Class size, class composition, and the distribution of student achievement

References

• Akerhielm, K. 1995. Does class size matter.. Economics of Education Review, 14, no. 3: 229–41. doi: 10.1016/0272-7757(95)00004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J.D., & V. Lavy 1999. Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, no. 2: 533–75. doi: 10.1162/003355399556061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock, P., & J.R. Betts 2009. Reduced-class distinctions: Effort, ability, and the education production function. Journal of Urban Economics, 65, no. 3: 314–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrow, L., & C. Rouse 2005. Causality, causality, causality: The view of education inputs and outputs from economics, Working Paper No. 2005-15, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
   Google Scholar
• Becker, W.E., & J.R. Powers 2001. Student performance, attrition, and class size given missing student data. Economics of Education Review, 20, no. 4: 377–88. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00060-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfield, C.R., & A. Fielding 2001. Measuring the relationship between resources and outcomes in higher education in the UK. Economics of Education Review, 20, no. 6: 589–602. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00037-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, J.R., & J.L. Shkolnik 1999. The behavioral effects of variations in class size: The case of math teachers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, no. 3: 193–213. doi: 10.3102/01623737021002193
   Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P., P. Bassett, H. Goldstein, & C. Martin 2003. Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the institute of education class size study of children aged 5–7 years. British Educational Research Journal, 29, no. 5: 709–30. doi: 10.1080/0141192032000133668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonesronning, H. 2003. Class size effects on student achievement in Norway: Patterns and explanations. Southern Economic Journal, 69, no. 4: 952–65. doi: 10.2307/1061660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonesronning, H. 2004. The determinants of parental effort in education production: Do parents respond to changes in class size?. Economics of Education Review, 23, no. 1: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00046-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boozer, M., & C. Rouse 2001. Intraschool variation in class size: Patterns and implications. Journal of Urban Economics, 50, no. 1: 163–89. doi: 10.1006/juec.2001.2216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth, R., & F. Caliendo 2007. Educational production and teacher preferences. Economics of Education Review, 4, 487–500. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B.W., & D.H. Saks 1975. The production and distribution of cognitive skills within schools. Journal of Political Economy, 83, no. 3: 571–93. doi: 10.1086/260341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B.W., & D.H. Saks 1987. The microeconomics of the allocation of teacher’s time and student learning. Economics of Education Review, 6, no. 4: 319–32. doi: 10.1016/0272-7757(87)90015-X
   Google Scholar
• Burke, W.M. 2003. The class size debate: Is small better?. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51, no. 4: 428–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, R.B., & D.A. Mason 1998. Class formation and composition in elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 35, no. 4: 739–72. doi: 10.3102/00028312035004739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, R.B., & D.A. Mason 2002. Class composition and student achievement in elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 39, no. 1: 207–33. doi: 10.3102/00028312039001207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C.T., H.F. Ladd, & J. Vigdor 2005. Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24, no. 4: 377–92. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C.T., H.F. Ladd, & J. Vigdor 2006a. The academic achievement gap in grades 3 to 8, Working Paper 12207, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
   Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C.T., H.F. Ladd, & J. Vigdor 2006b. Teacher-Student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41, no. 4: 778–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Zada, D., & E. Reuven 2008. Maximum class size rules and the regression discontinuity design: The case of secondary public schools in Israel, [Mimeo]: Ben-Gurion University.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S.T., & E. Cohn 1997. Estimation of a frontier production function for the South Carolina educational process. Economics of Education Review, 16, no. 3: 313–27. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7757(96)00077-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, W.L., & S.F. Lehrer 2005. Class size and student achievement: Experimental estimates of who benefits and who loses from reductions, Working Paper No. 1046, Queen’s Economics Department
   Google Scholar
• Dobbelsteen, S., J. Levin, & H. Oosterbeek 2002. The causal effect of class size on scholastic achievement: Distinguishing the pure class size effect from the effect of changes in class composition. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64, no. 1: 17–38. doi: 10.1111/1468-0084.00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman-Peck, J., & L. Foreman-Peck 2006. Should schools be smaller? The size-performance relationship for Welsh schools. Economics of Education Review, 25, no. 2: 157–71. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A. 1989. Rank, performance, and mobility in elementary school grouping. Sociological Quarterly, 30, no. 1: 109–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1989.tb01514.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., C. Prevatte, & P.M. Cunningham 1995. Eliminating ability grouping and reducing failure in the primary grades. In No quick fix, ed. R. Allington and S. Walmsley, 137–58. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E.A. 1999. Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, no. 2: 143–63. doi: 10.3102/01623737021002143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E.A., J.F. Kain, J.M. Markman, & S.G. Rivkin 2003. Does peer ability affect student achievement?. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, no. 5: 527–44. doi: 10.1002/jae.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E.A., J. F. Kain, & S.G. Rivkin 2002. Inferring program effects for special populations: Does special education raise achievement for students with disabilities?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, no. 4: 584–99. doi: 10.1162/003465302760556431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C.M. 2000. The effects of class size on student achievement: New evidence from population variation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, no. 4: 1239–85. doi: 10.1162/003355300555060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, T.K. 2003. It’s teacher shopping season: Principals gently wield veto power over parents who request popular teachers. News and Observer,July 15 1
   Google Scholar
• Jepsen, C., & S. Rivkin 2009. Class size reduction and student achievement: The potential tradeoff between teacher quality and class size. Journal of Human Resources, 44, no. 1: 223–50. doi: 10.1353/jhr.2009.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, A.B. 1999. Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, no. 2: 497–532. doi: 10.1162/003355399556052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, A.B. 2003. Economic considerations and class size. Economic Journal, 113, no. 485: F34–63. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, A.B., & D.M. Whitmore 2001. The effect of attending a small class in the early grades on college-test taking and middle school test results: Evidence from Project STAR. Economic Journal, 111, no. 468: 1–28. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, A.B., & D.M. Whitmore 2002. Would smaller classes help close the black-white achievement gap?. In Bridging the achievement gap, ed. J. Chub and T. Loveless, , Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. 1987. Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60, no. 2: 73–85. doi: 10.2307/2112583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavy, V., M.D. Paserman, & A. Schlosser 2008. Inside the black of box of ability peer effects: Evidence from variation in low achievers in the classroom, Tel-Aviv: The Foerder Institute for Economic Research/The Sackler Institute for Economic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lavy, V., & A. Schlosser 2007. Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school, Working Paper No. W13292, NBER
   Google Scholar
• Lazear, E.P. 2001. Educational production. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, no. 3: 777–803. doi: 10.1162/00335530152466232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, M. 2005. Home versus school learning: A new approach to estimating the effect of class size on achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107, no. 2: 375–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2005.00413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L.J., & R. Koenker 2006. Quantile regression methods for recursive structural equation models. Journal of Econometrics, 134, no. 2: 471–506. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maasoumi, E., D.L. Millimet, & V. Rangaprasad 2005. Class size and educational policy: Who benefits from smaller classes?. Econometric Reviews, 24, no. 4: 333–68. doi: 10.1080/07474930500405485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milesi, C., & A. Gamoran 2006. Effects of class size and instruction on kindergarten achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, no. 4: 287–313. doi: 10.3102/01623737028004287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pong, S.L., & A. Pallas 2001. Class size and eighth-grade math achievement in the United States and abroad. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, no. 3: 251–73. doi: 10.3102/01623737023003251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivkin, S.G., E.A. Hanushek, & J.F. kain 2005. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, no. 2: 417–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, J. 2010. Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, no. 1: 175–214. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieber, R.T. 1982. The politics of middle class success in an inner-city public school. Boston University Journal of Education, 30, no. 1: 30–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sims, D. 2008. A strategic response to class size reduction: Combination classes and student achievement in California. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, no. 3: 457–78. doi: 10.1002/pam.20353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal, R.R., & F.J. Rohlf 1994. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, P.E., & K. Wolpin 2003. On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. Economic Journal, 113, no. 485: F3–33. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquiola, M. 2006. Identifying class size effects in developing countries: Evidence from rural Bolivia. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, no. 1: 171–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquiola, M., & E. Verhoogen 2009. Class-size caps, sorting, and the regression-discontinuity design. American Economic Review, 99, no. 1: 179–215. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.1.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmore, D. 2005. Resource and peer impacts on girls’ academic achievement: Evidence from a randomized experiment. American Economic Review, 95, no. 2: 199–203. doi: 10.1257/000282805774670158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wossmann, L., & M. West 2006. Class-size effects in school systems around the world: Evidence from between-grade variation in TIMSS. European Economic Review, 50, no. 3: 695–736. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar