Fossil fuel divestment and public climate change policy preferences: an experimental test in three countries

References

• Ansar, A., Caldecott, B., and Tilbury, J., 2013. Stranded assets and the fossil fuel divestment campaign: what does divestment mean for the valuation of fossil fuel assets? London, University of Oxford’s Smith school of enterprise and the environment. Available from: https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-03/SAP-divestment-report-final.pdf [Accessed 6 Aug 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Aronow, P.M., Baron, J., and Pinson, L., 2019. A note on dropping experimental subjects who fail a manipulation check. Political Analysis, 27 (4), 572–589. doi:10.1017/pan.2019.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benegal, S.D., 2018. The spillover of race and racial attitudes into public opinion about climate change. Environmental Politics, 27 (4), 733–756. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1457287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, N., 2018. Impacts of the fossil fuel divestment movement: effects on finance, policy and public discourse. Sustainability, 10 (7), 2529–2547. doi:10.3390/su10072529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A.J., Margolis, M.F., and Sances, M.W., 2014. Separating the shirkers from the workers? Making sure respondents pay attention on self-administered surveys. American Journal of Political Science, 58 (3), 739–753. doi:10.1111/ajps.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brutger, R., et al., 2022. Abstraction and detail in experimental design. American Journal of Political Science. doi:10.1111/ajps.12710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E. and Stephan, M.J., 2011. Why civil resistance works: the strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheon, A. and Urpelainen, J., 2018. Activism and the Fossil Fuel Industry. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cojoianu, T.F., et al., 2021. Does the fossil fuel divestment movement impact new oil and gas fundraising? Journal of Economic Geography, 21 (1), 141–164. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbaa027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppock, A. and McClellan, O.A., 2019. Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Research & Politics, 6 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1177/2053168018822174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R.E. and McCright, A.M., 2008. A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50 (5), 26–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, P.J. and Mullin, M., 2017. Climate change: US public opinion. Annual Review of Political Science, 20 (1), 209–227. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, J.D., 1997. Signaling foreign policy interests: tying hands versus sinking costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41 (1), 68–90. doi:10.1177/0022002797041001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gause, L., 2022. Revealing issue salience via costly protest: how legislative behavior following protest advantages low-resource groups. British Journal of Political Science, 52 (1), 259–278. doi:10.1017/S0007123420000423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillion, D.Q., 2013. The political power of protest: minority activism and shifts in public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guber, D.L., 2013. A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. American Behavioral Scientist, 57 (1), 93–115. doi:10.1177/0002764212463361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N., 2017. Building norms from the grassroots up: divestment, expressive politics, and climate change. Law and Policy, 39 (4), 372–392. doi:10.1111/lapo.12083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazlett, C. and Mildenberger, M., 2020. Wildfire exposure increases pro-environment voting within democratic but not republican areas. American Political Science Review, 114 (4), 1359–1365. doi:10.1017/S0003055420000441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestres, L.E. and Hopke, J.E., 2020. Fossil fuel divestment: theories of change, goals, and strategies of a growing climate movement. Environmental Politics, 29 (3), 371–389. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1632672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R.A., Wicki, M.L., and Bernauer, T., 2020. Public support for environmental policy depends on beliefs concerning effectiveness, intrusiveness, and fairness. Environmental Politics, 29 (4), 649–673. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1629171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, J.V. and Barabas, J., 2019. No harm in checking: using factual manipulation checks to assess attentiveness in experiments. American Journal of Political Science, 63 (1), 234–249. doi:10.1111/ajps.12396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., et al., 2022. International public opinion on climate change. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and Data for Good at Meta.
   Google Scholar
• Lendway, P., 2021. The effect of informational and empathy-enhancing interventions on redistributive preferences. Yale Journal of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmann, S., 1993. A signaling model of informative and manipulative political action. American Political Science Review, 87 (2), 319–333. doi:10.2307/2939043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangat, R., Dalby, S., and Paterson, M., 2018. Divestment discourse: war, justice, morality and money. Environmental Politics, 27 (2), 187–208. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1413725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, M. and Weeks, J.L.P., 2019. Hawks, doves, and peace: an experimental approach. American Journal of Political Science, 63 (1), 53–66. doi:10.1111/ajps.12392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A.M., 2010. The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment, 32 (1), 66–87. doi:10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mildenberger, M., 2020. Carbon captured: how business and labor control climate politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osberghaus, D. and Fugger, C., 2022. Natural disasters and climate change beliefs: the role of distance and prior beliefs. Global Environmental Change, 74, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyton, K., Huber, G.A., and Coppock, A., 2021. The generalizability of online experiments conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 9 (3), 379–394. doi:10.1017/XPS.2021.17
   Google Scholar
• Rode, J.B., et al. 2021. Influencing climate change attitudes in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76, 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A.D., Rouse, S.M., and Mobley, W., 2019. Polarization of climate change beliefs: the role of the millennial generation identity. Social Science Quarterly, 100 (7), 2625–2640. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L.A., McLean, M.C., and Bunzl, M., 2013. When truth is personally inconvenient, attitudes change: the impact of extreme weather on implicit support for green politicians and explicit climate-change beliefs. Psychological Science, 24 (11), 2290–2296. doi:10.1177/0956797613492775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, G.W., 2015. Divestment dynamics: mobilizing, shaming, and changing the rules. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 82 (4), 1015–1037. doi:10.1353/sor.2015.0061
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, L.C., 2020. Short circuiting policy: interest groups and the battle over clean energy and climate policy in the American States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., 2004. Social movements, 1768–2004. London: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Toplensky, R., 2020. Divestment campaigns move beyond oil. Wall Street Journal, 15, Oct 15.
   Google Scholar
• Wasow, O., 2020. Agenda seeding: how 1960s black protests moved elites, public opinion and voting. American Political Science Review, 114 (3), 638–659. doi:10.1017/S000305542000009X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenberg, C., et al. 2021. The (minimal) persuasive advantage of political video over text. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118 (47), 1–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.2114388118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, R., 2019. The persuasive power of protest. How protest wins public support. Social Forces, 98 (1), 403–426. doi:10.1093/sf/soy110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, R. and Walgrave, S., 2017. Demonstrating power: how protest persuades political representatives. American Sociological Review, 82 (2), 361–383. doi:10.1177/0003122417690325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar