Visit motivations: development of a short scale for comparison across sites

References

• Asparouhov, Tihomir, and Bengt Muthén. 2014. “Multiple-Group Factor Analysis Alignment.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 21 (4): 495–508. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.919210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Timothy A. 2015. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Fang. 2007. “Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 14 (3): 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, Emily, and Eric Jensen. 2011. “Towards a Contextual Turn in Visitor Studies: Evaluating Visitor Segmentation and Identity-Related Motivations.” Visitor Studies 14 (2): 127–140. doi: 10.1080/10645578.2011.608001
   Google Scholar
• Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. 2002. Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester: University Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, John H. 2006. “An Identity-Centered Approach to Understanding Museum Learning.” Curator: The Museum Journal 49 (2): 151–166. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00209.x
   Google Scholar
• Falk, John H. 2009. Identity and the Museum Visitor Experience. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, John H. 2011. “Contextualizing Falk’s Identity-Related Visitor Motivation Model.” Visitor Studies 14 (2): 141–157. doi: 10.1080/10645578.2011.608002
   Google Scholar
• Falk, John H., Joseph Heimlich, and Kerry Bronnenkant. 2008. “Using Identity-Related Visit Motivations as a Tool for Understanding Adult Zoo and Aquarium Visitors’ Meaning-Making.” Curator: The Museum Journal 51 (1): 55–79. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2008.tb00294.x
   Google Scholar
• Falk, John H., Theano Moussouri, and Douglas Coulson. 1998. “The Effect of Visitors’ Agendas on Museum Learning.” Curator: The Museum Journal 41 (2): 107–120. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1998.tb00822.x
   Google Scholar
• Falk, John H., and Martin Storksdieck. 2010. “Science Learning in a Leisure Setting.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (2): 194–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, Martin E., and C. W. Nichols. 1987. “A Taxonomy of Human Goals and Some Possible Applications.” In Humans as Self-constructing Living Systems: Putting the Framework to Work, edited by Martin E. Ford, and Donald H. Ford, 289–311. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Furr, Michael R., and Verne R. Bacharach. 2013. Psychometrics: An Introduction. California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbing, David W., and Janet G. Hamilton. 1996. “Viability of Exploratory Factor Analysis as a Precursor to Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 3 (1): 62–72. doi: 10.1080/10705519609540030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer, Claudia, Katrin Neubauer, and Doris Lewalter. 2013. “Public Understanding of Science via Research Areas in Science Museums: The Evaluation of the EU Project NanoToTouch.” In Knowledge in Publics: Beyond Deficit, Engagement and Transfer, edited by Lorraine Locke, and Simon Locke, 50–74. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, Suzanne, and K. Ann Renninger. 2006. “The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development.” Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 111–127. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, Marilyn G. 1983. “Staying Away: Why People Choose Not to Visit Museums.” Museum News 61 (4): 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen-Verbeke, Myriam, and Johan van Rekom. 1996. “Scanning Museum Visitors: Urban Tourism Marketing.” Annals of Tourism Research 23 (2): 364–375. doi: 10.1016/0160-7383(95)00076-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima, Nobuko. 1998. “Knowing the Public: A Review of Museum Marketing Literature and Research 1.” Museum Management and Curatorship 17 (1): 21–39. doi: 10.1080/09647779800301701
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, Andreas. 2002. “Structural and Dynamic Aspects of Interest Development: Theoretical Considerations from an Ontogenetic Perspective.” Learning and instruction 12 (4): 383–409. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewalter, Doris, Siëlle Phelan, Claudia Geyer, Inga Specht, Rahel Grüninger, and Wolfgang Schnotz. 2015. “Investigating Visitor Profiles as a Valuable Addition to Museum Research.” International Journal of Science Education, Part B 5 (4): 357–374. doi: 10.1080/21548455.2015.1035688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, Sharon. 1995. “Consuming Science: Public Knowledge and the Dispersed Politics of Reception among Museum Visitors.” Media, Culture & Society 17 (1): 13–29. doi: 10.1177/016344395017001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, Herbert W., Bengt Muthén, Tihomir Asparouhov, Oliver Lüdtke, Alexander Robitzsch, Alexandre J. S. Morin, and Ulrich Trautwein. 2009. “Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, Integrating CFA and EFA: Application to Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 16 (3): 439–476. doi: 10.1080/10705510903008220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsap, Roger E. 2011. Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moussouri, Theano, and George Roussos. 2013. “Examining the Effect of Visitor Motivation on Observed Visit Strategies Using Mobile Computer Technologies.” Visitor Studies 16 (1): 21–38. doi: 10.1080/10645578.2013.767732
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, Linda K., and Bengt O. Muthén. 1998–2012. Mplus User’s Guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, Jan. 2004. “Motivational Factors and the Experience of Learning in Educational Leisure Settings” PhD diss., Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, Jan. 2006. “Learning for Fun: The Unique Contribution of Educational Leisure Experiences.” Curator: The Museum Journal 49 (3): 329–344. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00227.x
   Google Scholar
• Packer, Jan, and Roy Ballantyne. 2002. “Motivational Factors and the Visitor Experience: A Comparison of Three Sites.” Curator: The Museum Journal 45 (3): 183–198. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2002.tb00055.x
   Google Scholar
• Packer, Jan, and Roy Ballantyne. 2005. “Solitary vs. Shared: Exploring the Social Dimension of Museum Learning.” Curator: The Museum Journal 48 (2): 177–192. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2005.tb00165.x
   Google Scholar
• Pekarik, Andrew J., Zahava D. Doering, and David A. Karns. 1999. “Exploring Satisfying Experiences in Museums.” Curator: The Museum Journal 42 (2): 152–173. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1999.tb01137.x
   Google Scholar
• Pekarik, Andrew J., and James B. Schreiber. 2012. “The Power of Expectation.” Curator: The Museum Journal 55 (4): 487–496. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2012.00171.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, Richard, Andrea Davies, and Alison Beeho. 1997. “Seeking Generic Motivations for Visiting and Not Visiting Museums and Like Cultural Attractions.” Museum Management and Curatorship 16 (1): 45–70. doi: 10.1080/09647779700501601
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, Tenko, Cindy Rodenberg, and Anantharam Narayanan. 2015. “Optimal Shortening of Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments: A Latent Variable Modeling Procedure.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 22 (2): 227–235. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.935927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rounds, Jay. 2004. “Strategies for the Curiosity-Driven Museum Visitor.” Curator: The Museum Journal 47 (4): 389–412. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00135.x
   Google Scholar
• Thyne, Maree. 2001. “The Importance of Values Research for Nonprofit Organisations: The Motivation-Based Values of Museum Visitors.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 6 (2): 116–130. doi: 10.1002/nvsm.140
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, Robert J., and Charles E. Lance. 2000. “A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research.” Organizational Research Methods 3 (1): 4–70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar