‘Parties in the Shadows’ –Do Small and Marginal Parties Cater to a Niche?

References

• Abou-Chadi, T. 2016. “Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact.” British Journal of Political Science 46 (02): 417–436.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J. 2012. “Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence.” Annual Review of Political Science 15 (1): 401–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J., M. Clark, L. Ezrow, and Garrett Glasgow. 2006. “Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parteis? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties' Policy Shifts, 1976–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 513–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J., L. Ezrow, and D. Leiter. 2012. “Partisan Sorting and Niche Parties in Europe.” West European Politics 35 (6): 1272–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albaugh, Q., J. Sevenans, S. Soroka, et al. 2013. “The Automated Coding of Policy Agendas: A Dictionary-Based Approach.” 6th annual Comparative Agendas project.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, N., and B. J. Brox. 2005. “The Roots of Third Party Voting.” Party Politics 11 (5): 623–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, H., M. Debus, and P. Dumont. 2011. “Who Gets What in Coalition Governments? Predictors of Portfolio Allocation in Parliamentary Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 50 (4): 441–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnke, J. 2007. Das Wahlsystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, É. 2004. “Antipartyism and Third-Party Vote Choice.” Comparative Political Studies 37 (9): 1054–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, H., and U. Kranenpohl. 2011. “Große Politik in einer kleinen Partei. Strukturen und Determinanten Innerparteilicher Partizipation in der Ökologisch-Demokratischen Partei (ödp).” Mitteilungen des Instituts für Deutsches und Internationales Parteienrecht und Parteienforschung 17: 93–110.
   Google Scholar
• Bischof, D. 2015. “Towards a Renewal of the Niche Party Concept: Parties, Market Shares and Condensed Offers.” Party Politics 23 (3): 220–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N. 2013. New Parties in old Party Systems: Persistence and Decline in Seventeen Democracies. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borisyuk, G., C. Rallings, M. Thrasher, and Henk van der Kolk. 2007. “Voter Support for Minor Parties.” Party Politics 13 (6): 669–693.
   Google Scholar
• Bukow, S. 2016. “The Green Party in Germany.” In Green Parties in Europe: s.l, edited by E. van Haute, 112–140. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, A. 2012. “The Growth of Third-Party Voting: An Empirical Case Study of Vermont, 1840–55.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12 (3): 343–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. 2000. “Citizen Attitudes and Political Behaviour.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (6/7): 912–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, F. 2000. “Über das Scheitern des Neuen Rechtspopulismus in Deutschland: Republikaner, Statt-Partei und der Bund Freier Bürger.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 29 (2): 237–256.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, F., and V. Neu, eds. 2018. Handbuch der Deutschen Parteien. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Farrer, B. 2015. “Connecting Niche Party Vote Change in First- and Second-Order Elections.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 25 (4): 482–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Vazquez, P. 2018. “Voter Discounting of Party Campaign Manifestos.” Party Politics 24 (2): 135406881878735.
   Google Scholar
• Franzmann, S. T., H. Giebler, and T. Poguntke. 2019. “It’s no Longer the Economy, Stupid! Issue Yield at the 2017 German Federal Election.” West European Politics 58 (4): 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2005. “Minor Parties in Plurality Electoral Systems.” Party Politics 11 (1): 79–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. 2015. “Party and Voter Incentives at the Crowded Centre of British Politics.” Party Politics 21 (1): 80–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. E. 2008. “Back to the Archives? A Critique of the Danish Part of the Manifesto Dataset.” Scandinavian Political Studies 31 (2): 201–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, J. 2013. Das Politische System der BRD im Kontext. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, H. 1987. “Minor Parties: The Relevancy Perspective.” Comparative Politics 19 (3): 317–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano, S., and J. M. Snyder. 2007. “The Decline of Third-Party Voting in the United States.” The Journal of Politics 69 (1): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandura, O. 2007. Kleinparteien in der Mediendemokratie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B., and J.-J. Spoon. 2010. “Thinking Locally, Acting Supranationally: Niche Party Behaviour in the European Parliament.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (2): 174–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kercher, J., and F. Brettschneider. 2013. “Wahlprogramme als Pflichtübung? Typen, Funktionen und Verständlichkeit der Bundestagswahlprogramme 1994–2009.” In Wahlen und Wähler, edited by B. Weßels, H. Schoen, and O. W. Gabriel, 269–290. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, J. 2006. “Nicht-etablierte Parteien: Funktionen und Rechtsfragen.” In Kleine Parteien im Aufwind: Zur Veränderung der deutschen Parteienlandschaft, edited by U. Jun, H. Kreikenbom, and V. Neu, 39–57. New York, Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verl.
   Google Scholar
• Kranenpohl, U., and O. Niedermayer. 2013. “Kleinstparteien.” In Handbuch Parteienforschung, edited by O. Niedermayer, 663–681. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, M., K. Benoit, and J. Garry. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 311–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M., and J. Garry. 2000. “Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 619–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstam, E. 2019. “Signalling Issue Salience: Explaining Niche Party Support in Second-Order Elections.” Electoral Studies 60: 102026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luks, S., J. M. Miller, and L. R. Jacobs. 2003. “Who Wins? Campaigns and the Third Party Vote.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 33 (1): 9–30.
   Google Scholar
• Magin, R., M. Freitag, and A. Vatter. 2009. “Cleavage Structures and Voter Alignments Within Nations.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 3 (2): 231–256.
   Google Scholar
• Marcos-Marne, H., C. Plaza-Colodro, and T. Freyburg. 2020. “Who Votes for New Parties? Economic Voting, Political Ideology and Populist Attitudes.” West European Politics 43 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, M. 1998. “Testing the Second-Order Election Model After Four European Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 28 (4): 591–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, B. M. 2005. “Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 347–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, B. M. 2008. Party Competition Between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merz, N., and S. Regel. 2013. “Die Programmatik der Parteien.” In Handbuch Parteienforschung, edited by O. Niedermayer, 211–238. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, T. M., and B. Miller. 2015. “The Niche Party Concept and its Measurement.” Party Politics 21 (2): 259–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, T. M., and M. Wagner. 2013. “Mainstream or Niche? Vote-Seeking Incentives and the Programmatic Strategies of Political Parties.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (10): 1246–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhaylov, S., M. Laver, and K. Benoit. 2008. “Coder Reliability and Misclassification in Comparative Manifesto Project Codings.” Prepared for presentation at the 66th MPSA Annual National Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Morlok, M. 1999. “Zur Notwendigkeit, kleine politische Parteien zum Gegenstand der Parteirechtswissenschaft zu machen.” Mitteilungen des Instituts für Deutsches und Internationales Parteienrecht und Parteienforschung 9 (9): 92–100.
   Google Scholar
• Neto, O. A., and G. W. Cox. 1997. “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, J. L., and M. Bull. 1997. “Party Organisations and Alliances in Italy in the 1990s: A Revolution of Sorts.” West European Politics 20 (1): 81–109.
   Google Scholar
• Niedermayer, O. 2013. “Die Analyse Einzelner Parteien.” In Handbuch Parteienforschung, edited by O. Niedermayer, 61–82. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Pappi, F. U., A.-S. Kurella, and T. Bräuninger. 2019. “Die Etablierung Neuer Parlamentsparteien. Wählerpräferenzen als Erfolgsfaktor für die Alternative für Deutschland 2017 und die Grünen 1986.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 60 (2): 273–298.
   Google Scholar
• Pardos-Prado, S. 2015. “How Can Mainstream Parties Prevent Nicht Party Success? Center-Right Parties and the Immigration Issue.” The Journal of Politics 77 (2): 352–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, J., T. Sager, and A. Häusler. 2008. “PRO NRW und PRO D — Entwicklung, Struktur und Methodik.” In Rechtspopulismus als "Bürgerbewegung": Kampagnen gegen Islam und Moscheebau und kommunale Gegenstrategien, edited by A. Häusler, 72–87. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Proksch, S.-O., and J. B. Slapin. 2009. “How to Avoid Pitfalls in Statistical Analysis of Political Texts: The Case of Germany.” German Politics 18 (3): 323–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, K., and H. Schmitt. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowold, M. 1974. Im Schatten der Macht: Zur Oppositionsrolle der nicht-etablierten Parteien in der Bundesrepublik. Düsseldorf: Droste.
   Google Scholar
• Ruedin, D. 2013a. “Obtaining Party Positions on Immigration in Switzerland: Comparing Different Methods.” Swiss Political Science Review 19 (1): 84–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruedin, D. 2013b. “The Role of Language in the Automatic Coding of Political Texts.” Swiss Political Science Review 19 (4): 539–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruedin, D., and L. Morales. 2018. “Estimating Party Positions on Immigration.” Party Politics 2009 (1): 135406881771312.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, H. 2005. “The European Parliament Elections of June 2004: Still Second-Order?” West European Politics 28 (3): 650–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slapin, J. B., and S.-O. Proksch. 2008. “A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 705–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Boom, D. 1999. Politik Diesseits der Macht? Zu Einfluß, Funktion und Stellung von Kleinparteien im Politischen System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden, s.l.: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., P. Lehmann, T. Matthieß, et al. 2016. The Manifesto Project Dataset - Codebook. Manifesto Project (MRG / CMP / MARPOR). Version 2016b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. 2012. “Defining and Measuring Niche Parties.” Party Politics 18 (6): 845–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., and T. M. Meyer. 2016. “The Radical Right as Niche Parties? The Ideological Landscape of Party Systems in Western Europe, 1980–2014.” Political Studies 65 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, T. 2007. “Campaign Effects and Second-Order Cycles.” European Union Politics 8 (4): 509–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuttke, A. 2020. “New Political Parties Through the Voters’ Eyes.” West European Politics 43 (1): 22–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zons, G. 2015. “The Influence of Programmatic Diversity on the Formation of New Political Parties.” Party Politics 21 (6): 919–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zons, G. 2016. “How Programmatic Profiles of Niche Parties Affect Their Electoral Performance.” West Uropean Politics 39 (6): 1205–1229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar