The socio-spatial (re)configuration of legitimacy, knowledge, and practice in chemical risk governance: integrating boundary-work and scale-frame analytics

References

• Bal, R., Bijker, W., and Hendriks, R., 2004. Democratisation of scientific evidence. British Medical Journal, 329, 1339–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., 1992. Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: lay and professional ways of knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 267–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. (S.C.1999, c.33)
   Google Scholar
• Cash, D.W., et al., 2006. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multi-level world. Ecology & Society, 11 (2), 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, D.W. and Moser, S., 2000. Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change, 10, 109–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., et al., 2011. Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: a case study of river catchment management in Southern Ecuador. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77 (1), 55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Doern, B. and Reed, E.J., 2000. Risky business: Canada’s changing science-based policy and regulatory regime. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driedger, S.M. and Eyles, J., 2003. Different frames, different fears: communicating about chlorinated drinking water and cancer in the Canadian media. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1279–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, S., Donaldson, A., and Walker, G., 2006. Green groups and grey areas: scientific boundary-work, nongovernmental organisations, and environmental knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 38 (6), 1061–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edge, S. and Eyles, J., under review. Contested governmentalities of chemical management: NGO stakeholder enrolment, subjectivity and influence within a neoliberal risk governance agenda. Global Environmental Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R.M., 1993. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., 2005. Environmental regulation and risk-benefit analysis: from technical to deliberative policy making. In: R. Paehlke and D. Torgerson, eds. Managing leviathan: environmental politics and the administrative state. 2nd ed. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 59–80.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P., 2005. An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method. 2nd ed. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T.F., 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48 (6), 781–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Canada, 2008. Proposed risk management approach for bisphenol A. Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number (CAS RN): 80-05-7.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada, 2010. Chemicals management plan background [online]. Available from: http://www.chemicalsubstanceschimiques.gc.ca/plan/context-eng.php
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, L., 2009. Scales of knowledge: North Sea fisheries governance, the local fisherman and the European scientist. Environmental Politics, 18 (4), 557–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D., 2001. Boundary organizations in environmental science and policy: an introduction. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26 (4), 339–408.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. and Versteeg, W., 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7 (3), 175–184.
   Google Scholar
• Health Canada, 2008. Health risk assessment from bisphenol a from food packaging applications [online]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/securit/packag-emball/bpa/bpa_hra-ers-eng.php
   Google Scholar
• Heitzig, J., Lessman, K., and Zou, Y., 2011. Self-enforcing strategies to deter free-riding in the climate change mitigation game and other repeated public good games. PNAS, 108 (8), 15739–15744.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ICIS Chemical Business, 2009. Bisphenol A (BPA) CAS No: 80-05-7 [online]. Available from: http://www.icis.com/V2/chemicals/9075162/bisphenol-a.html [Accessed December 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Iles, A., 2007. Identifying environmental health risks in consumer products: non-governmental organizations and civic epistemologies. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 371–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 1987. Contested boundaries in policy-relevant research. Social Studies of Science, 17, 195–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 1990. The fifth branch: science advisors. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., and Jones, M., 2008. Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinman, D.L. and Kinchy, A.J., 2003. Boundaries in science policy making: bovine growth hormone in the European Union. The Sociological Quarterly, 44 (4), 577–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, K. and Veldkamp, T., 2011. Scale and governance: conceptual considerations and practical implications. Ecology & Society, 16 (2), 23.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, H., 2003. Scale frames and counter-scale frames: constructing the problem of environmental justice. Political Geography, 22, 887–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, I., Galloway, T., Scarlett, A., et al., 2008. Association with urinary bisphenol a concentration with medical disorders and laboratory abnormalities in adults. JAMA, 300 (11), 1303–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, B. and Haas, J., 2006. Scale framing of scientific uncertainty in controversy over the Endangered Steller sea lion. Environmental Politics, 15 (1), 78–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, S.A., 2000. The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 219–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., 2005. Scale, sovereignty and strategy in environmental governance. Antipode, 37 (4), 732–753.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C., 2001. Hybrid management: boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26 (4), 478–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C., 2005. New civic epistemologies of quantification: making sense of indicators of local and global sustainability. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 30 (3), 403–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M.G. and Bruyneel, S., 2010. Rescaling environmental governance, rethinking the state: a three-dimensional review. Progress in Human Geography, 34 (5), 646–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, T. and Jensen, O.B., 2003. Linking discourse and space: towards a cultural sociology of space in analysing spatial policy discourses. Urban Studies, 40 (1), 7–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C. and Kessener, B., 2007. Revitalizing stagnated policy processes: using the configuration approach for research and interventions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 256–272.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman, A., et al., 2010. ENGO evaluation project challenge program, chemicals management plan. Canadian Environmental Network’s Capacity Building Project.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lieshout, M., et al., 2011. Do scale frames matter? Scale frame mismatches in the decision making process of a ‘mega farm’ in a small Dutch village. Ecology and Society, 16 (1), 38. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art38].
   Google Scholar
• vom Saal, F. and Hughes, C., 2005. An extensive new literature concerning low-dose effects for bisphenol a shows the need for a new risk assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113 (8), 926–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar