Still Connected? Attitudinal Representativeness of German Party Memberships

References

• Achen, Christopher H. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (3): 475–510. doi: 10.2307/2110458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemann, Ulrich von, and Spier, Tim. 2008. “Doppelter Einsatz, halber Sieg? Die SPD und die Bundestagswahl 2005.” In Die Parteien nach der Bundestagswahl 2005, edited by Oskar Niedermayer, 37–65. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Alemann, Ulrich von, and Spier, Tim. 2011. “Erholung in der Opposition? Die SPD nach der Bundestagswahl 2009.” In Die Parteien nach der Bundestagswahl 2009, edited by Oskar Niedermayer, 57–77. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd, Heidar, Knut, and R. Karlsen, Rune. 2013. “After the Mass Party. A Longitudinal Study of Issue Congruence among Party Voters, Members, Delegates, and MPs in Norway 1990-2009.” Paper presented at the Conference ‘Towards More Multifaceted Understandings of Party Membership’ in Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Andeweg, Rudy B. 2011. “Approaching Perfect Policy Congruence. Measurement, Development and Relevance for Political Representation.” In How Democracy Works. Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies, edited by Martin Rosema, Bas Denters, and Kees Aarts, 39–52. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andeweg, Ruby B., and Jacques J. A Thomassen. 2011. “Modes of Political Representation. Toward a New Typology.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (4): 507–528. doi: 10.3162/036298005X201653
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, Christine, and Eliyahu V. Sapir. 2013. “Issue Congruence across Legislative Terms. Examining the Democratic Party Mandate in the European Parliament.” West European Politics 36 (3): 1292–1308. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.826033
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Samuel H. 1977. Representation in Italy. Institutionalized Tradition and Electoral Choice. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belchior, Ana Maria. 2010. “Ideological Congruence among European Political Parties.” Journal of Legislative Studies 16 (1): 121–142. doi: 10.1080/13572330903542191
   Google Scholar
• Belchior, Ana Maria. 2013. “Explaining Left-Right Party Congruence across European Party Systems. A Test of Micro-, Meso-, and Macro-Level Models.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (3): 352–386. doi: 10.1177/0010414012453695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belchior, Ana Maria, and André Freire. 2013. “Is Party Type Relevant to an Explanation of Policy Congruence? Catchall versus Ideological Parties in the Portuguese Case.” International Political Science Review 34 (3): 273–288. doi: 10.1177/0192512112467215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, Heiko. 2005. Parteimitglieder im Wandel. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, Henry E., Sidney Verba, and Kay Lehman Schlozman. 1995. “Beyond SES. A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–294. doi: 10.2307/2082425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, Philip E., and Roy Pierce. 1986. Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. 1985. “Political Parties and Political Representation. Party Supporters and Party Elites in Nine Nations.” Comparative Political Studies 18 (3): 267–299. doi: 10.1177/0010414085018003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, Catherine E, Armen Hakhverdian, and Bram Lancee. 2013. “The Dynamics of Voters’ Left/Right Identification. The Role of Economic and Cultural Attitudes.”  Political Science Research and Methods 1 (2): 223–238. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2013.4
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, Don A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys. The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Eulau, Heinz, and Karps, Paul D. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation. Specifying Components of Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 2 (3): 233–254. doi: 10.2307/439340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giger, Nathalie, and Zoe Lefkofridi. 2014. “Salience-Based Congruence Between Parties and their Voters. The Swiss Case.”  Swiss Political Science Review 20 (2): 287–304. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, Matt, and Jacek Stramski. 2010. “Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 90–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, Richard, and Larry Diamond. 2003. “Species of Political Parties. A New Typology.” Party Politics 9 (2): 167–199. doi: 10.1177/13540688030092003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, Roberto, Lübker, Malte, and Biehl, Heiko. 2002. Parteimitglieder im Vergleich. Partizipation und Repräsentation. Universität Potsdam.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Sören. 1999. “Collective Policy Congruence Compared.” In Policy Representation in Western Democracies, edited by Warren Miller, Roy Pierce, Jacques Thomassen, Richard Herrera, Sören Holmberg, Peter Esaisson, and Bernhard Wessels, 87–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Sören. 2000. “Issue Congruence.” In Beyond Westminster and Congress. The Nordic Experience, edited by Peter Esaiasson and Knut Heidar, 155–170. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Sören. 2011. “Democratic Representation from Above.” In How Democracy Works. Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies, edited by Martin Rosema, Bas Denters, and Kees Aarts, 53–76. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, John D. 1989. “Values and Partisanship in Left-Right Orientations. Measuring Ideology.” European Journal of Political Research 17 (5): 599–621. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1989.tb00209.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1976. “Party Identification, Ideological Preference and the Left-Right Dimension among Western Mass Publics.” In Party Identification and Beyond. Representations of Voting and Party Competition, edited by Ian Budge, Ivor Crewe, and Dennis Farlie, 243–273. London: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, Galen A., and Jacques J. A Thomassen. 1975. “Issue-Consensus in a Multi-Party System. Voters and Leaders in the Netherlands.” Acta Politca 10 (4): 389–420.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert. 1989. “The Internal Politics of Parties. The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited.” Political Studies 37 (3): 400–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1989.tb00279.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (6-7): 845–879. doi: 10.1177/001041400003300607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Anthony J McGann. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Markus. 2006. “Partizipation in politischen Parteien. Eine empirische Analyse des Mobilisierungspotenzials politischer Parteien sowie der Struktur innerparteilicher Partizipation in Deutschland.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 47 (1): 35–61. doi: 10.1007/s11615-006-0003-4
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Markus. 2011. “Was wissen wir über die Mitglieder der Parteien?” In Parteimitglieder in Deutschland, edited by Tim Spier, Markus Klein, Ulrich von Alemann, Hanna Hoffmann, Annika Laux, Alexandra Nonnenmacher, and Katharina Rohrbach, 31–38. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, Hans D. 1972. “Testing the Left-Right Continuum on a Sample of German Voters.” Comparative Political Studies 5 (1): 93–106. doi: 10.1177/001041407200500105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsen, Oddbjorn. 1997. “The Partisan and the Value-Based Component of Left-Right Self-Placement. A Comparative Study.” International Political Science Review 18 (2): 191–225. doi: 10.1177/019251297018002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsen, Oddbjorn. 1998. “Europeans Move Towards the Center. A Comparative Longitudinal Study of Left-Right Self-Placement in Western Europe.”  International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10 (4): 292–316. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/10.4.292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hans-Peter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheos Frey. 2006. “Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space. Six European countries compared.” European Journal of Political Research 45 (6): 921–956. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00644.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laux, Annika. 2011. “Was motiviert Parteimitglieder zum Beitritt?” In Parteimitglieder in Deutschland, edited by Tim Spier, Markus Klein, Ulrich von Alemann, Hanna Hoffmann, Annika Laux, Alexandra Nonnenmacher, and Katharina Rohrbach, 61–78. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Kay. 1980. “Political Parties and Linkage.” In Political Parties and Linkage. A Comparative Perspective, edited by Kay Lawson. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Leighley, Jan E. 1995. “Attitudes, Opportunities and Incentives. A Field Essay on Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (1): 181–209. doi: 10.1177/106591299504800111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttbeg, Norman R. 1981. “Introduction.” In Public Opinion and Public Policy. Models of Political Linkage, edited by Norman R. Luttbeg, 1–10. Ithaca, IL: Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, Georg, Kissau, Kathrin, and Rosset, Jan. 2012. “ Policy Congruence beyond Left-Right. Evidence from the Swiss 2007 Election.” Paper presented at the CCS Meeting in Mannheim.
   Google Scholar
• May, John D. 1973. “Opinion Structure of Political Parties. The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity.” Political Studies 21 (2): 35–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1973.tb01423.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkl, Peter H. 2005. “Linkage, or What Else? The Place of Linkage Theory in the Study of Political Parties.” In Political Parties and Political Systems. The Concept of Linkage Revisited, edited by Andrea Römmele, Piero Ignazi, and David M. Farrell, 3–16. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Warren E., and Donald E Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–56. doi: 10.2307/1952717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, Laura. 2009. Joining Political Organisations. Institutions, Mobilisation and Participation in Western Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narud, Hanne Marthe, and Audun Skare. 1999. “Are Party Activists the Party Extremists? The Structure of Opinion in Political Parties.” Scandinavian Political Studies 22 (1): 45–65. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 1995. “May’s Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited. Leaders, Officers, Members and Voters in British Political Parties.” Party Politics 1 (1): 29–47. doi: 10.1177/1354068895001001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, Roy. 1999. “Mass–Elite Issue Linkages and the Responsible Party Model of Representation.” In Policy Representation in Western Democracies, edited by Warren Miller, Roy Pierce, and Jacques Thomassen, 9–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poguntke, Thomas. 2000. Parteiorganisation im Wandel: Gesellschaftliche Verankerung und organisatorische Anpassung im europäischen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Poguntke, Thomas. 2002. “Party Organizational Linkage: Parties without Firm Social Roots?” In Political Parties in the New Europe. Political and Analytical Challenges, edited by Kurt Luther and Ferdinand Muller-Rommel, 43–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham. 2004. “Political Representation in Comparative Politics.”  Annual Review of Political Science 7: 273–296. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, Susan E. 1994. “The ‘Paradox of Enrollment’. Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Party Memberships.”  European Journal of Political Research 25 (1): 41–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1994.tb01200.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarrow, Susan E., and Burcu Gezgor. 2010. “Declining Memberships, Changing Members? European Political Party Members in a New Era.”  In Party Politics 16 (6): 823–843. doi: 10.1177/1354068809346078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyd, Patrick, and Paul Whiteley. 1992. Labour’s Grass Roots. The Politics of Party Membership. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Spier, Tim, Klein, Markus, von Alemann, Ulrich, Hoffmann, Hanna, Laux, Annika, Nonnenmacher, Alexandra, and Rohrbach, Katharina, ed. 2011. Parteimitglieder in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Walczak, Agnieszka, and Brug, Wouter van der. 2013. “European Parliament. Factors Affecting the Attitude Congruence of Voters and Candidates in the EP Elections.” European Union Politics 14 (1): 3–22. doi: 10.1177/1465116512456089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteley, Paul, and Patrick Seyd. 2002. High-Intensity Participation. The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Widfeldt, Anders. 1995. “Party Membership and Party Representativeness.” In Citizens and the State, edited by Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs, 134–182. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar