The Virtual Museum of Canada's learning objects: why do French Canadian teachers and their students use them so little?

References

• Angers, J., and K. Machtmes. 2005. “An Ethnographic-case Study of Beliefs, Context Factors, and Practices of Teachers Integrating Technology.” The Qualitative Report 10 (4): 771–794. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR10-4/angers.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bearman, D. 1995. L’avenir informatique et les musees. La Lettre de l’OCIM 38: 46–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bibeau, R. 2005. Les TIC a l’ecole: proposition de taxonomie et analyse des obstacles a leur integration. Revue de l’EPI. http://www.epi.asso.fr/revue/articles/a0511a.htm-Appel_Note3.
   Google Scholar
• Bibeau, R. 2008. Les technologies de l’information et de la communication peuvent contribuer a ameliorer les resultats scolaires des eleves. Vie pedagogique 146. http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/sections/viepedagogique/146/index.asp?page=TIC.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, A. 2011. “‘Wide-awake Learning’ Integrative Learning and Humanities Education.” Arts & Humanities in Higher Education 10 (1): 47–65. doi:10.1177/1474022210388399.
   Google Scholar
• CEFRIO. 2010. La generation C - les 12-24 ans: moteurs de transformation des organisations. http://www.cefrio.qc.ca/fileadmin/documents/Publication/GenerationC_leger_version2_01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chowcat, I., B. Phillips, and J. Popham. 2008. Harnessing Technology: Preliminary Identification of Trends Affecting the Use of Technology for Learning. London: BECTA.
   Google Scholar
• DigiCULT. 2003. Learning Objects from Cultural and Scientific Heritage Resources. http://www.digicult.info/pages/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, S. 2003. Designing Learning Objects. Australian Flexible Learning Framework. http://www.learnscope.anta.gov.au/learnscope/golearn.asp?category=11&DocumentId=4077.
   Google Scholar
• Ertl, H., & J. Plante. 2004. Connectivity and Learning in Canada’s Schools. Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/56f0004m/56f0004m2004011-eng.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, F. 2006. L’integration des TIC dans les pratiques pedagogiques en milieu francophone minoritaire : tendances et defis. http://www.ctf-fce.ca/f/programs/francophone/francaise/ArticleticfceClermont_Gauthier.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, A., S. Le Touzé, J.-Y. Thériault, and R. Landry. 2004. Le personnel enseignant face aux défis de l’enseignement en milieu minoritaire francophone. Ottawa: Fédération canadienne des enseignantes et des enseignants, Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche sur la citoyenneté et les minorités, Institut canadien de recherche sur les minorités linguistiques. http://www.ctf-fce.ca/f/programs/francophone/francaise/rapport/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Hedberg, J. G. 2011. “Towards a Disruptive Pedagogy: Changing Classroom Practice with Technologies and Digital Content.” Educational Media International 48 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/09523987.2011.549673.
   Google Scholar
• International Council of Museums. 2007. Museum Definition. 21st General Conference. Vienna, Austria: ICOM. http://icom.museum/the-vision/museum-definition/.
   Google Scholar
• Jhurreev, V. 2005. “Technology Integration in Education in Developing Countries: Guidelines to Policy Makers.” International Education Journal 6: 467–483.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-H., and C.-C. Tsai. 2010. “Exploring Teachers’ Perceived Self Efficacy and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge with Respect to Educational Use of the World Wide Web.” Instructional Science 38 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre, R. 2005. Dictionnaire actuel de l’education. Montreal: Guerin.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. C., S. Gregor, and J.-C. C. Huang. 2008. “The Hedonic Experience of Enjoyment and its Relationship to Informal Learning: A Study of Museum Websites.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), paper 208, December 15.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, A. H.-Y., and J.-P. Bowen. 2011. “Creating Online Collaboration Environments for Museums: A Case Study of a Museum Wiki.” International Journal of Web Based Communities 7: 407–428.
   Google Scholar
• Manzerolle, B. 2008. Les TIC a l’ecole de langue française en milieu minoritaire. Franquetes. Webzine de la Federation canadienne des enseignantes et enseignants. http://www.ctf-fce.ca/frenquetes/Article_TIC_Bernard_Manzerolle.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., R. Roschelle, W. Penuel, N. Sabelli, and G. Haertel. 2004. “Technology's Contribution to Teaching and Policy: Efficiency, Standardization, or Transformation?” In Review of Research in Education, edited by R. E. Floden, Vol. 27, 134–167. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, P. 2003. Etude sur l’integration des technologies de l’information et des communications dans les ecoles et les salles de classe du Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Educational Association and Canadian Rescol. http://www.cea-ace.ca/media/fr/Tendances_integration_TIC.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J., E. Wood, T. Willoughby, C. Ross, and J. Specht. 2008. “Identifying Discriminating Variables between Teachers who Fully Integrate Computers and Teachers with Limited Integration.” Computers & Education 51: 1523–1537. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. OECD Information Technology Outlook 2010. http://www.oecd.org/sti/oecdinformationtechnologyoutlook2010.htm.
   Google Scholar
• O’Haire, N. 2003. Le corps enseignant et la technologie. Perspectives 3 (4): 1–2. http://www.ctf-fce.ca/f/publications/pd_newsletter/PDVolume3-4French.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Okolo, C. M., C. S. Englert, E. C. Bouck, A. Heutsche, and H. Wang. 2011. “The Virtual History Museum: Learning U.S. History in Diverse Eighth Grade Classrooms.” Remedial and Special Education 32: 417–428. doi:10.1177/0741932510362241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palak, D., and R. T. Walls. 2009. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Technology Practices: A Mixed-methods Approach.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 41: 417–441. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782537.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, M. 2009. L’integration de l’utilisation des objets d’apprentissage des musees virtuels du Canada chez les enseignants francophones de l’elementaire et du secondaire: une recherche pan-canadienne. Rapport de recherche. Ottawa: Conseil canadien sur l’apprentissage. http://www.ccl-cca.ca/CCL/Research/FundedResearch/201004Paquin-2.html.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, M. 2012. L’integration des TIC au Canada français. Education Canada 53 (1). http://www.cea-ace.ca/fr/education-canada/article/l’integration-des-tic-au-canada-français.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, M., & M. A. Barfurth. 2007. “Web Sites and Virtual History Museums: Pedagogical Strategies Used by Canadian Francophone Teachers.” International Journal of Instructional Media 34 (2): 159–169.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pittard, V. 2004. “Evidence for e-learning Policy.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 13 (2): 181–194.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, L. D., & M. M. Weil. 1999. “Computer Availability, Computer Experience and Technophobia among Public School Teachers.” Computers in Human Behavior 1 (11): 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Schweibenz, W. 2004. “The Development of Virtual Museums.” Museum News 57 (3): 3.
   Google Scholar
• Soren, B. J. 2009. “Museum Experiences that Change Visitors.” Museum Management and Curatorship 24: 233–251. doi:10.1080/09647770903073060.
   Google Scholar
• Sosteric, M. 2002, October. “When is a Learning Object not an Object: A First Step towards a Theory of Learning Objects.” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 3 (2): 1–16. http://www.irrodl.org/content/v3.2/soc-hes.html.
   Google Scholar
• Staples, A., M. C. Pugach, and D. Himes. 2005. “Rethinking the Technology Integration Challenge: Cases from Three Urban Elementary Schools.” Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 37: 285–311.
   Google Scholar
• Tamim, R. M., R. M. Bernard, E. Borokhovski, P. C. Abrami, and R. F. Schmid. 2011. “What Fourty Years of Research Says about the Impact of Technology on Learning: A Second-order Meta-analysis and Validation Study.” Review of Educational Research 81 (1): 4–28. doi:10.3102/0034654310393361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 27: 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., J. van Braak, G. Sang, J. Voogt, P. Fisser, and A. Ottenbreit-Leftwich. 2012. “Preparing Pre-service Teachers to Integrate Technology in Education: A Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence.” Computers & Education 59 (1): 134–144. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2010. Projet de l’UNESCO sur le Cadre de competences en TIC pour les enseignants. http://portal.unesco.org/ci/fr/ev.php-URL_ID=31019&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vartiainen, H., and J. Enkenberg. 2013. “Learning from and with Museum Objects: Design Perspectives, Environment, and Emerging Learning Systems.” Educational Technology Research & Development 61: 841–862. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9311-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. M. 2006. “Understanding the Relationship between ICTs and Education Means Exploring Innovation and Change.” Education and Information Technologies 11 (3–4): 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Wishart, J., and P. Triggs. 2010. “Exploring How Schools, Museums and Interactive Technologies can Work Together to Support Learning.” Computers & Education 54: 669–678. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E., J. Mueller, T. Willoughby, J. Specht, and T. DeYoung. 2005. “Teachers’ Perceptions: Barriers and Supports to using Technology in the Classroom.” Education, Communication & Information 5 (2): 183–206. doi:10.1080/14636310500186214.
   Google Scholar