Greening Leviathan: the rise of the environmental state?

References

• Bäckstrand, K. and Kronsell, A., eds., 2015. Rethinking the green state: towards climate and sustainability transitions. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J., 1999. Rethinking green politics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J. and Eckersley, R., eds., 2005. The state and the global ecological crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., 2011. The SAGE handbook of governance. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. and Dingwerth, K., 2004. Global environmental change and the nation state. Global Environmental Politics, 4 (1), 1–22. doi:10.1162/152638004773730185
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. and Siebenhüner, B., 2009. Managers of global change: the influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, M., Jänicke, M., and Petschow, U., 2001. Green industrial restructuring. International case studies and theoretical interpretations. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, P.-O. and Jörgens, H., 2005. International patterns of environmental policy change and convergence. European Environment, 15 (2), 80–101. doi:10.1002/eet.374
   Google Scholar
• Christoff, P., 2005. Out of chaos a shining styar? Towards a typology of green states. In: J. Barry and R. Eckersley, eds. The state and the global ecological crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 25–52.
   Google Scholar
• Death, C., 2016. Green states in Africa: beyond the usual suspects. Environmental Politics, 25 (1). doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1074380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, A., 2007. Environmental citizenship: towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15 (5), 276–285. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A., 1972. ‘Up and Down With Ecology The “Issue-Attention Cycle”’, The Public Interest 28, 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S., 2005. The politics of the Earth. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S., et al., 2003. Green states and social movements: environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, A., 2014. State and environment the comparative study of environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, A., 2016. The four faces of the environmental state: environmental governance regimes in 28 countries. Environmental Politics, 25 (1). doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1077619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R.E. and York, R., 2012. The globalization of environmental concern. In: P.F. Steinberg and S.D. VanDeveer, eds. Comparative environmental politics. Theory practice, and prospects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–112.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, R.F., Fiorino, D.J., and O’Leary, R., 2004. Environmental governance reconsidered. Challenges, choices, and opportunities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R., 2004. The green state: rethinking democracy, and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R., 2016. National identities, international roles, and the legitimation of climate leadership: Germany and Norway compared. Environmental Politics, 25 (1). doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1076278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enloe, C., 1975. The politics of pollution in a comparative perspective: ecology and power in four nations. New York: David McKay Company.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G., 1990. Three world of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P.H., 2010. Policy-learning and environmental policy integration in the common agricultural policy, 1973-2003. Public Administration, 88 (2), 296–314. doi:10.1111/padm.2010.88.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feindt, P.H. 2013. “Encircling the commons. Property rights, political authority and the liberal environmental state.”; Paper presented the panel Green Leviathan, ecological insurance agency, or capitalism’s agent? Revisiting the Ecological State in the Anthropocene at ECPR Joint Sessions in Mainz, Germany, 11–16 March 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P.H. and Oels, A., 2005. Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7 (3), 161–173. doi:10.1080/15239080500339638
   Google Scholar
• Fiorino, D., 2011. Explaining national environmental performance: approaches, evidence, and implications. Policy Sciences, 44 (4), 367–389. doi:10.1007/s11077-011-9140-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, I., 2016. Welfare states and environmental states: a comparative analysis. Environmental Politics, 25 (1). doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1074382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, I. and Meadowcroft, J., 2011. Decarbonising the welfare state. In: J. Dryzek, R. Norgaard, and D. Schlosberg, eds. The oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 490–503.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D., 2003. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanf, K. and Jansen, A.I., eds., 1998. Governance and environment in Western Europe: politics, policy and administration. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D., ed., 1983. States and societies. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M., 2005. Ozone depletion and climate change: constructing a global response. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K., Knill, C., and Arts, B., 2008. Environmental policy convergence in Europe. the impact of international institutions and trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R., 2005. Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis & Praxis, 3 (3), 199–215. doi:10.1007/s10202-005-0074-0
   Google Scholar
• Hunold, C. and Dryzek, J.S., 2002. Green political theory and the state: context is everything. Global Environmental Politics, 2 (3), 17–39. doi:10.1162/152638002320310518
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S.E., 1991. The third wave. Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, D., 1998. Environmental performance and policy regimes: explaining variations in 18 OECD countries. Policy Sciences, 31 (2), 107–131. doi:10.1023/A:1004385005999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn, D., 2014. The three worlds of environmental politics. In: D. Andreas, ed. State and environment. The comparative study of environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M. and Jacob, K., 2004. Lead markets for environmental innovations: a new role for the nation state. Global Environmental Politics, 4 (1) (February 1), 29–46. doi:10.1162/152638004773730202
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M. and Weidner, H., eds., 1997. National environmental policies: a comparative study of capacity building. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. and Lenschow, A., 2010. Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20 (3), 147–158. doi:10.1002/eet.v20:3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Wurzel, R., and Zito, A.R., 2003. New instruments of environmental Governance? National experiences and prospects. London: Frank Cass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Debus, M., and Heichel, S., 2010. Do parties matter in internationalised policy areas? The impact of political parties on environmental policy outputs in 18 OECD countries, 1970-2000. European Journal of Political Research, 49 (3), 301–336. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2010.49.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, M. and Fritz, M., 2014. Building the eco-social state: do welfare regimes matter? Journal of Social Policy, 43 (4), 679–703. doi:10.1017/S004727941400035X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiss, W., 1972. The Domination of Nature. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., 2002. Environmental policy integration: greening sectoral policies in Europe. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., Newig, J., and Challies, E., 2016. Globalization’s limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 25 (1). doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1074384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, K., et al., 2012. Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45 (2), 123–152. doi:10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipschutz, R. and Conca, K., 1993. The state and social power in global environmental politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, B., 2000. International Environmental Issues and the OECD 1950-2000: an historical perspective. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Lövbrand, E. and Linnér, B.-O., 2015. Governing beyond or with the state? State conceptions in studies on non-state climate action. In: A. Kronsell and K. Bäckstrand, eds. Rethinking the state: environmental governance towards climate and sustainability transitions. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, L.J., 2001. A green fist in a velvet glove: the ecological state and sustainable development. Environmental Values, 10 (4), 455–472. doi:10.3197/096327101129340912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, L.J., 2004. Sweden and ecological governance: straddling the fence. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T.H., 1950. Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., 2005. From welfare state to ecostate? In: J. Barry and R. Eckersley, eds. The state and the global ecological crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., 2012. Greening the State. In: P. Steinberg and S. VanDeveer, eds. Comparative environmental politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 63–88.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., 2014. Comparing environmental performance. In: A. Duit, Ed. State and environment. The comparative study of environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 27–52.
   Google Scholar
• Mickwitz, P., 2006. Environmental policy evaluation: concepts and practice. Helsinki: Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A.P.J., 2016. The environmental nation state in decline. Environmental Politics, 25 (1). doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1074385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A.P.J. and Spaargaren, G., 2002. Ecological modernization and the environmental state. In: A.P.J. Mol and F.H. Buttel, ed. The environmental state under pressure. Bradford: Emerald, 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E., 2003. Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries. Ecological Economics, 45, 203–220. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00012-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M. and Eckerberg, K., 2007. Environmental policy integration in practice: shaping institutions for learning. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paehlke, R. and Torgerson, D., 2005. Managing leviathan: environmental politics and the administrative state. 2nd ed. New York: Broadview.
   Google Scholar
• Pattberg, P., 2007. Private institutions and global governance. The new politics of environmental sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., 2000. Debating governance: authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, C., 1996. The modern state. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P., 2004. Politics in time : history, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K., 1944. The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. New York: Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. and Van Der Linde, C., 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4), 97–118. doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J.T., Parks, B.C., and Vásquez, A.A., 2004. Who ratifies environmental treaties and why? Institutionalism, structuralism and participation by 192 nations in 22 treaties. Global Environmental Politics, 4, 22–64. doi:10.1162/1526380041748029
   Google Scholar
• Sands, P. and Peel, J. with Fabra, A. and MacKenzie, R., 2012. Principles of international environmental law. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schnaiberg, A., Pellow, D.N., and Weinberg, A., 2002. The treadmill of production and the environmental state. In: A.P.J. Mol and F. Buttel, eds. The environmental state under pressure. Bradford: Emerald, 15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., 1998. Seeing like a state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, L., 2003. Sustaining abundance: environmental performance in industrial democracies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerer, T. and Lim, S., 2016. The environmental state as a model for the world? An analysis of policy repertoires in 37 countries. Environmental Politics, 25 (1). doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1081719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenfeld, D.A. and Mol, A.P.J., 2011. Social theory and the environment in the new world (dis)order. Global Environmental Change, 21 (3) (August), 771–775. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G., 2011. Theories of practices: agency, technology, and culture. Global Environmental Change, 21 (3) (August), 813–822. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, P.F., 2001. Environmental leadership in developing countries : transnational relations and biodiversity policy in Costa Rica and Bolivia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, P.F., 2015. Who rules the Earth: how social rules shape our planet and our lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, P.F. and VanDeveer, S., eds., 2012. Comparative environmental politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A., 2008. ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33 (2) (March 1), 262–294. doi:10.1177/0162243907311265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P.C., 1985. Community, market, state-and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. European Sociological Review, 1 (2), 119–138.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. and Thelen, K., 2005. Beyond continuity. Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K., 2012. Varieties of capitalism: trajectories of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 137–159. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-070110-122959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP, 2012. Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tatenhove, J., 2016. The environmental state at sea. Environmental Politics, 25 (1). doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1074386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D., 1997. Trading up: consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weidner, H. and Jänicke, M., 2002. Capacity building in national environmental policy. A comparative study of 17 countries. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, E.B. and Jacobson, H.K., 2000. Assessing the record and designing strategies to engage countries. In: E.B. Weiss and H.K. Jacobson, eds. Engaging countries: strengthening compliance with International environmental accords. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R., Zito, A.R., and Jordan, A., 2013. Environmental governance in Europe. A comparative analysis of new environmental policy instruments. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O.R., King, L.A., and Schroeder, H., 2008. Institutions and environmental change : principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar