Globalization’s limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance

References

• Adger, W.N., Eakin, H., and Winkels, A., 2009. Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7 (3), 150–157. doi:10.1890/070148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amado, T.J.C. and Santi, A.L., 2007. Agricultura de precisão aplicada ao aprimoramento do manejo do solo. In: J.E. Fiorin, ed. Manejo da fertilidade do solo no sistema plantio direto. Passo Fundo: Berthier, 99–144.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A., 1997. Placing globalization. Theory, Culture & Society, 14 (2), 123–137. doi:10.1177/026327697014002011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., Sondorp, E., and Stevens, R.H., 2012. The promise and challenge of global network governance: the global outbreak alert and response network. Global Governance, 18 (3), 317–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bair, J., 2009. Global commodity chains: genealogy and review. In: J. Bair, ed. Frontiers of commodity chain research. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J. and Eckersley, R., 2005. Reinstating the state, an introduction. In: J. Barry and R. Eckersley, eds. The State and the Global Ecological Crisis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagwati, J., 2007. In defense of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., et al., 2012. Transforming governance and institutions for global sustainability: key insights from the earth system governance project. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4 (1), 51–60. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. and Dingwerth, K., 2004. Global environmental change and the nation state. Global Environmental Politics, 4 (1), 1–22. doi:10.1162/152638004773730185
   Google Scholar
• Börjeson, L., et al., 2006. Scenario types and techniques: towards a user’s guide. Futures, 38, 723–739. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K., 2009. Human Development and environmental governance: A reality check. In: W.N. Adger and A.J. Jordan, eds. Governing sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 32–52.
   Google Scholar
• Brown Weiss, E. and Jacobson, H.K., eds., 1998. Engaging countries: strengthening compliance with international environmental accords. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. and Jordan, A., 2012. Guest editorial: transnational environmental governance: new findings and emerging research agendas. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30 (4), 556–570. doi:10.1068/c3004ed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N., 2007. Global environmental politics. In: N. Carter, ed.. The politics of the environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 241–245.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M., 1996. The information age: economy, society and culture, vol. 1: the rise of the network society. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Challies, E., Newig, J., and Lenschow, A., 2014. What role for social–ecological systems research in governing global teleconnections?. Global Environmental Change, 27, 32–40. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chayes, A. and Chayes, A.H., 1993. On compliance. International Organization, 47 (2), 175–205. doi:10.1017/S0020818300027910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers, D.L., et al., 2011. Sustainability challenges of phosphorus and food: solutions from closing the human phosphorus cycle. BioScience, 61 (2), 117–124. doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compagnon, D., Chan, S., and Mert, A., 2012. The changing role of the state. In: F. Biermann, P. Pattberg, eds. Global environmental governance reconsidered. Cambridge: MIT Press, 237–263.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, A., et al., 2010. Governance, complexity, and resilience. Global Environmental Change, 20, 363–368. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin, H., et al., 2014. Significance of telecoupling for exploration of land-use change. In: K.C. Seto and A. Reenberg, eds. Rethinking global land use in an urban era. Cambridge: MIT Press, 141–163.
   Google Scholar
• EEA, 1999. The contribution of EU monitoring and reporting to ‘sound and effective’ environmental policy-making. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency (EEA).
   Google Scholar
• EEA, 2001. Reporting on environmental measures: are we being effective?. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency (EEA).
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, L.M., 2004. The global politics of the environment. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2003. Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC.
   Google Scholar
• Faust, J., 2006. Strategische Interessen deutscher Außenpolitk in der Zusammenarbeit mit Latainamerika - Ein Kommentar. Lateinamerika Analysen, 15 (3), 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Fearnside, P.M., 2001. Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil. Environmental Conservation, 28 (1), 23–38. doi:10.1017/S0376892901000030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glin, L.C., et al., 2012. Governing the transnational organic cotton network from Benin. Global Networks, 12 (3), 333–354. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2011.00340.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenz, J., et al., 2007. Umweltwirkungen der globalen Sojawirtschaft. Ressourcen- und Wertströme in Argentinien, Brasilien und Deutschland. Gaia, 16 (3), 208–214.
   Google Scholar
• Gruère, G.P., 2006. An analysis of trade related international regulations of genetically modified food and their effects on developing countries. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., Shogren, J., and White, B., 2007. Environmental economics in theory and practice. 2nd ed. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S., 1989. Debt for nature swaps: overview and discussion of key issues. Ecological Economics, 1 (1), 77–93. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(89)90025-6
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R.L., ed, 2006. Globalization and sustainable development: issues and applications. Tampa: Dr. Kiran C. Patel Center for Global Solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., 2008. Globalization and public policy. In: M. Moran, M. Rein, and R.E. Goodin, eds. The oxford handbook of public policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D., et al., 1999. Global Transformations. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, M. and Yeung, H.W.-C., 2006. Whither global production networks in economic geography? past, present and future.’. Environment and Planning A, 38 (7), 1193–1204. doi:10.1068/a38463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann-Riem, W., 2011. Die Governance-Perspektive in der rechtswissenschaftlichen Innovationsforschung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K., Knill, C., and Arts, B., 2008. Environmental policy convergence in Europe: the impact of institutions and trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G., 2003. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97 (2), 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hospes, O., Van Der Valk, O., and Van Der Mheen-Sluijer, J., 2012. Parallel development of five partnerships to promote sustainable soy in Brazil: solution or part of wicked problems? International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15 (B), 39–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. and Reimer, S., 2004. Geographies of commodity chains. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jörgens, H., Lenschow, A., and Liefferink, D., eds, 2014. Understanding environmental policy convergence. the power of words, rules and money. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaimowitz, D. and Smith, J., 2001. Soybean technology and the loss of natural vegetation in Brazil and Bolivia. In: A. Angelsen and D. Kaimowitz, eds. Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation. Jakarta: CIFOR, 195–212.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, J., et al., 2007. Biodiversity and socioeconomic impacts of selected agro-commodity production systems. The Journal of Environment & Development, 16 (2), 131–160. doi:10.1177/1070496507302516
   Google Scholar
• Kissinger, M. and Rees, W.E., 2010. An interregional ecological approach for modelling sustainability in a globalizing world: reviewing existing approaches and emerging directions. Ecological Modelling, 221 (21), 2615–2623. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissinger, M., Rees, W.E., and Timmer, V., 2011. Interregional sustainability: governance and policy in an ecologically interdependent world. Environmental Science & Policy, 14 (8), 965–976. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapivin, V.F. and Varotos, C.A., 2007. Globalization and sustainable development: environmental agendas. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lanje, K., 2005. Perspektiven für einen nachhaltigen Stoffstrom Soja zwischen Brasilien und Deutschland. Loccumer Protokolle 33/03. Rehburg-Loccum: Evangelische Akademie Loccum.
   Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., 2001. Regulatory interdependence and international governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (3), 474–492. doi:10.1080/13501760110056077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., 1998. The world trade dimension of ‘greening’ the EU’s common agricultural policy. In: J. Golub, ed. Global competition and EU external environmental policy. London: Routledge, 161–188.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., et al., 2012. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature, 486 (7401), 109–112. doi:10.1038/nature11145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., et al., 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 18 (2). doi:10.5751/ES-05873-180226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., et al., 2015. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science, 347 (6225), 963–972. doi:10.1126/science.1258832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, P.D. and Wilkinson, K., 2009. How do environmental actors make governance systems more sustainable? The role of politics and ideas in policy change. In: N.W. Adger and A.J. Jordan, eds. Governing sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 76–98.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, A., 1997. Democracy beyond borders? Globalization and the reconstruction of democratic theory and practice. In: A. McGrew, ed. The transformation of democracy: globalization and territorial democracy. Cambridge: Polity, 231–266.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., 2002. Politics and scale: some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61, 169–179. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00111-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., 2012. Greening the state?. In: P.F. Steinberg, and S.D. VanDeveer, eds. Comparative environmental politics: theory, practice and prospects. Cambridge: MIT Press: 63–87.
   Google Scholar
• Meyfroidt, P., et al., 2013. Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5 (5), 438–444. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A.P.J., 2001. The globalization of side effects. In: A.P.J. Mol, ed. Globalization and environmental reform: the ecological modernization of the global economy. Sabon: MIT Press, 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A.P.J. and Spaargaren, G., 2006. Towards a sociology of environmental flows: a new agenda for twenty-first-century environmental sociology. In: G. Spaargaren A.P.J. Mol, and F.H. Buttel, eds. Governing environmental flows. Global challenges to social theory. Cambridge: MIT Press, 39–82.
   Google Scholar
• Mose, I., Peithmann, O., and Schaal, P., 2007. Probleme der Intensivlandwirtschaft im Oldenburger Münsterland: Lösungsstrategien im Widerstreit der Interessen. In: H. Zepp, ed. Ökologische Problemräume Deutschlands. Darmstadt: Deutsche Akademie für Landeskunde, 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, S.C. and Hart, J.A.F., 2015. The long arm of climate change: societal teleconnections and the future of climate change impacts studies. Climatic Change, 129, 13–26. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1328-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munroe, D.K., et al., 2014. Using economic geography to reinvigorate land-change science. Geoforum, 52, 12–21. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neset, T.-S.-S. and Cordell, D., 2012. Global phosphorus scarcity: identifying synergies for a sustainable future. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 92 (1), 2–6. doi:10.1002/jsfa.4650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P., 2012. Globalization and the environment: capitalism, ecology and power. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Günther, D., and Pahl-Wostl, C., 2010. Synapses in the network. Learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecology and Society, 15, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, P., et al., 2006. Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11 (1), 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osório-Peters, S., 2003. Stoffstromanalyse Soja: Menge, Akteure, Probleme und (politische) Ansätze für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung. In: Soja - So nein. Hermannsburg: Evangelische Akademie Loccum.
   Google Scholar
• Pattberg, P., 2006. The institutionalization of private governance: how business and non-profit organizations agree on transnational rules. In: M. Jänicke and K. Jacob, eds. Environmental governance in global perspective. Berlin: Forschungsstelle für Umweltpolitik, 386–410.
   Google Scholar
• Ponte, S., Gibbon, P., and Vestergaard, J., eds, 2011. Governing through standards: origins, drivers and limitations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Quark, A.A., 2012. Scientized politics and global governance in the cotton trade: evaluating divergent theories of scientization. Review of International Political Economy, 19 (5), 895–917. doi:10.1080/09692290.2011.619115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, H.W., 1998. Was sind Futtermittel?. In: BUKO Agrar Koordination, ed. Soja. Hannover: Forum für Internationale Agrarpolitik, 30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Reichert, T. and Reichardt, M., 2011. Saumagen und Regenwald. Klima- und Umweltwirkungen deutscher Agrarrohstoffimporte am Beispiel Sojaschrot. Berlin: Forum Umwelt & Entwicklung.
   Google Scholar
• Rudra, N., 2008. Globalization and the race to the bottom in developing countries. who really gets hurt?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, W., 1999. Globalization and sustainability: an essay. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Sarzeaud, P., Dimitriadou, A., and Zjalic, M., eds., 2008. EU beef farming systems and CAP regulations. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, J.A., 2010. Governing a more global world. Corporate Governance, 10 (4), 459–474. doi:10.1108/14720701011069687
   Google Scholar
• Schouten, G. and Glasbergen, P., 2012. Private multi-stakeholder governance in the agricultural market place: an analysis of legitimization processes of the roundtables on sustainable palm oil and responsible soy. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15 (B), 53–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seto, K.C., et al., 2012. Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (20), 7687–7692. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117622109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E., 2002. The spaces and times of globalization: place, scale, networks, and positionality. Economic Geography, 78 (3), 307–330. doi:10.2307/4140812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T., 1985. Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research. In: P.B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol, eds. Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenfeld, D.A., 2008. Globalisation and environmental governance: is another world possible?. Global Environmental Change, 18 (3), 341–342. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speth, J.G. and Haas, P.M., 2006. Global environmental governance. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfeld, H., et al., 2010. Livestock in a changing landscape: drivers, consequences, and responses. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, R.B., 1992. Environmental Law in the United States and the European community: spillovers, cooperation, rivalry, institutions. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1992, 41–80.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., 1997. Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In: K. Cox, ed. Spaces of globalization: reasserting the power of the local. London: Guilford Press, 137–166.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., 2005. Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42 (11), 1991–2006. doi:10.1080/00420980500279869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai, K., Rahm, D., and Coggburn, J., 2007. Globalization and the environment: an introduction. In: K. Thai, D. Rahm, and J. Coggburn, eds. Handbook of globalization and the environment. New York, NY: CRC Press, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Velten, S., 2009. Perspektiven für die Nachhaltigkeit des Sojaanbaus im Nordwesten von Rio Grande do Sul, Brasilien. Eine Akteursnetzwerkanalyse. Lüneburg: Diplomarbeit, Leuphana University Lüneburg.
   Google Scholar
• Vercelli, A., 2006. Globalization and Sustainable Development. In: M. Basili, M. Franzini, and A. Vercelli, eds. Environment, inequality and collective action. London: Routledge, 9–33.
   Google Scholar
• Warning, M., 2006. Transnational bureaucracy networks: A resource of global environmental governance?. In: G. Winter, ed. Multilevel governance of global environmental change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 305–329.
   Google Scholar
• WTO, 2012. WTO rules and environmental policies: GATT exceptions. Geneva: WTO.
   Google Scholar
• Yellishetty, M., Ranjith, P.G., and Tharumarajah, A., 2010. Iron ore and steel production trends and material flows in the world: is this really sustainable?. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54 (12), 1084–1094. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, H.W.-C., 2002. The limits to globalization theory: A geographic perspective on global economic change. Economic Geography, 78 (3), 285–306. doi:10.2307/4140811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O.R., 1999. the effectiveness of international environmental regimes: causal connections and behavioral mechanisms. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O.R., 2008. Institutions and environmental change: the scientific legacy of a decade of IDGEC research. In: O.R. Young, L.A. King, and H. Schroeder, eds. Institutions and environmental change: principal findings, applications and research frontiers. Cambridge: MIT Press, 3–45.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O.R., et al., 2006. The globalization of social-ecological systems: an agenda for scientific research. Global Environmental Change, 16 (3), 304–316. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., Feng, K., and Hubacek, K., 2013. Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Global Environmental Change, 23 (5), 1178–1186. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoomers, A., 2010. Globalisation and the foreignisation of space: seven processes driving the current global land grab. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37 (2), 429–447. doi:10.1080/03066151003595325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar