Nationalist ideology, rightwing populism, and public views about climate change in Europe

References

• Baranzini, A., Van den Bergh, J., Carattini, S., Howarth, R., and Padilla, E., 2017. Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. WIREs Climate Change, 8 (4), 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.462
   Google Scholar
• Bar-On, T., 2018. The radical right and nationalism. In: J. Rydgren, ed. The Oxford handbook of the radical right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–41.
   Google Scholar
• Barrington, L.W., 1997. ‘Nation’ and ‘nationalism’: the misuse of key concepts in political science. Political Science & Politics, 30 (4), 712–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., 2010. Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity? Theory, Culture & Society, 27 (2–3), 254–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409358729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R.J., Carmichael, J., and Jenkins, J.C., 2012. Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Climatic Change, 114 (2), 169–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C., 1993. Nationalism and ethnicity. Annual Review of Sociology, 19 (1), 211–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.19.080193.001235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., 2013. States of denial: knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colantone, I. and Stanig, P., 2019. The surge of economic nationalism in Western Europe. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33 (4), 128–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cologna, V., and Siegrist, M., 2020. The role of trust for climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 101428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101428
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., et al. 2016. Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11 (4), 048002. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K.F., et al. 2018. A universal model for predicting human migration under climate change: examining future sea level rise in Bangladesh. Environmental Research Letters, 13 (6), 064030. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4d4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P., Price, J., and Leviston, Z., 2015. My country or my planet? exploring the influence of multiple place attachments and ideological beliefs upon climate change attitudes and opinions. Global Environmental Change, 30, 68–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drews, S. and Van Den Bergh, J., 2015. What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy, 16 (7), 855–876. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R.E., 2013. Climate change skepticism and denial: an introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 57 (6), 691–698. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213477097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eger, M.A. and Valdez, S., 2015. Neo-nationalism in Western Europe. European Sociological Review, 31 (1), 115–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eger, M.A. and Valdez, S., 2019. From radical right to neo-nationalist. European Political Science, 18 (3), 379–399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-018-0160-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Social Survey. 2020. ESS-8 2016 Documentation report. Edition 2.2. Bergen, European social survey data Archive, NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data for ESS ERIC. doi:https://doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS8-2016
   Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, M., 2016a. Externalities: why environmental sociology should bring them in. Environmental Sociology, 2 (4), 375–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1196636
   Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, M., 2016b. Trust and public support for environmental protection in diverse national contexts. Sociological Science, 3, 359–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.15195/v3.a17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, M., Johansson Sevä, I., and Kulin, J., 2019. Political trust and the relationship between climate change beliefs and support for fossil fuel taxes: evidence from a survey of 23 European countries. Global Environmental Change, 59, 102003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., 2019a. Climate change and the far right. WIREs Climate Change, 10 (5), 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.604
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., 2019b. The far right and the environment: politics, discourse and communication. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B. and Kølvraa, C., 2015. The nature of nationalism: populist radical right parties on countryside and climate. Nature and Culture, 10 (2), 199–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2015.100204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraune, C. and Knodt, M., 2018. Sustainable energy transformation in an age of populism, post-truth politics, and local resistance. Energy Research & Social Science, 43, 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingrich, A. and Banks, M., 2006. Neo-nationalism in Western Europe and beyond: perspectives from social anthropology. Oxford: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, M., 2016. Far right parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 477–497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042814-012441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisinger, A. and Saunders, E.N., 2017. Mapping the boundaries of elite cues: how elites shape mass opinion across international issues. International Studies Quarterly, 61 (2), 425–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halikiopoulou, D., Nanou, K., and Vasilopoulou, S., 2012. The paradox of nationalism: the common denominator of radical right and radical left euroscepticism. European Journal of Political Research, 51 (4), 504–539. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02050.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harring, N. and Jagers, S., 2013. Should we trust in values? explaining public support for pro-environmental taxes. Sustainability, 5 (1), 210–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su5010210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harring, N., Jagers, S.C., and Matti, S., 2017. Public support for pro-environmental policy measures: examining the impact of personal values and ideology. Sustainability, 9 (5), 679. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D.J. and Renner, M., 2019. Conservative political parties and energy transitions in Europe: opposition to climate mitigation policies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 419–428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M.J., et al. 2016. Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6 (6), 622. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M.J., Harris, E.A., and Fielding, K.S., 2018. Relationships among conspiratorial beliefs, conservatism and climate scepticism across nations. Nature Climate Change, 8 (7), 614–620. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0157-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovden, E. and Lindseth, G., 2004. Discourses in Norwegian climate policy: national action or thinking globally? Political Studies, 52 (1), 63–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00464.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R.F. and Norris, P., 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: economic have-nots and cultural backlash. Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series, RWP16-026.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, S.C., Harring, N., and Matti, S., 2018. Environmental management from left to right–on ideology, policy-specific beliefs and pro-environmental policy support. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61 (1), 86–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1289902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kølvraa, C., 2019. Wolves in sheep’s clothing? The Danish far right and ‘wild nature’. In: B. Forchtner, ed. The far right and the environment: politics, discourse and communication. London: Routledge; p. 107–120.
   Google Scholar
• Krange, O., Kaltenborn, B.P., and Hultman, M., 2019. Cool dudes in Norway: climate change denial among conservative Norwegian men. Environmental Sociology, 5 (1), 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1488516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulin, J. and Johansson Sevä, I., 2019. The role of government in protecting the environment: quality of government and the translation of normative views about government responsibility into spending preferences. International Journal of Sociology, 49 (2), 110–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2019.1582964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., 2006. American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 25 (6), 1433–1442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., et al., 2020. Politics & global warming, April 2020. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, G.B., Palm, R., and Feng, B., 2019. Cross-national variation in determinants of climate change concern. Environmental Politics, 28 (5), 793–821. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1512261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde, S., 2018. Political communication and public support for climate mitigation policies: a country-comparative perspective. Climate Policy, 18 (5), 543–555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1327840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., 2018. Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27 (4), 712–732. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubbers, M. and Coenders, M., 2017. Nationalistic attitudes and voting for the radical right in Europe. European Union Politics, 18 (1), 98–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116516678932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. and Mudde, C., 1998. The party family and its study. Annual Review of Political Science, 1 (1), 211–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., 2019. Authoritarianism, populism, and the environment: comparative experiences, insights and perspectives. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109 (2), 301–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1554393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E., 2011. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52 (2), 155–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A.M., Dunlap, R.E., and Marquart-Pyatt, S.T., 2016. Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25 (2), 338–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A.M., Dunlap, R.E., and Xiao, C., 2013. Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change, 119, 511–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0704-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., et al., 2019. Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: a cross-European analysis. Global Environmental Change, 55, 25–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmstorf, S., 2004. The climate sceptics. Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M., 2016. ‘This loopy idea’: an analysis of UKIP’s social media discourse in relation to rurality and climate change. Space and Polity, 20 (2), 226–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2016.1192332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruser, A. and Machin, A., 2019. Nationalising the climate: is the European far right turning green? Green European Journal, September. Available from: https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/nationalising-the-climate-is-the-european-far-right-turning-green/ [Accessed 14 Jan 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Schaller, S. and Carius, A., 2019. Convenient truths: mapping climate agendas of right-wing populist parties in Europe. Berlin: Adelphi.
   Google Scholar
• Schatz, R.T., Staub, E., and Lavine, H., 1999. On the varieties of national attachment: blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20 (1), 151–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S.L., 2008. Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 24 (1), 53–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcm034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E.K. and Mayer, A., 2018. A social trap for the climate? collective action, trust and climate change risk perception in 35 countries. Global Environmental Change, 49, 140–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E.K. and Mayer, A., 2019. Anomalous anglophones? contours of free market ideology, political polarization, and climate change attitudes in English-speaking countries, Western European and post-Communist states. Climatic Change, 152, 17–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2332-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T.A. and Bosker, R.J., 2011. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, B., 2008. The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13 (1), 95–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822289
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, S.K., Wilson, M.S., and Milfont, T.L., 2017. Exploring short-term longitudinal effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on environmentalism. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 174–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, Y., 2019. Why nationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tesler, M., 2018. Elite domination of public doubts about climate change (not evolution). Political Communication, 35 (2), 306–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1380092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist, 2015. The march of Europe’s little Trumps. The Economist. Available from: http://www.economist.com/node/21679855 [Published 10 Dec 2015; Accessed 14 Jan 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. and Debus, M., 2020. Right-wing populist parties and environmental politics: insights from the Austrian Freedom Party’s support for the glyphosate ban. Environmental Politics, 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1813997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranter, B. and Booth, K., 2015. Scepticism in a changing climate: a cross-national study. Global Environmental Change, 33, 154–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulou, S., 2009. Varieties of Euroscepticism: the case of the European extreme right. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 5 (1), 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., et al., 2018. The Manifesto data collection. Manifesto project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2018b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
   Google Scholar
• Woertz, E., coord., 2017. Populism in Europe: from symptom to alternative? Barcelona: Centre for International Affairs, CIBOD Report #01.
   Google Scholar