Meaning-making in the practice of collaboration: how implicit normative structures guide collaborative processes around contested natural resource issues

References

• Åhman, B., S. Rasmus, C. Risvoll, S. M. Eilersten, and H. Norberg. 2022. “Large Predators and Their Impact on Reindeer Husbandry.” In Reindeer Husbandry and Global Environmental Change: Pastoralism in Fennoscandia, edited by T. Horstkotte, Ö. Holand, J. Kumpula, and J. Moen. London & New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003118565-9.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beers, P., B. van Mierlo, and A. C. Hoes. 2016. “Toward an Integrative Perspective on Social Learning in System Innovation Initiatives.” Ecology and Society 21 (1): 33. doi:10.5751/ES-08148-210133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., A. Sjölander-Lindqvist, C. Sandström, and S. Larsson. 2022. “Addressing the Swedish Large Carnivore Controversy: Identifying Roadblocks in Collaborative Governance to Reduce Conflict.” Frontiers in Conservation Science 3: 952242. doi:10.3389/fcosc.2022.952242.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley Brymer, A. L., J. D. Wulfhorst, and M. W. Brunson. 2018. “Analyzing Stakeholders’ Workshop Dialogue for Evidence of Social Learning.” Ecology and Society 23 (1): 42. doi:10.5751/ES-09959-230142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummel, R. F., K. C. Nelson, S. Grayzeck Souter, P. J. Jakes, and D. R. Williams. 2010. “Social Learning in a Policy-Mandated Collaboration: Community Wildfire Protection Planning in the Eastern United States.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53 (6): 681–699. doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.488090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueger, C. 2014. “Pathways to Practice: Praxiography and International Politics.” European Political Science Review 6 (3): 383–406. doi:10.1017/S1755773913000167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. 2002. “A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development.” Organization Science 13 (4): 442–455. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin, B. C., H. Gosnell, and B. A. Cosens. 2014. “A Decade of Adaptive Governance Scholarship: Synthesis and Future Directions.” Ecology and Society 19 (3): 56. doi:10.5751/ES-06824-190356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, K., and M. J. Stern. 2018. “Boundary Spanners as Trust Ambassadors in Collaborative Natural Resource Management.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61 (2): 291–308. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1303462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contu, A., and H. Willmott. 2003. “Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory.” Organization Science 14 (3): 283–296. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.3.283.15167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diduck, A., A. J. Sinclair, G. Hostetler, and P. Fitzpatrick. 2012. “Transformative Learning Theory, Public Involvement, and Natural Resource and Environmental Management.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 55 (10): 1311–1330. doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.645718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díez, E. G., I. Etxano, and E. Garmendia. 2015. “Evaluating Participatory Processes in Conservation Policy and Governance: Lessons from a Natura 2000 Pilot Case Study.” Environmental Policy and Governance 25 (2): 125–138. doi:10.1002/eet.1667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressel, S. 2020. “Social-Ecological Performance of Collaborative Wildlife Governance. The Case of Swedish Moose Management.” Doctoral Thesis No. 2020. 30. Umeå, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh. 2011. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, A. 2019. “Review of Factors Influencing Social Learning within Participatory Environmental Governance.” Ecology and Society 24 (1): 3. doi:10.5751/ES-10599-240103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudge, M., and P. Leith. 2021. “Rethinking Participation in Commons Governance: Political Representation and Participation.” Society & Natural Resources 34 (8): 1038–1055. doi:10.1080/08941920.2021.1931592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giebels, D., A. van Buuren, and J. Edelenbos. 2015. “Using Knowledge in a Complex Decision-Making Process - Evidence and Principles from the Danish Houting Project‘s Ecosystem-Based Management Approach.” Environmental Science & Policy 47: 53–67. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgren, L., H. Bergeå, and L. Westberg. 2018. “Communication Problems When Participants Disagree (or Avoid Disagreeing) in Dialogues in Swedish Natural Resource Management – Challenges to Agonism in Practice.” Frontiers in Communication 3: 56. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2018.00056.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson-Forman, K., E. Reimerson, A. Sjölander-Lindqvist, and C. Sandström. 2018. “Governing Large Carnivores – Comparative Insights from Three Different Countries.” Society & Natural Resources 31 (7): 837–852. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1447179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huzzard, T. 2004. “Communities of Domination? Reconceptualising Organisational Learning and Power.” Journal of Workplace Learning 16 (6): 350–361. doi:10.1108/13665620410550321.
   Google Scholar
• Jager, N. W., J. Newig, E. Challies, and E. Kochskämper. 2020. “Pathways to Implementation: Evidence on How Participation in Environmental Governance Impacts on Environmental Outcomes.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 30 (3): 383–399. doi:10.1093/jopart/muz034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanarp, G. C. S., and L. Westberg. 2023. “Adapting Climate Change–How Government Authorities in Sweden Make Sense of Adaptation through a Network Practice.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2023: 1–21. doi:10.1080/09640568.2023.2171278.
   Google Scholar
• Kløcker Larsen, R., M. Boström, Muonio Reindeer Herding District, Vilhelmina Södra Reindeer Herding district, Vornese Reindeer Herding District, and J. Wik-Karlsson. 2022. “The Impacts of Mining on Sámi Lands: A Knowledge Synthesis from Three Reindeer Herding Districts.” The Extractive Industries and Society 9: 101051. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2022.101051.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkmann. 2015. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., C. M. Weible, S. R. Vince, S. N. Siddiki, and J. C. Calanni. 2014. “Fostering Learning through Collaboration: Knowledge Acquisition and Belief Change in Marine Aquaculture Partnerships.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (3): 591–622. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levesque, V. R., A. Calhoun, K. Bell, and T. Johnson. 2017. “Turning Contention into Collaboration: Engaging Power, Trust, and Learning in Collaborative Networks.” Society & Natural Resources 30 (2): 245–260. doi:10.1080/08941920.2016.1180726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linell, P. 1995. “Troubles with Mutualities: Towards a Dialogical Theory of Misunderstanding and Miscommunication.” In Mutualities in Dialogue, edited by Marková, I., C. F. Graumann, and K. Foppa, 176–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muro, M., and P. Jeffrey. 2008. “A Critical Review of the Theory and Application of Social Learning in Participatory Natural Resource Management Processes.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51 (3): 325–344. doi:10.1080/09640560801977190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. 2012. Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction, 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan, M., M. Mahon, and J. McDonagh. 2015. “Power, Discourse and Participation in Nature Conflicts: The Case of Turf Cutters in the Governance of Ireland’s Raised Bog Designations.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 17 (1): 127–145. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2014.914895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. 2009. “A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity and Multi-Level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes.” Global Environmental Change 19 (3): 354–365. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. 2008. “Stakeholder Participation for Environmental Management: A Literature Review.” Biological Conservation 141 (10): 2417–2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regeringens proposition 2012/13:191. En hållbar rovdjurspolitik. Stockholm. 2013. (The Swedish Government‘S Bill on a Sustainable Predator Policy). Accessed February 2023. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/en-hallbar-rovdjurspolitik_h003191/html/.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 2002. The Site of the Social: A Philosophical account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Universitu Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 1997. “Whose Text? Whose Context?” Discourse & Society 8 (2): 165–187. doi:10.1177/0957926597008002002-.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEPA, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. Förvaltningsverktyg för förekomst av stora rovdjur baserat på en toleransnivå för rennäringen. (Redovisning av ett regeringsuppdrag) Rapport 6555, April 2013. Accessed February, 2023 https://www.sametinget.se/56228.
   Google Scholar
• Sjölander-Lindqvist, A., C. Risvoll, R. Kaarhus, A. K. Lundberg, and C. Sandström. 2020. “Knowledge Claims and Struggles in Decentralized Large Carnivore Governance: Insights From Norway and Sweden.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8: 120. doi:10.3389/fevo.2020.00120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöhr, C., B. Lundholm, B. Crona, and I. Chabay. 2014. “Stakeholder Participation and Sustainable Fisheries: An Integrative Framework for Assessing Adaptive Co-Management Processes.” Ecology and Society 19 (3): 14. doi:10.5751/ES-06638-190314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A.-M., and J. L. Perry. 2006. “Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box.” Public Administration Review 66 (s1): 20–32. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wal, M., J. De Kraker, A. Offermans, C. Kroeze, P. A. Kirschner, and M. van Ittersum. 2014. “Measuring Social Learning in Participatory Approaches to Natural Resource Management.” Environmental Policy and Governance 24 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1002/eet.1627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waylen, K. A., K. L. Blackstock, K. B. Marshall, and J. Dunglinson. 2015. “Participation–Prescription Tension in Natural Resource Management: The Case of Diffuse Pollution in Scottish Water Management.” Environmental Policy and Governance 25 (2): 111–124. doi:10.1002/eet.1666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar