Understanding and explaining populist radical right parties’ commitment to animal welfare in Western Europe

References

• Allen, M.W., et al., 2000. Values and beliefs of 979 vegetarians and omnivores. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140 (4), 405–422. doi:10.1080/00224540009600481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, B. and Mohamad-Klotzbach, C., 2021. Populism and nature—the nature of populism: new perspectives on the relationship between populism, climate change, and nature protection. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 15 (2), 155–164. doi:10.1007/s12286-021-00492-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auter, Z.J. and Fine, J.A., 2016. Negative campaigning in the social media age: attack advertising on facebook. Political Behavior, 38 (4), 999–1020. doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9346-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backlund, A. and Jungar, A.-C., 2022. Animal advocacy and the radical right: the case of Sweden. Journal of Political Ideologies. online first. 1–20. doi:10.1080/13569317.2022.2138292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T., 2021. Populism and environmental performance. Global Environmental Politics, 21 (3), 97–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines, E.G. and Stimson, J.A., 1986. On the structure and sequence of issue evolution. The American Political Science Review, 80 (3), 901–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P.J., 2016. Animal welfare in Australia. Sidney: Sidney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dhont, K. and Hodson, G., 2014. Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption? Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 12–17. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donà, A., 2022. The rise of the radical right in Italy: the case of Fratelli d’Italia. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 27 (5), 775–794. doi:10.1080/1354571X.2022.2113216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., et al., 2019. Populists prefer social media over talk shows: an analysis of populist messages and stylistic elements across six countries. Social Media + Society, 5 (1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., 2020. The far right and the environment: politics, discourse and communication. London, New York: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B. and Kølvraa, C., 2015. The nature of nationalism: populist radical right parties on countryside and climate. Nature and Culture, 10 (2), 199–224. doi:10.3167/nc.2015.100204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B. and Özvatan, Ö., 2019. Environmental communication by the far right in Germany. In: B. Forchtner, ed. The far right and the environment. Politics, discourse and communication. Abingdon: Routledge, 216–236.
   Google Scholar
• François, S. and Nonjon, A., 2021. ‘Identitarian ecology’. The far right’s reinterpretation of environmental concerns. GW’s Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES). Available from: https://www.illiberalism.org/identitarian-ecology-rights-reinterpretation-environmental-concerns/ [Accessed 12 August 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P., 2014. Populism 2.0: social media activism, the generic internet user and interactive direct democracy. In: D. Trottier and C. Fuchs, eds. Social Media, politics and the state: protests, revolutions, riots, crime and policing in the age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. New York: Taylor and Francis, 67–87
   Google Scholar
• Guazzaloca, G., 2020. Anyone who abuses animals is no Italian: animal protection in fascist Italy. European History Quarterly, 50 (4), 669–688. doi:10.1177/0265691420960672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M.E., 2008. Back to the archives? A critique of the Danish part of the manifesto dataset. Scandinavian Political Studies, 3 (2), 201–216. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00202.x
   Google Scholar
• Hårstad, R.M.B. and Vik, J., 2023. Political parties’ framing of farm animal welfare: a fragmented picture. European Policy Analysis, 9, 30–47. doi:10.1002/epa2.1154
   Google Scholar
• Hyers, L.L., 2006. Myths used to legitimize the exploitation of animals: an application of social dominance theory. Anthrozoös, 19 (3), 194–210. doi:10.2752/089279306785415538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivaldi, G. 2022. Two of a kind? Marine Le Pen, Éric Zemmour, and the supply and demand for far right politics in the 2022 French presidential election. APSA Annual Meeting & Exhibition, American Political Science Association, Sep 2022, Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., et al, 2022. Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2019. Electoral Studies, 75, 102420. online first. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffmann, G., 2016. The origins of the national Front. Pouvoirs, 157 (2), 5–15. doi:10.3917/pouv.157.0005
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, B., 2017. Populist online practices: the function of the Internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 1293–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J.R. and G, K.G., 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33 (1), 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., 2018. Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27 (4), 712–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, N., 2022. The impact of gender on votes for the populist radical rights: marine Le Pen vs. Eric Zemmour. Modern & Contemporary France, 30 (4), 445–460. doi:10.1080/09639489.2022.2134328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, B.M., 2005. Competition between unequals. The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. The American Political Science Review, 99 (3), 347–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morini, M., 2018. ‘Animals first!’ the rise of animal advocacy parties in the EU: a new party family. Contemporary Politics, 24 (4), 418–435. doi:10.1080/13569775.2018.1434450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., 2004. The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39 (4), 541–563. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, M.T., Fromm, M. and Broda, E., 2021. Strategic clustering in right-wing-populism? ‘Green Policies’ in Germany and France. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 15, 185–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C., 1987. The comparative method. Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C.C., 2009. Configurational comparative methods: qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D., 2004. The Routledge dictionary of politics. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., et al. 2019. The PopuList: an overview of populist, far right, far left and eurosceptic parties in Europe. Available at: https://www.popu-list.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M.and Pauwels, T. 2011. Measuring populism: comparing two methods of content analysis. West European Politics, 34 (6), 1272–1283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, M.B., 2012. Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study. Appetite, 58 (1), 141–150. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren, J. and van der Meiden, S., 2019. The radical right and the end of Swedish exceptionalism. European Political Science, 18 (3), 439–455. doi:10.1057/s41304-018-0159-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwörer, J., 2021. Don’t call me a populist! The meaning of populism for Western European parties and politicians. Electoral Studies online first, 72, 102358. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwörer, J. and Fernández-García, B., 2021. Religion on the rise again? A longitudinal analysis of religious dimensions in election manifestos of Western European parties. Party Politics, 27 (6), 1160–1171. doi:10.1177/1354068820938008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwörer, J. and Fernández-García, B., 2023. Climate sceptics or climate nationalists? Understanding and explaining populist radical right parties’ positions towards climate change (1990–2022). Political Studies. online first. 003232172311764. doi:10.1177/00323217231176475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwörer, J., Fernández-García, B., and Caiani, M., 2023. Challengers or the establishment? How populists talk about populists. German Politics, 1–25. doi:10.1080/09644008.2023.2207014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwörer, J. and Romero-Vidal, X., 2020. Radical right populism and religion: Mapping parties’ religious communication in Western Europe. Religion, State & Society, 46 (3), 177–185
   Google Scholar
• Scully, M., 2003. The power of man, the suffering of animals, and the call to mercy. New York: St. Martin’s Press
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Graham, E., 2019. Protecting our green and pleasant land. UKIP, the BNP and a history of green ideology on Britain’s far right. In: B. Forchtner, ed. The far right and the environment. Politics, discourse and communication. Abingdon: Routledge, 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Vogeler, C., 2017. Farm animal welfare Policy in comparative perspective: determinants of cross-national differences in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. European Policy Analysis, 3 (1), 20–47. doi:10.1002/epa2.1015
   Google Scholar
• Voss, K., 2020. The ecological component of the ideology and legislative activity of the Freedom party of Austria. In: B. Forchtner, ed. The far right and the environment: politics, discourse and communication. New York: Routledge, 153–183.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. and Rheindorf, M., 2018. The Austrian Freedom party. In: A. Waring, ed. New authoritarianism. Vol. 2. Stuttgart: Columbia University Press, 171–198.
   Google Scholar