Metagovernance and policy forum outputs in Swiss environmental politics

References

• Ansell, C. and Gash, A., 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18 (4), 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, L.E., et al., 2013. The influence of forums and multilevel governance on the climate adaptation practices of Australian organizations. Ecology and Society, 18 (4). doi:10.5751/ES-06120-180462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, A. and Steurer, R., 2014. Innovation in climate adaptation policy: are regional partnerships catalysts or talking shops? Environmental Politics, 23 (5), 818–838. doi:10.1080/09644016.2014.924196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardo, R., 2013. The coevolution of perceptions of procedural fairness and link formation in self-organizing policy networks. The Journal of Politics, 75 (3), 686–700. doi:10.1017/S0022381613000455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biomasse Suisse, 2016. Stellungnahme zur Änderung der Energieverordnung (EnV) und der Stromversorgungsverordnung (StromVV). Zollikon: Biomasse Suisse.
   Google Scholar
• Bonard, C., et al., 2016. Rote Liste Gefässpflanzen. Gefährdete Arten der Schweiz. Bern: Bundeamt für Umwelt /Info Flora.
   Google Scholar
• Booher, D.E. and Innes, J.E., 2002. Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21 (3), 221–236. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. and Risse, T., 2010. Governance without a state: can it work? Regulation & Governance, 4 (2), 113–134. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J.M., Crosby, B.C., and Stone, M.M., 2006. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66 (1), 44–55. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buholzer, S., et al., 2014. Liste der gebietsfremden invasiven Arten der Schweiz. Genf: Info Flora.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, T. and Robertson, P.J., 2014. Deliberation and decision in collaborative governance: a simulation of approaches to mitigate power imbalance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24 (2), 495–518. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crona, B.I. and Parker, J.N., 2011. Network determinants of knowledge utilization: preliminary lessons from a boundary organization. Science Communication, 33 (4), 448–471. doi:10.1177/1075547011408116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crona, B.I. and Parker, J.N., 2012. Learning in support of governance: theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society, 17 (1), 32–50. doi:10.5751/ES-04534-170132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., and Balogh, S., 2012. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22 (1), 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M.S. and Khademian, A.M., 2007. The role of the public manager in inclusion: creating communities of participation. Governance, 20 (2), 305–324. doi:10.1111/gove.2007.20.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., 2012. Participatory governance: from theory to practice. In: D. Levi-Faur, ed. The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 457–472.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., 2015. Institutions and coalitions in policy processes: a cross-sectoral comparison. Journal of Public Policy, 35 (2), 245–268. doi:10.1017/S0143814X14000166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. and Leifeld, P., 2015. Policy forums: why do they exist and what are they used for? Policy Sciences, 48 (3), 363–382. doi:10.1007/s11077-015-9224-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. and Maggetti, M., 2016. Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the study of policy processes. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, published online. 1–17. doi:10.1080/13876988.2016.1149281
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., et al., 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., 2006. The work the document does: research, policy, and equity in health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 31 (1), 51–70. doi:10.1215/03616878-31-1-51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. and Maybin, J., 2011. Documents, practices and policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 7 (2), 155–170. doi:10.1332/174426411X579207
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B.S., 2012. Crowding out and crowding in of intrinsic preferences. In: E. Brousseau, T. Dedeurwardere, and B. Siebenhüner, eds. Reflexive governance for global public goods. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., et al., 2006. Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: the role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology, 34 (4), 573–592. doi:10.1007/s10745-006-9035-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, S.D. and Koontz, T.M., 2009. Rules for collaboration: institutional analysis of group membership and levels of action in watershed partnerships. Policy Studies Journal, 37 (3), 393–414. doi:10.1111/psj.2009.37.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. and Lehmkuhl, D., 2008. The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 28 (01), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, K. and Varone, F., 2012. Treating policy brokers seriously: evidence from the climate policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 319–346. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., 2002. The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W.J.M., Klijn, E.-H., and Koppenjan, J.F.M., 1997. Introduction: a management perspective on policy networks. In: W.J.M. Kickert, E.-H. Klijn, and J.F.M. Koppenjan, eds. Managing complex networks. Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., 2005. Designing and managing networks: possibilities and limitations for network management. European Political Science, 4 (3), 328–339. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210035
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H. and Koppenjan, J., 2000. Public management and policy networks. Foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Administration, 2 (2), 135–158.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., Koppenjan, J., and Termeer, K., 1995. Managing networks in the public sector: a theoretical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public Administration, 73 (3), 437–454. doi:10.1111/padm.1995.73.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., Steijn, B., and Edelenbos, J., 2010. The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks. Public Administration, 88 (4), 1063–1082. doi:10.1111/padm.2010.88.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T.M. and Johnson, E.M., 2004. One size does not fit all: matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy Sciences, 37 (2), 185–204. doi:10.1023/B:OLIC.0000048532.94150.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, A.A. and Jenkins, L.D., 2015. The role of bridging organizations in environmental management: examining social networks in working groups. Ecology and Society, 20 (2). doi:10.5751/ES-07541-200216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, G.A. and Douglas, J.W., 2013. Organizational structure and the optimal design of policymaking panels: evidence from consensus group commissions’ revenue forecasts in the American states. American Journal of Political Science, 57 (1), 135–149. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00614.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krick, E., 2015. Negotiated expertise in policy-making: how governments use hybrid advisory committees. Science and Public Policy, 42 (4), 487–500. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W.D. and Pelkey, N.W., 2001. Making watershed partnerships work: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127 (6), 378–385. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:6(378)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W.D., Pelkey, N.W., and Sabatier, P.A., 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21 (4), 645–670. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A., 1999. Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., et al., 2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 46 (1), 148–163. doi:10.2307/3088419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., 2003. Collaborative institutions, belief-systems, and perceived policy effectiveness. Political Research Quarterly, 56 (3), 309–323. doi:10.1177/106591290305600306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., 2004. Collaborative environmental institutions: all talk and no action? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23 (3), 549–573. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Henry, A.D., and McCoy, M., 2010. Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. American Journal of Political Science, 54 (2), 287–300. doi:10.1111/ajps.2010.54.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayntz, R. and Scharpf, F., 1995. Gesellschaftliche Selbstregulierung und politische Steuerung. Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Meerkerk, I.V., Edelenbos, J., and Klijn, E.-H., 2015. Connective management and governance network performance: the mediating role of throughput legitimacy. Findings from survey research on complex water projects in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: government and Policy, 33 (4), 746–764. doi:10.1068/c1345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J. and Fritsch, O., 2009. Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level – and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19 (3), 197–214. doi:10.1002/eet.v19:3
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M., 1965. The logic of collective action. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective actors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K.G. and Milward, H.B., 2001. Do networks really work? a framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61 (4), 414–423. doi:10.1111/puar.2001.61.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C., Drass, K.A., and Davey, S., 2009. Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.5. [Computer program].
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C., 1987. The comparative method. Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C., 2008. Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy-sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, S. and Mauch, C., 2007. Entwicklung einer Zusammenarbeitsstruktur im Bereich Wasser. Luzern: Interface Politikstudien.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C.C., 2009. Configurational Comparative Methods: qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W., 1997. Games real actors play: actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelker, R. and Geisselhardt, P., 2011. Projekt “Kunststoff Verwertung Schweiz. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU). Basel: Redilo GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, E. and Heikkila, T., 2009. Resolving water conflicts: a comparative analysis of interstate river compacts. The Policy Studies Journal, 37 (3), 367–392. doi:10.1111/psj.2009.37.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C., 2010. Standards of good practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9 (3), 397–418. doi:10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
   Google Scholar
• Sciarini, P., Fischer, M., and Traber, D., 2015. Political decision-making in Switzerland. The consensus model under pressure. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Selsky, J.W. and Parker, B., 2005. Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31 (6), 849–873. doi:10.1177/0149206305279601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J., 2005. The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28 (3), 195–218. doi:10.1111/scps.2005.28.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J., 2009. Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87 (2), 234–258. doi:10.1111/padm.2009.87.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiem, A. and Dusa, A., 2013. Qualitative comparative analysis with R. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Heijden, J., 2015. The role of government in voluntary environmental programmes: A fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Public Administration, 93 (3), 576–592. doi:10.1111/padm.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasser-Agenda 21, 2011. Einzugsgebietsmanagement. Leitbild für die integrale Bewirtschaftung des Wassers in der Schweiz. Bern: Wasser-Agenda 21.
   Google Scholar