References
- Arnold, K. E. 2010. “SIGNALS: Applying Academic Analytics.” EDUCAUSE Quarterly 33 (1).
- Arnold, K. E., and M. D. Pistilli. 2012. Course SIGNALS at Purdue: Using Learning Analytics to Increase Student Success. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Avery, C. 2013. Evaluation of the College Possible Program: Results From a Randomized Control Trial (NBER Working Paper No. 19562). Cambridge, MA: The National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Azmat, G., and N. Iriberri. 2010. “The Importance of Relative Performance Feedback Information: Evidence From a Natural Experiment Using High School Students.” Journal of Public Economics 94: 435–452. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.04.001.
- Bandiera, O., V. Larcinese, and I. Rasul. 2015. “Blissful Ignorance? A Natural Experiment on the Effect of Feedback on Students’ Performance.” Labour Economics 34 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.002.
- Bettinger, E., and R. Baker. 2014. “The Effects of Student Coaching in College: An Evaluation of a Randomized Experiment in Student Mentoring.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 36 (1): 3–19. doi:10.3102/0162373713500523.
- Campbell, J. P., P. B. DeBlois, and D. G. Oblinger. 2007. “Academic Analytics: A new Tool for a new era.” EDUCAUSE Review. https://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub6101.pdf
- Chen, Q., and T. Okediji. 2014. “Incentive Matters!—The Benefit of Reminding Students About Their Academic Standing in Introductory Economics Courses.” The Journal of Economic Education 45 (1): 11–24. doi:10.1080/00220485.2014.859955.
- Goodwin, M., A. Brandau, D. DeWall, and B. Du. 2010. “Implementation of an Early Warning System in Engineering: A Partnership with Academic Advisors and Instructors Across the Campus.” Paper presented at the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY.
- ITaP. 2016. https://www.itap.purdue.edu/studio/signals/.
- King, D. B., and S. Joshi. 2008. “Gender Differences in the use and Effectiveness of Personal Response Devices.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 17 (6): 544–552. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9121-7.
- Main, J. B., K. Mumford, and M. W. Ohland. 2015. “Examining the Influence of Engineering Students’ Course Grades on Major Choice and Major Switching Behavior.” International Journal of Engineering Education 31 (6A): 1468–1475.
- Main, J. B., and B. Ost. 2014. “The Impact of Grades on Student Effort, Course Selection, and Major Choice: A Regression-Discontinuity Analysis.” Journal of Economic Education 45 (1): 25–35. doi:10.1080/00220485.2014.859957 doi: 10.1080/00220485.2014.859953
- National Center for Education Statistics. 2014. Fast Facts-Enrollment. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372.
- Ost, B. 2010. “The Role of Peers and Grades in Determining Major Persistence in the Sciences.” Economics of Education Review 29 (6): 923–934. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.011.
- Owen, A. 2010. “Grades, Gender, and Encouragement: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis.” The Journal of Economic Education 41 (3): 217–234. doi:10.1080/00220485.2010.486718.
- Pennebaker, J. W., S. D. Gosling, and J. D. Ferrell. 2013. “Daily Online Testing in Large Classes: Boosting College Performance While Reducing Achievement Gaps.” PLoS One 8 (11): e79774. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079774.
- Pistilli, M. D., and K. E. Arnold. 2010. “Purdue SIGNALS: Mining Real-Time Academic Data to Enhance Student Success.” About Campus 15 (3): 22–24. doi:10.1002/abc.20025.
- Rask, K. N. 2010. “Attrition in STEM Fields at a Liberal Arts College: The Importance of Grades and pre-Collegiate Preferences.” Economics of Education Review 29 (6): 892–900. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.013.
- Rask, K. N., and J. Tienfenthaler. 2008. “The Role of Grade Sensitivity in Explaining the Gender Imbalance in Undergraduate Economics.” Economics of Education Review 27 (6): 676–687. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.09.010.
- Tanes, Z., K. E. Arnold, A. S. King, and M. A. Remnet. 2011. “Using SIGNALS for Appropriate Feedback: Perceptions and Practices.” Computers & Education 57 (4): 2414–2422. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.016.