How politicians and the population attribute responsibility for climate change mitigation: no indication of a ‘governance trap’ in Norway

References

• Aasen, M., et al., 2019. Folk og klima: Nordmenns holdninger til klimaendringer, klimapolitikk og eget ansvar. CICERO Report.
   Google Scholar
• Ademe, 2019. Les représentations sociales du changement climatique: Agence De L’environnement Et De La Matîtrise De L’energie.
   Google Scholar
• Allern, E.H. and Saglie, J., 2012. Inside the black box: parties as multi-level organisations in a unitary state. West European Politics, 35 (5), 947–970. doi:10.1080/01402382.2012.706406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Båtstrand, S., 2014. Giving content to new politics: from broad hypothesis to empirical analysis using Norwegian manifesto data on climate change. Party Politics, 20 (6), 930–939. doi:10.1177/1354068812462923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Båtstrand, S., 2015. More than markets: a comparative study of nine conservative parties on climate change. Politics & Policy, 43 (4), 538–561. doi:10.1111/polp.12122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. and Sparks, P., 2018. Talking about climate change mitigation: People’s views on different levels of action. Sustainability, 10 (5), 1357. doi:10.3390/su10051357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. and Moser, S.C., 2007. Responding to climate change: governance and social action beyond kyoto. Global Environmental Politics, 7 (2), 1–10. doi:10.1162/glep.2007.7.2.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. and Newell, P., 2023. Governing climate change. 3rd ed. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003219828.
   Google Scholar
• Cirone, A., Cox, G.W., and Fiva, J.H., 2021. Seniority-based nominations and political careers. American Political Science Review, 115 (1), 234–251. doi:10.1017/S0003055420000416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. Climate change: special eurobarometer. European Union, 513. doi:10.2834/437.
   Google Scholar
• Frantz, C.M. and Mayer, F.S., 2009. The emergency of climate change: why are we failing to take action? Analyses of social issues and public policy. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9 (1), 205–222. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01180.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frère, S. et al., 2021. Individual responsibility and climate action: some lessons from a perception survey administered in hauts-de-france. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 78 (1), 28–56. doi:10.1080/00207233.2020.1802941.
   Google Scholar
• Hlavac, M., 2022. Stargazer: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. Social Policy Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia. R package version 5.2.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stargazer.
   Google Scholar
• Ipcc, 2021. Summary for policymakers. In: V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou, eds. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group i to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ivarsflaten, E., et al., 2022. Norwegian citizen panel round 21, 2021. Data collected by ideas 2 evidence for the Norwegian Citizen Panel. Bergen: Sikt - Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., 1989. How citizens think about national issues: a matter of responsibility. American Journal of Political Science, 33 (4), 878–900. doi:10.2307/2111113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., et al., 2022. The political challenges of deep decarbonisation: towards a more integrated agenda. Climate Action, 1 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1007/s44168-022-00004-7.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, W.F., et al., 2020. Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3. doi:10.1017/sus.2020.13.
   Google Scholar
• Livgard, E.F., 2019. Kantar klimabarometer 2019. Kantar.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., and Whitmarsh, L., 2007. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17 (3–4), 445–459. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D., 2018a. Ggeffects: tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. Journal of Open Source Software, 3 (26), 772. doi:10.21105/joss.00772.
   Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D., 2018b. Sjmisc: data and variable transformation functions. Journal of Open Source Software, 3 (26), 754. doi:10.21105/joss.00754.
   Google Scholar
• Maniates, M.F., 2001. Individualization: plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? Global Environmental Politics, 1 (3), 31–52. doi:10.1162/152638001316881395.
   Google Scholar
• Meld. St. 13 (2020-2021). Norway’s climate action plan for 2021-2030.
   Google Scholar
• Miljødirektoratet, 2021. Utslipp av klimagasser i kommuner og fylker: Spørsmål og svar [ online]. https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/tjenester/klimagassutslipp-kommuner/sporsmal-og-svar/
   Google Scholar
• Moberg, K.R., et al., 2019. Mobility, food and housing: responsibility, individual consumption and demand-side policies in European deep decarbonisation pathways. Energy Efficiency, 12 (2), 497–519. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9708-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P. et al., 2015. Governance traps in climate change politics: Re‐framing the debate in terms of responsibilities and rights. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6 (6), 535–540. doi:10.1002/wcc.356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oecd, 2022. Oecd environmental performance reviews: Norway 2022: organisation for economic Co-operation and development. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/59e71c13-en.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 2010. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20 (4), 550–557. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panel of Elected Representatives, 2021. Wave 5. Data from ideas2evidence for the panel of elected representatives. Bergen: University of Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., 2012. Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy. Climate Policy, 12 (sup01), S85–S106. doi:10.1080/14693062.2012.702982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. and Butler, C., 2009. Risk analysis and climate change. Environmental Politics, 18 (5), 670–688. doi:10.1080/09644010903156976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., et al., 2019. Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: a cross-European analysis. Global Environmental Change, 55, 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram, K. and Wickham, H., 2018. Wes Anderson: a Wes Anderson palette generator. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wesanderson.
   Google Scholar
• Rapeli, L. and Koskimaa, V., 2022. Concerned and willing to pay? Comparing policymaker and citizen attitudes towards climate change. Environmental Politics, 31 (3), 542–551. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1970458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team, 2022. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rickards, L., Wiseman, J., and Kashima, Y., 2014. Barriers to effective climate change mitigation: the case of senior government and business decision makers. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5 (6), 753–773. doi:10.1002/wcc.305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saglie, J., et al., 2022. Lokale partilag og lister: Organisasjon, aktiviteter og økonomi. Oslo: Institutt for samfunnsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, K., 2021. Policy characteristics, electoral cycles, and the partisan politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 21 (2), 44–72. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjervheim, Ø., et al., 2021a. The panel of elected representatives: fifth wave methodology report.
   Google Scholar
• Skjervheim, Ø., et al., 2021b. Norwegian citizen panel: twenty-first wave methodology report.
   Google Scholar
• Ssb, 2022a. 01183: Fylkestingsvalget. Representanter, etter kjønn og parti/valgliste (k) 1975 - 2019 [online]. Statistisk sentralbyrå. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/01183/
   Google Scholar
• Ssb, 2022b. 04964: Kommunestyremedlemmer, etter statistikkvariabel og fireårlig [online]. Statistisk sentralbyrå. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/04964/tableViewLayout1/
   Google Scholar
• Steentjes, K., et al., 2017. European Perceptions of Climate Change (EPCC): topline findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Swim, J.K. and Geiger, N., 2021. Policy attributes, perceived impacts, and climate change policy preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, 101673. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolppanen, S. and Kärkkäinen, S., 2021. The blame-game: pre-service teachers views on who is responsible and what needs to be done to mitigate climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 43 (14), 1–24. doi:10.1080/09500693.2021.1965239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations, 2015. Paris Agreement [ online]. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf [ Accessed Access Date 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Venables, W.N. and Ripley, B.D., 2002. Modern applied statistics with s. Fourth ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., 2016. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., et al., 2022. Dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. and Miller, E., 2021. Aortic thrombosis in COVID-19. Clinical Infection in Practice, 9. doi:10.1016/j.clinpr.2020.100059.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willis, R., 2018. How members of parliament understand and respond to climate change. The Sociological Review, 66 (3), 475–491. doi:10.1177/0038026117731658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar