Party differences and energy reform: fiscal conservatism in the California legislature

References

• Boehmke, F.J. and Skinner, P., 2012. State policy innovativeness revisited. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 12 (3), 303–329. doi:10.1177/1532440012438890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryner, G., 2008. Failure and opportunity: environmental groups in U.S. climate change policy. Environmental Politics, 17 (2), 319–336. doi:10.1080/09644010801936255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttel, F., 2003. Environmental sociology and the explanation of environmental reform. Organization and Environment, 16 (3), 306–344. doi:10.1177/1086026603256279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California State Legislature, 2013. Bill search. Available from: http://www.legislature.ca.gov/port-bilinfo.html [Accessed 11 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy, 2013. California poised to move up in world economy rankings in 2013. Available from: http://www.ccsce.com/PDF/Numbers-July-2013-CA-Economy-Rankings-2012.pdf [Accessed 4 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Center for Responsive Politics, 2014a. Alternative energy production and services. Available from: http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=E1500 [Accessed 4 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Center for Responsive Politics, 2014b. Energy/natural resources. Available from: http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?Ind=E [Accessed 4 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., 2009. Trendy solutions: Why do states adopt Sustainable Energy Portfolio Standards? Energy Policy, 37 (8), 3274–3281. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chupp, B., 2011. Environmental constituent interest, green electricity policies, and legislative voting. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62 (2), 254–266. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2011.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Congress, 2013. Natural cash: fracking industry contributions to Congress. Available from: http://www.citizensforethics.org/page/-/PDFs/Reports/Natural_Cash_Fracking_Industry_Contributions_to_Congress_CREW_11_19_2013.pdf?nocdn=1 [Accessed 4 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. and Allen, D., 2004. Political economy and the adoption of everyday environmental policies in the American states, 1997: an exploratory analysis. The Social Science Journal, 41 (4), 525–542. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2004.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clawson, D., Neustadtl, A., and Scott, D., 1992. Money talks: Corporate Pacs and political influence. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Clean Edge. 2013. 2013 U.S. Clean Tech Leadership Index. Available from: http://www.cleanedge.com/research/leadership-index [Accessed 1 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Coley, J.S. and Hess, D.J., 2012. Green energy laws and Republican legislators in the United States. Energy Policy, 48 (1), 576–583. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. and Freudenburg, W., 2004. Postindustrialization and environmental quality: an empirical analysis of the environmental state. Social Forces, 83 (1), 157–188. doi:10.1353/sof.2004.0108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, L. and Breen, J., 2013. The impact of political factors on states’ adoption of renewable portfolio standards. The Electricity Journal, 26 (2), 79–94. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2013.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F., 2014. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture, and Society. Forthcoming. doi:10.1177/0263276414531627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., 2014. Do you trust scientists about the environment? Carsey Institute, Regional Issue Brief #40. Available from: http://carseyinstitute.unh.edu/sites/carseyinstitute.unh.edu/files/publications/IB-Hamilton-NH-Survey-2014-Science-web.pdf [Accessed 2 November 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. and Mai, Q., 2014. Renewable electricity policy in Asia: a qualitative comparative analysis of factors affecting sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 12, 31–46. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Huang, M.-Y., et al., 2007. Is the choice of renewable portfolio standards random? Energy Policy, 35 (11), 5571–5575. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, G., 2004. Partisan and ideological polarization in the California electorate. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 4 (2), 113–139. doi:10.1177/153244000400400201
   Google Scholar
• Jenner, S., et al., 2012. What drives states to support renewable energy? The Energy Journal, 33 (2), 1–12. doi:10.5547/01956574.33.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenner, S., Ovaere, L., and Schindele, S., 2013. The impact of private interest contributions on RPS adoption. Economics & Politics, 25 (3), 411–423.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., 2010. The Climate Zombie Caucus of the 112th Congress. Think Progress. Available from: http://thinkprogress.org/climate-zombie-caucus/ [Accessed 10 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Layzer, J., 2012. Open for business: Conservatives’ opposition to environmental regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, E., 2012. Fossil fuel industry ads dominate TV campaign. New York Times, Sept. 13.
   Google Scholar
• Lybecker, D., McBeth, M., and Kusko, E., 2013. Trash or treasure: recycling narratives and reducing political polarisation. Environmental Politics, 22 (2), 312–332. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.692935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, T P. and Yin, H., 2010. Why do states adopt renewable portfolio standards?: an empirical investigation. The Energy Journal, 31 (3), 133–157. doi:10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-No3-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matisoff, D., 2008. The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: Regional diffusion or internal determinants? Review of Policy Research, 25 (6), 527–546. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matisoff, D. and Edwards, J., 2014. Kindred spirits or intergovernmental competition? The innovation and diffusion of energy policies in the American states (1990–2008). Environmental Politics, 23 (5), 795–817. doi:10.1080/09644016.2014.923639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. and Koski, C., 2007. State environmental policies: analyzing green building mandates. Review of Policy Research, 24 (1), 49–65. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00267.x
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A. and Dunlap, R.E., 2011. Cool dudes: the denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21 (4), 1163–1172. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. and Spaargaren, G., 2000. Ecological modernization theory in debate: a review. Environmental Politics, 9 (1), 17–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute on Money in State Politics, 2014. State overviews. Available from: http://www.followthemoney.org/database/state_overview.phtml [Accessed 20 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, H., 2012. Lost opportunities: modeling commercial building energy code adoption in the United States. Energy Policy, 49 (October), 182–191. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peduzzi, P., et al., 1996. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49 (12), 1373–1379. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellow, D., Schnaiberg, A., and Weinberg, A., 2000. Putting the ecological modernization theory to the test: the promises and performances of urban recycling. Environmental Politics, 9 (1), 109–137.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, R. and Neumayer, E., 2012. Does the ‘California effect’ operate across borders? Trading- and investing-up in automobile emission standards. Journal of European Public Policy, 19 (2), 217–237. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.609725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheinberg, A., 2003. The proof of the pudding: urban recycling in North America as a process of ecological modernisation. Environmental Politics, 12 (4), 49–75. doi:10.1080/09644010412331308374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwom, R., 2011. A middle-range theorization of energy politics: the struggle for energy-efficient appliances. Environmental Politics, 20 (5), 705–726. doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.608535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon, S. and Menz, F.C., 2006. The role of social, political, and economic interests in promoting state green electricity policies. Environmental Science and Policy, 9 (7–8), 652–662. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasi, I., 2009. Social movements and industry development: the environmental movement’s impact on the wind energy industry. Mobilization, 14 (3), 315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasseur, M., 2014. Convergence and divergence in renewable energy policy among US States from 1998 to 2011. Social Forces, 92 (4), 1637–1657. doi:10.1093/sf/sou011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, J.G. and Koontz, T.M., 2012. Extent and types of small-scale wind policies in the U.S. states: adoption and effectiveness. Energy Policy, 46 (July), 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, H. and Feiock, R., 2012. Policy tool interactions and the adoption of state renewable portfolio standards. Review of Policy Research, 29 (2), 193–206. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00548.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, R. and Rosa, E., 2003. Key challenges to ecological modernization theory: institutional efficacy, case study evidence, units of analysis, and the pace of eco-efficiency. Organization and Environment, 16 (3), 273–288. doi:10.1177/1086026603256299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar