Process skeptical populist framing of climate change in right-leaning media

References

• Albright, E.A. and Crow, D., 2019. Beliefs about climate change in the aftermath of extreme flooding. Climatic Change, 155 (1), 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02461-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A., 2009. Media, Politics and climate change: towards a New research agenda: media, Politics and climate change. Sociology Compass, 3 (2), 166–182. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00188.x
   Google Scholar
• Antilla, L., 2010. Self-censorship and science: a geographical review of media coverage of climate tipping points. Public Understanding of Science, 19 (2), 240–256. doi:10.1177/0963662508094099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballew, M.T., et al., 2019. Climate change in the American mind: data, tools, and trends. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 61 (3), 4–18. doi:10.1080/00139157.2019.1589300
   Google Scholar
• Barr, R.R., 2009. Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics. Party Politics, 15 (1), 29–48. doi:10.1177/1354068808097890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T. and Shapiro, M.A., 2018. The US News media, polarization on climate change, and pathways to effective communication. Environmental Communication, 12 (2), 149–163. doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1397039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonikowski, B., 2017. Ethno-Nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment: Ethno-Nationalist populism. The British Journal of Sociology, 68 (S1), S181–213. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., van der Brug, W., and de Vreese, C., 2010. Media coverage of right-wing populist leaders. Communications, 35 (2), 141–163. doi:10.1515/comm.2010.008
   Google Scholar
• Boussalis, C. and Coan, T.G., 2016. Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt. Global Environmental Change, 36, 89–100. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M.T. 2011. Who speaks for the climate?: making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M.T., 2013. Understanding media representations of outlier views on climate change. American Behavioral Scientist, 57 (6), 796–817. doi:10.1177/0002764213476846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann, H.W. and Raymond, L., 2018. Does climate denialism still matter? The prevalence of alternative frames in opposition to climate policy. Environmental Politics, 27 (3), 433–454. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1439353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capstick, S.B. and Pidgeon, N.F., 2014. What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environmental Change, 24, 389–401. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D. and Druckman, J.N., 2007. Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10 (1), 103–126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coan, T.G., et al., 2021. Computer-assisted classification of contrarian claims about climate change. Scientific Reports, 11 (1), 22320. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-01714-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J., 2013. Inoculation theory. The Sage Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice, 2, 220–236.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R.E., 2013. Climate change skepticism and denial: an Introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 57 (6), 691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsasser, S.W. and Dunlap, R.E., 2013. Leading voices in the denier choir: conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. American Behavioral Scientist, 57 (6), 754–776. doi:10.1177/0002764212469800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R.M., 1993. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. The Journal of Communication, 43 (4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R.M., 2007. Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. The Journal of Communication, 57 (1), 163–173. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorino, D.J., 2022. Climate change and right-wing populism in the United States. Environmental Politics, 31 (5), 801–819. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.2018854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., 2019. Climate change and the far right. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, 10 (5), e604. doi:10.1002/wcc.604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B. and Balša Lubarda, B., 2023. Scepticisms and beyond? A comprehensive portrait of climate change communication by the far right in the European parliament. Environmental Politics, 32 (1), 43–68. doi:10.1080/09644016.2022.2048556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F., Shipan, C.R., and Wüest, B., 2021. Policy diffusion: the issue‐definition stage. American Journal of Political Science, 65 (1), 21–35. doi:10.1111/ajps.12521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, D.C. and Mancini, P., 2004. Comparing media systems: three models of media and Politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., 2018. A typology of populism: toward a revised theoretical framework on the sender side and receiver side of communication. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2171–2190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., 2021. They are selling themselves out to the enemy! The content and effects of populist conspiracy theories. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33 (1), 38–56. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaa004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., Bos, L., and de Vreese, C.H., 2019. Shoot the messenger? The media’s role in framing populist attributions of blame. Journalism, 20 (9), 1145–1164. doi:10.1177/1464884917698170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M. and Vliegenthart, R., 2020. The rise of a populist zeitgeist? A content analysis of populist media coverage in newspapers published between 1990 and 2017. Journalism Studies, 21 (1), 19–36. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2019.1620114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K.A. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C., 2018. Introduction. In: A. Hawkins, Kirk, E. Carlin, Ryan, L., Levente, K, Cristóbal Roviraeds. In: The ideational approach to populism. Routledge, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmer, N., 2016. Messengers of the right: conservative media and the transformation of American Politics. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A.J., 2011. Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment, 24 (1), 3–33. doi:10.1177/1086026611404336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, R. 1964. The paranoid style in American politics. Harper’s Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, P.D., et al., 2015. Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change, 5 (6), 596–603. doi:10.1038/nclimate2583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R.A., 2020. The Role of Populist Attitudes in Explaining Climate Change Skepticism and Support for Environmental Protection. Environmental Politics, 29 (6), 959–982. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1708186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R.A., Greussing, E., and Eberl, J.-M., 2022. From populism to climate scepticism: the role of institutional trust and attitudes towards science. Environmental Politics, 31 (7), 1115–1138. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1978200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K.H. and Capella, J.N., 2008. Echo chamber: rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jett, J. and Raymond, L., 2021. Issue framing and US state energy and climate policy choice. The Review of Policy Research, 38 (3), 278–299. doi:10.1111/ropr.12427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jylhä, K.M. and Hellmer, K., 2020. Right‐wing populism and climate change denial: the roles of exclusionary and anti‐egalitarian preferences, conservative ideology, and antiestablishment attitudes. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 20 (1), 315–335. doi:10.1111/asap.12203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karapin, R., 2016. Political opportunities for climate policy: California, New York, and the federal government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krange, O., Kaltenborn, B.P., and Hultman, M., 2021. ‘Don’t confuse me with facts’—how right wing populism affects trust in agencies advocating anthropogenic climate change as a reality. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8 (1). doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00930-7
   Google Scholar
• Kulin, J., Johansson Sevä, I., and Dunlap, R.E., 2021. Nationalist ideology, rightwing populism, and public views about climate change in Europe. Environmental Politics, 30 (7), 1111–1134. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1898879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küppers, A., 2022. ‘Climate-Soviets,’‘Alarmism,’and ‘eco-dictatorship’: the framing of climate change scepticism by the populist radical right alternative for Germany. German Politics, 1–21. doi:10.1080/09644008.2022.2056596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A.J.C., et al., 2022. International public opinion on climate change, 2022. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and Data for Good at Meta.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., 2018. Right-Wing Populism and the Climate Change Agenda: Exploring the Linkages. Environmental Politics, 27 (4), 712–732. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, L., 2018. Textual analysis: the UK party system. In: K.A. Hawkins, R.E. Carlin, L. Littvay, and C.R. Kaltwasser, eds. The ideational approach to populism: concept, theory, and analysis. London, England: Routledge, 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, J. and Lederer, M., 2022. Politicizing climate change in Times of populism: an Introduction. Environmental Politics, 31 (5), 735–754. doi:10.1080/09644016.2022.2083478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt, J., Oliveira, M.C., and Lederer, M., 2022. Same, same but different? How democratically elected right-wing populists shape climate change policymaking. Environmental Politics, 31 (5), 777–800. doi:10.1080/09644016.2022.2053423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G., 2008. Populism and the media. In: Daniele, D, D., McDonnell, Eds. In: Twenty-first century populism: the spectre of Western European democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Merkley, E., 2020. Anti-intellectualism, populism, and motivated resistance to expert consensus. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84 (1), 24–48. doi:10.1093/poq/nfz053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39 (4), 542–563. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C., 2012. Populism and (liberal) democracy: a framework for analysis. In: C. Mudde and C. Rovira Kaltwasser, eds. Populism in Europe and the Americas. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, A., 2019. Populist communication and media environments. Sociology Compass, 13 (8). doi:10.1111/soc4.12718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler, A., et al., 2021. Unmasking polarization: how conservatives make sense of COVID-19 coverage. Columbia Journalism Review.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T.E., Clawson, R.A., and Oxley, Z.M., 1997. Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. The American Political Science Review, 91 (3), 567–583. doi:10.2307/2952075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. and Inglehart, R., 2019. Cultural backlash: trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian populism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, R., 2019. Fox Populism: branding conservatism as working class. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., et al., 2011. Uncertain climate: an investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21 (3), 1015–1024. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rae, M., 2021. Hyperpartisan news: rethinking the media for populist politics. New Media & Society, 23 (5), 1117–1132. doi:10.1177/1461444820910416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigney, D., 1991. Three kinds of anti-intellectualism: rethinking Hofstadter. Sociological Inquiry, 61 (4), 434–451. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1991.tb00172.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., 2014. The mesmerising message: the diffusion of populism in public debates in Western European media. Political Studies, 62 (4), 726–744. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. and Pauwels, T., 2011. Measuring populism: comparing two methods of content analysis. West European Politics, 34 (6), 1272–1283. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.616665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, C., Bruno, F.V., and Littvay, L., 2017. The elite is up to something: exploring the relation between populism and belief in conspiracy theories. Swiss Political Science Review, 23 (4), 423–443. doi:10.1111/spsr.12270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, P., 2004. Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9 (3), 269–288. doi:10.1080/1356931042000263528
   Google Scholar
• Van Prooijen, J. and Jostmann, N.B., 2013. Belief in conspiracy theories: the influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43 (1), 109–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg, W., 2015. Climate Change Scepticism: A Conceptual Re-evaluation. SAGE Open, 5 (2), 1–13. doi:10.1177/2158244015579723
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L., 2008. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research, 11 (3), 351–374. doi:10.1080/13669870701552235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YouGov. 2022. Trust in media 2022. https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-reports/2022/04/05/trust-media-2022-where-americans-get-news-poll
   Google Scholar