Equal per capita carbon dividends and the waste objection

References

• Arcilla, A. and Baker, J.D., 2022. Evaluating carbon tax policy: a methodological reassessment of a natural experiment. Energy Economics, 111, 106053. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baatz, C. and Ott, K., 2017. In defense of emissions egalitarianism? In: L.H. Meyer and P. Sanklecha, eds. Climate justice and historical emissions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–197.
   Google Scholar
• Bhopal, A., 2023. The Norwegian oil fund in a warming world: what are the interests of future generations? Ethics, Policy & Environment, 26 (1), 106–120. doi:10.1080/21550085.2021.1940451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidadanure, J.U., 2019. The political theory of universal basic income. Annual Review of Political Science, 22 (1), 481–501. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, L., 2011. A lockean defense of grandfathering emission rights. In: D.G. Arnold, ed. The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 124–144.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, J.K., 2019. The case for carbon dividends. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, J.K., Ash, M., and Ranalli, B., 2023. Environmental justice and carbon pricing: can they Be reconciled? Global Challenges, 7 (4), 2200204. doi:10.1002/gch2.202200204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, J. and Foley, D.K., 2020. A world climate bank. Global Challenges Foundation. Available from: https://globalchallenges.org/library/a-world-climate-bank-2022/
   Google Scholar
• Budolfson, M., Dennig, F., and Errickson, F., et al. 2021. Protecting the poor with a carbon tax and equal per capita dividend. Nature Climate Change, 11 (12), 1025–1026. doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01228-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caney, S., 2012. Just emissions. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 40 (4), 255–300. doi:10.1111/papa.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carattini, S., Kallbekken, S., and Orlov, A., 2019. How to win public support for a global carbon tax. Nature, 565 (7739), 289–291. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00124-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chancel, L., 2022. Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019. Nature Sustainability, 5 (11), 931–938. doi:10.1038/s41893-022-00955-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chancel, L., et al. 2022. World inequality report 2022. World Inequality Lab. Available from: https://wir2022.wid.world/www-site/uploads/2023/03/D_FINAL_WIL_RIM_RAPPORT_2303.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Christmas, B., 2020. Ambidextrous lockeanism. Economics & Philosophy, 36 (2), 193–215. doi:10.1017/S0266267119000038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Climate Leadership Council, 2019. Economists’ statement on carbon dividends. Available from: https://www.econstatement.org/
   Google Scholar
• Copp, D., 1992. The right to an adequate standard of living: justice, autonomy, and the basic needs. Social Philosophy & Policy, 9 (1), 231–261. doi:10.1017/S0265052500003666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, E., 2020. Taking Locke seriously: of government, property rights, and climate change. Niskanen Center. https://www.niskanencenter.org/taking-locke-seriously-of-government-property-rights-and-climate-change/
   Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, O., et al. 2015. The atmosphere as a global commons. In: L. Bernard and W. Semmler, eds. The oxford handbook of the macroeconomics of global warming. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 260–296. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199856978.013.0012
   Google Scholar
• EPA, n.d. Climate change and the health of socially vulnerable people. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/climateimpacts/climate-change-and-health-socially-vulnerable-people
   Google Scholar
• Errendal, S., Ellis, J., and Jeudy-Hugo, S., 2023. The role of carbon pricing in transforming pathways to reach net zero emissions: insights from current experiences and potential application to food systems. OECD environment working Papers, No. 220, Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/5cefdf8c-en
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, S., et al. 2021. Understanding regressivity: challenges and opportunities of European carbon pricing. Energy Economics, 103, 105550. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fremstad, A. and Paul, M., 2019. The impact of a Carbon Tax on inequality. Ecological Economics, 163, 88–97. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelbach, J. and Pritchett, L., 2002. Is more for the poor less for the poor? The politics of means-tested targeting. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2 (1), 1–28. doi:10.2202/1538-0653.1027
   Google Scholar
• Gould, E. and Kandra, J., 2022. Inequality in annual earnings worsens in 2021. Economic Policy Institute. Available from: https://www.epi.org/publication/inequality-2021-ssa-data/
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, E., 2014. Climate justice and temporally remote emissions. Social Theory and Practice, 40 (2), 281–303. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract201440217
   Google Scholar
• Klenert, D., Mattauch, L., and Combet, E., et al. 2018. Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nature Climate Change, 8 (8), 669–677. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0201-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamboll, R.D., Nicholls, Z.R.J., and Smith, C.J., et al. 2023. Assessing the size and uncertainty of remaining carbon budgets. Nature Climate Change, 13 (12), 1360–1367. doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01848-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litan, R.E., 1977. On rectification in Nozick’s minimal state. Political Theory, 5 (2), 233–246. doi:10.1177/009059177700500207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J., 1988 [1690]. Two treatises of government, P. Laslett, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marron, D. and Maag, E., 2018. How to design carbon dividends. Urban-. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3305124
   Google Scholar
• Maskivker, J., 2018. Why a uniform basic income offends justice. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 11 (2), 191–219. doi:10.23941/ejpe.v11i2.335
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, G.E., 2019. Paying for pollution: why a carbon tax is good for America. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mildenberger, M., Lachapelle, E., and Harrison, K., et al. 2022. Limited impacts of carbon tax rebate programmes on public support for carbon pricing. Nature Climate Change, 12 (2), 141–147. doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01268-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz-Woo, K., 2021. Will carbon taxes help address climate change? Les ateliers de l’éthique/The Ethics Forum, 16 (1), 57–67. doi:10.7202/1083645ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz-Woo, K., 2024. Carbon tax ethics. WIREs Climate Change, 15 (1), e858. doi:10.1002/wcc.858
   Google Scholar
• Moellendorf, D., 2011. Common atmospheric ownership and equal emissions entitlements. In: G.A. Denis, ed. The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 104–123.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, D.R., 2017. Fairness in allocating the global emissions budget. Environmental Values, 26 (6), 669–691. doi:10.3197/096327117X15046905490335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulhern, O., 12 August 2020. A graphical history of atmospheric CO2 levels over time. Earth.org. Available from: https://earth.org/data_visualization/a-brief-history-of-co2/
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, L. and Nagel, T., 2004. The myth of ownership: taxes and justice. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E., 2000. In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics, 33 (2), 185–192. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00135-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2023. Job creation and local economic development 2023, 14 March.
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam, 21 September 2020. Confronting carbon inequality: putting climate justice at the heart of the COVID-19 recovery. https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621052/mb-confronting-carbon-inequality-210920-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam, 2023. Climate equality: a planet for the 99%. Available from: https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/climate-equality-a-planet-for-the-99-621551/
   Google Scholar
• Ravallion, M., 5 May 2017. Straw men in the debate on basic income versus targeting. Vox-EU – CEPR. Available from: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/straw-men-debate-basic-income-versus-targeting
   Google Scholar
• Risse, M., 2012. On global justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, L.M., 2023. Who’s afraid of more ambitious climate policy? How distributional implications shape policy support and compensatory preferences. Environmental Politics, online first. 33 (4), 567–590. doi:10.1080/09644016.2023.2247818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, L.A., 2021. A classification framework for carbon tax revenue use. Climate Policy, 21 (7), 897–911. doi:10.1080/14693062.2021.1946381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tank, L., 2020. The unfair burdens argument against carbon pricing. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 37 (4), 612–627. doi:10.1111/japp.12429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torpman, O., 2019. The case for emissions egalitarianism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 22 (3), 749–762. doi:10.1007/s10677-019-10016-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torpman, O., 2021. Isolationism and the equal per capita view. Environmental Politics, 30 (3), 357–375. doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1785809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torpman, O., 2022. Libertarianism, climate change, and individual responsibility. Res Publica, 28, 125–148. doi:10.1007/s11158-021-09514-3
   Google Scholar
• Tvinnereim, E. and Mehling, M., 2018. Carbon pricing and deep decarbonization. Energy Policy, 121, 185–189. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFCCC, 2016. Paris agreement. Available from: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_publication.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vallentyne, P., 2000. Introduction: left-libertarianism – a primer. In: P. Vallentyne and H. Steiner, eds. Left-libertarianism and its critics: the contemporary debate. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Vallentyne, P., Steiner, H., and Otsuka, M., 2005. Why left-libertarianism is not incoherent, indeterminate, or irrelevant: a reply to fried. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33 (2), 201–215. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00030.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vossen, B. and Christmas, B., 2023. Libertarianism. In: E.N. Zalta and U. Nodelman, eds. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/libertarianism/
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Fujimori, S., and Hasegawa, T., et al. 2022. Poverty and inequality implications of carbon pricing under the long-term climate target. Sustainability Science, 17 (6), 2513–2528. doi:10.1007/s11625-022-01206-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar