Cyborgian entanglements: post-human feminism, diffraction and the science exhibition Bundled-up in Blue

References

• Åsberg, Cecilia. 2010. “Enter Cyborg: Posthumanities and the Ontological Turn of Feminist Theory.” International Journal of Feminist Technoscience 1 (1): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Åsberg, Cecilia. 2013. “The Timely Ethics of Posthumanist Gender Studies.” Feministische Studien 31 (1): 7–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åsberg, Cecilia, and Nina Lykke. 2010. “Feminist Technoscience Studies.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 17 (4): 299–305. doi:10.1177/1350506810377692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åsberg, Cecilia, Kathrin Thiele, and Iris Van der Tuin. 2015. “Speculative Before the Turn: Reintroducing Feminist Materialist Performativity.” Cultural Studies Review 21 (2): 145. doi:10.5130/csr.v21i2.4324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831. doi: 10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Tony. 1995. The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsdóttir, Arndís. 2016. “Museums and Feminist Matters: Considerations of a Feminist Museology.” NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 24 (2): 126–139. doi: 10.1080/08038740.2016.1182945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birke, Lynda. 2000. Feminism and the Biological Body. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Fiona R. 2015. “Ecologizing Experimentations. A Method and Manifesto for Composing a Post-Humanist Museum.” In Climate Change and Museum Futures, edited by Fiona R. Cameron and Brett Neilson, 8:16–33. Routledge Research in Museum Studies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphijn, Rick, and Iris van der Tuin. 2012. “‘Matter Feels, Converses, Suffers, Desires, Yearns and Remembers’. Interview with Karen Barad.” In New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies, 48–70. Ann Arbor: MPublishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hallgrímsdóttir, Margrét. 2015. “Foreword.” In Bundled-up in Blue – The Re-Investigation of a Viking Grave, 5–7. Publication of the National Museum of Iceland 38. Reykjavík: The National Museum of Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14: 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 149–181. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1992. “The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others.” In Cultural Studies, edited by L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, and P. A. Treichler, 295–333. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouseTM. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna, and Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. 2000. How Like a Leaf: Donna J. Haraway. An Interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Rodney. 2015. “Beyond ‘Natural’ and ‘Cultural’ Heritage: Toward an Ontological Politics of Heritage in the Age of Anthropocene.” Heritage & Society 8 (1): 24–42. doi: 10.1179/2159032X15Z.00000000036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayeur Smith, Michéle. 2015. “Dress, Jewellery and Textiles. From the Textile Specialist’s Perspective.” In Bundled-up in Blue – The Re-Investigation of a Viking Grave, 25–43. Publication of the National Museum of Iceland 38. Reykjavík: The National Museum of Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Juleskjær, Malou, and Nete Schwennesen. 2012. “Intra-Active Entanglements – An Interview with Karen Barad.” Kvinder, Køn & Forskning 1 (2): 10–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinmann, Adam. 2012. “Intra-Actions. Interview of Karen Barad.” Mousse Magazine 34 (3): 76–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lykke, Nina. 2010. Feminist Studies: A Guide to Intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marstine, Janet, ed. 2005. New Museum Theory and Practice: An Introduction. 1st ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• M’charek, Amade. 2010. “Fragile Differences, Relational Effects: Stories About the Materility of Race and Sex.” European Journal of Women's Studies 17 (4): 307–322. doi:10.1177/1350506810377698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pagani, Camilla. 2013. “Ethnographic Museums: Towards a New Paradigm?” In European Museums in the 21st Century: Setting the Framework, 165–183. Vol. 1. Mela Books 7. Milano: Politecnico di Milano.
   Google Scholar
• Pétursdóttir, Þóra. 2009. “Icelandic Viking Age Graves: Lack in Material – Lack of Interpretation?” Archaeologia Islandica 7: 22–39.
   Google Scholar
• Rectanus, Mark W. 2011. Globalization: Incorporating the Museum, 381–397. Chichester: Blackwell-Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, Leigh. 2000. “Sanitising the Female Body: Costume, Corsetry and the Case for Corporeal Feminism in Social History Museums.” Open Museum Journal 1. http://hosting.collectionsaustralia.net/omj/vol1/summers.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tubman, Julia. 2015. “The Conservation of the Face. From the Conservator’s Perspective.” In Bundled-up in Blue – The Re-Investigation of a Viking Grave. Publication of the National Museum of Iceland 38. Reykjavík: The National Museum of Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• van der Tuin, Iris. 2011. “‘A Different Starting Point, a Different Metaphysics’: Reading Bergson and Barad Diffractively.” Hypatia 26 (1): 22–42. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01114.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Tuin, Iris. 2014. “Diffraction as a Methodology for Feminist Onto-Epistemology: On Encountering Chantal Chawaf and Posthuman Interpellation.” Parallax 20 (3): 231–244. doi: 10.1080/13534645.2014.927631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Tuin, Iris. 2015. Generational Feminism. New Materialist Introduction to a Generative Approach. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• V. St. 1938. “Merkilegur fornleifafundur í Hjaltastaðaþinghá. Kvendys með skartgripum frá 10. öld [Remarkable archaeological find in Hjaltastaðaþinghá. Female Viking Age grave with jewellery from the 10th century].” Morgunblaðið, September 25, sec. Lesbók.
   Google Scholar
• Walser III, Joe W. 2015. “Reading the Bones. From the Osteologist’s Perspective.” In Bundled-up in Blue – The Re-Investigation of a Viking Grave, 47–53. Publication of the National Museum of Iceland 38. Reykjavík: The National Museum of Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Elizabeth Ida. 2009. “The Rhetorical Challenge of the Everyday Object: ‘Þjóð Verða Til’ at the National Museum of Iceland.” Nordisk Museologi 1: 5–15.
   Google Scholar