710
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Hard to say goodbye: South Korea, Japan, and China as the last lenders for coal

, , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1186-1207 | Received 07 May 2022, Accepted 26 Apr 2023, Published online: 01 Jun 2023

References

  • Aklin, M. and Urpelainen, J., 2018. Renewables: the politics of a global energy transition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Blondeel, M., Colgan, J., and Van de Graaf, T., 2019. What drives norm success? Evidence from anti–fossil fuel campaigns. Global Environmental Politics, 19 (4), 63–84. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00528.
  • Blondeel, M., Van de Graaf, T., and Haesebrouck, T., 2020. Moving beyond coal: exploring and explaining the powering past coal alliance. Energy Research & Social Science, 59 (January), 101304. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101304.
  • Brauers, H. and Oei, P.-Y., 2020. The political economy of coal in Poland: drivers and barriers for a shift away from fossil fuels. Energy Policy, 144 (September), 111621. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111621.
  • Brauers, H., Oei, P.-Y., and Walk, P., 2020. Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37 (December), 238–253. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.001.
  • Breetz, H., Mildenberger, M., and Stokes, L., 2018. The political logics of clean energy transitions. Business and Politics, 20 (4), 492–522. doi:10.1017/bap.2018.14.
  • Brown, B. and Spiegel, S.J., 2019. Coal, climate justice, and the cultural politics of energy transition. Global Environmental Politics, 19 (2), 149–168. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00501.
  • Burke, P.J., et al., 2019. Overcoming barriers to solar and wind energy adoption in two Asian giants: India and Indonesia. Energy Policy, 132 (September), 1216–1228. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.055.
  • Checkel, J.T., 2001. Why comply? Social learning and European identity change. International Organization, 55 (3), 553–588. doi:10.1162/00208180152507551.
  • Cheng, E. 2021. “China has ‘no other choice’ but to rely on coal power for now, official says.” CNBC. 2021 April 29. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/29/climate-china-has-no-other-choice-but-to-rely-on-coal-power-for-now.html.
  • Chen, X., Gallagher, K.P., and Mauzerall, D.L., 2020. Chinese overseas development financing of electric power generation: a comparative analysis. One Earth, 3 (4), 491–503. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.015.
  • Cho, H. and Kalinowski, T., 2010. Bank nationalization, restructuring and reprivatization: the case of Korea since the Asian financial crisis. Korea Observer, 41 (1), 1–30.
  • Downs, G.W., Rocke, D.M., and Barsoom, P.N., 1996. Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization, 50 (3), 379–406. doi:10.1017/S0020818300033427.
  • Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K., 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52 (4), 887–917. doi:10.1162/002081898550789.
  • Gallagher, K.S., et al., 2021. Banking on coal? Drivers of demand for Chinese overseas investments in coal in Bangladesh, India, Indonesia and Vietnam. Energy Research & Social Science, 71 (January), 101827. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101827.
  • Gao, X., et al., 2021. The challenges of coal phaseout: coal plant development and foreign finance in Indonesia and Vietnam. Global Environmental Politics, 21 (4), 110–133. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00630.
  • George, A.L. and Bennett, A., 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. BCSIA Studies in International Security. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Haddad, M.A., 2021. Effective advocacy: lessons from East Asia’s environmentalists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hadden, J., 2020. Why are fossil fuels so entrenched? Global Environmental Politics, 20 (2), 157–161. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00550.
  • Hale, T., Liu, C., and Urpelainen, J., 2020. “Belt and road decision-making in China and recipient countries: how and to what extent does sustainability matter?” ISEP, BSG, and ClimateWorks Foundation.
  • Harris, P.G. and Lang, G., eds., 2020. Routledge handbook of environment and society in Asia. 1st ed. Abingdon, Oxon New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hestres, L.E. and Hopke, J.E., 2020. Fossil fuel divestment: theories of change, goals, and strategies of a growing climate movement. Environmental Politics, 29 (3), 371–389. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1632672.
  • Hochstetler, K., 2020. Political economies of energy transition: wind and solar power in Brazil and South Africa. Business and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108920353
  • JACSES, Kiko Network, 350.org Japan, Friends of the Earth Japan, Greenpeace Japan, and Mekong Watch. 2020. “Joint statement on Japan government’s revised policy on overseas coal power projects.” 350.Org. 2020 July 9. https://350.org/press-release/joint-statement-on-japan-governments-revised-policy-on-overseas-coal-power-projects/.
  • Jakob, M., et al. 2020. The future of coal in a carbon-constrained climate. Nature Climate Change, 10 (8), 704–707. doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0866-1.
  • Kalkuhl, M., et al., 2019. Successful coal phase-out requires new models of development. Nature Energy, 4 (11), 897–900. doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0500-5.
  • Kim, S.-Y. and Thurbon, E., 2015. Developmental environmentalism: explaining South Korea’s ambitious pursuit of green growth. Politics & Society, 43 (2), 213–240. doi:10.1177/0032329215571287.
  • Kim, S. and Yoo, Y., 2019. Fuelling development? The rise of new development finance in Korea’s overseas energy cooperation with Southeast Asia. European Journal of Development Research, 31 (5), 1470–1489. doi:10.1057/s41287-019-00218-2.
  • Kong, B. and Gallagher, K.P., 2021a. Inadequate demand and reluctant supply: the limits of Chinese official development finance for foreign renewable power. Energy Research & Social Science, 71 (January), 101838. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101838.
  • Kong, B. and Gallagher, K.P., 2021b. The new coal champion of the world: the political economy of Chinese overseas development finance for coal-fired power plants. Energy Policy, 155 (August), 112334. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112334.
  • Lamb, W.F. and Minx, J.C., 2020. The political economy of national climate policy: architectures of constraint and a typology of countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 64 (June), 101429. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101429.
  • Larson, D.W. and Shevchenko, A., 2019. Quest for status: Chinese and Russian foreign policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Lee, J.-H. and Woo, J., 2020. Green new deal policy of South Korea: policy innovation for a sustainability transition. Sustainability, 12 (23), 10191. doi:10.3390/su122310191.
  • Li, Z., Gallagher, K.P., and Mauzerall, D.L., 2020. China’s global power: estimating Chinese foreign direct investment in the electric power sector. Energy Policy, 136 (January), 111056. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111056.
  • Meckling, J. and Hughes, L., 2018. Global interdependence in clean energy transitions. Business and Politics, 20 (4), 467–491. doi:10.1017/bap.2018.25.
  • Meidan, M., 2020. China: climate leader and villain. In: M. Hafner and S. Tagliapietra, eds. The geopolitics of the global energy transitionLecture Notes in Energy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 75–91. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39066-2_4
  • METI. 2018. “The fifth strategic energy plan.” https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2018/pdf/0703_002c.pdf.
  • Midford, P., 2002. The logic of reassurance and Japan’s grand strategy. Security Studies, 11 (3), 1–43. doi:10.1080/714005337.
  • Ministry of Ecology and Environment, People’s Republic of China. 2017. “Guidance on promoting green belt and road.” 2017 June 28. https://english.mee.gov.cn/Resources/Policies/policies/Frameworkp1/201706/t20170628_416864.shtml.
  • Moe, E., 2016. The political economy of sustainable energy transitions. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (2), 130–135. doi:10.1162/GLEP_r_00344.
  • Mori, A., 2020. Foreign actors, faster transitions? co-evolution of complementarities, perspectives and sociotechnical systems in the case of Indonesia’s electricity supply system. Energy Research & Social Science, 69 (November), 101594. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101594.
  • NDRC. 2022. “【关于推进共建‘一带一路’绿色发展的意见(发改开放〔2022〕408号)】-国家发展和改革委员会.” https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/202203/t20220328_1320629.html?code=&state=123.
  • NDRC, MOFCOM, PBOC, and MOFA. 2017. “Notice on guiding opinions on further guiding and regulating the direction of overseas investment (No. 74).” National Development and Reform Commission. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-08/18/content_5218665.htm
  • Neville, K.J., 2020. Shadows of divestment: the complications of diverting fossil fuel finance. Global Environmental Politics, 20 (2), 3–11. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00555.
  • Oei, P.-Y., et al., 2020. Coal phase-out in Germany – implications and policies for affected regions. Energy, 196 (April), 117004. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117004.
  • Ohta, H., 1995. Japan’s politics and diplomacy of climate change. New York: Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.
  • O’Neill, B., 2000. Nuclear weapons and national prestige. UCLA. http://www.polisci.ucla.edu/faculty/lofchie/NuclearWeapons_NationalPrestige.pdf
  • Ragin, C., et al., 2009. The distinctive of comparative research. In: The SAGE handbook of comparative politics. London: SAGE Publications, 13–34. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-sage-handbook-of-comparative-politics/book228802
  • Secretariat of BRI Green Development Coalition. 2021. “BRI green review.” http://en.brigc.net/Media_Center/BRI_Green_Review/2021/202107/P020210729465376906569.pdf.
  • Sun, Y. and Yu, B., 2023. Greening China’s Belt and Road Initiative: from norm localization to norm subsidiarity? Global Environmental Politics, 23 (1), 91–116. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00685.
  • Trencher, G., et al., 2019. Discursive resistance to phasing out coal-fired electricity: narratives in Japan’s coal regime. Energy Policy, 132 (September), 782–796. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.020.
  • Trencher, G., et al., 2020. Divestment trends in Japan’s international coal businesses. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 124 (May), 109779. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109779.
  • Van de Graaf, T. and Sovacool, B.K., 2020. Global energy politics. Cambridge: Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Global+Energy+Politics-p-9781509530489
  • Weiss, J.C. and Wallace, J.L., 2021. Domestic politics, China’s rise, and the future of the liberal international order. International Organization, 75 (2), 635–664. doi:10.1017/S002081832000048X.
  • Xue, Y., 2022. A cultural theory of Chinese foreign policy. Journal of Contemporary China, 31 (135), 412–427. doi:10.1080/10670564.2021.1966899.
  • Yang, J., 2022 January. Understanding China’s changing engagement in global climate governance: a struggle for identity. Asia Europe Journal, 20 (4), 357–376. doi:10.1007/s10308-021-00643-1

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.