The political economy of distillers’ grains and the frictions of consumption

References

• Ayres-Deets, A., 2013. Pig bang theory: what’s causing manure to explode? [online]. mic.com. Available from: https://mic.com/articles/42463/pig-bang-theory-what-s-causing-manure-to-explode [Accessed 11 Nov 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Babcock, B.A., Hayes, D.J., and Lawrence, J.D., 2008. Using distillers grains in the U.S. and international livestock and poultry industries. Ames, IA: Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center, Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, J., 2015. Fuel, feed and the corporate restructuring of the food regime. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 42 (2), 295–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, J., Keeney, R., and Tyner, W., 2011. Feed demands and coproduct substitution in the biofuel era. Agribusiness, 27 (1), 1–18. doi:10.1002/agr.v27.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., McMichael, P., and Scoones, I., 2011. The politics of biofuels, land and Agrarian change. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, V.R., et al., 2010. Distillers grains and livestock are important to ethanol energy and greenhouse gas balance. Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports, Paper 551.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. and National Chicken Farmers, 2017. Re: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0091; Renewable Fuel Standard Program: Standards for 2018 and Biomass-Based Diesel Volume for 2019; Proposed Rule; 82 Fed. Reg. 34206 (21 July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Bryden, W.L., 2012. Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain: implications for animal productivity and feed security. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 173 (1–2), 134–158. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, L., 2011. Standards: recipes for reality. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, W.E., Maloney, R., Johnson, B.J., Brooks, J.C., Brashears, M.M., and Loneragan, G.H., 2018. Corn-based distillers’ grains in diets for feedlot cattle are associated with the burden of escherichia coli O157 in feces. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 15 (7), 398–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., 2003. Transnational corporate interests and global environmental governance: negotiating rules for agricultural biotechnology and chemicals. Environmental Politics, 12 (4), 1–23. doi:10.1080/09644010412331308354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., 2009. Food price volatility and vulnerability in the global south: considering the global economic context. Third World Quarterly, 30 (6), 1183–1196. doi:10.1080/01436590903037481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. and Martin, S.J., 2013. Food and agriculture. In: P.G. Harris, ed. Routledge handbook of global environmental politics. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 520–532.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., 2018. Mega-mergers on the menu: corporate concentration and the politics of sustainability in the global food system. Global Environmental Politics, 18, 12–33. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. and Dauvergne, P., 2005. Paths to a green world: the political economy of the global environment. 2nd. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. and Fuchs, D.A., eds., 2009. Corporate power in agrifood – introduction. In: Corporate power in global agrifood governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. and Helleiner, E., 2012. International political economy and the environment: back to the basics? International Affairs, 88 (3), 485–501. doi:10.1111/inta.2012.88.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. and Isakson, S.R., 2018. Speculative harvests. Halifax: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Cronon, W., 1992. Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the great west. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, R., 2009. The troubled birth of the ‘biotech century’: global corporate power and its limits. In: J. Clapp and D.A. Fuchs, eds. Corporate power in global agrifood governance. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 225–252.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, 2018. Assessing the contribution of bioeconomy to countries’ economy: a brief review of national frameworks. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Farm Industry News, 2016. The 5 largest ethanol producers [online]. Farm Industry News. Available from: http://www.farmindustrynews.com/ethanol/5-largest-ethanol-producers [Accessed 9 Jun 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Feed & Grain, 2011. The challenges of DDGS caking in transit [online]. Feed and Grain. Available from: http://www.feedandgrain.com/magazine/the-challenges-of-ddgs-caking-in-transit [Accessed 7 Mar 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Forge, F., 2007. Biofuels – an energy, environmental or agricultural policy? Ottawa, Ontario: Parliament of Canada, Parliament of Canada No. PRB 06-37E.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, H., 1992. Distance and durability: shaky foundations of the world food economy. Third World Quarterly, 13 (2), 371–383. doi:10.1080/01436599208420282
   Google Scholar
• Gillon, S., 2010. Fields of dreams: negotiating an ethanol agenda in the Midwest United States. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37 (4), 723–748. doi:10.1080/03066150.2010.512456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillon, S., 2016. Flexible for whom? Flex crops, crises, fixes and the politics of exchanging use values in US corn production. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43 (1), 117–139. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.996555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goven, J. and Pavone, V., 2015. The bioeconomy as political project: a polanyian analysis. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40 (3), 302–337. doi:10.1177/0162243914552133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Group, C.M.E., 2015. Delisting of CBOT distillers’ dried grain futures contract [online]. cmegroup.com. Available from: http://www.cmegroup.com/content/cmegroup/en/tools-information/lookups/advisories/ser/SER-7360.html [Accessed 2 Nov 2017
   Google Scholar
• Harangody, J., 2011. Mitigating ethanol market risk by monitoring opportunities [online]. Ethanol Producer Magazine. Available from: http://www.ethanolproducer.com/articles/8321/mitigating-ethanol-market-risk-by-monitoring-opportunities [Accessed 26 Apr 2017
   Google Scholar
• Hilbrands, A.M., et al., 2016. Influence of storage bin design and feed characteristics on flowability of pig diets containing maize distillers dried grains with solubles. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 32 (2), 273–280. doi:10.13031/aea.32.11175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. and Dohlman, E., 2011. USDA economic research service – market potential for U.S. distillers. Amber waves: the economics of farming, natural resources and rural America. Washington, D.C: USDA
   Google Scholar
• Huffstutter, P.J. and Hirtzer, M., 2017. Exclusive: vomitoxin makes nasty appearance for U.S. farm sector. Reuters, [22 Apr 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Hunsberger, C., et al., 2014. Livelihood impacts of biofuel crop production: implications for governance. Geoforum, 54, 248–260. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICPB, 2016. Livestock [online]. Iowa Corn Promotion Board. Available from: https://www.iowacorn.org/corn-uses/livestock/[Accessed 1 Aug 2017
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, H., 2014. Fishing for Profit. Ethanol Producer Magazine, np.
   Google Scholar
• Klopfenstein, T.J., Erickson, G.E., and Bremer, V.R., 2007. Feeding corn milling byproducts to feedlot cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 23 (2), 223–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. and Mol, A., 2008. Globalisation in practice: on the politics of boiling pigswill. Geoforum, 39 (1), 133–143. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J., 2012. Freaks of fortune: the emerging world of capitalism and risk in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M., 2014. “ Science and technology studies”, Discard Studies Compendium. Discard Studies. https://discardstudies.com/discard-studies-compendium/
   Google Scholar
• Lima, M.G.B. and Gupta, J., 2013. The policy context of biofuels: a case of non-governance at the global level? Global Environmental Politics, 13 (2), 46–64. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, M.G.B. and Gupta, J., 2014. The extraterritorial dimensions of biofuel policies and the politics of scale: live and let die? Third World Quarterly, 35 (3), 392–410. doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.893484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K., 2011. Chemical composition of distillers grains, a review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59 (5), 1508–1526. doi:10.1021/jf103512z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkar, H.P.S., FAO, eds, 2012. Biofuel co-products as livestock feed: opportunities and challenges. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S.J. and Clapp, J., 2015. Finance for agriculture or agriculture for finance? Journal of Agrarian Change, 15 (4), 549–559. doi:10.1111/joac.2015.15.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P., 2010. Agrofuels in the food regime. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37 (4), 609–629. doi:10.1080/03066150.2010.512450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A.P.J., 2010. Environmental authorities and biofuel controversies. Environmental Politics, 19 (1), 61–79. doi:10.1080/09644010903396085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S., Burch, D., and Clapp, J., 2012. Cereal secrets: the world’s largest grain traders and global agriculture. London, UK: Oxfam International, Oxfam Research Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Neville, K.J. and Dauvergne, P., 2016. The problematic of biofuels for development. In: J. Grugel and D. Hammett, eds. The Palgrave handbook of international development. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 649–668.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P., 2008. The political economy of global environmental governance. Review of International Studies, 34 (03), 507–529. doi:10.1017/S0260210508008140
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M., 2010. Legitimation and accumulation in climate change governance. New Political Economy, 15 (3), 345–368. doi:10.1080/13563460903288247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepple, L., 2013. Foaming in deep-pit manure storages: understanding the causes. Peoria, IL: 2013 Illinois Pork Expo.
   Google Scholar
• Philpott, T., 2013. Mysterious poop foam causes explosions on hog farms [online]. Mother Jones. Available from: http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2013/05/menace-manure-foam-still-haunting-huge-hog-farms [Accessed 23 Aug 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, S. and Harvey, M., 2009. Battles over biofuels in Europe: NGOs and the politics of markets battles over biofuels in Europe: NGOs and the politics of markets. Sociological Research Online, 15 (3), 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponte, S., 2014. The evolutionary dynamics of biofuel value chains: from unipolar and government-driven to multipolar governance. Environment and Planning A, 46 (2), 353–372. doi:10.1068/a46112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponte, S. and Birch, K., 2014. Guest Editorial. Environment and Planning A, 46 (2), 271–279. doi:10.1068/a46296
   Google Scholar
• Ponte, S. and Daugbjerg, C., 2015. Biofuel sustainability and the formation of transnational hybrid governance. Environmental Politics, 24 (1), 96–114. doi:10.1080/09644016.2014.954776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RFA, 2012. Fuel Your Future: Ethanol Activity Book. Washington, D.C: Renewable Fuels Association.
   Google Scholar
• RFA, 2016a. 2015 U.S. distillers grains trade statistics summary. Washington, D.C: Renewable Fuels Association.
   Google Scholar
• RFA, 2016b. Ethanol industry outlook: building partnerships. Washington, D.C: Renewable Fuels Association, Outlook.
   Google Scholar
• RFA, 2018. 2017 US Distillers Grains Trade Statistics Summary. Washington, D.C: Renewable Fuels Association.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. and Sharma, S., 2014. China’s pork miracle? Agribusiness and development in China’s pork industry. Minneapolis, MN: Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, K., 2015. Hydrogen sulfide the invisible killer in hog manure [online]. National Hog Farmer. Available from: http://www.nationalhogfarmer.com/facilities/hydrogen-sulfide-invisible-killer-hog-manure [Accessed 30 Apr 2018]
   Google Scholar
• Shum, R.Y., 2015. Where constructivism meets resource constraints: the politics of oil, renewables, and a US energy transition. Environmental Politics, 24 (3), 382–400. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1008236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shurson, G.C., Tilstra, H., and Kerr, B.J., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2012. Impact of United States biofuels co-products on the feed industry. In: H.P.S. Makkar, ed. Biofuel co-products as livestock feed: opportunities and challenges. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 35–59.
   Google Scholar
• Shurson, G.C., 2017. The role of biofuels coproducts in feeding the world sustainably. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 5 (1), 229–254. doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-022516-022907
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein, R.A. and Katz, D.E., 2017. Escherichia coli, cattle and the propagation of disease. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 364, 6. doi:10.1093/femsle/fnx051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, D. and Gillon, S., 2013. Scaling up to address new challenges to conservation on US farmland. Land Use Policy, 31 (Supplement C), 223–236. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Thiex, N., 2016. Analytical methodology for quality standards and other attributes of DDGS. In: K. Liu and K.A. Rosentrater, eds. Distillers grains: production, properties, and utilization. Boca Raton, FL.: CRC Press, 193–208.
   Google Scholar
• USDA, 2014. U.S. bioenergy statistics [online]. Available from: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/us-bioenergy-statistics.aspx#46674 [Accessed 17 Aug 2014
   Google Scholar
• USDA, 2016a. Dried distillers grain with solubles: supply and disappearance. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, USDA-World Agricultrual Supply and Demand Estimates.
   Google Scholar
• USDA, 2016b. U.S. Bioenergy Statistics [online]. Economic Research Service USDA. Available from: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/us-bioenergy-statistics.aspx [Accessed 23 May 2016].
   Google Scholar
• USDA, Foreign Agricultural Trade Report, 2015. U.S. exports of corn-based products continue to climb. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• US Grains Council, 2012. Distiller’s dried grains with solubles handbook. Washington, D.C: US Grain Council.
   Google Scholar
• Veldman, S., 2006. Ethanol powered cows: feeding distillers grains from ethanol plants [online]. BEEF Magazine. Available from: http://beefmagazine.com/mag/beef_ethanolpowered_cows [Accessed 6 Jan 2014
   Google Scholar
• Weber, J.A., RFA, 2014. Fueling a nation, feeding the world: the role of the US ethanol industry in food and feed production. Washington, DC: Renewable Fuels Association.
   Google Scholar
• Weis, T., 2014. The ecological hoofprint: the global burden of industrial livestock. New York: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• White, B. and Dasgupta, A., 2010. Agrofuels capitalism: a view from political economy. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37 (4), 593–607. doi:10.1080/03066150.2010.512449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar