963
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Two shades of Green? The electorates of GreenLeft and the Party for the Animals

&

References

  • Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., and Snyder, J.M., 2008. The strength of issues: using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102 (2), 215–232. doi:10.1017/S0003055408080210
  • Berlin, D. and Lundqvist, L.J., 2012. Do leopards ever change their spots ? The development of political trust among Swedish green party sympathisers. Environmental Politics, 21 (1), 131–152. doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.643372
  • Bethlehem, J., 2010. Selection bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review, 78 (2), 161–188. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1751-5823
  • Bovens, M. and Wille, A., 2010. The education gap in participation and its political consequences. Acta Politica, 45 (4), 393–422. doi:10.1057/ap.2010.7
  • Callicott, J.B., 1988. Animal liberation and environmental ethics. Together again. Between the Species, 4 (3), 163–169.
  • Callicott, J.B., 1980. Animal liberation: a triangular affair. Environmental Ethics, 2 (4), 311–338. doi:10.5840/enviroethics19802424
  • Carroll, P., et al., 2009. Environmental attitudes, beliefs about social justice and intention to vote green: lessons for the New Zealand green party ? Environmental Politics, 18 (2), 257–278. doi:10.1080/09644010802682635
  • Carter, N., 2010. The greens in the 2009 European parliament election. Environmental Politics, 19 (2), 295–302. doi:10.1080/09644010903576926
  • Catterberg, G. and Moreno, A., 2005. The individual bases of political trust: trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17 (1), 31–48.
  • Clements, B., 2012. The sociological and attitudinal bases of environmentally-related beliefs and behaviour in Britain. Environmental Politics, 21 (6), 901–921. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.724215
  • Coombs, C.H., 1964. A theory of data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • De Pers. 2008. Wij worden groter dan GroenLinks. 31 Mar.
  • De Telegraaf. 2007. Partij voor de Dieren-senator Niko Koffeman gruwt van CDA. 2 Jul.
  • Dobson, A., 1994. Green political thought. New York: Routledge.
  • Dolezal, M., 2010. Exploring the stabilization of a political force: the social and attitudinal basis of green parties in the age of globalization. West European Politics, 33 (3), 534–552. doi:10.1080/01402381003654569
  • GroenLinks, 2008. GroenLinks: Partij van de Toekomst. Utrecht: GroenLinks.
  • Hug, S., 2001. Altering party systems. Strategic behaviour and the emergence of new political parties in western democracies. Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Inglehart, R. and Andeweg, R., 1993. Change in Dutch political culture: a silent or a silenced revolution. West European Politics, 16 (3), 345–361. doi:10.1080/01402389308424978
  • Jamieson, D., 1998. Animal liberation is an environmental ethic. Environmental Values, 7 (1), 41–57. doi:10.3197/096327198129341465
  • Kitschelt, B.H.P., 1988. Left-libertarian parties : explaining innovation in competitive party systems. World Politics, 40 (2), 194–234. doi:10.2307/2010362
  • Kriesi, H., et al., 2008. West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Krouwel, A. and Lucardie, P., 2008. Waiting in the wings: new parties in the Netherlands. Acta Politica, 43 (2–3), 278–307. doi:10.1057/ap.2008.9
  • Kruijt, M. 2007. ‘Stem tegen, stem SP’ kiest voor de dieren. De Volkskrant, 15 Mar, p. 3.
  • Lagendijk, J., et al., 1992. Uitgangspunten voor GroenLinkse politiek. Utrecht: GroenLinks.
  • Lipset, S.M., Lazerfeld, P.F., Barton, A.H., Linz, J. 1954. The psychology of voting. An analysis of political behaviour. In: G. Lindzey, ed. Handbook of Social Psychology. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  • Louwerse, T. and Otjes, S., 2012. Design challenges in cross-national VAAs: the case of the EU Profiler. International Journal of E-Governance, 5 (3–4), 279–297.
  • Lowery, D., et al., 2013. Policy agendas and births and deaths of political parties: the Dutch model. Party Politics, 19 (3), 381–407. doi:10.1177/1354068811407576
  • Lucardie, P., 2006. Links voor dieren én mensen. Trouw.5 Dec, p. 7.
  • Lucardie, P., 2008. Twee in, dertien uit. Electoraal succes and falen van nieuwe partijen in 2006. In: G. Voerman, ed. Jaarboek Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse Politieke Partijen 2006. Groningen: University of Groningen.
  • Lucardie, P., 2012 Animalism: a nascent ideology: exploring the idea of animal rights parties in Europe. Paper presented at the Workshop‘Political Animals and Animal Politics’ of the ECPR Joint Sessions Antwerp, 10–15 Apr.
  • Lucardie, P., Van Schuur, W., and Voerman, G., 1999. Verloren Illusie, Geslaagde Fusie? GroenLinks in historisch en politicologisch perspectief. Leiden: DSWO Press.
  • Lucardie, P. and Voerman, G., 2010. Van de Straat naar de Staat? GroenLinks 1990–2010. Amsterdam: Boom.
  • Meguid, B.M., 2007. Party competition between unequals. strategies and electoral fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mokken, R.J., 1971. A theory and procedure of scale analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Müller-Rommel, F., 1998. Explaining the electoral success of green parties: A cross-national analysis. Environmental Politics, 7 (4), 145–154. doi:10.1080/09644019808414428
  • Otjes, S., 2014. Animal party politics in parliament. In: M. Wissenburg and D. Schlosberg, eds. Animal politics and political animals. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 107–122.
  • Otjes, S. 2015. Hervormen en Herverdelen. Is de links-rechtslijn de enige conflictlijn op het sociaaleconomisch terrein? Res Publica, 133–158.
  • Otjes, S., forthcoming How the Eurozone crisis reshaped national economic policy space: the Netherlands 2006–2012 Acta Politica.
  • Otjes, S. and Louwerse, T., 2014. Spatial models in voting advice applications. Electoral Studies, 36 (4), 263–271. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.004
  • Partij voor de Dieren. 2005. Beginselverklaring. Available from: https://www.partijvoordedieren.nl/departij/beginselverklaring [Accessed 17 September 2014].
  • Partij voor de Dieren, 2014. Weerwoord aan Brussel. Verkiezingsprogramma. Partij voor de Dieren. Europese verkiezingen 2014. Amsterdam: Partij voor de Dieren.
  • Pellikaan, H., De Lange, S., and Van der Meer, T., 2007. Fortuyn’s legacy: party system change in the Netherlands. Comparative European Politics, 5 (3), 282–302. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110097
  • Pifer, L., Shimizu, K., and Pifer, R., 1994. Public attitudes toward animal research: some international comparisons. Society & Animals, 2 (2), 95–113. doi:10.1163/156853094X00126
  • Rabinowitz, G. and Macdonald, S.E., 1989. A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 83 (1), 93–121.
  • Rohrschneider, R., 1993. New party versus old left realignments: environmental attitudes, party policies, and partisan affiliations in four West European countries. The Journal of Politics, 55 (3), 682–701.
  • Sagoff, M., 1984. Animal liberation and environmental ethics: bad marriage, quick divorce. Osgood Hall Law Journal, 22 (2), 297–307.
  • Singer, P., 1990. Animal Liberation. Revised ed. New York: Avon Books.
  • Smith, J.K., 2005. Green space: explaining variation in green party success. In: Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association 31 August–3 September.
  • Thieme, M., 2006. De eeuw van het dier. Antwerpen: Houtekiet.
  • Van der Ark, L.A., 2007. Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistiscal Software, 20 (11), 1–19.
  • Van der Eijk, C., 2002. Design issues in electoral research: taking care of (core) business. Electoral Studies, 21 (2), 189–206. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(01)00017-8
  • Van der Eijk, C., et al., 2006. Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: on the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities. Electoral Studies, 25 (3), 424–447. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2005.06.012
  • Van der Heijden, H.A., 2010. The Dutch 2010 elections and the environment. Environmental Politics, 19 (6), 1000–1005. doi:10.1080/09644016.2010.518687
  • Van der Kolk, H., et al., 2012. Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 2010. Available from http://dans.knaw.nl [Accessed 6 August 2014].
  • Van der Kolk, H. et al., 2014. Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 2012. Available from http://dans.knaw.nl [Accessed 6 August 2014].
  • Van der Kolk, H., 2010. Van radicaal naar normaal? Kiezers van en over GroenLinks. In: P. Lucardie and G. Voerman, eds. Van de Staat naar de Straat. GroenLinks 1990–2010. Amsterdam: Boom.
  • Van Dijk,, et al., 2013. Terug naar de Toekomst. Utrecht: GroenLinks.
  • Van Os, P. 2010. Dierenmanieren; portret Partij voor de Dieren. NRC Handelsblad 17 Apr.
  • Van Schuur, W. and Kiers, H., 1994. Why factor analysis often is the incorrect model for analysing bipolar concepts, and what model to use instead. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18 (2), 97–110. doi:10.1177/014662169401800201
  • Van Spanje, J. and Van der Brug, W., 2009. Being intolerant of the intolerant. The exclusion of Western European anti-immigration parties and its consequences for party choice. Acta Politica, 44 (4), 353–384. doi:10.1057/ap.2009.7
  • Wilensky, H.L., 2002. Rich democracies: political economy, public policy, and performance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Wissenburg, M. and Schlosberg, D., 2014. Introducing animal politics and political animals. In: M. Wissenburg and D. Schlosberg, eds. Animal politics and political animals. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1–16.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.