Policy change and Europeanization: Implementing the European Union’s Habitats Directive in Germany and the United Kingdom

References

• Alphandery, P. and Fortier, A., 2001. Can a territorial policy be based on science alone? The system for creating the Natura 2000 network in France. Sociologia Ruralis, 41 (3), 311–328. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beunen, R. and van Ark, R., 2007. De politieke dimensie van Natura 2000. Landschap, 24 (1), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Beunen, R., Van Assche, K., and Duineveld, M., 2013. Performing failure in conservation policy: the implementation of European Union directives in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy, 31 (1), 280–288. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrass, L., 2014. Varying practices of implementing the Habitats Directive in German and British forests. Forest Policy and Economics, 38 (3), 151–160. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T., 2003. How the European Union interacts with its member states. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies. Political Science Series 93.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. and Risse, T., 2003. Conceptualising the domestic impact of Europe. In: K. Featherstone and C. Radaelli, eds. The politics of Europeanisation. Oxford: OUP, 57–80.
   Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., 2005. EU-Richtlinie Fauna-Flora-Habitat: Umsetzungsprobleme und Erklärungsansätze. disP, 163 (4), 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. and Caiani, M., 2009. Social movements and Europeanization. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., 1998. Nature conservation. In: P. Lowe and S. Ward, eds. British environmental policy and Europe. Politics and policy in transition. London: Routledge, 214–231.
   Google Scholar
• Eppler, A., 2010. Föderalismusreform I im Politikfeld Umweltpolitik als Europäisierungsschritt. In: J. von Blumenthal and S. Bröchler, eds. Föderalismusreform in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, 217–231.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2007. Guidance document on the strict protection of animal species of Community interest under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC. Final Version.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2012a. The Habitats Directive. Celebrating 20 years of protecting biodiversity in Europe. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/pdf/20yrs_brochure.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2012b. Scoping document on forests and Natura 2000. 23 July 2012. (unpublished)
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D., 2012. Building the European Union’s Natura 2000 network. Nature Conservation, 1, 11–26. doi:10.3897/natureconservation.1.1808
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D., et al., 2013. Adapting environmental conservation legislation for an enlarged European Union: experience from the Habitats Directive. Environmental Conservation, 40 (2), 97–107. doi:10.1017/S0376892912000422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbrass, J. and Jordan, A., 2001. European Union environmental policy and the UK Government: a passive observer or a strategic manager? Environmental Politics, 10 (2), 1–21. doi:10.1080/714000537
   Google Scholar
• FC, 2003. Practice guide: the management of semi-natural woodlands; 3. Lowland mixed broadleaved woods. Available from: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/PDF/fcpg003.pdf/$FILE/fcpg003.pdf [Accessed 26 November 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, P. and Vink, M., eds., 2008. Europeanization. New research agendas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25 (3), 275–296. doi:10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. and Taylor, C., 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44 (5), 936–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., et al., 2001. Differential Europe. The European Union impact on national policymaking. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hiedenpää, J., 2002. European-wide conservation versus local well-being: the reception of the Natura 2000 Reserve Network in Karvia, SW-Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61 (2–4), 113–123. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00106-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. and Cashore, B., 2007. Re-visiting the new orthodoxy of policy dynamics: the dependent variable and re-aggregation problems in the study of policy change. Canadian Political Science Review, 1 (2), 50–62.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., 2006. Environmental policy. In: I. Bache and A. Jordan, eds. The Europeanization of British politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 231–247.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. and Liefferink, D., eds., 2004. Environmental policy in Europe. The Europeanization of national environmental policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C. and Lenschow, A., 1998. Coping with Europe: the impact of British and German administrations on the implementation of EU environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 5 (4), 595–614. doi:10.1080/13501769880000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krott, M., 2000. Voicing interests and concerns: NATURA 2000 – an ecological network in conflict with people. Forest Policy and Economics, 1 (3–4), 357–366. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(00)00031-9
   Google Scholar
• Ledoux, L., et al., 2000. Implementing EU biodiversity policy: UK experiences. Land Use Policy, 17 (4), 257–268. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00031-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibenath, M., 2008. Legitimacy of biodiversity policies in a multi-level setting. The case of germany. In: J. Keulartz and G. Leistra, eds. Legitimacy in European nature conservation policy: case studies in multilevel governance. Dordrecht: Springer, 233–250.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, P. and Ward, S., eds., 1998. British environmental policy and Europe. Politics and policy in transition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G. and McAdam, D., 1996. Social movements and the changing structure of political opportunity in the European Union. West European Politics, 19 (2), 249–278. doi:10.1080/01402389608425133
   Google Scholar
• Mehtälä, J. and Vuorisalo, T., 2007. Conservation policy and the EU Habitats Directive: favourable conservation status as a measure of conservation success. European Environment, 17 (6), 363–375. doi:10.1002/eet.458
   Google Scholar
• Nail, S., 2008. Forest policies and social change in England. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, J., 2004. Protected areas governance and justice: theory and the European Unions’ Habitats Directive. Environmental Sciences, 1 (1), 59–77. doi:10.1076/evms.1.1.59.23763
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C., 2003. The Europeanization of public policy. In: K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli, eds. The politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–56.
   Google Scholar
• Rauschmayer, F., van den Hove, S., and Koetz, T., 2009. Participation in EU biodiversity governance: how far beyond rhetoric? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27 (1), 42–58. doi:10.1068/c0703j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. and Da Silva, J., 2005. From environmental ethics to nature conservation policy: natura 2000 and the burden of proof. Journal of Agricultural Environmental Ethics, 18 (2), 107–130. doi:10.1007/s10806-005-0634-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkranz, L., et al., 2014. Income losses due to the implementation of the Habitats Directive in forests — conclusions from a case study in Germany. Forest Policy and Economics, 38 (1), 207–218. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, A., 2006. European nature conservation policy: challenges for local implementation in Germany. In: B. Tress, et al., eds. From landscape research to landscape planning: aspects of integration, education and application. Dordrecht: Springer, 173–189.
   Google Scholar
• Schaber-Schoor, G., 2010. Fachliche Anforderungen, Ziele und Handlungsansätze verschiedener Alt- und Totholzkonzepte. AFZ-Der Wald, 65 (1), 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Slepcevic, R., 2009. The judicial enforcement of EU law through national courts: possibilities and limits. Journal of European Public Policy, 16 (3), 378–394. doi:10.1080/13501760802662847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotirov, M., Borrass, L., and Winkel, G., 2011. Dem Wandel auf der Spur - Theoretische Ansätze zur Analyse von Politikwandel und -stabilität mit Fokus auf das Beispiel waldbezogener EU-Naturschutzpolitik. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 182 (11/12), 215–230.
   Google Scholar
• Sotirov, M., Lovric, M., and Winkel, G., 2015. Environmental governance between Europeanization and domestic politics: Analyzing the implementation of EU biodiversity conservation policy in Bulgaria and Croatia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy (accepted, in press).
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelonline, 2006. Newts in danger: Merkel wants to loosen EU wildlife protection. Spiegelonline, 12 December. Available from: http://www.spiegel.de/international/newts-in-danger-merkel-wants-to-loosen-eu-wildlife-protection-a-454072.html
   Google Scholar
• Sumares, D. and Fidelis, T., 2011. Natura 2000 and the narrative nature of nature: a case for critical discourse analysis. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 8 (1), 53–68. doi:10.1080/1943815X.2011.556649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S., 2006. Implementation of the Habitats Directive in the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www-user.uni-bremen.de/~avosetta/repgb2006.pdf [Accessed 26 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• van Apeldoorn, R., et al., 2009. Natura 2000 – Information and communication on the designation and management of Natura 2000 sites. Wageningen: Alterra, Main Report 1. Available from: http://www.inbo.be/files/bibliotheek/34/213534.pdf [Accessed 25 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, M., 2006. Conservation challenge no. 1; ideas for a UK nature conservation framework. Peterborough: JNCC. Available from: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/pdf/cchallenge_001_web.pdf [Accessed 26 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Volkery, A., 2007. Föderalismus und Naturschutz. Anatomie eines Spannungsfelds. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, N., 2004. Akteure der Forstwirtschaft und des Naturschutzes. Anwendung des Akteursansatzes auf die Forstpolitik. AFZ-DerWald, 59 (1), 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, N. and Christophersen, T., 2002. The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European policy process. Forest Policy and Economics, 4 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00070-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel, G., 2007. Waldnaturschutzpolitik in Deutschland. Bestandsaufnahmen, Analysen und Entwurf einer Story-Line. Freiburger Schriften zur Forst- und Umweltpolitik 13. Remagen-Oberwinter: Dr. Kessel.
   Google Scholar
• Winkel, G. and Sotirov, M., 2011. An obituary for national forest programmes? Analyzing and learning from the strategic use of “new modes of governance” in Germany and Bulgaria. Forest Policy and Economics, 13 (2), 143–154. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel, G. and Sotirov, M., 2014. Whose integration is this? European forest policy between the gospel of coordination, institutional competition, and new spirits of integration. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. Available online. doi:10.1068/c1356j.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S., et al., 2014. The impact of Natura 2000 on forest management: a socio-ecological analysis in the continental region of the European Union. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23 (14), 3451–3482. doi:10.1007/s10531-014-0822-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R., 2002. Environmental policy-making in Britain, Germany and the European Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar