Climate institutions in Brazil: three decades of building and dismantling climate capacity

References

• Aamodt, S., 2018. The ability to influence: a comparative analysis of the rise of advocacy coalitions in Brazilian climate politics. Review of Policy Research, 35 (3), 372–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aberbach, J.D. and Rockman, B.A., 2002. Conducting and coding elite interviews. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35 (4), 673–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abers, R.N. and Oliveira, M.S.D., 2015. Nomeações políticas no ministério do meio ambiente (2003–2013): interconexões Entre ONGs, partidos e governos. Opinião Pública, 21 (2), 336–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912015212336.
   Google Scholar
• Araújo, S.M.V.G.D., 2020. Environmental policy in the bolsonaro government: response of environmentalists in the legislature. Brazilian Political Science Review, 14 (2), e0005. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202000020005.
   Google Scholar
• Assunção, J., Gandour, C., and Rocha, R., 2015. Deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian amazon: prices or policies? Environment and Development Economics, 20 (6), 697–722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X15000078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, A.A., et al., 2017. Limits of Brazil’s forest code as a means to end illegal deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (29), 7653–7658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604768114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersch, K., Praça, S., and Taylor, M.M., 2017. State capacity, bureaucratic politicization, and corruption in the Brazilian State. Governance, 30 (1), 105–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazil, Federative Republic of, 2016. Executive summary: third National Communication of Brazil to the United Nations Framework convention on climate change. Brasília: Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. Available from: unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/branc3es.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CAIT Climate Data Explorer. 2017. Historical emissions data. Available from: www.wri.org/resources/data-sets/cait-historical-emissions-data-countries-us-states-unfccc.
   Google Scholar
• Casa Civil. 2021. Atas do comitê interministerial sobre mudança do clima. Available from: www.gov.br/casacivil/pt-br/assuntos/comite-interministerial-sobre-mudanca-do-clima/atas-do-cim.
   Google Scholar
• Chiaretti, D., 2019. Desmatamento afeta imagem do país e causa preocupação. Valor Econômico, 22 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• Coalizão Brasil: Clima, Florestas e Agricultura. 2018. Visão 2030–2050: o Futuro das Florestas e da Agricultura no Brasil. Available from: www.unica.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/O-Futuro-Das-Florestas.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Comitê Interministerial sobre Mudança do Clima, 2008. Plano Nacional sobre Mudança do Clima. Brasília: Comitê Interministerial sobre Mudança do Clima.
   Google Scholar
• DIAP - Departamento Intersindical de Assessoria Parlamentar. 2010. Radiografia do Novo Congresso: legislatura 2011–2014. Available from: www.diap.org.br/index.php/publicacoes/send/13-radiografia-do-novo-congresso/413-radiografia-do-novo-congresso-legislatura-2011-2015.
   Google Scholar
• Dubash, N., 2021. Varieties of climate governance: toward an understanding of the emergence and functioning of climate institutions. Environmental Politics.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrante, L. and Fearnside, P., 2019. Brazil’s new president and ‘ruralists’ threaten amazonia’s environment, traditional peoples and the global climate. Environmental Conservation, 46 (4), 261–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892919000213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fórum Brasileiro de Mudança do Clima, 2018a. Proposta inicial de implementação da contribuição nacionalmente determinada do Brasil (NDC). Brasília: Fórum Brasileiro de Mudança do Clima.
   Google Scholar
• Fórum Brasileiro de Mudança do Clima. 2018b. (Draft) report for the presidency of Brazilian scenarios for net zero emissions for 2060. Available from: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/fbec55_4b7299c708ee4b61abcd8d351dab1713.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, D.J., Hironaka, A., and Schofer, E., 2000. The Nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 25 (1), 96–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2657291.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, H., et al., 2016. Did ranchers and slaughterhouses respond to zero-deforestation agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? Conservation Letters, 9 (1), 32–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godar, J., et al., 2014. Actor-specific contributions to the deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences, 111, 15591–15596. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322825111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, K., 2021. Political economies of energy transition: wind and solar power in Brazil and South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, K. and Keck, M.E., 2007. Greening Brazil: environmental activism in state and society. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, K. and Montero, A., 2013. The renewed developmental state: the national development bank and the Brazil model. Journal of Development Studies, 49 (11), 1484–1499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.807503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, K. and Viola, E., 2012. Brazil and the politics of climate change: beyond the global commons. Environmental Politics, 21 (5), 753–771. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.698884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinnah, S., 2017. Makers, takers, shakers, shapers: emerging economies and normative engagement in climate governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 23 (2), 285–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02302009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., et al., 2018. Governing climate change polycentrically: setting the scene. In: A. Jordan, et al., eds. Governing Climate Change: polycentricity in Action? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. and Matt, E., 2014. Designing policies that intentionally stick: policy feedback in a changing climate. Policy Sciences, 47, 227–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9201-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, K., et al., 2012. Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45, 123–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, M., et al., 2019. Demystifying Sustainable Soy in Brazil. Land Use Policy, 82, 349–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., et al., 2017. Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: a research Agenda. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35 (2), 312–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K., eds, 2009. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manzatto, C.V., et al., 2020. Mitigação das emissões de gases de efeito estufa pela adoção das tecnologias do plano ABC: estimativas parciais. Jaguariúna: Embrapa Meio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Mayka, L., 2019. Building participatory institutions in Latin America: reform coalitions and institutional change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, C.L., Irland, L.C., and Pacheco, P., 2015. Forest certification and legality initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon: lessons for Effective and equitable forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 134–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo, A.L.P.D. and Silva, B.S.D., 2018. Projeto PMR Brasil: perspectivas sobre o Mercado Brasileiro de Redução de Emissões. In: F.W. Frangetto, A.P.B. Veiga, and G. Luedemann, eds. Legado do MDL: impactos e Lições Aprendidas a Partir da Implementação do Mecanismo de Desenvolvimento Limpo no Brasil Como Subsídios para Novos Mecanismos, 357–375. Brasília: IPEA.
   Google Scholar
• Melo, M.A., 2016. Latin America’s new turbulence: crisis and integrity in Brazil. Journal of Democracy, 27 (2), 50–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, 2012. Plano Setorial de Mitigação e de Adaptação às Mudanças Climáticas para a Consolidação de uma Economia de Baixa Emissão de Carbono na Agricultura: plano ABC. Brasília: Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento.
   Google Scholar
• Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. 2021. Governo federal institui sistema para monitorar plano ABC 2021/2030. Available from: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/governo-federal-institui-sistema-para-monitorar-plano-abc-2021-2030.
   Google Scholar
• Ministério de Minas e Energia, 2011. Plano decenal de expansão de energia 2020. Brasília: Ministério de Minas e Energia and Empresa de Pesquisa Energética.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, B., 2018. Property rights implications for the brazilian forest code. Revista De Economia E Sociologia Rural, 56 (2), 329–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1234-56781806-94790560209.
   Google Scholar
• Nepstad, D., et al., 2014. Slowing amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science, 344 (6188), 1118–1123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Observatório do Clima. 2021. ‘Passando a boiada’: o segundo ano de desmonte ambiental de jair bolsonao. Available from: https://www.oc.eco.br/passando-boiada-o-segundo-ano-de-desmonte-ambiental-sob-jair-bolsonaro/.
   Google Scholar
• Observatório do Clima. N.d. Interview with alfredo sirkis. Available from: https://www.ethos.org.br/cedoc/e-preciso-declarar-guerra-ao-desmate/#.XfZFiy10eb8.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, M.S.D., 2016. Movimento para as Instituições: ambientalistas, Partidos Políticos e a Liderança de Marina Silva. Brasília: PhD Dissertation at the Instituto de Ciência Política, Universidade de Brasília.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 2010. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20 (4), 550–557. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, C., Power, T.J., and Rennó, L.R., 2008. Agenda power, executive decree authority, and the mixed results of reform in the Brazilian Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 33 (1), 5–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.3162/036298008783743309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Projeto PMR Brasil. 2020. Síntese das análises e resultados do projeto PMR Brasil. Available from: https://www.gov.br/produtividade-e-comercio-exterior/pt-br/assuntos/competitividade-industrial/pmr/relatorio-sintese-pmr.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rajao, R., et al., 2020. The rotten apples of Brazil’s agribusiness. Science, 369 (6501), 246–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rausch, L.L. and Gibbs, H., 2016. Property arrangements and soy governance in the Brazilian State of Mato Grosso: implications for deforestation-free production. Land, 5 (7), 5020007. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/land5020007.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Brazil. 1988. Constituição de República federative do Brasil de 1988. Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. and Geels, F.W., 2019. Conditions for politically-accelerated transitions: historical institutionalism, the multi-level perspective, and two historical case studies in transport and agriculture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 221–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochedo, P.R.R., et al., 2018. (Letter): the threat of political bargaining to climate mitigation in Brazil. Nature Climate Change, 8, 695–698. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0213-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M.G., 2015. Bringing local voices to the global negotiation table: norm dissemination and consensus building on tropical forests and climate change. New Global Studies, 9 (2), 125–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2015-0016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, S. 2019. Ministra da agricultura critica moratoria de soja. Globo/Reuters 14 Nov. Available from: https://g1.globo.com/economia/agronegocios/noticia/2019/11/14/ministra-da-agricultura-critica-moratoria-da-soja-mas-diz-que-discussao-cabe-ao-mercado.ghtml.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, S., 2019. Rural Brazil During the Lula Administration: agreements with Agribusiness and Disputes in Agrarian Policies. Latin American Perspectives, 46 (4), 103–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X16685176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling-Vaca-Flor, A., et al., 2021. Contextualizing certification and auditing: soy certification and access of local communities to land and water in Brazil. World Development, 140, 105281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzman, S., Moutinho, P., and Hamburg, S., 2012. Policy update: amazon deforestation and Brazil’s forest code: a crossroads for climate change. Carbon Management, 3 (4), 341–343. doi:https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.12.34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirgado, P. 2010. COP-16: fórum Brasileiro de Mudanças Climáticas Discute Situação Climática no País. Available from: https://www.ana.gov.br/noticias-antigas/cop-16-fa3rum-brasileiro-de-mudanassas-clima-ticas.2019-03-15.6836207626, Accessed 29 Apr 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Supremo Tribunal Federal. 2020. Arguição de descumprimento de preceito fundamental 708. Available from: http://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=5951856.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, G.M., Viana, C., and Toni, F., 2019. From frontier governance to governance frontier: the political geography of Brazil’s Amazon transition. World Development, 114, 59–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale, M.M., et al., 2021. The COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to weaken environmental protection in Brazil. Biological Conservation, 255, 108994. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola, E. and Franchini, M., 2018. Brazil and climate change: beyond the Amazon. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar