References
- Arts, B., Leroy, P., and Van Tatenhove, J., 2006. Political modernisation and policy arrangements: a framework for understanding environmental policy change. Public Organization Review, 6 (2), 93–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-006-0001-4
- Beer, K., et al., 2018. Politische Prozesse der Bioökonomie zwischen Ökonomie und Ökologie. Bio-Ökopoli-Arbeitsbericht 1: fallauswahl und Übersichtsanalysen. Hagen: FernUniversität in Hagen.
- Béland, D. and Howlett, M., 2016. How solutions chase problems: instrument constituencies in the policy process. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 29 (3), 393–409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12179
- Birch, K., 2019. Neoliberal bio-economies? The co-construction of markets and natures. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Birch, K. and Tyfield, D., 2013. Theorizing the bioeconomy. Biovalue, biocapital, bioeconomics or … what? Science, Technology & Human Values, 38 (3), 299–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912442398
- Böcher, M., 2012. A theoretical framework for explaining the choice of instruments in environmental policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 14–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.03.012
- Böcher, M., et al., 2020. Research trends: bioeconomy politics and governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 118, 102219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102219
- Böcher, M. and Töller, A.E., 2012. Umweltpolitik in Deutschland. Eine politikfeldanalytische Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
- Brooks, A.L., Wang, S., and Jambeck, J.R., 2018. The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4 (6), eaat0131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat0131
- Bugge, M., Hansen, T., and Klitkou, A., 2016. What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8 (7), 691. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691
- Calabrò, P.S. and Grosso, M., 2018. Bioplastics and waste management. Waste Management, 78, 800–801. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.054
- Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., and Olsen, J.P., 1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (1), 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088
- D’Amato, D., et al., 2017. Green, circular, bio economy: a comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 716–734. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053
- Dauvergne, P., 2018. The power of environmental norms: marine plastic pollution and the politics of microbeads. Environmental Politics, 27 (4), 579–597. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1449090
- De Pellegrini Elias, L., 2020. Sistemas alimentares sustentáveis e agricultura familiar no contexto do desenvolvimento recente do estado de Santa Catarina. Campinas, SP. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
- Devaney, L., Henchion, M., and Regan, Á., 2017. Good governance in the bioeconomy. EuroChoices, 16 (2), 41–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12141
- Dietz, T., et al., 2018. Governance of the bioeconomy: a global comparative study of national bioeconomy strategies. Sustainability, 10 (9), 3190. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093190
- European Commission, 2012. Innovating for sustainable growth. A bioeconomy for Europe. COM(2012) 60 final. Brussels: European Commission.
- European Commission, 2015. Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the circular economy. COM(2015) 614 final. Brussels: European Commission.
- European Commission, 2018a. A European strategy for plastics in a circular economy. COM(2018) 28 final. Brussels: European Commission.
- European Commission, 2018b. A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe. Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment: updated bioeconomy strategy. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- European Parliament, 2020. Handbook on the ordinary legislative procedure. A guide to how the European Parliament co-legislates. Brussels: European Parliament.
- European Union, 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. OJ L, 140, 16–62.
- European Union, 2018. Directive 2018/2001/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). OJ L, 328, 82–209.
- Fast, S. and McCormick, K., 2012. Biofuels: from a win–win solution to a wicked problem? Biofuels, 3 (6), 737–748. doi:https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.12.56
- Friesinger, E., 2011. NGOs und Agrotreibstoffe – ein spannungsreiches Verhältnis. In: A. Brunnengräber, ed. Zivilisierung des Klimaregimes. NGOs und soziale Bewegungen in der nationalen, europäischen und internationalen Klimapolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 233–262.
- Heidbreder, L.M., et al., 2019. Tackling the plastic problem: a review on perceptions, behaviors, and interventions. The Science of the Total Environment, 668, 1077–1093. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.437
- Hobson, K., 2020. The limits of the loops: critical environmental politics and the circular economy. Environmental Politics, 30 (1–2), 161–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1816052
- Juerges, N. and Hansjürgens, B., 2018. Soil governance in the transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy – a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1628–1639. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.143
- Kingdon, J.W., 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little Brown and Co.
- Kiser, L.L. and Ostrom, E., 1982. The three worlds of action: a metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In: E. Ostrom, ed. Strategies of political inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage, 179–222.
- Klitkou, A., Fevolden, A.M., and Capasso, M., eds., 2019. From waste to value. Valorisation pathways for organic waste streams in circular bioeconomies. London: Routledge.
- Ladu, L., 2020. The governance of genome editing techniques for the European bio-based industry. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23 (2), 165–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1850247
- Legislative Observatory, 2018. Results of vote in Parliament. 2018/2035(INI) - A8-0262/2018 [online]. European Parliament. Available from: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31441&l=en [Accessed 5 Feb 2021].
- Leipold, S., 2021. Transforming ecological modernization ‘from within’ or perpetuating it? The circular economy as EU environmental policy narrative. Environmental Politics, 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1868863
- Leipold, S. and Petit-Boix, A., 2018. The circular economy and the bio-based sector - Perspectives of European and German stakeholders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 1125–1137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.019
- Levidow, L., 2013. EU criteria for sustainable biofuels. Accounting for carbon, depoliticising plunder. Geoforum, 44, 211–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.09.005
- Levidow, L., Birch, K., and Papaioannou, T., 2012. EU agri-innovation policy. Two contending visions of the bio-economy. Critical Policy Studies, 6 (1), 40–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.659881
- Loges, B. and Jakobi, A.P., 2020. Not more than the sum of its parts: de-centered norm dynamics and the governance of plastics. Environmental Politics, 29 (6), 1004–1023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1703385
- Lühmann, M., 2020. Whose European bioeconomy? Relations of forces in the shaping of an updated EU bioeconomy strategy. Environmental Development, 35, 100547. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100547
- Maes, D. and Van Passel, S., 2019. Effective bioeconomy policies for the uptake of innovative technologies under resource constraints. Biomass and Bioenergy, 120, 91–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.008
- Meyer, R., 2017. Bioeconomy strategies. contexts, visions, guiding implementation principles and resulting debates. Sustainability, 9 (6), 1031. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061031
- Nielsen, T.D., Holmberg, K., and Stripple, J., 2019. Need a bag? A review of public policies on plastic carrier bags – where, how and to what effect? Waste Management, 87, 428–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.025
- Palmer, J., 2012. Risk governance in an age of wicked problems. Lessons from the European approach to indirect land-use change. Journal of Risk Research, 15 (5), 495–513. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.643477
- Patermann, C. and Aguilar, A., 2018. The origins of the bioeconomy in the European Union. New Biotechnology, 40 (Part A), 20–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.002
- Penca, J., 2018. European plastics strategy: what promise for global marine litter? Marine Policy, 97, 197–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.06.004
- Peterson, J., 2017. Juncker’s political European Commission and an EU in crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55 (2), 349–367.
- Ramcilovic-Suominen, S. and Pülzl, H., 2018. Sustainable development – a ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework? Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4170–4180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157
- Rietig, K., 2019. The importance of compatible beliefs for effective climate policy integration. Environmental Politics, 28 (2), 228–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1549781
- Ronzon, T. and Sanjuán, A.I., 2020. Friends or foes? A compatibility assessment of bioeconomy-related Sustainable Development Goals for European policy coherence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 119832. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119832
- Scarlat, N., et al., 2019. Brief on biomass for energy in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Schleifer, P., 2013. Orchestrating sustainability. The case of European Union biofuel governance. Regulation & Governance, 7 (4), 533–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12037
- Schlosser, K., 2020. Contrasting visions of the green new deal. Environmental Politics, 1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1847514
- Schröder, P., et al., 2019. The politics of marine plastics pollution. In: P. Schröder, eds. The circular economy and the global south. Sustainable lifestyles and green industrial development. Abingdon, NY: Routledge, 43–56.
- Sengers, F., Raven, R.P., and Van Venrooij, A., 2010. From riches to rags. Biofuels, media discourses and resistance to sustainable energy technologies. Energy Policy, 38 (9), 5013–5027. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.030
- Sharman, A. and Holmes, J., 2010. Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence gathering? Biofuels, the EU and the 10% target. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20 (5), 309–321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.543
- Simons, A. and Voß, J.-P., 2018. The concept of instrument constituencies: accounting for dynamics and practices of knowing governance. Policy and Society, 37 (1), 14–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1375248
- Slavici, M., 2021. Barrierefreiheit in der Wohnungspolitik. Eine Analyse auf der Ebene der Bundesländer. Magdeburg: Universität Magdeburg.
- Stecker, R., 2015. Zur Entstehung des neuen Politikfeldes Klimawandelanpassungspolitik in Deutschland. der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 8 (1), 71–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v8i1.19111
- Töller, A.E., et al., 2021. Is bioeconomy policy a policy field? A conceptual framework and findings on the European Union and Germany. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23 (2), 152–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1893163
- Töller, A.E., et al., 2018. Governing shale gas in Germany. In: J. Whitton, eds. Governing shale gas. Development, citizen participation and decision making in the US, Canada, Australia and Europe. London: Routledge, 66–82.
- Vivien, F.-D., et al., 2019. The hijacking of the bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159, 189–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027
- Vogelpohl, T., et al., 2015. Immunization by neoliberalization. The strange non-death of the win-win narrative in European agrofuel policy. In: K. Dietz, eds. The political ecology of agrofuels. Abingdon, NY: Routledge, 236–252.
- Vogelpohl, T. and Perbandt, D., 2019. Biofuel sustainability certifications in the EU. Democratically legitimate and socio-environmentally effective? In: M. Vogt, ed. Sustainability certification schemes in the agricultural and natural resource. Outcomes for society and the environment. London, NY: Routledge, 179–198.
- Vogelpohl, T. and Töller, A.E., 2021. Perspectives on the bioeconomy as an emerging policy field. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23 (2), 143–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1901394
- Zahariadis, N., 2007. The multiple streams framework: structure, limitations, prospects. In: P.A. Sabatier, ed. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, Co: Westview Press, 65–92.