Authority, strategy, and influence: environmental INGOs in comparative perspective

References

• Abbott, K.W. and Snidal, D., 2009. The governance triangle: regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In: W. Mattli and N. Woods, eds. The politics of global regulation. Princeton University Press. 44–88.
   Google Scholar
• Alcock, F., 2008. Conflicts and coalitions within and across the ENGO community. Global Environmental Politics, 8 (4), 66–91. doi:10.1162/glep.2008.8.4.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anheier, H., Kaldor, M., and Glasius, M., 2012. The global civil society yearbook: lessons and insights 2001–2011. In: M. Kaldor, H.L. Moore and S. Selchow, eds. Global civil society 2012. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2–26.
   Google Scholar
• Auld, G., 2014. Constructing private governance: the rise and evolution of forest, coffee, and fisheries certification. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auld, G. and Gulbrandsen, L.H., 2010. Transparency in nonstate certification: consequences for accountability and legitimacy. Global Environmental Politics, 10 (3), 97–119. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avant, D.D., Finnemore, M., and Sell, S.K., eds., 2010. Who governs the globe? New Haven: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M.N., 2011. Empire of humanity: A history of humanitarianism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartley, T. and Child, C., 2014. Shaming the corporation: the social production of targets and the anti-sweatshop movement. American Sociological Review, 79 (4), 653–679. doi:10.1177/0003122414540653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, D., and Prakash, A., 2012. From norms to programs: the united nations global compact and global governance. Regulation & Governance, 6 (2), 149-166. doi:10.1111/rego.2012.6.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S.F., 2001. The compromise of liberal environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Betsill, M.M. and Corell, E., 2008. NGO diplomacy: the influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, M.J., 2014. Shame campaigns and environmental justice: corporate shaming as activist strategy. Environmental Politics, 23 (2), 263–281. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.821824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bob, C., 2005. The marketing of rebellion: insurgents, media, and international activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bob, C., 2012. The global right wing and the clash of world politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosso, C., 2005. Environment, inc.: from grassroots to beltway. Kansas City: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Busby, J.W., 2010. Moral movements and foreign policy (Vol. 116). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmin, J., and Bast, E., 2009. Cross-movement activism: a cognitive perspective on the global justice activities of us environmental ngos. Environmental Politics, 18 (3), 351-370. doi:10.1080/09644010902823550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C., 2012. ‘You talk of terrible things so matter-of-factly in this language of science’: constructing human rights in the academy. Perspectives on Politics, 10 (2), 363–383. doi:10.1017/S1537592712000710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C., 2014. “Lost” causes: agenda vetting in global issue networks and the shaping of human security. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cashore, B., Auld, G., and Newsom, D., 2003. Forest certification (eco-labeling) programs and their policy-making authority: explaining divergence among North American and European case studies. Forest Policy and Economics, 5 (3), 225–247. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00060-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciplet, D., Roberts, J.T., and Khan, M., 2013. The politics of international climate adaptation funding: justice and divisions in the greenhouse. Global Environmental Politics, 13 (1), 49–68. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., 2017. Responsibility to the rescue? Governing private financial investment in global agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, 34(1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauvergne, P. and LeBaron, G., 2014. Protest Inc.: the corporatization of activism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dicker, J., 2005. The United States of Wal-Mart. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, C., 2006. The Wal-Mart effect: how the world’s most powerful company really works–and how it’s transforming the American economy. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Freidberg, S., 2013. Calculating sustainability in supply chain capitalism. Economy and Society, 42 (4), 571–596. doi:10.1080/03085147.2012.760349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnaerig, B. and MacCormack, C.F., 1999. The challenges of globalization: save the children. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28 (suppl 1), 140–146. doi:10.1177/089976499773746483
   Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, P.A., Lake, D.A., and Stein, J.G., 2012. The credibility of transnational NGOs: when virtue is not enough. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J.F., 2013. Rethinking private authority: agents and entrepreneurs in global environmental governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P.M., 1992. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46 (01), 1–35. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadden, J., 2015. Networks in contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haufler, V., 1999. International business self-regulation: the intersection of private and public interests. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Hilhorst, D. and Jansen, B.J., 2010. Humanitarian space as arena: a perspective on the everyday politics of aid. Development and Change, 41 (6), 1117–1139. doi:10.1111/dech.2010.41.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A., 2009. Shades of green. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7(2), 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T., 2016. Cooperation, co-optation, competition, conflict: international bureaucracies and non-governmental organizations in an interdependent world. Review of International Political Economy, 24 (2), 737–767. doi:10.1080/09692290.2016.1217902
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K., 1998. Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N., 2015. This changes everything: capitalism vs. the climate. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, M., 2014. The good project: humanitarian relief NGOs and the fragmentation of reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lecy, J.D., Mitchell, G.E., and Schmitz, H.P., 2010. Advocacy organizations, networks, and the firm analogy. In: A. Prakash and M.K. Gugerty, eds. Advocacy organizations and collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 229–251.
   Google Scholar
• Lenox, M.J. and Eesley, C.E., 2009. Private environmental activism and the selection and response of firm targets. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18 (1), 45–73. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00207.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livesey, S.M., 1999. McDonald’s and the environmental defense fund: a case study of a green alliance. Journal of Business Communication, 36 (1), 5–39. doi:10.1177/002194369903600101
   Google Scholar
• Longhofer, W., et al., 2016. NGOs, INGOs, and environmental policy reform, 1970–2010. Social Forces, 94 (4), 1743–1768. doi:10.1093/sf/sow031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luxon, E.M. and Wong, W.H., 2017. Agenda-setting in greenpeace and amnesty: the limits of centralisation in international NGOs. Global Society, 31 (4), 479–509. doi:10.1080/13600826.2016.1277190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, T.P., ed., 2010. Good cop/Bad cop: environmental NGOs and their strategies toward business. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, F. and Gereffi, G., 2010. Regulation and economic globalization: prospects and limits of private governance. Business and Politics, 12 (3), 1–25. doi:10.2202/1469-3569.1325
   Google Scholar
• Moreton, B., 2009. To serve god and Wal-Mart: the making of Christian free enterprise. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moyn, S., 2010. The last utopia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murdie, A. and Urpelainen, J., 2015. Why pick on us? Environmental INGOs and state shaming as a strategic substitute. Political Studies, 63 (2), 353–372. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, P.J. and Dorsey, E., 2008. New rights advocacy: changing strategies of development and human rights NGOs. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I.B. and Sending, O.J., 2010. Governing the global polity: practice, mentality, rationality. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P., 2001. Environmental NGOs, TNCs, and the question of governance. In: D. Stevis and V. Assetto, eds. The international political economy of the environment: critical perspectives. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 85–107.
   Google Scholar
• Nooruddin, I. and Wilson, S., 2012. Credible certification of child labor. In: The credibility of transnational NGOs: when virtue is not enough. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., 2005. Norm diffusion within international organizations: a case study of the World Bank. In: P. Gourevitch, D. Lake, and J.S. Stein, eds. Journal of International Relations and Development, 8 (2), 111–141. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800051
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, A. and Gugerty, M.K., eds., 2010. Advocacy organizations and collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, A. and Potoski, M., 2006a. Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001. American Journal of Political Science, 50 (2), 350–364. doi:10.1111/ajps.2006.50.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, A. and Potoski, M., 2006b. The voluntary environmentalists: green clubs, ISO 14001, and voluntary environmental regulations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rootes, C., 2006. Facing South? British environmental movement organisations and the challenge of globalisation. Environmental Politics, 15 (5), 768–786. doi:10.1080/09644010600937207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rootes, C., 2013. Acting locally: local environmental mobilizations and campaigns. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sasser, E.N., et al., 2006. Direct targeting as an NGO political strategy: examining private authority regimes in the forestry sector. Business and Politics, 8 (3), 1–32. doi:10.2202/1469-3569.1163
   Google Scholar
• Sending, O., 2015. Politics of Expertise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., 2004. The world social forum and the challenges of global democracy. Global Networks, 4 (4), 413–421. doi:10.1111/glob.2004.4.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N.C. and Crawford, R., 2011. Walmart: love, earth (A). Case 09/2011-5830. Bedfordshire, UK: INSEAD.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D.A. and Soule, S.A., 2010. A primer on social movements. New York: WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Soule, S.A., 2009. Contention and corporate social responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroup, S.S., 2012. Borders among activists: international NGOs in the United States, Britain, and France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroup, S.S. and Wong, W.H., 2016. The agency and authority of international NGOs. Perspectives on Politics, 14 (1), 138. doi:10.1017/S153759271500328X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroup, S.S. and Wong, W.H., 2017. The authority trap: the strategic choices of international NGOs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., et al., 2013. The opening up of international organizations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tamir, I., 2017. Oxfam’s code for corporate campaigning. Sur International Journal on Human Rights, 14 (25), 249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S., 2001. Transnational politics: contention and institutions in international politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4 (1), 1–20. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S., 2005. The new transnational activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Heijden, H.A., 2006. Globalization, environmental movements, and international political opportunity structures. Organization & Environment, 19 (1), 28–45. doi:10.1177/1086026605285452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D., 2008. Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 261–282. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.141706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlstrom, M., Wennerhag, M., and Rootes, C., 2013. Framing ‘the climate issue:’ patterns of participation and prognostic frames among climate summit protestors. Global Environmental Politics, 13 (4), 101–122. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wapner, P.K., 1996. Environmental activism and world civic politics. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W.H., 2012. Internal affairs: how the structure of NGOs transforms human rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yaziji, M. and Doh, J., 2009. NGOs and corporations: conflict and collaboration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zelli, F., Möller, I., and Asselt, H.V., 2017. Institutional complexity and private authority in global climate governance: the cases of climate engineering, REDD+ and short-lived climate pollutants. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 669–693. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1319020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar