671
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The territorialization of transnational sustainability governance: production, power and globalization in Iceland’s fisheries

ORCID Icon

References

  • Auld, G., et al., 2009. The emergence of non-state market-driven (NSMD) global environmental governance: a cross-sectoral assessment. In: M.A. Delsmas and O.R. Young, eds. Governance for the environment: new perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183–218.
  • Bartley, T., 2007, Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113 (2), 297–351. doi:10.1086/518871
  • Bartley, T., Koos, S., and Samel, H., 2015. Looking behind the label: global industries and the conscientious consumer. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Bernstein, S. and Cashore, B., 2007. Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation & Governance, 1, 347–371. doi:10.1111/rego.2007.1.issue-4
  • Bexell, M., 2014, Global governance, legitimacy and (de)legitimacy. Globalizations, 11 (3), 289–299. doi:10.1080/14747731.2014.919744
  • Brenner, N., 1999, Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society, 28 (1), 39–78. doi:10.1023/A:1006996806674
  • Brenner, N., Peck, J., and Theodore, N., 2014. New constitutionalism and variegated neo-liberalization. In: S. Gill and A.C. Cutler, eds. New constitutionalism and world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 126–142.
  • Bridge, G., 2008, Global production networks and the extractive sector: governing resource-based development. Journal of Economic Geography, 8 (3), 389–419. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn009
  • Bush, S., et al., 2015. Sustainability governance of chains and networks: a review and future outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 8–19. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.019
  • Bush, S. and Oosterveer, P., 2015. Vertically differentiating environmental standards: the case of the Marine Stewardship Council. Sustainability, 7, 1861–1883. doi:10.3390/su7021861
  • Büthe, T., 2010, Global private politics: a research agenda. Business and Politics, 12 (3), 1–24. doi:10.2202/1469-3569.1345
  • Büthe, T. and Mattli, W., 2011. The new global rulers: the privatization of regulation in the world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Campling, L. and Havice, E., 2014, The problem of property in industrial fisheries. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41 (5), 707–727. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.894909
  • Cashore, B., 2002, Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance: an International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 15 (4), 503–529. doi:10.1111/gove.2002.15.issue-4
  • Cashore, B., et al., ed. 2006. Confronting sustainability: forest certification in developing and transitioning countries. New Haven, CT: Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies.
  • Cashore, B., Auld, G., and Newsom, D., 2003. Forest certification (eco-labeling) programs and their policy-making authority: explaining divergence among North American and European case studies. Forest Policy and Economics, 5, 225–247. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00060-6
  • Cashore, B., Auld, G., and Newsom, D., 2004. Governing through markets: forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
  • Clapp, J., 1998, The privatization of global environmental governance: ISO 1400 and the developing world. Global Governance, 4 (3), 295–316.
  • Constance, D. and Bonanno, A., 2000, Regulating the global fisheries: the World Wildlife Fund, Unilever, and the Marine Stewardship Council. Agriculture and Human Values, 17 (2), 125–139. doi:10.1023/A:1007625606243
  • Corson, C., 2011, Territorialization, enclosure and neoliberalism: non-state influence in struggles over Madagascar’s forests. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38 (4), 703–726. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.607696
  • Cox, R.W., 1981, Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10 (2), 126–155. doi:10.1177/03058298810100020501
  • Cox, R.W., 1987. Production, power, and world order. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
  • Cutler, C., Haufler, V., and Porter, T., ed., 1999. Private authority and international affairs. Albany: SUNY Press.
  • Eberlein, B., et al., 2014, Transnational business governance interactions: conceptualization and framework for analysis. Regulation & Governance, 8 (1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/rego.12030
  • FAO, 1995. Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. Rome: FAO.
  • FAO, 2005. The FAO guidelines for the ecolabelling of fish and fisheries products from marine capture fisheries. Rome: FAO.
  • Foley, P., 2013, National government responses to Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) fisheries certification: insights from Atlantic Canada. New Political Economy, 18 (2), 284–307. doi:10.1080/13563467.2012.684212
  • Foley, P. and Havice, E., 2016. The rise of territorial eco-certifications: new politics of transnational sustainability governance in the fishery sector. Geoforum, 69, 24–33. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.11.015
  • Foley, P. and Hébert, K., 2013, Alternative regimes of transnational environmental certification: governance, marketization, and place in Alaska’s salmon fisheries. Environment and Planning A, 45 (11), 2734–2751. doi:10.1068/a45202
  • Fransen, L., 2012. Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: legitimation politics in the institutional design of corporate social responsibility. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 163–192. doi:10.1093/ser/mwr029
  • Gale, F. and Haward, M., 2011. Global commodity governance: state responses to sustainable forest and fisheries certification. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Getz, C. and Shreck, A., 2006, What organic and fair trade labels do not tell us: towards a place-based understanding of certification. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30 (5), 490–501. doi:10.1111/ijc.2006.30.issue-5
  • Gibbon, P. and Ponte, S., 2005. Trading down: Africa, value chains and the global economy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Gill, S. and Cutler, C., ed., 2014. New constitutionalism and world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gray, T.S., Gray, M.J., and Hague, R.A., 1999, Sandeels, sailors, sandals and suits: the strategy of the environmental movement in relation to the fishing industry. Environmental Politics, 8 (3), 119–139. doi:10.1080/09644019908414482
  • Graz, J. and Nölke, A., ed., 2008. Transnational private governance and its limits. London: Routledge.
  • Gulbrandsen, L., 2010. Transnational environmental governance: the origins and effects of the certi fication of forests and fisheries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Gulbrandsen, L., 2014, Dynamic governance interactions: evolutionary effects of state responses to non-state certification programs. Regulation & Governance, 8 (1), 74–92. doi:10.1111/rego.12005
  • Guthman, J., 2004. Agrarian dreams: the paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Hall, R.B. and Biersteker, T.J., ed., 2002. The emergence of private authority in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hallström, T. and Boström, M., 2010. Transnational multi-stakeholder standardization: organizing fragile non-state authority. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Higgott, R., Underhill, G., and Bieler, A., 2000. Non-state actors and authority in the global system. London: Routledge.
  • Hospes, O., 2014. Marking the success or end of global multi-stakeholder governance? The rise of national sustainability standards in Indonesia and Brazil for palm oil and soy. Agriculture and Human Values, 31, 425–437. doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9511-9
  • Humphreys, D., 2006. Logjam: deforestation and the crisis of global governance. London: Earthscan.
  • IntraFish, 2016. GSSI recognition of the IRFM certification programme [online]. Available from: www.intrafish.com/ [Accessed 8 November 2016].
  • Kalfagianni, A. and Pattberg, P., 2014, Exploring the output legitimacy of transnational fisheries governance. Globalizations, 11 (3), 385–400. doi:10.1080/14747731.2014.888305
  • Kvalvik, I., Nøstvold, B.H., and Young, J.A., 2014. National or supranational fisheries sustainability certification schemes? A critical analysis of Norwegian and Icelandic responses. Marine Policy, 46, 137–142. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.01.015
  • Laxness, H., 1999. Independent people, Trans. Thompson, J.A. London: Harvill Press.
  • Lister, J., 2011. Corporate social responsibility and the state: international approaches to forest co-regulation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
  • Marx, A., 2014, Legitimacy, institutional design, and dispute settlement: the case of eco-certification systems. Globalizations, 11 (3), 401–416. doi:10.1080/14747731.2014.899245
  • Marx, A., 2015. How relevant is the public private distinction in the case of voluntary sustainability standards? EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/30.
  • McDermott, C.L., 2012. Trust, legitimacy and power in forest certification: a case study of the FSC in British Columbia. Geoforum, 43, 634–644. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.11.002
  • Meidinger, E., 2008, Competitive supragovernmental regulation: how could it become democratic. Chicago Journal of International Law, 8 (2), 513–534.
  • Meidinger, E., 2007. Beyond Westphalia: competitive legalization in emerging transnational regulatory systems. In: C. Brutsch and D. Lehmkuhl, eds. Law and legalization in transnational relations. Oxford: Routledge, 121–143.
  • Mol, A., 2010, Environmental authorities and biofuel controversies. Environmental Politics, 19 (1), 61–79. doi:10.1080/09644010903396085
  • Mol, A. and Jänicke, M., 2009. The origins and theoretical foundations of ecological modernisation theory. In: A. Mol., D.A. Sonnenfeld, and G. Spaargaren, eds. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London: Routledge, 17–27.
  • Mol, A. and Sonnenfeld, D.A., 2000, Ecological modernisation around the world: an introduction. Environmental Politics, 9 (1), 1–14.
  • Mutersbaugh, T., 2005, Fighting standards with standards: harmonization, rents, and social accountability in certified agrofood networks. Environment and Planning A, 37 (11), 2033–2051. doi:10.1068/a37369
  • Oosterveer, P. and Spaargaren, G., 2011, Organising consumer involvement in the greening of global food flows: the role of environmental NGOs in the case of marine fish. Environmental Politics, 20 (1), 97–114. doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.538168
  • Parkes, G., et al. 2010. Behind the signs—a global review of fish sustainability information schemes. Review in Fisheries Science, 18 (4), 344–356. doi:10.1080/10641262.2010.516374
  • Ponte, S., 2012, The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) and the making of a market for ‘sustainable fish’. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12 (2–3), 300–315. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00345.x
  • Ponte, S. and Daugbjerg, C., 2015, Biofuel sustainability and the formation of transnational hybrid governance. Environmental Politics, 24 (1), 96–114. doi:10.1080/09644016.2014.954776
  • Ponte, S., Gibbon, P., and Vestergaard, J., ed., 2011. Governing through standards: origins, drivers and limits. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Raynolds, L.T. and Wilkinson, J., 2007. Fair trade in the agriculture and food sector: analytical dimensions. In: L.T. Raynolds, D.L. Murray, and J. Wilkinson, eds. Fair trade: the challenges of transforming globalization. London: Routledge, 33–48.
  • Robbins, P., 2012. Political ecology: a critical introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Rosenau, J.N., 1992. Governance, order, and change in world politics. In: J.N. Rosenau and E. Czempiel, eds. Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–29.
  • Ruggie, J.G., 2004, Reconstituting the global public domain—issues, actors, and practices. European Journal of International Relations, 10 (4), 499–531. doi:10.1177/1354066104047847
  • Sassen, S., 2005, When national territory is home to the global: old borders to novel borderings. New Political Economy, 10 (4), 523–541. doi:10.1080/13563460500344476
  • Sassen, S., 2014. When the global inhabits the national: fuzzy interactions. In: S. Gill and A.C. Cutler, eds. New constitutionalism and world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 115–125.
  • Smith, T.M. and Fischlein, M., 2010, Rival private governance networks: competing to define the rules of sustainability performance. Global Environmental Change, 20 (3), 511–522. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.006
  • Spaargaren, G., Mol, A., and Sonnenfeld, D.A., 2009. Ecological modernisation: assessment, critical debates and future directions. In: A. Mol., D.A. Sonnenfeld, and G. Spaargaren, eds. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London: Routledge, 501–520.
  • Stoll, J. and Johnson, T.R., 2015. Under the banner of sustainability: the politics and prose of an emerging US federal seafood certification. Marine Policy, 51, 415–422. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.027
  • United Nations, 2007. GEO year book 2007: an overview of our changing environment. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
  • Vandergeest, P. and Peluso, N.L., 1995, Territorialization and state power in Thailand. Theory and Society, 24 (3), 385–426. doi:10.1007/BF00993352
  • Vandergeest, P., Ponte, S., and Bush, S., 2015, Assembling sustainable territories: space, subjects, objects, and expertise in seafood certification. Environment and Planning, 47 (9), 1907–1925.
  • Vandergeest, P. and Unno, A., 2012, A new extraterritoriality? Aquaculture certification, sovereignty, and empire. Political Geography, 31 (6), 358–367. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.05.005

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.