Environmental decision-making: the influence of policy information

References

• Altman, D., 2010. Direct democracy worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bayulgen, O. and Ladewig, J.W., 2017. Vetoing the future: political constraints and renewable energy. Environmental Politics, 26 (1), 49–70. doi:10.1080/09644016.2016.1223189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, M.M. and Scheve, K.F., 2013. Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110 (34), 13763–13768. doi:10.1073/pnas.1306374110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D., et al., 2013. Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy. Environmental Politics, 22 (1), 115–135. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D., Gray, T., and Haggett, C., 2005. The ‘social gap’ in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses. Environmental Politics, 14 (4), 460–477. doi:10.1080/09644010500175833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, L., et al., 2018. The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: a two-step comparative examination. Environmental Politics, 27 (1), 42–68. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1383007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., Druckman, J.N., and Cook, F.L., 2015. Citizens’, scientists’, and policy advisors’ beliefs about global warming. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658 (1), 271–295. doi:10.1177/0002716214558393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, N. and Lanz, B., 2008. Voting on the environment: price or ideology? Evidence from Swiss referendums. Ecological Economics, 67 (3), 430–440. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, N. and Thalmann, P., 2008. ‘I pay enough taxes already!’ Applying economic voting models to environmental referendums. Social Science Quarterly, 89 (5), 1336–1355. doi:10.1111/ssqu.2008.89.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, C. and MacKenzie, S.A., 2014. Informing the electorate? How party cues and policy information affect public opinion about initiatives. American Journal of Political Science, 58 (1), 48–62. doi:10.1111/ajps.12054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, J.G., 2011. Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. American Political Science Review, 105 (3), 496–515. doi:10.1017/S0003055411000165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., 1980. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (5), 752–766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D. and Druckman, J.N., 2007. Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101 (4), 637–655. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, C. and Kriesi, H., 2017. Party, policy–or both? Partisan-biased processing of policy arguments in direct democracy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27 (3), 235–253. doi:10.1080/17457289.2016.1254641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, R. and Shapiro, P., 1975. Private preference for collective goods revealed through voting on referenda. The American Economic Review, 65 (5), 943–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dermont, C., et al., 2017. Bringing the policy making perspective in: a political science approach to social acceptance. Energy Policy, 108, 359–368. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P., 2005. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy, 8 (2), 125–139. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A.H. and Chaiken, S., 1993. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. and Hill, J., 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., and Yamamoto, T., 2015. Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112 (8), 2395–2400. doi:10.1073/pnas.1416587112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D.J., and Yamamoto, T., 2014. Causal inference in conjoint analysis: understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis, 22 (1), 1–30. doi:10.1093/pan/mpt024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbheer, D., Niggli, S., and Schmutzler, A., 2006. What does it take to sell environmental policy? An empirical analysis of referendum data. Environmental & Resource Economics, 33 (4), 441–462. doi:10.1007/s10640-005-4993-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S., Traber, D., and Kurer, T., 2015. Altersvorsorge 2020. Intakte Erfolgschancen trotz starkem Widerstand gegen Sparmassnahmen. Zürich: Universität Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• Hobman, E.V. and Ashworth, P., 2013. Public support for energy sources and related technologies: the impact of simple information provision. Energy Policy, 63, 862–869. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, M.E. and Matsusaka, J.G., 1997. Demand for environmental goods: evidence from voting patterns on California initiatives. The Journal of Law and Economics, 40 (1), 137–174. doi:10.1086/467369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J., 2002. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8 (3), 239–260. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., 2005. Direct democratic choice: the Swiss experience. Lanham: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., 2012. Political communication in direct democratic campaigns: enlightening or manipulating? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, R., 2011. Internal and external validity. In: J.N. Druckman, D.P. Green, J.H. Kuklinski, and A. Lupia, eds. Cambridge handbook of experimental political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Milfont, T.L., 2009. The effects of social desirability on self-reported environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour. The Environmentalist, 29 (3), 263–269. doi:10.1007/s10669-008-9192-2
   Google Scholar
• Mondak, J.J., 1994. Question wording and mass policy preferences: the comparative impact of substantive information and peripheral cues. Political Communication, 11 (2), 165–183. doi:10.1080/10584609.1994.9963022
   Google Scholar
• Nai, A., 2010. Processus cognitifs et formation de l’opinion dans les votations fédérales (1999-2005): une analyse multiniveaux. Thesis (PhD). University of Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T., 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: R.E. Petty and J.T. Cacioppo, eds. Communication and persuasion. New York: Springer, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Stadelmann-Steffen, I., 2011. Citizens as veto players: climate change policy and the constraints of direct democracy. Environmental Politics, 20 (4), 485–507. doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.589577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiss Confederation, 2016. Energiegesetz (EnG). Bundesblatt, 40, 7683–7730.
   Google Scholar
• Szulecki, K., 2018. Conceptualizing energy democracy. Environmental Politics, 27 (1), 21–41. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thalmann, P., 2004. The public acceptance of green taxes: 2 million voters express their opinion. Public Choice, 119 (1/2), 179–217. doi:10.1023/B:PUCH.0000024165.18082.db
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G., 2002. Veto players: how political institutions work. New York: Russel Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van Rijnsoever, F.J., van Mossel, A., and Broecks, K.P.F., 2015. Public acceptance of energy technologies: the effects of labeling, time, and heterogeneity in a discrete choice experiment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45 (5), 817–829. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.040
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X. and Cutter, B., 2011. Who votes for public environmental goods in California? Ecological Economics: the Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, 70 (3), 554–563. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., and Bürer, M.J., 2007. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35 (5), 2683–2691. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar