Instagram and the museum experience: theorising the connection through aesthetics, space and sharing

References

• Adkins, B., D. Smith, K. Barnett, and E. Grant. 2006. “Public Space as ‘Context’ in Assistive Information and Communication Technologies for People with Cognitive Impairment.” Information, Communication & Society 9 (3): 355–372. doi:10.1080/13691180600751330.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2000. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, G., and A. H. Le. 2022. “A Survey of Middle Years Students' Perceptions of Aesthetic Literacies, Their Importance and Inclusion in Curriculum and the Workforce.” The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Biehl-Missal, B., and D. vom Lehn. 2015. “Aesthetics and Atmosphere in Museums: A Critical Marketing Perspective.” In The International Handbooks of Museum Studies: Museum Media, edited by M. Henning, 235–258. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bitgood, S., M. Pierce, G. Nichols, and D. Patterson. 1987. “Formative Evaluation of a Cave Exhibit.” Curator: The Museum Journal 30 (1): 31–39. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.1987.tb00644.x.
   Google Scholar
• Borden, I. M. 2001. Skateboarding, Space and the City: Architecture and the Body. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdeau, L., and J. C. Chebat. 2001. “An Empirical Study of the Effects of the Design of the Display Galleries of an art Gallery on the Movement of Visitors.” Museum Management and Curatorship 19 (1): 63–73. doi:10.1080/09647770100601901.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, K. 2017. “Objects in Focus: Museum Visitors and Instagram.” Curator: The Museum Journal 60 (1): 67–85. doi:10.1111/cura.12183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, R. 1994. “If you Don’t Stop, you Don’t see Anything.” Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 95 (4): 520–525. http://lakeoswegoartliteracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/If-You-Dont-Stop-You-Dont-See-Anything.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, J. 1997. Developing Minds: Meaning and Value in Responding to Works of art. New York: Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. C. 2017. “Art Perception in the Museum: How we Spend Time and Space in art Exhibitions.” i-Perception 8 (1). doi:10.1177/2041669517694184.
   Google Scholar
• Chlebus-Grudzień, P. 2018. “Selfie at a Museum: Defining a Paradigm for an Analysis of Taking (Self-Portrait) Photographs at Museum Exhibitions.” Turyzm/Tourism 28 (1): 7–13. doi:10.18778/0867-5856.28.1.09.
   Google Scholar
• Consoli, G. 2014. “The Emergence of the Modern Mind: An Evolutionary Perspective on Aesthetic Experience.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (1): 37–55. doi:10.1111/jaac.12059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consoli, G. 2015a. “Creativity and Aesthetic Evaluation. Two Proposals to Improve the Model of Aesthetic dis/Fluency.” Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1520. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consoli, G. 2015b. “From Beauty to Knowledge: A new Frame for the Neuropsychological Approach to Aesthetics.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9: 290. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., and K. Hermanson. 1999. “Intrinsic Motivation in Museums: Why Does one Want to Learn?” In Public Institutions for Personal Learning: Establishing a Research Agenda, edited by J. H. Falk, and L. D. Dierking, 67–78. Arlington: American Association of Museums.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., and R. E. Robinson. 1990. The Art of Seeing. An Interpretation of the Aesthetic Encounter. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Custodero, L. A., D. T. Hansen, A. Neumann, and D. Kerdeman. 2005. “Introduction.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 39 (5): 33–35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3527404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1934. Art as Experience. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.
   Google Scholar
• DuGay, P., S. Hall, L. Janes, H. Mackay, and K. Negus. 1997. Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, E., Z. Bilda, and L. Muller. 2009. “Artist, Evaluator and Curator: Three Viewpoints on Interactive art, Evaluation and Audience Experience.” Digital Creativity 20 (3): 141–151. doi:10.1080/14626260903083579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W., and S. M. Dobbs. 1988. “Silent Pedagogy: How Museums Help Visitors Experience Exhibitions.” Art Education 41 (4): 6–15. doi:10.2307/3193116.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. 2011. “Contextualizing Falk’s Identity-Related Visitor Motivation Model.” Visitor Studies 14 (2): 141–157. doi:10.1080/10645578.2011.608002.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. 2016. “Museum Audiences: A Visitor-Centered Perspective.” Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure 39 (3): 357–370. doi:10.1080/07053436.2016.1243830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., and L. D. Dierking. 1992. The Museum Experience. Washington: Whalesback Books.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., and L. D. Dierking. 2000. Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning. Lanham: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1977. “The Theory of Affordances.” In Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, edited by R. Shaw, and J. Bransford, 67–82. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gottdiener, M. 1993. “A Marx for our Time: Henri Lefebvre and the Production of Space.” Sociological Theory 11 (1): 129–134. doi:10.2307/201984.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, G. J. 1994. “Gibson's Affordances.” Psychological Review 101 (2): 336–342. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, K., and T. van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heilig, J. V., H. Cole, and A. Aguilar. 2010. “From Dewey to No Child Left Behind: The Evolution and Devolution of Public Arts Education.” Arts Education Policy Review 111 (4): 136–145. doi:10.1080/10632913.2010.490776.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, L., and S. Pink. 2014. “New Visualities and the Digital Wayfarer: Reconceptualizing Camera Phone Photography and Locative Media.” Mobile Media & Communication 2 (1): 40–57. doi:10.1177/2050157913505257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway-Attaway, L. 2014. “Performing Materialities.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies 20 (1): 55–68. doi:10.1177/1354856513514337.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. 2007. “Studying Visitors.” In A Companion to Museum Studies, edited by S. Macdonald, 362–376. London: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, D., and R. R. Wohl. 1956. “Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction.” Psychiatry 19: 215–229. doi:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubard, O. M. 2007. “Complete Engagement: Embodied Response in Art Museum Education.” Art Education 60 (6): 46–56. doi:10.1080/00043125.2007.11651133.
   Google Scholar
• Hubard, O. M. 2015. “‘How Does This Artwork Make You Feel?’ A ‘No-No’ Question in Art Museum Education?” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 49 (2): 82–98. doi:10.5406/jaesteduc.49.2.0082.
   Google Scholar
• Instagram. 2018. “Community Guidelines.” Instagram. Accessed April 19, 2018. https://help.instagram.com/477434105621119.
   Google Scholar
• John, N. A. 2013. “Sharing and Web 2.0: The Emergence of a Keyword.” New Media & Society 15 (2): 167–182. doi:10.1177/1461444812450684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, N. A. 2017. The Age of Sharing. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. 2016. “Conceptual Boundaries of Sharing.” Information, Communication & Society 19 (4): 461–474. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1046894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidder, J. L. 2009. “Appropriating the City: Space, Theory, and Bike Messengers.” Theory and Society 38 (3): 307–328. doi:10.1007/s11186-008-9079-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidder, J. L. 2012. “Parkour, the Affective Appropriation of Urban Space, and the Real/Virtual Dialectic.” City & Community 11 (3): 229–253. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6040.2012.01406.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiiler, E. 2011. “Circulation of Museum Visitors’ Photographs: From Art Museums to Collaborative Archives.” Spaces of Creation 15 (Nov): 58–66. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=175441.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., and T. van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krukar, J. 2014. “Walk, Look, Remember: The Influence of the Gallery’s Spatial Layout on Human Memory for an art Exhibition.” Behavioral Sciences 4: 181–201. doi:10.3390/bs4030181.
   Google Scholar
• Langridge, D. W. 1989. Subject Analysis: Principles and Procedures. East Grinstead: Bowker- Saur.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lemon, N. 2010. “Young Children as Digital Photographers – Possibilities for Using the Digital Camera in the Primary Classroom.” Australia Art Education 33 (2): 59–79. https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:10755.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 1936. Principles of Topological Psychology. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Litt, E. 2012. “Knock, Knock. Who’s There? The Imagined Audience.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56 (3): 330–345. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., and d. boyd. 2014. “Networked Privacy: How Teenagers Negotiate Context in Social Media.” New Media & Society 16 (7): 1051–1067. doi:10.1177/1461444814543995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K. A., and B. Comber. 2015. “Socio-spatial Approaches to Literacy Studies: Rethinking the Social Constitution and Politics of Space.” In Handbook of Literacy Studies, edited by K. Pahl, and J. Rowsell, 91–103. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. W. 2014. “Artists as Entrepreneurs, Fans as Workers.” Popular Music and Society 37 (3): 273–290. doi:10.1080/03007766.2013.778534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocejo, R. E., and S. Tonnelat. 2014. “Subway Diaries: How People Experience and Practice Riding the Train.” Ethnography 15 (4): 493–515. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24467154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z., and E. Easton. 2013. “In the Habitus of the new: Structure, Agency, and the Social Media Habitus.” In A Companion to new Media Dynamics, edited by J. Hartley, J. Burgess, and A. Bruns, 167–184. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarik, A. J., Z. D. Doering, and D. Karns. 1999. “Exploring Satisfying Experiences in Museums.” Curator: The Museum Journal 42 (2): 152–173. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.1999.tb01137.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pierroux, P., I. Krange, and I. Sem. 2011. “Bridging Contexts and Interpretations: Mobile Blogging on art Museum Field Trips.” MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 27 (50): 18. doi:10.7146/mediekultur.v27i50.2997.
   Google Scholar
• Psarra, S. 2005. “Spatial Culture, way-Finding and the Educational Message: The Impact of Layout on the Spatial, Social and Educational Experiences of Visitors to Museums and Galleries.” In Reshaping Museum Space, edited by S. Macleod, 78–94. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quan-Haase, A., and K. Martin. 2013. “Digital curation and the networked audience of urban events: Expanding La Fiesta de Santo Tomás from the physical to the virtual environment.” International Communication Gazette 75 (5-6), https://521-537.10.1177/1748048513491910.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, G. 2009a. Abdu, CR: 144. Olbricht Collection. Essen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, G. 2009b. Iblan, CR: 143. Olbricht Collection. Essen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, G. 2009c. Musa, CR: 141. Olbricht Collection. Essen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, G. 2009d. Yusuf, CR: 142. Olbricht Collection. Essen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Roppola, T. 2013. Designing for the Museum Visitor Experience. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, A., J. Watkins, L. Kelly, and S. Chan. 2006. “How Will Social Media Affect Museum Communication?” Paper Presented at the Nordic Digital Excellence in Museums (NODEM 06), Conference, Oslo, Norway, December 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, A., J. Watkins, L. Kelly, and S. Chan. 2008. “Participatory Communication with Social Media.” Curator: The Museum Journal 51 (1): 21–31. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2008.tb00292.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., and G. M. Barton. 2014. “The Spatialized Practices of Teaching Writing: Shaping the Discoursal Self.” Research in the Teaching of English 48 (3): 303–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salo, J., M. Lankinen, and M. Mäntymäki. 2013. “The use of Social Media for Artist Marketing: Music Industry Perspectives and Consumer Motivations.” International Journal on Media Management 15 (1): 23–41. doi:10.1080/14241277.2012.755682.
   Google Scholar
• Schorch, P. 2014. “The Experience of a Museum Space.” Museum Management and Curatorship 28 (2): 193–208. doi:10.1080/09647775.2013.776797.
   Google Scholar
• Sintas, J. L., E. G. Álvarez, and E. P. Rubiales. 2014. “Art Museum Visitors: Interaction Strategies for Sharing Experiences.” Museum Management and Curatorship 29 (3): 241–259. doi:10.1080/09647775.2014.919175.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 2015. “Seeing the Light: Using Visual Ethnography in Family Business Settings.” Family Business Review 28 (1): 76–82. doi:10.1177/0894486513504585.
   Google Scholar
• Specker, E., P. P. Tinio, and M. van Elk. 2017. “Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 11 (3): 265–275. doi:10.1037/aca0000107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, R. 1994. “Art Interpretation.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (2): 193–206. doi:10.1111/1540_6245.jaac52.2.0193.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianou-Lambert, T. 2017. “Photographing in the Art Museum: Visitor Attitudes and Motivations.” Visitor Studies 20 (2): 114–137. doi:10.1080/10645578.2017.1404345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suess, A. 2015. “Art Gallery Visitors and Instagram.” Master's diss., University of London, Academia.
   Google Scholar
• Suess, A. 2020. “Instagram and the Art Gallery: Aesthetic Experience, Sharing, and Space.” Unpublished doctoral thesis, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, C., and A. Jaworski. 2011. “Banal Globalization? Embodied Actions and Mediated Practices in Tourists’ Online Photo-Sharing.” In Digital Discourse: Language in the new Media, edited by C. Thurlow, and K. Mroczek, 220–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tröndle, M. 2014. “Space, Movement and Attention: Affordances of the Museum Environment.” International Journal of Arts Management 17 (1): 4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tröndle, M., S. Greenwood, K. Bitterli, and K. van den Berg. 2014. “The Effects of Curatorial Arrangements.” Museum Management and Curatorship 29 (2): 140–173. doi:10.1080/09647775.2014.888820.
   Google Scholar
• Tröndle, M., and W. Tschacher. 2012. “The Physiology of Phenomenology: The Effects of Artworks.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 30 (1): 75–113. doi:10.2190/EM.30.1.g.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tröndle, M., S. Wintzerith, R. Wäspe, and W. Tschacher. 2012. “A Museum for the Twenty-First Century: The Influence of ‘Sociality’ on Art Reception in Museum Space.” Museum Management and Curatorship 27 (5): 461–486. doi:10.1080/09647775.2012.737615.
   Google Scholar
• Tzortzi, K. 2017. “Museum Architectures for Embodied Experience.” Museum Management and Curatorship 32 (5): 491–508. doi:10.1080/09647775.2017.1367258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 1990. The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, B. 2018. “Rethinking Microcelebrity: Key Points in Practice, Performance and Purpose.” Celebrity Studies, 1–18. doi:10.1080/19392397.2018.1536558.
   Google Scholar
• Vivienne, S., and J. Burgess. 2013. “The Remediation of the Personal Photograph and the Politics of Self-Representation in Digital Storytelling.” Journal of Material Culture 18: 279–298. doi:10.1177/1359183513492080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vom Lehn, D., C. Heath, and J. Hindmarsh. 2001. “Exhibiting Interaction: Conduct and Collaboration in Museums and Galleries.” Symbolic Interaction 24 (2): 189–216. doi:10.1525/si.2001.24.2.189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. 2009. “Presence in Social Networks.” In Handbook of Research on Social Software and Developing Community Ontologies, edited by S. Hatzipanagos, and S. Warburton, 493–511. Hershey: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Winget, M. 2009. “Describing art: An Alternative Approach to Subject Access and Interpretation.” Journal of Documentation 65 (6): 958–976. doi:10.1108/00220410910998942.
   Google Scholar
• Witcomb, A. 2014. “‘Look, Listen and Feel’: The First Peoples Exhibition at the Bunjilaka Gallery, Melbourne Museum.” Thema 1: 49–62. http://dro.deakin.edu.au/view/DU:30070290.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E., and K. Latham. 2013. The Objects of Experience: Transforming Visitor-Object Encounters in Museums. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wurtzler, S. 1993. “The Space Between the Object and the Label: Exhibiting Restored Vitaphone Films and Technology.” Film History 5 (3): 275–288. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3815142.
   Google Scholar
• Yenawine, P. 2002. “Interactive Learning in Museums of art and Design.” Paper Presented at Interactive Learning in Museums, Victoria and Albert Museum, London, UK, May 17–18. http://media.vam.ac.uk/media/documents/legacy_documents/file_upload/5756_file.pdf.
   Google Scholar