‘Climate-Soviets,’ ‘Alarmism,’ and ‘Eco-Dictatorship’: The Framing of Climate Change Scepticism by the Populist Radical Right Alternative for Germany

References

• AfD. 2013. Wahlprogramm der AfD zur Bundestagswahl 2013”.
   Google Scholar
• AfD. 2014. Mut zu Deutschland. Programm für die Wahl zum Europäischen Parlament am 25. Mai 2014”.
   Google Scholar
• AfD. 2016. Programm für Deutschland. Das Grundsatzprogramm der Alternative für Deutschland”.
   Google Scholar
• Almiron, N., M. Boykoff, M. Narberhaus, and F. Heras. 2020. “Dominant Counter-Frames in Influential Climate Contrarian European Think Tanks.” Climatic Change 162: 2003–2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arifi, B., and G. Winkel. 2021. “Wind Energy Counter-Conducts in Germany: Understanding a New Wave of Socio-Environmental Grassroots Protest.” Environmental Politics, doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1792730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Art, D. 2018. “The AfD and the End of Containment in Germany?” German Politics and Society 36 (2): 76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzheimer, K. 2015. “The AfD: Finally a Successful Right-Wing Populist Eurosceptic Party for Germany?” West European Politics 38 (3): 535–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzheimer, K., and C. Berning. 2019. “How the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and Their Voters Veered to the Radical Right, 2013–2017.” Electoral Studies 60), doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2019.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-On, T. 2018. “The Radical Right and Nationalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, edited by J. Rydgren, 17–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Björnberg, K., M. Karlsson, M. Gilek, and S. O. Hansson. 2017. “Climate and Environmental Science Denial: A Review of the Scientific Literature Published in 1990–2015.” Journal of Cleaner Production 167: 229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohr, J. 2016. “The ‘Climatism’ Cartel: Why Climate Change Deniers Oppose Market-Based Mitigation Policy.” Environmental Politics 25 (5): 812–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boussalis, C., and T. G. Coan. 2016. “Text-Mining the Signals of Climate Change Doubt.” Global Environmental Change 36: 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R., J. Carmichel, and C. Jenkins. 2012. “Shifting Public Opinion on Climate Change: An Empirical Assessment of Factors Influencing Concern Over Climate Change in the U.S., 2002–2010.” Climatic Change 114: 169–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterwegge, C. 2019. Antisozialer Patriotismus: Die Rentenpläne der AfD.” In Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 9/19.
   Google Scholar
• Cann, H., and L. Raymond. 2018. “Does Climate Denialism Still Matter? The Prevalence of Alternative Frames in Opposition to Climate Policy.” Environmental Politics 27 (3): 433–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lange, S. 2007. “A New Winning Formula?” Party Politics 13 (4): 411–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B. 2019. “Articulations of Climate Change by the Australian far Right.” In Europe at the Crossroads, edited by P. Bevelander, and R. Wodak, 159–179. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., and C. Kølvraa. 2015. “The Nature of Nationalism: Populist Radical Right Parties on Countryside and Climate.” Nature and Culture 10 (2): 199–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., A. Kroneder, and D. Wetzel. 2018. “Being Skeptical? Exploring Far-Right Climate-Change Communication in Germany.” Environmental Communication 12 (5): 589–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzmann, S. 2014. “Die Wahlprogrammatik der AfD in Vergleichender Perspektive.” MIP 20: 115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Franzmann, S. 2019. “Extra-Parliamentary Opposition Within a Transforming Political Space: The AfD and FDP Under Merkel III Between 2013 and 2017.” German Politics 28 (3): 332–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraune, C., and M. Knodt. 2018. “Sustainable Energy Transformations in an Age of Populism, Post-Truth Politics, and Local Resistance.” Energy Research & Social Science 43: 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup. 2021. “Environment”, https://news.gallup.com/poll/1615/environment.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W., and A. Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, R. 2015. “The Rise of the German Eurosceptic Party Alternative für Deutschland, Between Ordoliberal Critique and Popular Anxiety.” International Political Science Review 36 (3): 264–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havertz, R. 2020. “Strategy of Ambivalence: Afd Between Neoliberalism and Social Populism.” Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 24 (4): 549–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M., E. Harris, P. Bain, and K. Fielding. 2016. “Meta-Analyses of the Determinants and Outcomes of Belief in Climate Change.” Nature Climate Change 6 (6): 622–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R. 2020. “The Role of Populist Attitudes in Explaining Climate Change Skepticism and Support for Environmental Protection.” Environmental Politics 29 (6): 959–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R., E. Greussing, and J. M. Eberl. 2021. “From Populism to Climate Scepticism the Role of Institutional Trust and Attitudes Towards Science.” Environmental Politics, Advance online publication, doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1978200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R., T. Maltby, K. Szulecki, and S. Cetcovic. 2021. “Is Populism a Challenge to European Energy and Climate Policy Empirical Evidence Across Varieties of Populism.” Journal of European Public Policy 28 (7): 998–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jylhä, K., and K. Hellmer. 2020. “Right-Wing Populism and Climate Change Denial: The Roles of Exclusionary and Anti-Egalitarian Preferences, Conservative Ideology, and Antiestablishment Attitudes.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 20 (1): 315–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jylhä, K., P. Strimling, and J. Rydgren. 2020. “Climate Change Denial among Radical Right-Wing Supporters.” Sustainability 12 (23), doi:10.3390/su122310226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, B. 2020. Solidarischer Patriotismus. Die Soziale Frage von Rechts. Schnellroda: Verlag Antaios.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., and A. McGann. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krange, O., B. Kaltenborn, and M. Hultman. 2019. “Cool Dudes in Norway: Climate Change Denial Among Conservative Norwegian Men.” Environmental Sociology 5 (1): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulin, J., I. Sevä, and R. Dunlap. 2021. “Nationalist Ideology, Rightwing Populism, and Public Views About Climate Change in Europe.” Environmental Politics 30 (7): 1111–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. 2018. “Right-Wing Populism and the Climate Change Agenda: Exploring the Linkages.” Environmental Politics 27 (4): 712–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A., and R. Dunlap. 2000. “Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement’s Counter-Claims.” Social Problems 47 (4): 499–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A., and R. Dunlap. 2011. “The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010.” The Sociological Quarterly 52 (2): 155–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., A. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2019. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadel, J. 2020. Revisionist Memory: How the Far-Right Alternative for Germany Is Seeking to Reshape the Nation’s Collective Memory to Promote a Eurosceptic, German-Centric Foreign Policy Agenda.” The Yale Review of International Studies, http://yris.yira.org/essays/4039.
   Google Scholar
• Otteni, C., and M. Weisskircher. 2021. “Global Warming and Polarization. Wind Turbines and the Electoral Success of the Greens and the Populist Radical Right.” European Journal of Political Research, Advance online publication, doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panno, A., L. Leone, and G. Carrus. 2019. “Attitudes Towards Trump Policies and Climate Change: The Key Roles of Aversion to Wealth Redistribution and Political Interest.” Journal of Social Issues 75 (1): 153–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, T., and M. Rooduijn. 2015. “Populism in Belgium in Times of Crisis: Intensification of Discourse, Decline in Electoral Support.” In European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession, edited by H. Kriesi, and T. Pappas, 91–108. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., L. Whitmarsh, L. Steg, G. Böhm, and S. Fischer. 2019. “Climate Change Perceptions and Their Individual-Level Determinants: A Cross-European Analysis.” Global Environmental Change 55: 25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmstorf, S. 2004. “The Climate Sceptics.” In Weather Catastrophes and Climate Change, edited by Munich Re, 76–83. Munich: Munich Re Group.
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., S. de Lange, and W. van der Brug. 2014. “A PopulistZeitgeist? Programmatic Contagion by Populist Parties in Western Europe.” Party Politics 20 (4): 563–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfelder, J. 2017. “Die Programmatik der AfD: Inwiefern hat sie Sich von Einer Primär Euroskeptischen zu Einer Rechtspopulistischen Partei Entwickelt?” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 48 (1): 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schaller, S., and A. Carius. 2019. Convenient Truths. Berlin: Adelphi.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M., and S. O’Neill. 2017. “Frame Analysis in Climate Change Communication: Approaches for Assessing Journalists’ Minds, Online Communication and Media Portrayals.” In Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication, edited by M. Nisbet. New York: Oxford University Press, doi: 10.1093/acref/9780190498986.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Terkildsen, N., and F. Schnell. 1997. “How Media Frames Move Public Opinion: An Analysis of the Women’s Movement.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (4): 879–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg, W. 2015. “Climate Change Scepticism.” SAGE Open 5 (2): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Zulianello, M. 2020. “Varieties of Populist Parties and Party Systems in Europe: From State-of-the-Art to the Application of a Novel Classification Scheme to 66 Parties in 33 Countries.” Government and Opposition 55: 327–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar