Convincing people to go green: managing strategic action by minimising political talk

References

• Abair, J.W., 2008. Green buildings: what it means to be ‘green’ and the evolution of green building laws. Urban Lawyer, 40 (3), 623–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, C., et al., 2005. The political ethics of consumerism. Consumer Policy Review, 15 (2), 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R.D. and Snow, D.A., 2000. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K.R., 2009. The social dynamics and durability of moral boundaries. Sociological Forum, 24 (4), 854–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R.J., Carmichael, J., and Jenkins, C.J., 2012. Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Climatic Change [online]. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com.proxy.libraries.rutgers.edu/content/k17856khp026w174/fulltext.pdf [Accessed 1 March 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, J.G., 2008. Think locally, act globally: the political economy of ethical consumption. In: G. De Neve, et al., eds. Hidden hands in the market: ethnographies of fair trade, ethical consumption, and corporate social responsibility. Bingley, England: JAI, 31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Chess, C. and Johnson, B.B., 2007. Information is not enough. In: S.C. Moser and L. Dilling, eds. Creating a climate for change: communication climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 223–233.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, N., et al., 2007. The political rationalities of fair trade consumption in the United Kingdom. Politics and Society, 35 (4), 583–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N., 1998. Avoiding politics: how Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, E.A., 2010. Issues in green building and the federal response: an introduction. Congressional Research Service. Available from: http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/18960.pdf [Accessed 3 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Grigsby, M., 2004. Buying time and getting by: the voluntary simplicity movement. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groom, S., 2008. Making the green-building dean’s list: LEED for homes. Fine Homebuilding, 195, 94–101.
   Google Scholar
• Haenfler, R., Johnson, B., and Jones, E., 2012. Lifestyle movements: exploring the intersection of lifestyle and social movements. Social Movement Studies, 11 (1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huneke, M.E., 2005. The face of the un-consumer: an empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States. Psychology and Marketing, 22 (7), 527–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J.M., 1999. The art of moral protest: culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J.M., 2006. Getting your way: strategic dilemmas in the real world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. and Baumann, S., 2010. Foodies: democracy and distinction in the gourmet foodscape. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E., 2002. Social responsibility activism: why individuals are changing their lifestyles to change the world. Thesis (PhD). University of Colorado. Available from: http://www.betterworldshopper.com/Jones-Social-Responsibility-Doctoral-Thesis.PDF [Accessed 13 July 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, L., 1996. Saving the creation: Christian environmentalism in the United States. Sociology of Religion, 57 (1), 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichterman, P., 1996. The search for political community: American activists reinventing commitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzen, J.A., 2012a. Going green: the process of lifestyle change. Sociological Forum, 27 (1), 94–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzen, J.A. 2012b. Green and smart: the co-construction of users and technology. Human Ecology Review, 19 (1), 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque, E., 2005. Researching environmental citizenship and its publics. Environmental Politics, 14 (2), 211–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lybecker, D.L., McBeth, M.K., and Kusko, E., 2013. Trash or treasure: recycling narratives and reducing political polarization. Environmental Politics, 22 (2), 312–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackuen, M., 1990. Speaking of politics: individual conversational choice, public opinion, and the prospects for deliberative democracy. In: J.A. Ferejohn and J.H. Kuklinski, eds. Information and democratic processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 59–99.
   Google Scholar
• Maniates, M., 2002. Individualization: plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? In: T. Princen, M. Maniates, and K. Conca, eds. Confronting consumption. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Mazar, N. and Zhong, C., 2010. Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21 (4), 494–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E., 2011. The politicization of climate change and the polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., et al., 2006. Toward sustainable consumption: researching voluntary simplifiers. Psychology and Marketing, 23 (6), 515–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, P.D., 1998. A frame analysis of favor seeking in the renaissance: agency, networks, and political culture. American Journal of Sociology, 104 (1), 51–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, P.D., 2007. The art of the network: strategic interaction and patronage in renaissance Florence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, M.K., 2012. Environmental groups’ communication strategies in multiple media. Environmental Politics, 21 (1), 49–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlemiss, L., 2011. The effects of community-based action for sustainability on participants’ lifestyles. Local Environment, 16 (3), 265–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mische, A., 2008. Partisan publics: communication and contention across Brazilian youth activist networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard, K.M., 2011. Living in denial: climate change, emotions, and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. and Conway, E.M., 2010. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Passy, F. and Giugni, M., 2000. Life-spheres, networks, and sustained participation in social movements: a phenomenological approach to political commitment. Sociological Forum, 15 (1), 117–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichardo Almanzar, N.A., Sullivan-Catlin, H., and Deane, G., 1998. Is the political personal? Everyday behaviors as forms of environmental movement participation. Mobilization, 3 (2), 185–205.
   Google Scholar
• Rootes, C., 2011. New issues, new forms of action? Climate change and environmental activism in Britain. In: J.W. van Deth and W. Maloney, eds. New participatory dimensions in civil society: professionalization and individualized collective action. London: Routledge, 46–68.
   Google Scholar
• Rumpala, Y., 2011. ‘Sustainable consumption’ as a new phase in a governmentalization of consumption. Theory and Society, 40 (6), 669–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scerri, A. and Magee, L., 2012. Green householders, stakeholder citizenship and sustainability. Environmental Politics, 21 (3), 387–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., 2006. Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: examining local organic food networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 383–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D., 2007. Consumer voters in imagined communities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27 (3/4), 135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M.L. 2009. ‘How many cases do I need?’ On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10 (1), 5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A.M. and Pulver, S., 2009. Ethics-based environmentalism in practice: religious environmental organizations in the United States. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 13, 145–179.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P.C., et al. 1999. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6 (2), 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Stolle, D., Hooghe, M., and Michelette, M., 2005. Politics in the supermarket: political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review, 26 (3), 245–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szasz, A., 2007. Shopping our way to safety: how we changed from protecting the environment to protecting ourselves. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S.M., 2007. Green sisters: a spiritual ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thøgersen, J. and Crompton, T. 2009. Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32 (2), 141–163.
   Google Scholar
• Thøgersen, J. and Noblet, C. 2012. Does green consumerism increase the acceptance of wind power? Energy Policy, 51, 854–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, K.C., 2004. Talking about politics: informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J., 2012. Climate change and society: the chimera of behaviour change technologies. Sociology, 46 (1), 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, M.M. and Schor, J.B., 2012. Does changing a light bulb lead to changing the world? Political action and the conscious consumer. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 160–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar