3,343
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH ARTICLES

Responsibilities for just transition to low-carbon societies: a role-based framework

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Albin, A., 1999. Can NGOs enhance the effectiveness of international negotiation? International Negotiation, 4 (3), 371–387. doi:10.1163/15718069920848534
  • Archer, A., et al., 2020. Celebrity, Democracy, and Epistemic Power. Perspectives on Politics, 18 (1), 27–42. doi:10.1017/S1537592719002615
  • Avelino, F. and Wittmayer, J.M., 2016. Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: a multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning: The Politics of Transition, 18 (5), 628–649. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259
  • Bäckstrand, K., Zelli, F., and Schleifer, P., 2018. Legitimacy and accountability in polycentric climate governance. In: A.H. Jordan, C.A. D, and H. Forster, J, eds. Governing climate change. Polycentricity in Action? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 338–356.
  • Berggren, C., Magnusson, T., and Sushandoyo, D., 2015. Transition pathways revisited: established firms as multi-level actors in the heavy vehicle industry. Research Policy, 44 (5), 1017–1028. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.009
  • Birollo, G., Esper, S., and Rouleau, L., 2021. Not dinosaurs but dynamos: the roles of middle managers in corporate social responsibility and sustainable development issues. In: S. Teerikangas, et al., eds. Research handbook of sustainability agency. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 62–74.
  • Callero, P.L., 1994. From role-playing to role-using: understanding role as resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57 (3), 228–243. doi:10.2307/2786878
  • Caney, S., 2010. Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13 (1), 203–228. doi:10.1080/13698230903326331
  • Cole, D.H., 2015. Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change, 5 (2), 114–118. doi:10.1038/nclimate2490
  • Correa, F., 2015. Human Rights Ltd.: an alternative approach to assessing the impact of transnational corporations on human rights. In: K. Mills and D.J. Karp, eds. Human rights protection in global politics: responsibilities of states and non-state actors. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 159–179.
  • Cripps, E., 2013. Climate change and the moral agent: individual duties in an interdependent world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Deveaux, M., 2015. The global poor as agents of justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 12 (2), 125–150. doi:10.1163/17455243-4681029
  • Eckersley, R., 2016. Responsibility for climate change as a structural injustice. In: T. Gabrielson, et al., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 346–361.
  • Eckersley, R., 2021. Greening states and societies: from transitions to great transformations. Environmental Politics, 30 (1–2), 245–265. doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1810890
  • Evans, G. and Phelan, L., 2016. Transition to a post-carbon society: linking environmental justice and just transition discourses. Energy Policy, 99, 329–339. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.003
  • Farla, J., et al., 2012. Sustainability transitions in the making: a closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79 (6), 991–998. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001
  • Fischer, L.-B. and Newig, J., 2016. Importance of actors and agency in sustainability transitions: a systematic exploration of the literature. Sustainability, 8 (5), 476. doi:10.3390/su8050476
  • Fraser, N., 2010. Scales of justice: reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Geels, F.W., 2020. Micro-foundations of the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions: developing a multi-dimensional model of agency through crossovers between social constructivism, evolutionary economics and neo-institutional theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119894. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119894
  • Geels, F.W. and Schot, J.W., 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36 (3), 399–417. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
  • Harrahill, K. and Douglas, O., 2019. Framework development for ‘just transition’ in coal producing jurisdictions. Energy Policy, 134, 110990. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110990
  • Huttunen, S., 2015. Farming practices and experienced policy coherence in agri-environmental policies: the case of land clearing in Finland. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17 (5), 573–592. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2014.1003348
  • Huttunen, S., et al., 2021. Pluralising agency to understand behaviour change in sustainability transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 76, 102067. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102067
  • Jenkins, K.E., et al., 2020. Politicising the Just Transition: linking global climate policy, Nationally Determined Contributions and targeted research agendas. Geoforum, 115, 138–142. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.012
  • Jugov, T. and Ypi, L., 2019. Structural injustice, epistemic opacity, and the responsibilities of the oppressed. Journal of Social Psychology, 50 (1), 7–27.
  • Karp, D.J., 2015. The Concept of Human Rights Protection and the UN Guiding principles on business and human rights. In: K. Mills and D.J. Karp, eds. Human rights protection in global politics: responsibilities of states and non-state actors. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 137–158.
  • Kortetmäki, T., 2019. Nobody’s fault? Structural injustice, food, and climate change. In: E. Gilson and S. Kenehan, eds. Food, environment and climate change: justice at the intersections. London: Rowman and Littlefield, 47–62.
  • Kortetmäki, T. and Järvelä, M., 2021. Social vulnerability to climate policies: building a matrix to assess policy impacts on well-being. Environmental Science and Policy, 123, 220–228. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.018
  • Loo, C., 2019. Participation and food justice in light of global climate change. In: E. Gilson and S. Kenehan, eds. Food, environment and climate change: justice at the intersections. London: Rowman and Littlefield, 63–75.
  • Loorbach, D. and Rotmans, J., 2010. The practice of transition management: examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures, 42 (3), 237–246. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009
  • Martinsen, F. and Seibt, J., 2013. Climate change and the concept of shared ecological responsibility. Environmental Ethics, 35 (2), 163–187. doi:10.5840/enviroethics201335216
  • McCauley, D. and Heffron, R., 2018. Just transition: integrating climate, energy and environmental justice. Energy Policy, 119, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.014
  • Mills, K. and Karp, D.J., Eds. 2015. Human rights protection in global politics: responsibilities of states and non-state actors. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Morena, E., Krause, D., and Stevis, D., Eds. 2020. Just transitions: social justice in the shift towards a low-carbon world. London: Pluto Press.
  • Mountfield, A., et al., 2021. Barriers to implementing sustainability experienced by middle managers in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods and Retail sector. In: S. Teerikangas, et al., eds. Research handbook of sustainability agency. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 75–92.
  • Neuhäuser, C., 2014. Structural injustice and the distribution of forward-looking responsibility. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 38 (1), 232–251. doi:10.1111/misp.12026
  • Portes, A., 2000. The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15 (1), 1–12. Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers. 10.1023/A:1007537902813.
  • Reitzenstein, A., Schulz, S., and Heilmann, F., 2020. The story of coal in Germany: a model for just transition in Europe? In: K. Morena and Stevis eds. Just transitions. Social justice in the shift towards a low-carbon world. London: Pluto Press, 151–171.
  • Schlosberg, D., 2007. Defining environmental justice: theories, movements, and nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schlosberg, D., Collins, L.B., and Niemeyer, S., 2017. Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation. Environmental Politics, 26 (3), 413–437. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1287628
  • Silveira, A. and Pritchard, P., 2018. Justice in the transition to a low carbon economy. A Working Paper by the Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership. University of Cambridge. Available: https://www.cisl.cam.ac.uk/resources/publication-pdfs/justice-in-the-transition-to-a-low-carbon-economy.pdf (Accessed 7 Jul 2021)
  • Wallimann-Helmer, I., 2015. Justice for climate loss and damage. Climatic Change, 133 (3), 469–480. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1483-2
  • Williams, S. and Doyon, A., 2019. Justice in energy transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 144–153. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.001
  • Wittmayer, J.M., et al., 2017. Actor roles in transition: insights from sociological perspectives. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 45–56. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003
  • Young, I., 2006. Responsibility and Global Justice: a Social Connection Model. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23 (1), 102–130. doi:10.1017/S0265052506060043
  • Young, I.M., 2011. Responsibility for justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Zheng, R., 2018. What is my role in changing the system? A new model of responsibility for structural injustice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21 (4), 869–885. doi:10.1007/s10677-018-9892-8