Commodity exports and transboundary atmospheric impacts: regulating coal in an era of climate change

References

• 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, 2010. Final Document, NPT/CONF.2010/50 (Vol. I), New York.
   Google Scholar
• ABC News, 2011. ‘Flannery named Climate Commissioner’, Lateline, Transcript, 10/2/2011, Available from: www.abc.net.au[Accessed 10 June 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D., 1985. Economic statecraft. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bharati, R., Crain, S., and Kaminski, V., 2012. Clustering in crude oil prices and the target pricing zone hypothesis. Energy Economics, 34 (4), 1115–1123. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Business and the Environment, 2012. ‘Last Minute Agreements Salvage COP 17’, Business and the Environment, 23 (1), January, 1. p. 1–1.
   Google Scholar
• Camilleri, J. and Falk, J., 2009. Worlds in transition: evolving governance across a stressed planet. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J., 1990. The political economy of world energy: a twentieth-century perspective. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Daoudi, M. and Dajani, M., 1983. Economic sanctions: ideals and experience. Melbourne: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Denicola, R., et al., 2011. Carbon offshoring: the legal and regulatory framework for U.S. coal exports. New York, NY: Center for Climate Change Law, Columbia Law School. July.
   Google Scholar
• Diesendorf, M., 2010. Strategies for radical climate mitigation. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 66 (December), 98–117.
   Google Scholar
• Doelle, M., 2004. Climate change and the WTO: opportunities to motivate state action on climate change through the world trade organization. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 13 (1), April, 85–103. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9388.2004.00386.x
   Google Scholar
• Esty, D., 2001. Bridging the trade-environment divide. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (3), 113–130. doi:10.1257/jep.15.3.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esty, D. and Moffa, A., 2012. Why climate change collective action has failed and what needs to be done within and without the trade regime. Journal of International Economic Law, 15 (3), 777–791. doi:10.1093/jiel/jgs033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G., 2008. Transformation from “Carbon Valley” to a “Post-Carbon Society” in a climate change hot spot: the Coalfields of the Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia. Ecology & Society, 13 (1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, S., Rosendahl K.E., Egging R., Avetisyan H.G., Siddiqui S., 2012. Cartelization in gas markets: studying the potential for a “Gas OPEC”. Energy Economics, 34 (1), 137–152. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, D., 2011. Disarmament diplomacy and human security: regimes, norms and moral progress in international relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P.Keohane, R. and Levy, M. eds., 1993. Institutions for the earth: sources of effective environmental protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P. and Symons, J., 2013. Norm conflict in climate governance: greenhouse gas accounting and the problem of consumption. Global Environmental Politics, 13 (1), 9–29. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00151
   Google Scholar
• Harstad, B., 2012. Buy coal! a case for supply-side environmental policy. Journal of Political Economy, 120 (1), 77–115. doi:10.1086/665405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., and Rittberger, V., 1997. Theories of international regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A., 1969. National power and the structure of foreign trade. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M., 2011. Climate governance at the crossroads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, C., 2012. For the sake of a credible climate change policy in Australia – revisiting the nuclear energy option. Economic Analysis and Policy, 42 (1), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2013. Available from: http://www.iaea.org/index.html [Accessed 17 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL), 2012a. Timeline of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, Geneva: ICBL, October 2012. [Available from: http://www.icbl.org/index.php/icbl/content/download/35198/536497/file/icb009_chronology_a5_v4-pages.pdf [Accessed 18 February 2014].
   Google Scholar
• International Campaign to Ban Landmines, 2012b. ‘Mine Ban Treaty’. Available from: www.icbl.org/index.php/icbl/treaty [Accessed 21 April 2012].
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA), 2009. World Energy Outlook 2009, OECD/IEA.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA), 2010. Coal Information 2010, OECD/IEA.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA), 2012. C02 Emissions from Fuel Combustion –2012 Edition, OECD/IEA.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA), 2013. Coal Information 2013, OECD/IEA.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, R., Dees S., Karadeloglou P., Sanchez M., 2004. Does OPEC matter? An econometric analysis of oil prices. The Energy Journal, 25 (4), 67–90. doi:10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol25-No4-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenworthy, T. and Gordon, K. 2011. ‘Enabling Exports Clouds Environmental, Economic Goals’, Center for American Progress, April 2011. Available from: http://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2011/04/pdf/coal_exports.pdf[Accessed 13 December 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Knorr, K., 1977. International economic leverage and its uses. In: K. Knorr. and F. Trager, eds., Economic issues and national security. Kansas: Regents Press of Kansas, 109–113.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, J., 2003. Welfare of cattle transported from Australia to Egypt. Australian Veterinary Journal, 81 (7). doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.2003.tb11559.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)., 2007. The future of coal: options for a carbon-constrained world. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, L., 2011. Sustaining the African common position on climate change: international organisations, Africa and COP17. South African Journal of International Affairs, 18 (2), 257–269. doi:10.1080/10220461.2011.588825
   Google Scholar
• McGinley, P. and Haden, C., 2011. Climate change and the war on coal: exploring the dark side. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 13 (2), 255–331.
   Google Scholar
• Nordström, H. and Vaughan, S., 1999. Trade and environment. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), 2013. Available from: http://www.nuclearsuppliersgroup.org/Leng/default.htm[Accessed 17 February].
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J., 1981. Maintaining a non-proliferation regime. International Organization, 35 (01), 15–38. doi:10.1017/S0020818300004069
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, B., Riahi, K., and Keppo, I., 2010. Mitigation implications of midcentury targets that preserve long-term climate policy options. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107 (3), 1011–1016. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903797106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachauri, R. and Reisinger, A. eds., 2007. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, B. 2011. ‘The time to move on from coal is now’, Greenpeace Australia Pacific, News and Events. Available from: www.greenpeace.org[Accessed 20 February].
   Google Scholar
• Petherick, J., 2005. Animal welfare issues associated with extensive livestock production: the northern Australian beef cattle industry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 92 (3), 211–234. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2005.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, R., 1998. Reversing the gun sights: transnational civil society targets land mines. International Organization, 52 (03), 613–644. doi:10.1162/002081898550671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosewarne, S., 2010. Meeting the challenge of climate change: the poverty of the dominant economic narrative and market solutions as subterfuge. Journal of Australian Political Economy, pp. 17–50. 66 (December).
   Google Scholar
• Rothe, D., 2011. Managing climate risks or risking a managerial climate: state, security and governance in the international climate regime. International Relations, 25 (3), 330–345. doi:10.1177/0047117811415486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runge, C., 1990. Trade protectionism and environmental regulations: the new nontariff barriers. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 11 (1), 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Shambaugh, G., 1999. States, firms, and power. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spar, D., 1994. The cooperative edge: the internal politics of international cartels. London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC., 2008. Kyoto protocol reference manual: on accounting of emissions and assigned amount. UNFCCC: November. Bonn, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC, 2009. ‘Fact sheet: UNFCCC Emissions Reporting’, June 2009, Available from: http://unfccc.int/files/press/backgrounders/application/pdf/fact_sheet_unfccc_emissions_reporting.pdf[Accessed 20 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC, 2011a. ‘Copenhagen Accord’, Available from: http://unfccc.int/meetings/cop_15/copenhagen_accord/items/5262.php[Accessed 20 September].
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC, 2011b. ‘Kyoto Protocol’. Available from: http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php[Accessed 19 September].
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects, 2001. Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All its Aspects, UN Document A/CONF.192/1, July.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs (UNODA), 2013. ‘Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)’. Available from: http://www.un.org/disarmament/WMD/Nuclear/NPT.shtml[Accessed 17 February].
   Google Scholar
• Uranium Industry Framework Steering Group (UIFSG)., 2006. Report of the uranium industry framework steering group. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. September.
   Google Scholar
• Verdier, D., 2008. Multilateralism, bilateralism, and exclusion in the nuclear proliferation regime. International Organization, 62 (03), 439–476. doi:10.1017/S0020818308080156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western Organization of Resource Councils (WORC), 2011. ‘Exporting Powder River Basin Coal: Risks and Costs’, January 2011. Available from: http://www.worc.org/userfiles/file/Coal/Exporting_Powder_River_Basin_Coal_Risks_and_Cost.pdf [Accessed 13 December 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Young, O., 1989. The politics of international regime formation: managing natural resources and the environment. International Organization, 43 (03), 349–375. doi:10.1017/S0020818300032963
   Google Scholar
• Zangger Committee, 2013. Available from: http://www.zanggercommittee.org/Seiten/default.aspx[Accessed 17 February 2013].
   Google Scholar