References
- Baer, M., Campiglio, E., and Deyris, J., 2021. It takes two to dance: institutional dynamics and climate-related financial policies. Ecological Economics, 190, 107210. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107210
- Binder, S. and Spindel, M., 2017. The myth of independence: how congress governs the federal reserve. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Bolton, P., et al., 2020. The green swan. Central banking and financial stability in the age of climate change. Basel: Bank of International Settlements.
- Busuioc, M.E. and Lodge, M., 2016. The reputational basis of public accountability. Governance, 29 (2), 247–263. doi:10.1111/gove.12161
- Carpenter, D., 2010. Reputation and Power. Organizational image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Carpenter, D., and Krauser, D., 2012. Reputation and public administration. Public Administration Review, 72 (1), 26–32.
- Conti-Brown, P. and Whishnick, D.A., 2021. Technocratic pragmatism, Bureaucratic Expertise, and the Federal Reserve. The Yale Law Journal, 130 (3), 546–777. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3754523
- CTI, 2011. Unburnable carbon. Are the world’s financial markets carrying a carbon bubble?. London: Carbon Tracker Initiative.
- CTI, 2013. Wasted capital and stranded assets. London: Carbon Tracker Initiative.
- Dafermos, Y. et al., 2022. An environmental mandate, now what? Alternatives for greening the Bank of England’s corporate bond purchases. London: INSPIRE.
- Dafermos, Y., Gabor, G., Nikolaidi, M., Pawloff, A., and van Lerven, F., 2020a. Decarbonising is easy: Beyond market neutrality in the ECB’s corporate QE. London: New Economics Foundation.
- Dafermos, Y., Gabor, G., Nikolaidi, M., Pawloff, A., and van Lerven, F., 2020b. Decarbonising the Bank of England’s pandemic QE: ‘perfectly sensible’. London: New Economics Foundation.
- Deyris, J., 2023. Too green to be true? Forging a climate consensus at the European Central Bank. New Political Economy, 28 (5), 713–730. doi:10.1080/13563467.2022.2162869
- Diessner, S. (2019) Essays in the political economy of central banking, Thesis (PhD). London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
- Dikau, S., and Volz, U., 2021. ‘Central bank mandates, sustainability objectives and the promotion of green finance.’ Ecological Economics, 184, 1–20.
- DiLeo, M., Rudebusch, G., and van ‘t Klooster, J. (2023). Why the Fed and ECB parted ways on climate change. Hutching Center Working Paper #88, Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
- Eames, N.and Barmes, D. 2022. The Green Central Banking Scorebord. 2022nd ed. London: Positive Money.
- Gabor, D., 2020. Critical macro-finance: a theoretical lense. Finance and Society, 6 (1), 45–55.
- Guber, D.L., Bohr, J., and Dunlap, R.E., 2021. ‘Time to wake up’: climate change advocacy in a polarized Congress, 1996-2015. Environmental Politics, 30 (4), 538–558. doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1786333
- Hercelin, N., 2019. Green monetary policy: it’s about changing the mindset, not the mandate. Available from: https://www.positivemoney.eu/2019/04/green-ecb-change-mindset-not-mandate/ [Accessed17 Apr 2019].
- Jackson, J. and Bailey, D., 2023a. The central bank lacuna in green state transformation. Environmental Politics, forthcoming, 1–21. doi:10.1080/09644016.2023.2289336
- Jackson, J. and Bailey, D., 2023b. Facilitating the transition to net zero’ and institutional change in the Bank of England: perceptions of the environmental mandate and its policy implications within the British state. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, forthcoming. doi:10.1177/13691481231189382.
- Jourdan, S. and Del Vasto, A., 2021. Why and how the ECB should go beyond ‘market neutrality’. Brussels: Positive Money EU.
- Jourdan, S. and Kalinowksi, W., 2019. Aligning monetary policy with the EU’s climate targets. Paris: The Veblen Institute and Positive Money EU.
- Macquarie, R., 2018. A Green Bank of England. London: Positive Money UK.
- Maor, M., 2015. Theorizing bureaucratic reputation. In: A. Wæraas and M. Maor, eds. Organizational reputation in the public sector. London: Routledge, 17–36.
- Matikainen, S., Campiglio, E., and Zenghelis, D., 2018. The climate impact of quantitative easing. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
- McCright, A., Dunlap, R.E., and Marquart-Pyatt, S.T., 2016. Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25 (2), 338–358. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371
- McPhilemy, S., 2015. Financial stability and central bank power: a comparative perspective, Thesis (PhD). University of Warwick.
- McPhilemy, S. and Moschella, M., 2019. Central banks under stress: reputation, accountability and regulatory coherence. Public Administration, 97 (3), 489–498. doi:10.1111/padm.12606
- Moschella, M., 2023. Unexpected revolutionaries: how central banks made and unmade economic orthodoxy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- NGFS., 2019. A call for action: climate change as a source of financial risk. Paris: Network for Greening the Financial System.
- Quorning, S. and Quorning, 2023. The ‘climate shift’ in central banks: how field arbitrageurs paved the way for climate stress testing. Review of International Political Economy, forthcoming, 1–23. doi:10.1080/09692290.2023.2171470.
- Siderius, K., 2023. An unexpected climate activist: central banks and the politics of the climate-neutral economy. Journal of European Public Policy, 30 (8), 1588–1608. doi:10.1080/13501763.2022.2093948
- Sunak, R., 2021. Monetary policy remit: Budget 2021.
- Thiemann, M., 2019. Is resilience enough? The macroprudential reform agenda and the lack of smoothing of the cycle. Public Administration, 97 (3), 561–575. doi:10.1111/padm.12551
- Thiemann, M., Büttner, T., and Kessler, O., 2023. Beyond market neutrality? Central banks and the problem of climate change. Finance and Society, 9 (1), 14–34. doi:10.2218/finsoc.8090
- van ’t Klooster, J. and Fontan, C., 2020. The myth of market neutrality: a comparative study of the European Central Bank’s and the Swiss National Bank’s corporate security purchases. New Political Economy, 25 (6). doi:10.1080/13563467.2019.1657077.