/area.12576.
  • Bark, Rosalind, Julia Martin-Ortega, and Kerry Waylen. 2021. “Stakeholders’ Views on Natural Flood Management: Implications for the Nature-Based Solutions Paradigm Shift?” Environmental Science & Policy 115: 91–98. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.10.018.
  • Buchecker, Matthias, Dominika Maria Ogasa, and Elizabeth Maidl. 2016. “How Well Do the Wider Public Accept Integrated Flood Risk Management? An Empirical Study in Two Swiss Alpine Valleys.” Environmental Science & Policy 55 (2): 309–317. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.021.
  • Chin, Anne, Melinda Daniels, Michael Urban, Hervé Piégay, Kenneth Gregory, Wendy Bigler, Anya Butt, et al. 2008. “Perceptions of Wood in Rivers and Challenges for Stream Restoration in the United States.” Environmental Management 41 (6): 893–903. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9075-9.
  • Connelly, Angela, Andrew Snow, Jeremy Carter, and Rachel Lauwerijssen. 2020. “What Approaches Exist to Evaluate the Effectiveness of UK-Relevant Natural Flood Management Measures? A Systematic Map Protocol.” Environmental Evidence 9 (11): 1–13. doi:10.1186/s13750-020-00192-x.
  • D’Souza, Mikaela, Matthew Johnson, and Christopher Ives. 2021. “Values Influence Public Perceptions of Flood Management Schemes.” Journal of Environmental Management 291: 112636. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112636.
  • Dadson, Simon, Jim Hall, Anna Murgatroyd, Mike Acreman, Paul Bates, Keith Beven, Louise Heathwaite, et al. 2017. “A Restatement of the Natural Science Evidence Concerning Catchment-Based ‘Natural’ Flood Management in the UK.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science 473 (2199): 1–19. doi:10.1098/rspa.2016.0706.
  • Ellis, Nicola, Karen Anderson, and Richard Brazier. 2021. “Mainstreaming Natural Flood Management: A Proposed Research Framework Derived from a Critical Evaluation of Current Knowledge.” Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 45 (6): 819–841. doi:10.1177/0309133321997299.
  • European Union. 2007. “Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the Assessment and Management of Flood Risks.” Official Journal of the European Communities L 288/27:27–34. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32007L0060.
  • Gregory, K. J., and R. J. Davis. 1993. “The Perception of Riverscape Aesthetics: An Example from Two Hampshire Rivers.” Journal of Environmental Management 39 (3): 171–185. doi:10.1006/jema.1993.1062.
  • Gunnell, Kelly, Mark Mulligan, Robert Francis, and David Hole. 2019. “Evaluating Natural Infrastructure for Flood Management within the Watersheds of Selected Global Cities.” The Science of the Total Environment 670: 411–424. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.212.
  • Hein, Thomas, Ulrich Schwarz, Helmut Habersack, Julian Nichersu, Stefan Preiner, Nigel Willby, and Gabriele Weigelhofer. 2016. “Current Status and Restoration Options for Floodplains along the Danube River.” The Science of the Total Environment 543 (Pt A): 778–790. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.073.
  • Holstead, Kirsty L., Wendy Kenyon, Josselin Rouillard, Jonathan Hopkins, and C. Galán-Díaz. 2017. “Natural Flood Management from the Farmer’s Perspective: Criteria That Affect Uptake.” Journal of Flood Risk Management 10 (2): 205–218. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12129.
  • How, Fraser, and Joanne Tippett. 2021. Evaluation of Community Engagement: Towards a National Nature Reserve in the Flashes of Wigan and Leigh. Report for Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Natural England. Manchester: The University of Manchester. https://carbonlandscape.org.uk/resource-category/fraser-how-joanne-tippett-evaluation-community-engagement-nnr.
  • Howgate, Olivia, and Wendy Kenyon. 2009. “Community Cooperation with Natural Flood Management: A Case Study in the Scottish Borders.” Area 41 (3): 329–340. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00869.x.
  • Iacob, Oana, John Rowan, Iain Brown, and Chris Ellis. 2014. “Evaluating Wider Benefits of Natural Flood Management Strategies: An Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Perspective.” Hydrology Research 45 (6): 774–787. doi:10.2166/nh.2014.184.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-ii/.
  • Kenyon, Wendy. 2007. “Evaluating Flood Risk Management Options in Scotland: A Participant-Led Multi-Criteria Approach.” Ecological Economics 64 (1): 70–81. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.011.
  • Lorenzoni, Irene, Sophie Nicholson-Cole, and Lorraine Whitmarsh. 2007. “Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications.” Global Environmental Change 17 (3-4): 445–459. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004.
  • Mell, Ian. 2019. Green Infrastructure Planning: Reintegrating Landscape in Urban Planning. London: Lund Humphries.
  • Mostert, Erik, Claudia Pahl-Wostl, Yvonne Rees, Brad Searle, David Tàbara, and Joanne Tippett. 2007. “Social Learning in European River-Basin Management: Barriers and Fostering Mechanisms from 10 River Basins.” Ecology and Society 12 (1): 16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267838. doi:10.5751/ES-01960-120119.
  • Oisalu, Sandra. 2022. “Barriers and Enablers for up-Scaling NbS in Urban Environment in the Baltic States.” LAND4FLOOD. COST Action CA16209, European Cooperation in Science and Technology. n.d. http://www.land4flood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/VM_report-Up-scalingNBS-final.pdf.
  • Poledniková, Zuzana, and Tomáš Galia. 2021. “Photo Simulation of a River Restoration: Relationships between Public Perception and Ecosystem Services.” River Research and Applications 37 (1): 44–53. doi:10.1002/rra.3738.
  • Posthumus, H., J. R. Rouquette, J. Morris, D. J. G. Gowing, and T. M. Hess. 2010. “A Framework for the Assessment of Ecosystem Goods and Services: A Case Study on Lowland Floodplains in England.” Ecological Economics 69 (7): 1510–1523. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.011.
  • Raška, Pavel, Nejc Bezak, Carla S. S. Ferreira, Zahra Kalantari, Kazimierz Banasik, Miriam Bertola, Mary Bourke, et al. 2022. “Identifying Barriers for Nature-Based Solutions in Flood Risk Management: An Interdisciplinary Overview Using Expert Community Approach.” Journal of Environmental Management 310: 114725. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114725.
  • Tippett, Joanne, Iain Deas, and Graham Haughton. 2022. “Geo-Environmental Spatial Imaginaries: Reframing Nature Using Soft Spaces and Hybrid Rationalities.” Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 4: 1–15. doi:10.3389/frsc.2022.882929.
  • Tippett, Joanne, and Fraser How. 2020. “Where to Lean the Ladder of Participation: A Normative Heuristic for Effective Coproduction Processes.” Town Planning Review 91 (2): 109–132. doi:10.3828/tpr.2020.7.
  • Tseng, Chin-Pei, and Edmund Penning-Rowsell. 2012. “Micro-Political and Related Barriers to Stakeholder Engagement in Flood Risk Management.” The Geographical Journal 178 (3): 253–269. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2012.00464.x.
  • Tufte, Edward. 1990. Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
  • Waylen, K. A., K. L. Holstead, K. Colley, and J. Hopkins. 2018. “Challenges to Enabling and Implementing Natural Flood Management in Scotland.” Journal of Flood Risk Management 11 (2): S1078–S1089. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12301.
  • Wells, Josh, Jillian Labadz, Amanda Smith, and Mofakkarul Islam. 2020. “Barriers to the Uptake and Implementation of Natural Flood Management: A Social-Ecological Analysis.” Journal of Flood Risk Management 13 (Suppl. 1): e12561. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12561.
  • Wengel, Yana, Alison McIntosh, and Cheryl Cockburn-Wootten. 2019. “Co-Creating Knowledge in Tourism Research Using the Ketso Method.” Tourism Recreation Research 44 (3): 311–322. doi:10.1080/02508281.2019.1575620.
  • Werritty, Alan, Donald Houston, Tom Ball, Amy Tavendale, and Andrew Black. 2007. Exploring the Social Impacts of Flood Risk and Flooding in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive, Central Research Unit. https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20150219020106/http:/www.gov.scot/Publications/2007/04/02121350/0
  • Wharton, Geraldene, and David Gilvear. 2007. “River Restoration in the UK: Meeting the Dual Needs of the European Union Water Framework Directive and Flood Defence?” International Journal of River Basin Management 5 (2): 143–154. doi:10.1080/15715124.2007.9635314.
  • Wingfield, Thea, Neil Macdonald, Kimberley Peters, and Jack Spees. 2021. “Barriers to Mainstream Adoption of Catchment-Wide Natural Flood Management: A Transdisciplinary Problem-Framing Study of Delivery Practice.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 25 (12): 6239–6259. doi:10.5194/hess-25-6239-2021.